Search

Simple Summary: Although gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a relatively rare mesenchymal neoplasm of the digestive tract, molecular advancements in GISTs over the past two decades have caused a paradigm shift in the field of precision oncology. GISTs are mainly driven by activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA oncogenes, rendering them sensitive to targeted therapies. However, there is a significant lack of data from Kuwait that needs to be addressed. We carried out this retrospective analysis of a cohort of 200 GIST patients at the Kuwait Cancer Center to provide much-needed insights into the genetic makeup and clinicopathological characteristics of our population. We detailed the mutational spectrum in KIT and PDGFRA, identified a small subgroup of wild-type tumors, and shed some light on the clinical implications. This study opens the doors for potential larger-scale, multi-institutional outcome studies in the Arabian Gulf region. In gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), identifying prototypical mutations in the KIT/PDGFRA oncogenes, or in rare alternate genes, is essential for prognostication and predicting response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Conversely, wild-type GISTs (WT-GIST), which lack known mutations, have limited treatment options. Data on the mutational landscape of GISTs and their impact on disease progression are very limited in Kuwait. Using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel, we investigated the spectrum and frequency of KIT, PDGFRA, and RAS-pathway-related mutations in 95 out of 200 GISTs diagnosed at Kuwait Cancer Center from 2005 to 2023 and assessed their correlation with clinicopathological parameters. Among the 200 tumors (median age 55 years; 15–91), 54% originated in the stomach, 33% in the small bowel, 7% in the colorectum, 1.5% in the peritoneum, and 4.5% had an unknown primary site. Of the 95 molecularly profiled cases, 88% had a mutation: KIT (61%), PDGFRA (25%), NF1 (2%), and one NTRK1 rearrangement. Ten WT-GISTs were identified (stomach = 6, small bowel = 2, and colorectum = 2). WT-GISTs tended to be smaller (median 4.0 cm; 0.5–8.0) (p = 0.018), with mitosis ≤5/5 mm2, and were of lower risk (p = 0.019). KIT mutations were an adverse indicator of disease progression (p = 0.049), while wild-type status did not significantly impact progression (p = 0.934). The genetic landscape in this cohort mirrors that of global studies, but regional collaborations are needed to correlate outcomes with genetic variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The antibody targeting platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA), olaratumab, was approved in 2016 for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in combination with doxorubicin based on promising results of a phase Ib/II trial by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, recently the phase III ANNOUNCE trial could not confirm the additional value of olaratumab in this context.Methods: Here, in a retrospective analysis we share our single-centre experience with olaratumab/doxorubicin in STS by including n = 32 patients treated with olaratumab/doxorubicin between 2016 and 2019.Results: Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall cohort was 3.1 months (range 0.6-16.2). A response [complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) or stable disease (SD)] was seen in n = 11 (34%) cases, whereas n = 21 (66%) patients showed progressive disease (PD). In n = 9 patients surgery was performed subsequently in an individual therapeutic approach. Out of n = 5 patients receiving additional regional hyperthermia, n = 3 achieved PR or SD.Conclusions: This single-centre experience does also not support the promising phase Ib/II results for olaratumab/doxorubicin in STS. However, our findings do not preclude that olaratumab combination therapy could be valuable in a neoadjuvant setting. This warrants further exploration also taking into account the heterogeneous nature of STS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] Indatraline suppressed these morphological changes in proneural glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). [•] Indatraline increased the level of Rho GTPase and calcium level. [•] Indatraline downregulated angiogenesis-related genes and a stem cell marker. [•] Antiangiogenic activities of indatraline in order to reveal its potential for GBM treatment. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) comprises a family of rare, heterogeneous tumors of mesenchymal origin. Single-agent doxorubicin remains the first-line standard-of-care treatment for advanced and inoperable STS, but response rates are only around 15%. In 2016, phase Ib/II clinical trial results reported an overall survival benefit of 11.8 months when combining doxorubicin and the platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA)-directed antibody olaratumab compared to doxorubicin alone, without providing a scientific rationale for such unprecedented therapeutic effect. We decided to evaluate the efficacy of olaratumab in a panel of STS patient-derived xenografts (PDX).Methods: NMRI nu/nu mice were bilaterally transplanted with tumor tissue of patient-derived xenograft models expressing PDGFRA, including models of leiomyosarcoma (UZLX-STS22), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (UZLX-STS39), myxofibrosarcoma (UZLX-STS59) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UZLX-STS84). Mice were randomly divided into four different treatment groups: (1) control, (2) doxorubicin (3 mg/kg once weekly), (3) anti-PDGFRA [olaratumab (60 mg/kg twice weekly) + mouse anti-PDGFRA antibody 1E10 (20 mg/kg twice weekly)] and (4) the combination of doxorubicin and anti-PDGFRA (same dose/schedule as in the single treatment arms). Tumor volume, histopathology and Western blotting were used to assess treatment efficacy.Results: Anti-PDGFRA treatment as a single agent did not reduce tumor growth and did not result in significant anti-proliferative or pro-apoptotic activity. Combining doxorubicin and anti-PDGFRA did not reduce tumor burden, though a mild inhibition of proliferation was observed in UZLX-STS39 and -STS59. A pro-apoptotic effect was observed in all models except UZLX-STS22. Antitumor effects on histology were not significantly different comparing doxorubicin and the combination treatment. Moreover, anti-PDGFRA treatment, both as a single agent as well as combined with doxorubicin, did not result in inhibition of the downstream MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways.Conclusions: We were not able to demonstrate significant antitumor effects of anti-PDGFRA treatment in selected STS PDX models, neither alone nor in combination with doxorubicin. This is in line with the very recent results of the phase III clinical trial NCT02451943 ANNOUNCE, which did not confirm the clinical benefit of olaratumab in combination with doxorubicin over single agent doxorubicin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]