1. The Seated Trunk Control Test: Investigation of Reliability and Known-Groups Validity Using Individuals Post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
- Author
-
Pollen, Travis R., Roe, Chelsey, Johnson, Darren L., Silfies, Sheri P., and Noehren, Brian
- Subjects
- *
TORSO physiology , *EXERCISE tests , *STATISTICS , *STATISTICAL reliability , *CONFIDENCE intervals , *CROSS-sectional method , *POSTURAL balance , *POSTOPERATIVE care , *LABORATORIES , *SITTING position , *T-test (Statistics) , *INTER-observer reliability , *POSTURE , *ANTERIOR cruciate ligament injuries , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *ANTERIOR cruciate ligament surgery , *SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics) , *DATA analysis , *RECEIVER operating characteristic curves , *REHABILITATION ,RESEARCH evaluation - Abstract
Context: Decreased trunk neuromuscular control is a risk factor for both upper- and lower-extremity injuries, yet there are few reliable and valid clinical tests to identify deficits. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and known-groups validity of a novel clinical test, the seated trunk control test (STCT). Design: Cross-sectional reliability and known-groups validity study. Setting: Laboratory. Participants: 89 unique participants: 34 were 3 months postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and 55 healthy controls. Methods: For the STCT, participants sat on a balance board with their eyes closed for three 30-second trials while investigators counted balance errors. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used to assess interrater reliability (N = 20) and test–retest reliability (N = 40). To assess known-groups validity, independent t tests were used to compare STCT errors at 3 months post-ACLR with healthy matched controls (N = 34/group). Area under a receiver operating characteristic curve identified an optimal cutoff for distinguishing between groups. Results: The STCT had perfect interrater reliability (ICC2,3 = 1.00) and good test–retest reliability (ICC3,3 =.79; 95% confidence interval =.61–.89). The ACLR group made significantly more errors on the STCT (mean [SD] = 15.5 [5.4]) than controls (mean [SD] = 8.2 [4.1]; P <.001, Cohen d = 1.52). The STCT's ability to distinguish between groups was excellent (area under a ROC curve = 0.86). A cutoff of 12 errors maximized sensitivity (76%) and specificity (85%). Conclusions: The STCT is reliable between raters and across days. It also has excellent ability to distinguish between individuals with a recent ACLR and healthy matched controls, which provides initial evidence to suggest that the STCT may be clinically useful for identifying deficits in trunk neuromuscular control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF