Search

Objectives: Elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) is reported to differ from young-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA) with regard to patient background and drug treatment. We examined the amount of drug administered to patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA) for rheumatoid arthritis at our hospital. Methods: Demographics, clinical history, and treatments were compared between patients with EORA (n=70) and YORA (n=190). Results: There was a significant difference in the average age (73.8 vs. 57.8 years), disease duration (6.66 vs. 14.7 years), and sex (62.9% males vs. 83.7% females), but no difference in rheumatoid factor positivity (85.3% vs. 80.7%), anti-citrullinated peptide antibody positivity (86.5% vs. 87.7%), simplified disease activity index (4.28 vs. 4.59), or disease activity score 28-CRP (1.99 vs. 2.04) in the EORA and YORA groups, respectively. There were also no significant differences in prednisolone use (37.1% vs. 36.3%), amount of methotrexate administered (MTX) (1.45 vs. 1.41 mg), and MTX use (55.7% vs. 65.3%). However, the MTX dose (2.89 vs. 4.09 mg/week, p=.011) and overall biologics use (32.9% vs. 56.3%, p=.0012) were significantly lower in patients with EORA than in those with YORA. Conclusion: Patients with EORA may be able to achieve LDA with lower drug dosage than those with YORA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To verify predictive validity of simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission for subsequent functional and structural outcomes in real-world clinical settings under a treat-to-target strategy (T2T). Methods: In this multicenter, prospective cohort study, T2T was implemented in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with moderate-to-high disease activity. SDAI or clinical disease activity index (CDAI) was assessed every 12 weeks, and treatment was adjusted to achieve clinical remission or low disease activity (LDA). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the associations of SDAI remission (-3.3) at week 24 with the health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI)-0.5 or with the delta van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (DvdH-mTSS)

Background: Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and simplified disease activity index (SDAI) are useful tools for the evaluation of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but have not been comparatively validated in Moroccan population. Therefore, this study was designed to assess validity and reliability of CDAI and SDAI in comparison to disease activity score-28 joints (DAS-28) in Moroccan patients with RA.Methods: Patients with RA were included in a cross-sectional study. Patient characteristics and RA were collected. The disease activity was assessed by DAS-28, CDAI and SDAI. Patients were splitted into groups of remission, low, moderate and high activity on the basis of predefined cut-offs for DAS-28, CDAI, and SDAI. A Spearman correlation between composite indexes and inter-group comparison of the indexes were performed. Using DAS-28 as a gold standard, the Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the performance of a screening test at different levels.Results: The study was conducted with 103 patients of female predominance (87.4%). Mean age was 49.7 ± 11.4 years. Median disease duration was in the order of 8 years [3-14]. There was an excellent correlation between DAS-28 and CDAI (r = 0.95, p <0.001), CDAI and SDAI (r = 0.90, p <0.001), and DAS-28 and SDAI (r = 0.92, p <0.001). There was a good inter-rater alignment between the DAS-28 and CDAI (Weighted kappa =0.743) and there was a moderate inter-rater alignment between the DAS-28 and SDAI (Weighted kappa =0.60), and also between the SDAI and CDAI (Weighted kappa = 0.589). There was no statistically significant difference between AUROC of CDAI and SDAI as both were performed equally well.Discussion: This study is the first Moroccan case study to compare the performance of both CDAI and SDAI in evaluation of disease activity in patients with RA. Our study showed that there was a direct and excellent correlation between DAS-28 and CDAI, and SDAI and DAS-28.Conclusion: Our study shows a strong positive correlation between DAS-28, CDAI and SDAI. The cut-off values for CDAI and SDAI used in western literature can be used with minor modifications in Moroccan scenario. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Patients with RA have systemic inflammation and increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, including thrombosis. Levels of fibrinogen, a pro-thrombotic protein with predictive value for CV disease (CVD), are elevated during systemic inflammation. We compared circulating fibrinogen levels in patients with RA with healthy controls and evaluated the relationship with measures of disease activity.Methods. Patients with RA and controls were recruited at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). Disease activity was evaluated using standard composite indices. Fibrinogen, ESR, serum CRP, acute-phase serum amyloid A and levels of selected cytokines were quantified.Results. A total of 105 RA patients and 62 controls were studied. Among patients with RA, disease activity ranged from quiescent to highly active disease. Circulating fibrinogen levels were significantly higher in RA than in controls [median (interquartile range) 466 (391–575) vs 367 (309–419) mg/dl, respectively, P < 0.0001]. This difference remained highly statistically significant after adjustment for demographic variables and BMI. Although fibrinogen correlated significantly with clinical measures of disease activity, significantly elevated levels were observed at low levels of activity, even in RA patients with no detectable swollen or tender joints. In multivariable models, ∼80% of the increased fibrinogen in RA was accounted for by increases in CRP and ESR.Conclusion. Circulating levels of fibrinogen are elevated in RA and correlated with markers of inflammation, but only modestly correlate with clinical assessments of disease activity. Even RA patients with excellent clinical disease control exhibit elevated levels compared with controls. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

