Search

Objectives: To compare the hearing performance of patients with conductive and mild mixed hearing loss and single‐sided sensorineural deafness provided with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant (the Baha Attract System) with unaided hearing as well as aided with a sound processor on a softband. Furthermore, to evaluate safety and subjective benefit before and after implantation of the test device. Participants: Fifty‐four adult patients in five participating centres were enrolled in this prospective study. Baseline data were collected during a pre‐operative visit, and after a softband trial, all patients were implanted unilaterally. Follow‐up visits were scheduled at 10 days, 4, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months. Main outcome measures. Free‐field hearing thresholds pure‐tone average (PTA4 in dB HL; mean threshold at 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz; primary outcome measure). Individual free‐field hearing thresholds, speech recognition in quiet and in noise, soft tissue status during follow‐up and subjective benefit as measured with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Health Utilities Index (HUI) questionnaires. Results: Implantation of the Baha Attract System resulted in favourable audiological outcomes compared to unaided conditions. On the primary outcome parameter, a statistically significant improvement was observed compared to unaided hearing for the patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss (mean PTA4 difference −20.8 dB HL, SD 9.8; P < 0.0001) and for the patients with single‐sided sensorineural deafness (SSD) (mean PTA4 difference −21.6 dB HL, SD 12.2; P < 0.0001). During all audiology tests, the non‐test ear was blocked. Statistically significant improvements were also recorded in speech tests in quiet and noise compared to unaided hearing for the conductive/mixed hearing loss group and for speech in quiet in the SSD group. Compared to the pre‐operative measurement with softband, no significant differences were recorded in the PTA4 free‐field hearing threshold or the other audiological outcomes in either of the groups (P > 0.05). Soft tissue‐related issues observed during follow‐up included numbness, pain/discomfort at the implant site and to a lesser extent pressure‐related skin complications. A declining trend was noted in the rate of these complications during follow‐up. Approximately 20% of patients reported some degree of numbness and 38% (slight) pain/discomfort at final follow‐up of 6 months. Good results on the subjective benefit questionnaires were observed, with statistically significant improvements on APHAB and SSQ questionnaires, and on the hearing attribute of HUI3. Conclusions: The Baha Attract System provided a significant improvement in hearing performance and subjective benefit compared to the pre‐operative unaided condition (with the non‐test ear blocked). Hearing performance of the Baha Attract was similar to a test situation with the same sound processor on a softband. A proportion of the patients reported numbness and pain/discomfort at the implant site during follow‐up, especially during the first post‐operative weeks. Based on the results of the current multicentre study, the Baha Attract can be considered as a treatment option for patients with the aforementioned hearing losses. Especially in the SSD patients, a careful selection procedure is warranted. Therefore, a pre‐operative trial should be part of the decision‐making process before fitting a patient with the Baha Attract System. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The Nucleus 5 or CI500 series cochlear implants are the new generation of Nucleus® cochlear implants. The receiver-stimulator package has a low profile without a pedestal projecting from the medial surface. This study aimed to demonstrate that the new design can facilitate a minimally invasive surgical approach, without the need for tie-down sutures and without a seat drilled for the receiver-stimulator package. Methods The surgical technique involved placing the device directly on the surface of the bone in a secure sub-periosteal pocket with a channel drilled for the lead. A well or ramped seat was not drilled and tie-down sutures were not used. Measurements were taken from the transmitting coil to the tragus and the coil to the lobule immediately after implantation, and serially thereafter to document implant position. Results To date, over 200 implants have been performed with the Nucleus 5 device. In all cases, healing was uneventful without major complications. Of 137 patients with at least 6-week follow-up data, 8% showed a measurement change of greater than 1 cm whereas only 4.4% demonstrated any clinically evident movement. None had any complications relating to migration and none required repositioning of the device. Discussion The new design can safely be inserted without drilling a well for the receiver-stimulator package. Some early post-operative movement of the package was observed which caused no clinical impact. This modified surgical technique reduces the risk of intracranial complications and reduces operating time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pneumomediastinum is often an incidental finding following a blunt or penetrating trauma to the neck or chest. We report a rare case of pneumomediastinum following an isolated facial trauma that was diagnosed on imaging. We also review the clinical signs of this condition, its radiologic characteristics, and the 18 previously reported cases of pneumomediastinum following facial trauma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In cochlear implantation and other major ear surgeries a post auricular incision is often used. Following this, fascia, muscle and fat is divided, and then a periosteal flap is raised. This creates different tissue planes which need to be held back and protected from the surgeon and the drill. We present a new device which provides excellent retraction for this procedure, does not put undue pressure on the pinna, while at the same time it allowing the surgeon an unobstructed view. