Search

BACKGROUND: This report describes the 48-month efficacy and benefit-cost analysis of Project TrEAT (Trial for Early Alcohol Treatment), a randomized controlled trial of brief physician advice for the treatment of problem drinking. METHODS: Four hundred eighty-two men and 292 women, ages 18-65, were randomly assigned to a control (n = 382) or intervention (n = 392) group. The intervention consisted of two physician visits and two nurse follow-up phone calls. Intervention components included a review of normative drinking, patient-specific alcohol effects, a worksheet on drinking cues, drinking diary cards, and a drinking agreement in the form of a prescription. RESULTS: Subjects in the treatment group exhibited significant reductions (p < 0.01) in 7-day alcohol use, number of binge drinking episodes, and frequency of excessive drinking as compared with the control group. The effect occurred within 6 months of the intervention and was maintained over the 48-month follow-up period. The treatment sample also experienced fewer days of hospitalization (p = 0.05) and fewer emergency department visits (p = 0.08). Seven deaths occurred in the control group and three in the treatment group. The benefit-cost analysis suggests a 43,000 dollars reduction in future health care costs for every 10,000 dollars invested in early intervention. The benefit-cost ratio increases when including the societal benefits of fewer motor vehicle events and crimes. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term follow-up of Project TrEAT provides the first direct evidence that brief physician advice is associated with sustained reductions in alcohol use, health care utilization, motor vehicle events, and associated costs. The report suggests that a patient's personal physician can successfully treat alcohol problems and endorses the implementation of alcohol screening and brief intervention in the US health care system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that 14% of women age 18 to 40 drink alcohol above recommended limits. Of special concern is the increasing use of alcohol by women during pregnancy. This article reports 48 month follow-up data from a subanalysis of a trial for early alcohol treatment (Project TrEAT) focused on women of childbearing age. METHODS: Project TrEAT was conducted in the offices of 64 primary care, community-based physicians from 10 Wisconsin counties. Of 5979 female patients ages 18 to 40 who were screened for problem drinking, 205 were randomized into an experimental group (n = 103) or control group (n = 102). The intervention consisted of two 15 min, physician-delivered counseling visits that included advice, education, and contracting by using a scripted workbook. A total of 174 subjects (85%) completed the 48 month follow-up procedures. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the experimental and control groups at baseline for alcohol use, age, socioeconomic status, smoking, depression or anxiety, conduct disorder, lifetime drug use, or health care utilization. The trial found a significant treatment effect in reducing both 7 day alcohol use (p = 0.0039) and binge drinking episodes (p = 0.0021) over the 48 month follow-up period. Women in the experimental group who became pregnant during the follow-up period had the most dramatic decreases in alcohol use. A logistic regression model based on a 20% or greater reduction in drinking found an odds ratio of 1.93 (confidence interval 1.07-3.46) in the sample exposed to physician intervention. Age, smoking, depression, conduct disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and illicit drug use did not reduce drinking significantly. No significant differences were found in health care utilization and health status between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides the first direct evidence that brief intervention is associated with sustained reductions in alcohol consumption by women of childbearing age. The results have enormous implications for the U.S. health care system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education now requires pediatric residency programs to include advocacy training, but few guidelines for development exist. PURPOSE: To determine faculty and resident attitudes regarding advocacy training, and to develop consensus on the best method to teach and learn advocacy. METHODS: Pediatric residents (n = 28) and faculty (n = 51) participated in a survey about experience and training in advocacy, identified issues important to address in an advocacy curriculum, and rated a variety of learning methods. RESULTS: Nearly 90% of residents felt advocacy training was needed, and 82% felt advocacy activities would continue following residency. Faculty and residents agreed that participation in short-term or longitudinal projects was the best way to teach and learn advocacy skills. Respondents identified and ranked 45 issues to address through advocacy efforts and training, and these results were used to develop and implement an advocacy curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Residents and faculty were interested in incorporating an advocacy curriculum, and survey results were used to guide curriculum development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]