Lu, Xiaoqiang, Liu, Yan, Liu, Li, Zhang, Zhao, Hu, Feilong, Liu, Xueyan, and Sun, Xinchao
• TF , SF and Ei had no significant differences between UP and LP. • TF NO 3 −-N and SO 4 2−-S fluxes were slightly/significantly lower in UP compared to LP. • SF NO 3 −-N and SO 4 2−-S fluxes were quite similar between the two slope plots. • NTF NO 3 −-N and SO 4 2−-S fluxes were negative at both UP and LP. • Canopy exchange may be dominant factor on these hydrochemical fluxes in watershed. Forest canopies create a high spatial variability of both canopy interception (Ei) and acid deposition. However, spatial characteristics of these hydrochemical fluxes along a slope gradient in forest watersheds remain unclear. Here we monitored bulk precipitation (BP), throughfall (TF), stemflow (SF), and associated nitrate (NO 3 −) and sulfate (SO 4 2−) in an upper slope plot (UP) and a lower slope plot (LP) in a subtropical broadleaved forest, Southeast China. Results showed that annual rates of TF , SF and Ei to BP in UP were 85.2%, 2.6%, and 12.2%, respectively. Corresponding values in LP were 88.6%, 2.2%, and 9.2%. There were no significant differences among these rainfall partitioning components between UP and LP. Additionally, annual volume weighted mean concentrations of NO 3 −-N in TF and SF were significantly lower than in BP , whereas no significant differences were found for SO 4 2−-S among BP , TF and SF. Unlike annual TF NO 3 −-N fluxes were similar in UP and LP, annual TF SO 4 2−-S fluxes significantly increased along the UP to LP. Net TF + SF (NTF) fluxes were negative for NO 3 −-N and SO 4 2−-S at the two slope plots, illustrating retained/uptake in the canopy. Dormant season NTF S fluxes were close to zero, indicating that dry deposition does not appear to play a major role, whereas exchange with foliage surfaces should be the dominant factor controlling the spatial patterns of TF N and S fluxes in the watershed. This study can contribute to the evaluation of watershed-scale water and acidifying input into the soil during canopy passage, and further consequent effects on forest ecosystems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]