Search

Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of predictive models for metritis spontaneous cure (SC) and cure among ceftiofur-treated cows using farm-collected data only, and with the addition of hemogram variables and circulating concentration of metabolites, minerals, and biomarkers (BM) of inflammation measured at time of diagnosis. Data related to parity, calving-related issues, BCS, rectal temperature, and DIM at metritis diagnosis were collected from a randomized clinical trial that included 422 metritic cows from 4 herds in Texas, California, and Florida. Metritis was defined as the presence of red-brownish, watery, and fetid vaginal discharge, and cure was defined as the absence of metritis 14 d after initial diagnosis. Cows were randomly allocated to receive systemic ceftiofur therapy (2 subcutaneous doses of 6.6 mg/kg of ceftiofur crystalline-free acid on the day of diagnosis and 3 d later; CEF) or to remain untreated (control). At enrollment (day of metritis diagnosis), blood samples were collected and submitted to complete blood count (CBC) and processed for the measurement of 13 minerals and BM of metabolism and inflammation. Univariable analysis to evaluate the association of farm-collected data and blood-assessed variables with metritis cure were performed, and variables with P ≤ 0.20 were offered to multivariable logistic regression models and retained if P ≤ 0.15. The areas under the curve for models predicting SC using farm data only and farm + BM were 0.70 and 0.76, respectively. Complete blood count variables were not retained in the models for SC. For models predicting cure among CEF cows, the area under the curve was 0.75, 0.77, 0.80, and 0.80 for models using farm data only, farm + CBC, farm + BM, and farm + CBC + BM, respectively. Predictive models of metritis cure had fair accuracy, with SC models being less accurate than models predictive of cure among CEF cows. Additionally, adding BM variables marginally improved the accuracy of models using farm collected data, and CBC data did not improve the accuracy of predictive models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The list of standard abbreviations for JDS is available at adsa.org/jds-abbreviations-24. Nonstandard abbreviations are available in the Notes. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of ceftiofur on metritis cure, milk yield, reproductive performance, and culling up to 300 DIM. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of metritis cure at 5 (early cure [ECURE]) and 14 (late cure [LCURE]) days after diagnosis on milk production, reproduction, and culling. A total of 422 Holstein cows diagnosed with metritis from 4 herds located in Texas, California, and Florida were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Cows diagnosed with metritis (fetid, watery, reddish or brownish uterine discharge) were blocked by herd and parity and were randomly allocated to receive systemic administration of ceftiofur (CEF) or to remain untreated (CON). In addition, 399 nonmetritic cows (NMET) were included for comparison purposes. Metritis cure was evaluated at 5 and 14 d after diagnosis and was defined as the absence of metritis clinical signs. Logistic regression models were fitted to the data to assess the effect of treatment on metritis cure. Milk yield was analyzed using a mixed linear model, while logistic regression, Cox proportional hazard, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis models were fitted to culling and reproduction data. Cows treated with CEF had 1.86 (95% CI: 1.22–2.81) and 1.68 (95% CI: 1.02–2.75) greater odds of being cured than CON cows at 5 and 14 d after diagnosis, respectively. No effect of CEF was observed for milk yield; however, NMET cows had greater milk yield compared with metritic cows (CEF = 36.0, 95% CI = 33.8–38.1; CON = 36.1, 95% CI = 33.9–38.2; NMET = 36.9 kg/d, 95% CI = 34.8–39.4). Likewise, no effect of CEF was observed on reproductive performance and culling. Nonetheless, the likelihood of conceiving for NMET cows was 1.72 (95% CI = 1.41–2.12) and 1.64 (95% CI = 1.33–2.00) times greater than for CEF and CON cows, respectively. Ceftiofur-treated and CON cows had 2.93 (95% CI = 1.90–4.51) and 2.37 (95% CI = 1.51–3.71) greater hazard of culling compared with NMET, respectively. Regardless of treatment, no differences between ECURE and LCURE were observed on milk yield, reproduction, and culling throughout the entire lactation, but cows that cured at 5 or 14 d after diagnosis had greater milk production in the first 60 DIM compared with cows that did not cure (NCURE). Cows in ECURE and LCURE also had a 1.59 (95% CI = 1.16–2.16) and 1.49 (95% CI = 1.08–2.05) greater hazard of pregnancy and 0.43 (95% CI = 0.26–0.71) and 0.56 (95% CI = 0.34–0.92) hazard of culling compared with NCURE. Ceftiofur therapy increased metritis cure, but benefits to productivity and longevity were not observed. Also, cows that fail to cure have impaired lactation performance, but no differences regarding timing of cure were observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

GARCÍA PRIM J.M., GONZÁLEZ BARCALA F.J., PAZ ESQUEJE J., POSE REINO A., FONDEVILA LÓPEZ A. & VALDÉS CUADRADO L. (2010) European Journal of Cancer Care 19, 227–233 Lung cancer in a health area of Spain: incidence, characteristics and survival To examine the incidence, characteristics, therapeutic approach and survival of diagnosed lung cancer (LC) in the Santiago de Compostela Health Area. A retrospective study was carried out on LC for a period of 3 years. Of the 481 cases collected, 92.7% were male. The median age was 66.93 years. The crude incidence for men and women was 80.71 and 5.84 per 100 000 inhabitants respectively. Among the non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), 68.1% were diagnosed in stage IIIB or IV. The cancer had already spread in 62.2% of the small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Chemotherapy was used in 51.6% of patients. The survival probability from the first to the fifth year was 47.7%, 24.3%, 12.9%, 10% and 8.9% respectively. The median survival at 5 years was 12.12 months for NSCLC, rising to 29.8 months in stage I, and 8.85 months in SCLC. In our Health Area LC occurs more often in men, in whom the prevalence of smoking is very high. The most common histology type was squamous cell carcinoma. In the majority of cases, the diagnosis is made in the advanced stages, which accounts for the low percentage of surgical treatments and the short survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Reward system dysfunction is evident across neuropsychiatric conditions. Here we present data from a double-blinded pharmaco-fMRI study investigating the triggering of anhedonia and reward circuit activity in women.Methods: The hormonal states of pregnancy and parturition were simulated in euthymic women with a history of postpartum depression (PPD+; n = 15) and those without such a history (PPD-; n = 15) by inducing hypogonadism, adding back estradiol and progesterone for 8 weeks ("addback"), and then withdrawing both steroids ("withdrawal"). Anhedonia was assessed using the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS) during each hormone phase. Those who reported a 30 % or greater increase in IDAS anhedonia, dysphoria, or ill temper during addback or withdrawal, compared with pre-treatment, were identified as hormone sensitive (HS+) and all others were identified as non-hormone sensitive (HS-). The monetary incentive delay (MID) task was administered during fMRI sessions at pre-treatment and during hormone withdrawal to assess brain activation during reward anticipation and feedback.Results: On average, anhedonia increased during addback and withdrawal in PPD+ but not PPD-. During reward feedback, both HS+ (n = 10) and HS- (n = 18) showed decreased activation in clusters in the right putamen (p < .031, FWE-corrected) and left postcentral and supramarginal gyri (p < .014, FWE-corrected) at the withdrawal scans, relative to pre-treatment scans.Limitations: A modest sample size, stringent exclusion criteria, and relative lack of diversity in study participants limit the generalizability of results.Conclusion: Although results do not explain differential hormone sensitivity in depression, they demonstrate significant effects of reproductive hormones on reward-related brain function in women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]