tocilizumab (TCZ) greatly inhibits inflammatory markers, methods of evaluating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity that include inflammatory markers may overestimate the effect of TCZ treatment. We have evaluated the impact of inflammatory markers on the efficacy of TCZ by comparing the efficacy indicated by the 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) with that indicated by the clinical and simplified disease activity indexes (CDAI and SDAI, respectively) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set criteria in a double-blind study of TCZ-the SATORI study. The Spearman correlation coefficient between DAS28-ESR and CDAI was comparable between that at week 24 and that at baseline [correlation coefficient at baseline and week 24 was 0.823 ( p < 0.0001) and 0.818 ( p < 0.0001), respectively]. A large difference between the DAS28 remission rate and CDAI remission rate was observed at week 24. However, these results are comparable to those of a previous study conducted with non-TCZ-treated patients. Moreover, the same results were obtained in the comparison between the DAS28-ESR and SDAI, even though the SDAI includes an inflammatory parameter as a component. These results confirm that the DAS28-ESR has a validity comparable to that of other methods in terms of evaluating the RA treatment efficacy of TCZ, despite its strong inflammatory marker-inhibiting effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To obtain the simplest definition of minimal disease activity (MDA) and to compare it with published proposed definitions of MDA in patients with RA.Methods. Two hundred and fourteen patients with long-standing RA (LSRA) were evaluated for clinical and laboratory parameters. Factor analysis was performed to remove redundant variables included in the core set measure for MDA definition stated by the OMERACT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis allowed to obtain optimal cut-off predictors of a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) ⩽2.85. These were tested in 112 LSRA and 95 early-onset RA (ERA) patients.Results. Factor and ROC curve analysis showed that the best predictors of a DAS28 ⩽ 2.85 in LSRA cohort were: (i) ESR <20 mm/h (sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 54%); (ii) swollen joint count (out of 28) ⩽2 (sensitivity: 95%, specificity: 74%); (iii) patient global assessment (0–100) ⩽15 (sensitivity: 78%, specificity: 78%); and (iv) HAQ (0–3) ⩽0.5 (sensitivity: 91%, specificity: 61%). To each of these four criteria we assigned a value of 1 when it was satisfied (score ranging: 0–4). The cut-off with the highest overall accuracy for identifying RA patients with DAS28 ⩽ 2.85 was a score &geqslant;3. We adopted these four parameters in order to define the residual MDA (RMDA). Comparing RMDA criteria, in distinct 112 LSRA and 95 ERA patients, with OMERACT, Simplified Disease Activity Index and Clinical Disease Activity Index definitions of MDA, we found a good agreement in the LSRA cohort and moderate agreement in the ERA cohort.Conclusions. HAQ, PaGA, SJC28 and ESR allow identification of RA patients with an RMDA. The RMDA criteria behaves similarly to OMERACT definitions, but appears more simple and feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]