Search

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision is a standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Mismatch repair-deficient locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) was highly sensitive to PD-1 blockade. However, most rectal cancers are microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) subtypes for which PD-1 blockade is ineffective. Radiation can trigger the activation of CD8 + T cells, further enhancing the responses of MSS/pMMR rectal cancer to PD-1 blockade. Radioimmunotherapy offers a promising therapeutic modality for rectal cancer. Progenitor T exhausted cells are abundant in tumour-draining lymph nodes and play an important role in immunotherapy. Conventional irradiation fields include the mesorectum and regional lymph nodes, which might cause considerable damage to T lymphocytes and radiation-induced fibrosis, ultimately leading to a poor response to immunotherapy and rectal fibrosis. This study investigated whether node-sparing modified short-course irradiation combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade could be effective in patients with MSS/ pMMR LARC. Methods: This was a open-label, single-arm, multicentre, prospective phase II trial. 32 LARC patients with MSS/pMMR will receive node-sparing modified short-course radiotherapy (the irradiated planned target volume only included the primary tumour bed but not the tumour-draining lymph nodes, 25 Gy/5f, 5 Gy/f) followed by CAPOX and tislelizumab. CAPOX and tislelizumab will be started two days after the completion of radiotherapy: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 intravenous infusion, day 1; capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 oral administration, days 1–14; and tislelizumab 200 mg, intravenous infusion, day 1. There will be four 21-day cycles. TME will be performed at weeks 14–15. We will collect blood, tumour, and lymphoid specimens; perform flow cytometry and in situ multiplexed immunofluorescence detection; and analyse the changes in various lymphocyte subsets. The primary endpoint is the rate of pathological complete response. The organ preservation rate, tumour regression grade, local recurrence rate, disease-free survival, overall survival, adverse effects, and quality of life will also be analysed. Discussion: In our research, node-sparing modified radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy probably increased the responsiveness of immunotherapy for MSS/pMMR rectal cancer patients, reduced the occurrence of postoperative rectal fibrosis, and improved survival and quality of life. This is the first clinical trial to utilize a node-sparing radiation strategy combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, which may result in a breakthrough in the treatment of MSS/pMMR rectal cancer. Trial registration: This study was registered at . Trial registration number: NCT05972655. Date of registration: 31 July 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Programmed death receptor‐1 monoclonal antibodies (PD‐1 mAbs) have been applied in the treatment of different kinds of malignant tumors. However, a streamlined and expedited evaluation method for certain tumor types without approved indications is currently lacking in terms of their expandable applications. In this study, a novel evaluation method for the expandability of PD‐1 mAb was established for the first time. Clinical trial data of PD‐1 mAb in first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer were collected for comparison. For the first time, the clinical trial outcomes were analyzed through the entropy weight method and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to evaluate the effectiveness and safety. The accessibility was assessed using the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) standard survey method. Combining the results of effectiveness, safety, and accessibility, the recommendation for expandability of PD‐1 mAb was provided. Tislelizumab ranks seventh in effectiveness, higher than the chemotherapy group and the pembrolizumab group, and ranks fourth in safety evaluation and first in the combination chemotherapy groups. The annual drug cost of tislelizumab is 0.497 times the annual household income for urban residents of Shaanxi Province. 56.67% of medical institutions are equipped with tislelizumab in Shaanxi Province. These results indicate the promising efficacy and safety profile of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy as a first‐line treatment option for advanced gastric cancer. Notably, tislelizumab emerges as a more accessible alternative to sintilimab and boasts greater affordability compared to nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Consequently, tislelizumab should be considered a viable option for expandable application in first‐line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, contingent upon clinical necessity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The RATIONALE-306 study revealed that patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) could benefit from treatment with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for treating OSCC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Partitioned survival model estimated the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone for treating OSCC using RATIONALE-306 data. Costs and utilities were obtained from local databases and published studies. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), incremental net health benefits (INHB), and incremental net monetary benefits (INMB) were outcomes. Price simulation were conducted at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to assess model robustness. Compared with chemotherapy alone, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy yielded an ICER of USD 27,896/QALY, gained an additional 0.414 QALYs and 0.751 life-years, and increased the cost by USD 11,560. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective at the WTP of USD 38,258/QALY with probability of 94.43%. When the price in China was less than USD 3.714 per mg, the price simulation results indicated that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of USD 38,258. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy yielded an INHB of 0.112 QALYs and an INMB of USD 4,279 compared with chemotherapy alone at a WTP threshold of USD 38,258. Based on the sensitivity analyses, the above results were stable. A general trend was observed for subgroups with better survival benefits related to a higher probability of cost-effectiveness. From the Chinese healthcare perspective, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is more cost-effective than chemotherapy alone as a first-line therapy for OSCC. These findings can help clinicians make optimal clinical decisions and assist decision-makers in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is an extremely rare but aggressive hematopoietic malignancy, and the prognosis has been reported to be rather unfavorable with a median overall survival of merely 6 months. We presented a 58-year-old female patient complaining of abdominal pain and fever, who was admitted to our institution in September 2021. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) scan showed enlargement of generalized multiple lymph nodes. Subsequently, laparoscopic retroperitoneal lesion biopsy and bone marrow aspiration were performed. The pathological findings indicated the diagnosis of HS concurrent with follicular lymphoma. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of the tumor lesion revealed a high expression of CD38 and PD-L1 proteins. Furthermore, KRAS gene mutation was identified by means of next-generation sequencing. The patient exhibited poor treatment response to both first- and second-line cytotoxic chemotherapies. Therefore, she underwent six cycles of Daratumumab (anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody), Pazopanib (multi-target receptor tyrosine kinases inhibitor) combined with third-line chemotherapy, followed by involved-site radiotherapy and maintenance therapy with the PD-1 inhibitor Tislelizumab. Long-term partial remission was finally achieved after multi-modality treatment. Duration of remission and overall survival reached 22 and 32 months, respectively. Our case indicated that immuno-targeted treatment coupled with chemotherapy and radiotherapy might constitute a potential therapeutic option for HS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: How to comprehensively evaluate the rationality of drug use is a challenging issue. OBJECTIVE: To establish the evaluation index of the effective use of tislelizumab, so as to ensure its higher rationality and normalization in clinical application. METHODS: Based on the indications, drug instructions, and relevant guidelines of the National Basic Medical Insurance Restriction Catalogue, a retrospective analysis and evaluation of 286 cases of using tislelizumab injection in our hospital from January to December 2022 were conducted using the weighted technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. RESULTS: Among the 286 medical records evaluated, the main irrational manifestations were inappropriate indications (90 cases, 31.47%), auxiliary examination and laboratory examination did not meet the minimum requirements of combination chemotherapy drugs (40 cases, 13.99%), the drug course was not standard (39 cases, 13.64%). Among the included cases, 57.34% were reasonable cases ( C i ⩾ 0.8), 10.84% were basic reasonable cases (0.6 ⩽ C i < 0.8), and 31.82% were unreasonable cases ( C i < 0.6). CONCLUSION: The TOPSIS method, with its attribute hierarchical model (AHM)-weighted approach, can be employed as the rational assessment technique for the injection of tislelizumab. The clinical application of tislelizumab in our hospital is still insufficient, which needs to be further improved management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The standard care for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves perioperative therapy combining chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, typically lasting 6 to 12 months. However, the optimal treatment strategies for potentially resectable squamous cell lung carcinoma (SCC) remain unclear. This Phase 2 trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen with tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable stage III SCC. Methods: Patients with potentially resectable stage IIIA-IIIB (N2) SCC received intravenous tislelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and carboplatin for up to four cycles. The primary endpoints were major pathologic response (MPR) and incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Safety and potential biomarkers for efficacy prediction were also assessed. Results: Among 35 enrolled patients, 32 underwent surgery with R0 resection achieved in all cases. MPR was achieved in 24 patients and pathological complete response (pCR) in 14 patients. Radiographic objective response was observed in 31 patients. The 12-month and 24-month event-free survival rate was 85.7 and 61.0%, respectively. Four patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Tumor tissue based next-generation sequencing revealed the potential associations between several biomarkers and pathological response, including tumor neoantigen burden score, 18-gene expression profile score, CD8 + T cells, M1/M2 macrophages ratio and interferon‐gamma expression level. Besides, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and concentration were also associated with pathological response and the presence of ctDNA at postoperative month 1 was a strong predictor for disease relapse. Furthermore, metagenomic sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid demonstrated Streptococcus was the most abundant genus in the pCR group. Conclusions: A condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable toxicities in potentially resectable stage III SCC. Specific biomarkers showed potential for predicting treatment efficacy and the mechanism of superior antitumor response of pCR patients was preliminarily and indirectly explored. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05024266. Registered August 27, 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in prolonging overall survival (OS) as the second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and were recommended by the guidelines. However, it remains uncertain which ICI is the most cost-effective. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of ICIs as the second-line treatment for ESCC based on the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to obtain the Hazard ratios (HRs) for indirect comparisons. A three-state Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness. The state transition probabilities were calculated with Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves data from clinical trial and HRs from the NMA. Utilities and costs were derived from local charges or previously published studies. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to examine model robustness. The results were assessed based on the total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Results: Five clinical trials (ATTRACTION-3, ESCORT, KEYNOTE-181, ORIENT-2, RATIONALE-302) with a total of 1797 patients were included in the NMA. The NMA showed that both camrelizumab and tislelizumab received relatively high rankings for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Compared with sintilimab, treatment with tislelizumab and camrelizumab gained 0.018 and 0.034 additional QALYs, resulting in incremental ICERs of $75,472.65/QALY and $175,681.9/QALY, respectively. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab produced lower QALYs and greater costs, suggesting that both were dominated in comparison to sintilimab. HRs and health state utilities were the most influential parameters in most univariate sensitivity analyses of paired comparisons. PSA results suggested that sintilimab had an 84.4% chance of being the most cost-effective treatment regimen at the WTP threshold of $38,223.34/QALY. In the scenario analysis, sintilimab would no longer be cost-effective, if the price of camrelizumab was assumed to decrease by 64.6% or the price of tislelizumab was assumed to decrease by 16.9%. Conclusions and relevance: Among the five potential competing ICIs, sintilimab was likely to be the most cost-effective regimen as the second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic ESCC in China. Key points: Question: Which immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is the most cost-effective for the second-line treatment of the patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)? Findings: At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,223.34/QALY, sintilimab was cost-effective in 84.4% of the simulations, the highest of the ICIs. Meaning: Sintilimab was the most cost-effective option compared to other ICIs as the second-line therapy for ESCC in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Esophageal carcinoma is a type of cancer that occurs in the esophagus. For patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who have either experienced disease progression following first-line standard chemotherapy or are intolerant to it, the prognosis is typically poor. Additionally, these patients often bear a substantial economic burden during the course of their treatment. Tislelizumab is a selective PD-1 inhibitor with efficacy proven in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab versus camrelizumab as the second-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients in China. Methods: From the perspective of China's healthcare system, the partitioned survival model with three health states was established in a 3-week cycle and a lifetime horizon. Anchored matching adjusted indirect comparison was used for survival analyses based on individual patient data from RATIONALE 302 trial and the published ESCORT study due to the lack of head-to-head clinical trials. Only direct medical costs were included. Costs and utility values were derived from local charges, the published literature, and related databases. Sensitivity analyses and a scenario analysis were also performed to verify the robustness of the model results. Results: Compared with camrelizumab monotherapy, tislelizumab monotherapy incurred a lower lifetime cost ($8,346 vs. $8,851) and yielded higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (0.87 vs. 0.63), which resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -$2,051/QALY. Tislelizumab monotherapy is a dominant option over camrelizumab monotherapy in China. The three primary parameters upon which this result was most sensitive were the unit cost of camrelizumab, the unit cost of tislelizumab, and the duration of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP). According to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), tislelizumab monotherapy was 100% cost-effective when the WTP was 1–3 times GDP per capita in China($11,207/QALY∼$33,621/QALY). Scenario analysis showed that the result was consistent. Conclusion: Tislelizumab monotherapy is a dominant option compared with camrelizumab monotherapy as the second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic ESCC in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the era of combination therapy, there has been limited research on body