Search

The rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine in the last few years highlights the importance of developing bigger and better systems for data and model sharing. However, the presence of Protected Health Information (PHI) in medical data poses a challenge when it comes to sharing. One potential solution to mitigate the risk of PHI breaches is to exclusively share pre-trained models developed using private datasets. Despite the availability of these pre-trained networks, there remains a need for an adaptable environment to test and fine-tune specific models tailored for clinical tasks. This environment should be open for peer testing, feedback, and continuous model refinement, allowing dynamic model updates that are especially important in the medical field, where diseases and scanning techniques evolve rapidly. In this context, the Discovery Viewer (DV) platform was developed in-house at the Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute at Mount Sinai (BMEII) to facilitate the creation and distribution of cutting-edge medical AI models that remain accessible after their development. The all-in-one platform offers a unique environment for non-AI experts to learn, develop, and share their own deep learning (DL) concepts. This paper presents various use cases of the platform, with its primary goal being to demonstrate how DV holds the potential to empower individuals without expertise in AI to create high-performing DL models. We tasked three non-AI experts to develop different musculoskeletal AI projects that encompassed segmentation, regression, and classification tasks. In each project, 80% of the samples were provided with a subset of these samples annotated to aid the volunteers in understanding the expected annotation task. Subsequently, they were responsible for annotating the remaining samples and training their models through the platform's "Training Module". The resulting models were then tested on the separate 20% hold-off dataset to assess their performance. The classification model achieved an accuracy of 0.94, a sensitivity of 0.92, and a specificity of 1. The regression model yielded a mean absolute error of 14.27 pixels. And the segmentation model attained a Dice Score of 0.93, with a sensitivity of 0.9 and a specificity of 0.99. This initiative seeks to broaden the community of medical AI model developers and democratize the access of this technology to all stakeholders. The ultimate goal is to facilitate the transition of medical AI models from research to clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patellofemoral anatomy has not been well characterized. Applying deep learning to automatically measure knee anatomy can provide a better understanding of anatomy, which can be a key factor in improving outcomes. Methods: 483 total patients with knee CT imaging (April 2017–May 2022) from 6 centers were selected from a cohort scheduled for knee arthroplasty and a cohort with healthy knee anatomy. A total of 7 patellofemoral landmarks were annotated on 14,652 images and approved by a senior musculoskeletal radiologist. A two-stage deep learning model was trained to predict landmark coordinates using a modified ResNet50 architecture initialized with self-supervised learning pretrained weights on RadImageNet. Landmark predictions were evaluated with mean absolute error, and derived patellofemoral measurements were analyzed with Bland–Altman plots. Statistical significance of measurements was assessed by paired t-tests. Results: Mean absolute error between predicted and ground truth landmark coordinates was 0.20/0.26 cm in the healthy/arthroplasty cohort. Four knee parameters were calculated, including transepicondylar axis length, transepicondylar-posterior femur axis angle, trochlear medial asymmetry, and sulcus angle. There were no statistically significant parameter differences (p > 0.05) between predicted and ground truth measurements in both cohorts, except for the healthy cohort sulcus angle. Conclusion: Our model accurately identifies key trochlear landmarks with ~0.20–0.26 cm accuracy and produces human-comparable measurements on both healthy and pathological knees. This work represents the first deep learning regression model for automated patellofemoral annotation trained on both physiologic and pathologic CT imaging at this scale. This novel model can enhance our ability to analyze the anatomy of the patellofemoral compartment at scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interpretation of high-resolution CT images plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of interstitial lung diseases. However, interreader variation may exist due to varying levels of training and expertise. This study aims to evaluate interreader variation and the role of thoracic radiology training in classifying interstitial lung disease (ILD). This is a retrospective study where seven physicians (radiologists, thoracic radiologists, and a pulmonologist) classified the subtypes of ILD of 128 patients from a tertiary referral center, all selected from the Interstitial Lung Disease Registry which consists of patients from November 2014 to January 2021. Each patient was diagnosed with a subtype of interstitial lung disease by a consensus diagnosis from pathology, radiology, and pulmonology. Each reader was provided with only clinical history, only CT images, or both. Reader sensitivity and specificity and interreader agreements using Cohen's κ were calculated. Interreader agreement based only on clinical history, only on radiologic information, or combination of both was most consistent amongst readers with thoracic radiology training, ranging from fair (Cohen's κ: 0.2–0.46), moderate to almost perfect (Cohen's κ: 0.55–0.92), and moderate to almost perfect (Cohen's κ: 0.53–0.91) respectively. Radiologists with any thoracic training showed both increased sensitivity and specificity for NSIP as compared to other radiologists and the pulmonologist when using only clinical history, only CT information, or combination of both (p < 0.05). Readers with thoracic radiology training showed the least interreader variation and were more sensitive and specific at classifying certain subtypes of ILD. Thoracic radiology training may improve sensitivity and specificity in classifying ILD based on HRCT images and clinical history. • Compared to other readers, thoracic radiologists displayed better overall sensitivity and specificity when diagnosing ILD • Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia was most accurately diagnosed by thoracic radiologists • Readers with thoracic radiology training showed the most interreader agreement when classifying ILD based on HRCT and clinical history [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]