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) remain a challenge due to their anatomical location and propensity to growth. Macrophages are present in VS but their roles in VS pathogenesis remains unknown. Objectives: The objective was to assess phenotypic and functional profile of macrophages in VS with single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). Methods: scRNAseq was carried out in three VS samples to examine characteristics of macrophages in the tumour. RT-qPCR was carried out on 10 VS samples for CD14, CD68 and CD163 and a panel of macrophage-associated molecules. Results: scRNAseq revealed macrophages to be a major constituent of VS microenvironment with three distinct subclusters based on gene expression. The subclusters were also defined by expression of CD163, CD68 and IL-1β. AREG and PLAUR were expressed in the CD68+CD163+IL-1β+ subcluster, PLCG2 and NCKAP5 were expressed in CD68+CD163+IL-1β− subcluster and AUTS2 and SPP1 were expressed in the CD68+CD163−IL-1β+ subcluster. RT-qPCR showed expression of several macrophage markers in VS of which CD14, ALOX15, Interleukin-1β, INHBA and Colony Stimulating Factor-1R were found to have a high correlation with tumour volume. Conclusions: Macrophages form an important component of VS stroma. scRNAseq reveals three distinct subsets of macrophages in the VS tissue which may have differing roles in the pathogenesis of VS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To establish audiological and other outcomes following cochlear implantation in humans and animals with eluting electrodes. Methods: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched (April 2023): MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science. Studies reporting outcomes in either humans or animals following cochlear implantation with a drugeluting electrode were included. No limits were placed on language or year of publication. Risk of bias assessment was performed on all included studies using either the Brazzelli or Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) assessment tools. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Results: Searches identified 146 abstracts and 108 full texts. Of these, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 523 animals (17 studies) and 24 humans (1 study). Eluting electrodes included dexamethasone (16 studies), aracytine (1 study), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (1 study), the growth factors insulinlike growth factor 1 (IGF1) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (1 study), and neurotrophin-3 (1 study). All included studies compare outcomes following implantation with an eluting electrode with a control non-eluting electrode. In the majority of studies, audiological outcomes (e.g., auditory brainstem response threshold) were superior following implantation with an eluting electrode compared with a standard electrode. Most studies which investigated post-implantation impedance reported lower impedance following implantation with an eluting electrode. The influence of eluting electrodes on other reported outcomes (including post-implantation cochlear fibrosis and the survival of hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons) was more varied across the included studies. Conclusions: Eluting electrodes have shown promise in animal studies in preserving residual hearing following cochlear implantation and in reducing impedance, though data from human studies remain lacking. Further in-human studies will be required to determine the clinical usefulness of drug-eluting cochlear implants as a future treatment for sensorineural hearing loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study is a systematic review of the literature which seeks to evaluate auditory and quality of life (QOL) outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Usher syndrome. Methods: Systematic review of studies indexed in Medline via PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov was performed up to March 9th 2022, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Patient demographics, comorbidity, details of cochlear implantation, auditory, and QOL outcomes were extracted and summarized. Results: 33 studies reported over 217 cochlear implants in 187 patients with Usher syndrome, comprising subtypes 1 (56 patients), 2 (9 patients), 3 (23 patients), and not specified (99 patients). Auditory outcomes included improved sound detection, speech perception, and speech intelligibility. QOL outcomes were reported for 75 patients, with benefit reported in the majority. Conclusions: Many patients with Usher syndrome develop improved auditory outcomes after cochlear implantation with early implantation being an important factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen Syndrome (JLNS). Methods Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched on Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits placed on language or year of publication. Review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Searches identified 63 abstracts and 19 full texts. Of these, 9 studies met inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 66 patients with at least 72 implants. Hearing outcomes were generally good. Mortality secondary to cardiac complications within the follow up period occurred in at least five cases (7.6%), though three of these were thought to be unrelated to surgery. Potentially dangerous arrhythmias without associated morbidity were also noted in at least five patients. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, predominantly consisting of case reports and non-controlled case series with small numbers of patients. All studies were OCEBM grade IV. One study contributed 41/66 patients (62%). Hearing outcomes following CI in JLNS are generally good with the majority of patients experiencing useful hearing improvement. Significant peri-operative cardiac risks exist and should be discussed with the patient and family during pre-operative counselling and prompt thorough investigation, pre-operative optimisation and peri-operative monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • Electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS)-evoked eye movements are trackable with an infrared camera. • Unilateral vestibular schwannoma attenuated the ocular torsion response to EVS. • EVS-evoked ocular torsion responses provide a convenient, non-invasive vestibular assessment. Abstract Objectives We determined if eye movements evoked by Electrical Vestibular Stimulation (EVS) can be used to detect vestibular dysfunction in patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS). Methods Ocular torsion responses to monaural sinusoidal EVS currents (±2 mA, 2 Hz) were measured in 25 patients with tumours ranging in size from Koos grade 1–3. For comparative purposes we also measured postural sway response to EVS, and additionally assessed vestibular function with the lateral Head Impulse Test (HIT). Patient responses were compared to age-matched healthy control subjects. Results Patients exhibited smaller ocular responses to ipsilesional versus contralesional EVS, and showed a larger asymmetry ratio (AR) than control subjects (19.4 vs. 3.3%, p < 0.05). EVS-evoked sway responses were also smaller in ipsilesional ear, but exhibited slightly more variability than the eye movement response, along with marginally lower discriminatory power (patients vs. controls: AR = 16.6 vs 2.6%, p < 0.05). The HIT test exhibited no significant difference between groups. Conclusions These results demonstrate significant deficits in the ocular torsion response to EVS in VS patients. Significance The fast, convenient and non-invasive nature of the test are well suited to clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An abstract of the article "Baha Attract System: 6-month results of a multicentre, open, prospective clinical investigation" by Peter Monksfield and others is presented.

An abstract of the article "Bone Conduction Implant, clinical trial of a new transcutaneous implant and results so far" by Peter Monksfield and others is presented.

Objective: This systematic review aims to establish the expected hearing and speech outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with profound congenital deafness secondary to Waardenburg syndrome (WS). Methods: A systematic review of the literature and narrative synthesis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Databases searched: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits were placed on language or year of publication. Results: Searches identified 186 abstracts and full texts. Of these, 16 studies met inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 179 patients and at least 194 implants. Hearing outcomes of those receiving cochlear implantation were generally good. Five studies included genetic analysis of one or more of the participants. A total of 11 peri/post‐operative complications were reported. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, mainly comprising noncontrolled case series with small cohort size. All studies were OCEBM grade III–IV. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation in congenitally deafened children with Waardenburg Syndrome is a well‐established intervention as a method of auditory rehabilitation. Due to the uncommon nature of the condition, there is a lack of large‐scale high‐quality studies examining the use of cochlear implantation in this patient group. However, overall outcomes following implantation are positive with the majority of patients demonstrating improved audiometry, speech perception and speech intelligibility supporting its use in appropriately selected cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To identify United Kingdom (UK)-specific research priorities in the field of bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs).Method: Narrative summary of the discussions and outcomes of a UK BCHD research workshop. The workshop was organized on 8 September 2016 under the auspices of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network (CRN) ENT Specialty group and Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) Clinical Research Initiative. Representatives from a wide range of patient and professional groups from the UK and abroad were invited to attend. Main outcome measures were research priorities and approaches in the field of BCHDs.Results: Key research questions in the field of BCHDs are as follows: (1) What are the existing national BCHD practices? (2) What are the patient information and support needs on BCHDs? (3) Which outcomes should be measured across clinical studies in the field of BCHDs? The workshop suggested the following approaches to address these priorities: (1) a service evaluation of current UK BCHD practice; development of a national registry of BCHDs; (2) qualitative research to understand patient information and support needs; development of patient decision support tools; (3) development of core outcome sets for BCHDs.Discussion: Building upon the framework of the recent UK Research Agenda for ENT, Hearing and Balance, patients and professionals defined key UK-specific research priorities and approaches in the field of BCHDs. This approach promotes engagement, buy-in, national collaboration and thereby value of future BCHD research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Congenital cholesteatomas account for just up to 5% of all cholesteatomas and most commonly arise in the petrous apex and middle ear. Congenital cholesteatomas arising in the mastoid are rare and typically present late. METHODS: In this study, we report a case series of 3 cases managed in our department between 2006 and 2021 and present a summary of the current literature. RESULTS: Congenital cholesteatomas arising in the mastoid is a rare finding and even among reported cases, not all are clearly mastoid in origin. Their location allows for considerable growth before symptoms develop. Pain and localized swelling in the temporal area are the most common presenting symptoms which can lead to diagnostic challenges. Our cases show that although surgery is often appropriate, conservative management may be suitable in certain situations. CONCLUSION: Congenital cholesteatoma of mastoid origin is rare and can present a diagnostic challenge. Greater awareness is important to facilitate early detection. A high index of suspicion is needed in those presenting with retro-auricular pain and swelling in the context of a normal ontological examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Establish anatomical considerations, audiological outcomes, and optimal management in patients with branchiootic/branchiootorenal syndrome (BO/BOR). Methods: Databases reviewed: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical or radiological studies of patients with BOR syndrome describing either the audiological profile or anatomical changes were included. Articles in which BOR syndrome was associated with other syndromes, and those that were focused only on general and genetic aspects of BOR syndrome were excluded. Articles were assessed using Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine (OCEBM) grading system and the Brazzelli risk of bias tool for nonrandomized studies. Results: Searches identified 379 articles. Of these, 64 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 482 patients from at least 95 families. In 308 patients, hearing loss was categorized as sensorineural (29%), conductive (20%), and mixed (51%). Hearing outcomes were variable in terms of onset, pattern, and severity; ranging from mild to profound deafness. One hundred sixty‐nine patients presented with inner ear anomalies, 145 had middle, and 151 had external ear abnormalities. In 44 studies, 58 ear operations were described. Mixed outcomes were reported in patients managed with hearing aids or middle ear surgery; however, successful cochlear implantation was described in all five cases. Conclusion: The anatomical and audiological profiles of patients with BO/BOR are variable. A range of surgical procedures were described, however lacked objective outcome measures. Given the range of anatomical variants, management decisions should be made on an individual basis including full audiological and radiological assessment. Level of evidence: NA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: As the population ages and implantation criteria are relaxed, more patients with complex comorbidities are becoming eligible for cochlear implantation (CI). These patients have higher risks associated with general anesthesia. This systematic review assesses outcomes and complications following CI under local anesthetic to examine utility for patients deemed not suitable or at high risk for general anesthesia. Methods: A systematic review and meta‐analysis performed according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched were MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov. There were no limitations on year of publication or language. Results: Then, 132 unique were identified. After screening abstracts and full texts for eligibility criteria a total of 18 articles were included. In the nine studies where audiological data were reported, all patients demonstrated improvement in audiological outcomes following implantation under local anesthetic (LA). Only minor complications of transient vertigo, wound infection, facial nerve paralysis, confusion, and tinnitus were reported but all were transient. Meta‐analysis showed surgical time was significantly shorter under LA. Conclusions: CI under LA is safe for patients with comorbidities which preclude them from general anesthesia, with minimal complications and an improved cost‐effectiveness profile. However, larger scale, robust trials are required to assess this further. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To identify the psychosocial assessments utilized with individuals with conductive and/or mixed hearing loss as part of a broader effort by the Auditory Rehabilitation Outcomes Network (AURONET) group to develop a core set of patient-centred outcome measures. A review of articles published between 2006 and 2016 was completed. Included studies had more than three adult participants, were available in English, and reported a psychosocial outcome from any treatment of mixed and/or conductive hearing loss. Sixty-six articles from seven databases. Sixty-six articles met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Within this set, 15 unique psychosocial or patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) were identified, with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) being the most frequently dispensed. Five of the fifteen were only administered in one study. In-house questionnaires (IHQs) were reported in 19 articles. Only 66 (22%) of the 300 articles with outcomes contained a PRO. Some of the mostly frequently employed PROs (e.g., APHAB) were judged to include only social items and no psychological items. Lack of PRO standardization and the use of IHQs make psychosocial comparisons across treatments in this population difficult for patients, clinicians and stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: BAHA; osseo-integrated implants; outcomes; research EN BAHA osseo-integrated implants outcomes research 846 849 4 06/23/21 20210701 NES 210701 Key points Linear incision with soft tissue preservation surgery is a commonly performed method of implanting bone-anchored hearing implants (BAHI). Fourteen patients were excluded who had revision tissue preservation surgery after undergoing soft tissue reduction surgery in their previous operation. One patient (skin thickness 10mm) required tissue reduction surgery after initial tissue preservation as even when the 12mm abutment was tried this was not satisfactory. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction. [Extracted from the article]

