Search

Abstract: We employed a health status measure to describe the outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis patients over five years. Of the 410 rheumatoid arthritis patients who were originally administered the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS), 299 completed a follow-up five years later. Data were analyzed using nine health status scales, three components of health status, and an overall arthritis impact item. Results for survivors indicated that there were no clinically important deteriorations in any of these measures. In fact, small improvements on most measures were found. The health status changes were similar for patients originally in a clinical trial and for those receiving routine specialty care. Age was found to positively relate to improvements in psychological status and overall arthritis impact, but we were unable to demonstrate any consistent effects of sex, marital status, education, or disease duration. Our results contrast with other studies that have noted major declines over time in the health status of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, level of education was not a major determinant of morbidity in this group. These results suggest that health status in certain patients with rheumatoid arthritis is more stable than previously thought. This has implications for both clinical practice and clinical research in rheumatology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the financial return of additional training in a cognitive-oriented medical subspecialty (rheumatology) and in a procedure-oriented medical subspecialty (gastroenterology) relative to general internal medicine.Design: Analysis of existing data to compare lifetime discounted earnings of physicians in different medical specialties.Participants: General internists, gastroenterologists, and rheumatologists were surveyed.Main Outcome Measures: Using data from surveys conducted by Medical Economics and the American College of Rheumatology, we constructed lifetime earnings streams that allowed the calculation of the net present values of discounted lifetime earnings in general internal medicine, gastroenterology, and rheumatology. Net present values of lifetime earnings were calculated for each group at two discount rates. Sensitivity analyses were done to estimate how changes in relative income would affect calculations of the net present values.Main Results: The average net incomes before taxes for general internists, gastroenterologists, and rheumatologists in 1988 were $115,825, $201,875, and $118,056, respectively. At 5% and 10% discount rates, the net present values of the estimated career earnings stream for additional training in gastroenterology relative to general internal medicine were + $1,101,863 and + $512,952, respectively; for additional training in rheumatology relative to general internal medicine, the respective values were - $84,748 and - $92,467. If the incomes of general internists were decreased by 3% and the incomes of gastroenterologists were decreased by 25% to reflect the effect of potential changes due to the resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS), or if gastroenterology training were increased to 3 years and rheumatology fellowship stipends were increased by 30%, large differences would still exist between the groups.Conclusion: Gastroenterologists have an extremely large return on their additional investment in training, but rheumatologists have a negative return. When considered exclusively as a financial decision, fellowship training in a cognitive-oriented medical subspecialty such as rheumatology is a poor investment. Even major changes in reimbursement policies will not affect the relative pecuniary attractiveness of procedure-oriented medical subspecialties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. This study detected secular change in disability and health among persons aged 55 to 70 years, the life period when increases in disability and morbidity begin and retirement occurs. Methods. Cross-sectional comparisons were completed with data from similarly aged members of the original (n = 1760) and offspring (n = 1688) cohorts of the Framingham Heart Study, which represent 2 generations. Analyses were conducted by gender and on chronic disease subgroups by logistic regression. Results. There was substantially less disability in the offspring cohort than in the original cohort. Thirty-six percent of offspring men were disabled vs 52% of original cohort men (P = .001); among women, these proportions were 54% vs 72% (P = .001). Fewer offspring perceived their health as fair or poor and fewer had chronic diseases. Offspring were more physically active and less likely to smoke or consume high amounts of alcohol, but their average weight was greater. The secular decline in disability was strongly evident among individuals with chronic diseases. Conclusions. Our findings depict a secular change toward a less disabled and globally healthier population in the period of life when retirement occurs. (Am J Public Health. 1999;89: 1678-1683) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Focuses on a study conducted by the Framingham Heart Study using cohort analysis to determine whether obesity is the possible cause of knee osteoarthritis. Description of osteoarthritis; Difference in risks of getting osteoarthritis for both obese women and men; Observance of an association between antecedent obesity and both symptomatic and asymptomatic radiographic osteoarthritis.

Two-independently developed patient outcome measurement instruments were administered to forty-eight subjects with rheumatoid arthritis using a random cross-over design. The independent estimates of physical disability and pain are highly correlated. Each instrument displayed highly significant relationships with global health, providing evidence for convergent validity. The results demonstrate that health status is composed of at least three major dimensions: physical disability, psychological disability, and pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]