Search

Background: There is wide variation in stress test utilization before major vascular surgery and adherence to practice guidelines is unclear. We defined rates of stress test compliance at our institution and led a quality improvement initiative to improve compliance with American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. Methods: We implemented a stress testing order set in the electronic medical record at one tertiary hospital. We reviewed all patients who underwent elective, major vascular surgery in the 6 months before (Jan 1, 2022 – Jul 1, 2022) and 6 months after (Aug 1, 2022 – Jan 31, 2023) implementation. We studied stress test guideline compliance, changes in medical or surgical management, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Results: Before order set implementation, 37/122 patients (30%) underwent stress testing within the past year (29 specifically ordered preoperatively) with 66% (19/29) guideline compliance. After order set implementation, 50/173 patients (29%) underwent stress testing within the past year (41 specifically ordered preoperatively) with 80% (33/41) guideline compliance. In the pre- and postimplementation cohorts, stress testing led to a cardiovascular medication change or preoperative coronary revascularization in 24% (7/29) and 27% (11/41) of patients, and a staged surgery or less invasive anesthetic strategy in 14% (4/29) and 4.9% (2/41) of patients, respectively. All unindicated stress tests were surgeon-ordered and none led to a change in management. There was no change in MACE after order set implementation. Conclusions: Electronic medical record-based guidance of perioperative stress testing led to a slight decrease in overall stress testing and an increase in guideline-compliant testing. Our study highlights a need for improved preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment prior to major vascular surgery, which may eliminate unnecessary testing and more effectively guide perioperative decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The utilization and cost-effectiveness of stress testing before abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair remains insufficiently studied. We examined the variation and financial implications of stress testing, and their association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Methods: We studied patients who underwent elective endovascular (EVAR) or open AAA repair (OAR) at Vascular Quality Initiative centers from 2015 to 2019. We grouped centers into quintiles of preoperative stress testing frequency. We calculated the risk of postoperative MACE, a composite of in-hospital myocardial infarction, heart failure, or death, for each center-quintile. We obtained charges for stress tests locally and applied these to the cohort to estimate charges per 1000 patients. Results: We studied 32,459 patients (EVAR: 27,978; OAR: 4481; 283 centers). Stress test utilization varied across quintiles from 13.0% to 68.6% (median: 36.8%) before EVAR and 15.9% to 85.0% (median: 59.4%) before OAR. The risk of MACE was 1.4% after EVAR and 10.2% after OAR. There was a trend towards more common MACE after EVAR among centers with higher utilization of stress testing: 0.9% among centers in the lowest quintile, versus 1.7% in the highest quintile (p -trend = 0.068). There was no association between MACE and stress testing frequency for OAR (p -trend = 0.223). The estimated financial charges for stress testing before EVAR ranged from $125,806 per 1000 patients at 1st-quintile centers, to $665,975 at 5th-quintile centers. Charges before OAR ranged from $153,861 at 1st-quintile centers, to $825,473 at 5th-quintile centers. Conclusion: Stress test use before AAA repair is highly variable and associated with substantial cost, with an unclear association with postoperative MACE. This highlights the need for improved stress testing paradigms prior to surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to create and validate an integrated data acquisition system for gauging the force distribution between a laryngoscope and soft-tissue during trans-oral surgery. Methods: Sixteen piezoresistive force sensors were interfaced to a laryngoscope and custom maxillary tooth guard. A protocol for calibrating the laryngoscope and maxilla sensors was developed using a motor-controlled linear stage and force measurements were validated against a digital scale. The system was initially tested during suspension laryngoscopy on three cadaver heads mounted on a cadaver head-holder. Intraoperative data was also collected from three patients undergoing head and neck tumor resection. Results: Mean calibration error of the scope sensors was less than 150 g (n = 3) and mean maxilla sensor error was less than 200 g (n = 3). Peak scope mag-forces of 8.09 ± 6.61 kg and peak maxilla forces of 7.62 ± 4.57 kg were experienced during the cadaver trials. The peak scope sensor mag-force recorded during the intraoperative cases was 24.7 ± 4.53 kg, and the peak maxilla force was 22.0 ± 4.60 kg. Conclusion: The data acquisition system was successfully able to record intraoperative force distribution data. The usefulness of this technology in informing surgeons during trans-oral surgery should be further evaluated in patients with varying anatomic and procedural characteristics. Significance: Creation of a low-cost, integrated force-sensing system allows for the characterization of retraction forces at anatomic sites including the pharynx and larynx, brain, and abdomen. Real-time force detection provides surgeons with valuable intraoperative feedback and can be used to improve deformation models at various anatomic sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]