Objectives: To assess outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with hearing loss secondary to primary or secondary autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED). Methods: A systematic review and narrative synthesis was completed according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits were placed on year of publication or language. Results: A total of 551 studies were identified, of which 29 were included after removal of duplicates, and screening the title, abstract, and full text. All except one study were OCEBM grade IV. 114 of 115 patients displayed improvement in hearing following cochlear implantation. With implant use, roughly a third of these patients had hearing that improved over time, a third improved and plateaued, and a third remained stable. There was no additional risk of perioperative complications found in AIED patients compared what is generally accepted in general cochlear implantation, although two episodes of device failure after 6 months were noted, and four patients with secondary AIED displayed poor initial audiological outcomes. Conclusion: CI in both primary and secondary AIED provides marked improvement in hearing. Early CI may be a valid management option, provide long‐lasting hearing in patients and reduce the side effects of long‐term systemic immunosuppressants. However, patients should be counseled residual hearing may be lost if there is cochlear ossification or fibrosis which may make implant insertion more traumatic. Level of Evidence: NA. Autoimmune inner ear disease is characterised by bilateral, assymetrical, progressive (or fluctuating) hearing loss that develops over weeks to months and is steroid responsive. Cochlear implantation has been suggested as a useful intervention in this group when medical management fails, however there is limited data in the literature. This review aims to systematically review all available evidence of post‐cochlear implantation hearing outcomes in patients with autoimmune inner ear disease to assess its benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

All these patients had 2 implants loaded: with 2 patients having both implants failing, and 10 having only 1 implant failure. The high proportion of patients refusing implants due to their preference is quite staggering and indicates a lack of effective communication between clinicians and patients as to the process of implant insertion and prosthesis loading. Implant loading While all 123 patients who underwent a pinnectomy and the placement of osseointegrated implants, loading of the implant with an auricular prosthesis was only observed in 85 patients. Radiotherapy does not influence the long term survival of osseointegrated implants following treatment for ear and temporal bone malignancy. [Extracted from the article]

Rehabilitation options for conductive and mixed hearing loss are continually expanding, but without standard outcome measures comparison between different treatments is difficult. To meaningfully inform clinicians and patients core outcome sets (COS), determined via a recognised methodology, are needed. Following our previous work that identified hearing, physical, economic and psychosocial as core areas of a future COS, the AURONET group reviewed hearing outcome measures used in existing literature and assigned them into different domains within the hearing core area. Scoping review. Literature including hearing outcome measurements for the treatment of conductive and/or mixed hearing loss. The literature search identified 1434 studies, with 278 subsequently selected for inclusion. A total of 837 hearing outcome measures were reported and grouped into nine domains. The largest domain constituted pure-tone threshold measurements accounting for 65% of the total outcome measures extracted, followed by the domains of speech testing (20%) and questionnaires (9%). Studies of hearing implants more commonly included speech tests or hearing questionnaires compared with studies of middle ear surgery. A wide range of outcome measures are currently used, highlighting the importance of developing a COS to inform individual practice and reporting in trials/research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients following temporal bone trauma. Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits are placed on language or year of publication. The review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Searches identified 223 abstracts and 64 full texts. Of these, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 77 patients with at least 96 implants. Hearing outcomes were generally good with most patients demonstrating improved audiological and functional outcomes. Complications were reported in 14 cases with 10 of these being major. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, predominantly consisting of case reports and non-controlled case series with small numbers of patients. All studies were OCEBM grade IV. Hearing outcomes following CI in temporal bone trauma are good with useful functional improvement demonstrated in the majority of patients. It appears to be an effective method of aural rehabilitation and should be considered in selected cases following hearing loss due to temporal bone fracture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The new CI600 series cochlear implants (Nucleus® Profile™ Plus Series; CI) are more MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) compatible. The magnet's attraction force is lower, possibly posing a problem in patients needing a higher strength magnet due to increased skin thickness. This study aims to investigate the relationship between skin thickness and magnet strength in patients undergoing cochlear implantation. