Search

In this paper, we examine the impact of macroprudential policy on economic growth. The results show that the implementation of macroprudential policies contributes to fostering economic growth, especially in the period following the onset of the global financial crisis. In particular, we show that tightening loan loss provisions, loan-to-value, lending restriction, liquidity requirements and systemically important financial institutions measures all lead to higher economic growth. However, we also find that, while tightening macroprudential policy is generally beneficial for the economy, excessive tightening policy can exert a negative growth impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

How does government recentralization reform affect corruption? We utilize the pilot recentralization reform that transforms the legislative function, power, and responsibility of the district‐level authorities to the higher level of the government organ in Vietnam as a quasi‐natural experiment to address the aforementioned question. We find strong evidence that recentralization reform leads to lower corruption. The result illustrates that, among the firms which have the highest probability of making a bribe payment, those incorporated in jurisdictions experiencing the recentralization reform are 4.3% less likely to pay a bribe. In addition, the perception that bribery is a common and necessary practice is also significantly lowered in the post‐recentralization period. We further show that the impact of recentralization is stronger for firms which lack a political connection. Overall, these results shed light on the real impact of the government recentralization reform and also the determinants of corruption, thereby providing important policy implications for policymakers to create a more conducive business environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigate whether, and to what extent, banks exploit their discretion over loan loss provisions to achieve their management purposes during the pandemic. Using a sample of US banks during the current COVID-19 outbreak, we find that banks are more eager to use discretionary loan loss provisions in response to the worsening pandemic situation. We find in particular that banks use discretionary loan loss provisions to manage regulatory capital, smooth income and signal private information to outsiders. Overall, this paper enriches the literature on bank discretionary behaviour during the difficult time, especially during the current COVID-19 pandemic, and therefore, it has important implications for banking supervisor and bank stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]