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from 46 patients with cochlear implants. Data collected included age, body mass index, magnet strength used, pre-operative and post-operative imaging and skin thickness. Results: There was a weak, positive correlation between magnet strength and skin thickness, which was not statistically significant (r(46) = 0.149, p = 0.324). There was a weak, positive correlation between magnet strength and body mass index, which was not statistically significant (r(46) = 0.113, p = 0.456). There was a moderate, positive correlation between body mass index and skin thickness, which was statistically significant (r(46) = 0.362, p = 0.012). Discussion: The increased skin thickness in patients with higher body mass indexes, might mean that these patients will require a stronger magnet. Conclusion: There are concerns that the lower attraction force in the CI600 (Nucleus® Profile™ Plus Series) may pose a retention problem for these patients. This might mean that discussions about skin flap reduction surgery are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study's aim was to establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with mitochondrial disorders associated with deafness. Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched: Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, COCHRANE, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits on language or year of publication. Review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Searches identified 437 abstracts and 37 full text articles, of which 11 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in a total of 17 patients. All implants achieved good hearing outcomes, and follow-up ranged between 1 week and 12 months. The methodological quality of the included studies was sufficient, scoring grades 3 to 4 using the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine grading system. All studies were retrospective and consisted of case reviews and case reports. All cases of CI showed positive outcomes in speech perception and detection. There is some qualitative evidence to suggest improvement in quality of life and satisfaction postoperatively. There was very limited information available on secondary outcomes such as surgical complications, quality of life, and method of cochlear implant insertion. The small sample size of our patient cohort and quality of studies suggests a need for large-scale studies with more robust methodology to assess the effectiveness of CI. There is a need for studies that assess other factors to be considered when counseling patients about cochlear implants, such as adverse events, surgical complications, and long-term benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with superficial siderosis (SS). MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for this systematic review. No limits were placed on the language or the year of publication. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Of a total of 46 studies, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 38 patients. Of the 44 implants, 23 implants (52.27%) had good hearing outcomes at the last follow-up, 9 (20.45%) were initially beneficial for the patient, but then the performance deteriorated (4 of which were re-implanted), and 12 (27.27%) were not beneficial for the patient. All studies were classified as grade 4 studies using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) grading system, being retrospective in nature and consisting of case reports and noncontrolled case series with a small number of patients. Of the 44 implants, 32 (72.73%) showed improved hearing outcomes following CI for SS at some point in time, of which 23 (52.2%) implants showed sustained benefit at the last follow-up (average follow-up time was 21.97 months). It is difficult to predict the longevity of benefit owing to the progressive nature of the disease or the patients in whom it may be beneficial, as the preoperative investigations inadequately predict benefit. Preimplantation and postimplantation counseling with the patient and their family regarding the potential limited benefit and eventual parallel decline with the neurological disease are crucial, along with thorough clinical investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with Pendred syndrome. Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits placed on language or year of publication. Review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Searches identified 251 abstracts and 242 full texts. Of these, 22 studies met inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 231 patients with at least 234 implants. Hearing outcomes were generally good with patients experiencing useful functional improvement. A total of 46 minor complications were reported in 78 cases. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, predominantly consisting of case reports and non-controlled case series with small numbers of patients. All studies were OCEBM grade III-IV. Hearing outcomes following CI in Pendred syndrome are generally good with useful functional improvement. However, outcomes reported in published studies lack long term follow up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summarise outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with post-meningitis deafness. Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits placed on language or year of publication. Studies with a minimum of 20 individuals with post-meningitis deafness were included. Review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Searches identified 906 abstracts and 291 full texts. Of these, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 610 patients with 650 implants. Audiological outcomes improved across all studies following cochlear implantation. 7 studies demonstrated a statistically significant difference between pre and post-CI outcomes. Patients with no cochlear ossification, full electrode insertion, shorter duration of deafness and no neurological sequelae generally appeared to perform best. A total of 31 minor and 19 major complications were reported, with 15 cases of reimplantation. The methodological quality of the included studies was sufficient, predominantly consisting of cohort studies. 15 studies were OCEBM grade III and 4 studies were OCEBM grade IV. All studies had a minimum of 20 individuals with post-meningitic deafness and used multi-channel cochlear implant devices. Audiological outcomes following cochlear implantation in meningitis are satisfactory, providing functional levels of speech perception and intelligibility. Improvement in hearing is dependent on the amount of cochlear ossification, duration of deafness prior to implantation, electrode insertion depth and presence of neurological sequalae. Cochlear implantation in meningitis patients can be challenging due to the presence of ossification and inaccuracies of pre-operative imaging. Therefore, early and bilateral implantation is recommended in all patients with post-meningitis hearing loss to improve the likelihood of full electrode insertion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with postsynaptic auditory neuropathy (AN). Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits placed on language or year of publication. Review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Searches identified 98 studies in total, of which 14 met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 25 patients with at least 28 CIs. Of these, 4 studies focused on Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), 3 on Brown- Vialetto-Van-Laere syndrome (BVVL), 2 on Friedreich Ataxia (FRDA), 2 on Syndromic dominant optic atrophy (DOA+), 2 on Cerebellar ataxia - areflexia - pes cavus - optic atrophy - sensorineural hearing loss (CAPOS) syndrome, and 1 on Deafness-dystonia-optic neuronopathy (DDON) syndrome. All studies were Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) grade IV. Overall trend was towards good post-CI outcomes with 22 of the total 25 patients displaying modest to significant benefit. Hearing outcomes following CI in postsynaptic ANs are variable but generally good with patients showing improvements in hearing thresholds and speech perception. In the future, development of a clearer stratification system into pre, post, and central AN would have clinical and academic benefits. Further research is required to understand AN pathophysiology and develop better diagnostic tools for more accurate identification of lesion sites. Multicenter longitudinal studies with standardized comprehensive outcome measures including health-related quality of life data will be key in establishing a better understanding of short and long-term post-CI outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Synchrotron radiation X‐ray fluorescence microscopy is frequently used to investigate the spatial distribution of elements within a wide range of samples. Interrogation of heterogeneous samples that contain large concentration ranges has the potential to produce image artefacts due to the profile of the X‐ray beam. The presence of these artefacts and the distribution of flux within the beam profile can significantly affect qualitative and quantitative analyses. Two distinct correction methods have been generated by referencing the beam profile itself or by employing an adaptive‐thresholding procedure. Both methods significantly improve qualitative imaging by removing the artefacts without compromising the low‐intensity features. The beam‐profile correction method improves quantitative results but requires accurate two‐dimensional characterization of the X‐ray beam profile. The presence of image artefacts within synchrotron‐radiation X‐ray‐fluorescence microscopy is reported here. These artefacts can be attributed to the profile of the X‐ray beam; two correction methods have been developed to improve qualitative and quantitative synchrotron radiation X‐ray fluorescence mapping and are presented here. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tinnitus is a bothersome symptom with various etiologies. Pulsatile tinnitus constitutes only a small percentage of tinnitus types and is due to a vascular pathology close to the inner ear which causes a sensation of noise. Many vascular lesions are associated with pulsatile tinnitus: paraganglionoma, persistent stapedial artery, a vascular loop in the internal auditory meatus or cerebello-pontine angle, carotid-vertebral stenosis, and arterio-venous malformation. We report one case of pulsatile tinnitus that originated in a venous diverticulum of the sigmoid sinus and which was transmitted to the inner ear through perisinus pneumatisation. Treatment options for this condition are discussed, with insights from the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Balance disequilibrium is a significant contributor to falls in the elderly. The most common cause of balance dysfunction is loss of sensory cells from the vestibular sensory epithelia of the inner ear. However, inaccessibility of inner ear tissue in humans severely restricts possibilities for experimental manipulation to develop therapies to ameliorate this loss. We provide a structural and functional analysis of human vestibular sensory epithelia harvested at trans-labyrinthine surgery. We demonstrate the viability of the tissue and labeling with specific markers of hair cell function and of ion homeostasis in the epithelium. Samples obtained from the oldest patients revealed a significant loss of hair cells across the tissue surface, but we found immature hair bundles present in epithelia harvested from patients >60 years of age. These results suggest that the environment of the human vestibular sensory epithelium could be responsive to stimulation of developmental pathways to enhance hair cell regeneration, as has been demonstrated successfully in the vestibular organs of adult mice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An abstract of the article "Chronic suppurative otitis media in adult cochlear implantation: a review of our experience" by Nina Mistry and others is presented.