composition. Specific body composition, such as sarcopenia, possesses the potential to serve as a predictive biomarker for toxic effects and clinical response in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) undergoing tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (T + GC). Materials and Methods: A total of 112 UC patients who received T + GC were selected at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from April 2020 to January 2023. Baseline patient characteristics and detailed hematological parameters were collected using the electronic medical system and laboratory examinations. The computed tomography images of patients were analyzed to calculate psoas muscle mass index (PMI). We evaluated the association between sarcopenia (PMI < 4.5 cm2/m2 in men; PMI < 3.3 cm2/m2 in women) and both hematological toxicity and tumor response. Results: Overall, of the 112 patients (65.2% male, median age 56 years), 43 (38.4%) were defined as sarcopenia. Patients with sarcopenia were notably older (p = 0.037), more likely to have hypertension (p = 0.009), and had poorer ECOG-PS (p = 0.027). Patients with sarcopenia were more likely to develop leukopenia (OR 2.969, 95% CI 1.028–8.575, p = 0.044) after receiving at least two cycles of T + GC. However, these significant differences were not observed in thrombocytopenia and anemia. There were no significant differences in the tumor response and grade 3–4 hematological toxicity between patients with sarcopenia and those without sarcopenia. Conclusions: Patients with sarcopenia were more likely to develop leukopenia after receiving T + GC. There were no notable alterations observed in relation to anemia or thrombocytopenia. No significant difference was found between the sarcopenia group and non-sarcopenia group in terms of tumor response and grade 3–4 hematological toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

von Hippel‐Lindau (VHL) disease is a rare autosomal dominant multiorgan disease characterized by several benign and malignant tumors rich in vascular, as well as cysts in other organs. A great clinical treatment strategy is significantly warranted for good prognosis of patients with VHL disease. Herein, we reported a case of a 45‐year‐old woman diagnosed with VHL disease with spinal hemangioblastoma (HB) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Four years after the resection of the right kidney, a recurrent RCC in the right kidney and a malignant lesion in the left kidney were observed. This patient was started on sorafenib (800 mg, daily) and tislelizumab (200 mg per 3 weeks). After 6 months of treatment, the size of renal cell carcinoma was dramatically reduced and renal function improved. More importantly, she achieved partial response during the whole treatment. Microscopically, intramedullary masses resection was done and the HB in T4‐5 thoracic spinal was removed. Neurologic symptoms such as numbness and pain were remarkably alleviated. Additionally, tislelizumab‐induced elevation in liver transaminase levels and hypothyroidism were revered by hepatoprotector and levothyroxine, respectively. In short, comprehensive treatment strategies may benefit patients with VHL disease, especially with HB and ccRCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The anti-PD-1 antibodies have been reported to show a striking effect in relapsed and refractory(R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), however, there is still limited real-world data assessing the role of anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy in early-stage cHL. In this retrospective analysis, we reported the effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab monotherapy in the first-line therapy of early-stage cHL. Twenty-three consecutive patients (10 males and 13 females) with previously untreated stage I A-II B cHL were included. At interim evaluation after 2 doses of tislelizumab monotherapy, 11 of 23 patients (47.8%) achieved complete response (CR). At the end of tislelizumab monotherapy (EOTM), objective response was observed in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%), with CR in 16 patients (69.6%). Among six patients with PR-EOTM, two patients underwent 4 cycles of ABVD chemotherapy and one patient underwent 4 cycles of tislelizumab plus AVD. One patient who developed progressive disease (PD) after 4 doses of tislelizumab subsequently underwent 4 cycles of ABVD chemotherapy. Except for four patients with CR-EOTM, consolidative radiotherapy was given to 19 patients. All patients obtained CR at the end of all treatments. With a median follow-up time of 21.3 months (range, 6.9–32.7 months), the estimated 2-year PFS rate and 2-year OS rate were 95.65% and 100%, respectively. Except for grade 3 lymphocyte count decreased, no other grade 3/4 TRAE was observed. In addition, no serious AE was reported. Our preliminary data observed that tislelizumab monotherapy was safe and highly effective in previously untreated early-stage cHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The promising therapeutic outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have been confirmed by several phase II clinical trials and have been widely demonstrated in clinical work. Theoretically, postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy may further improve the therapeutic effect, but there is still lack of evidence. The aim of this study was to analyse the safety and efficacy of perioperative immunotherapy (tislelizumab) in locally advanced resectable thoracic ESCC (PILOT trial). Methods: Seventy-three eligible patients with pathologically confirmed thoracic ESCC of clinical T1b-3N1-3M0 or T3N0M0 stage were allocated to receive neoadjuvant immunotherapy (tislelizumab 200 mg d1, q3w × 2 cycles) plus chemotherapy (nad-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 d1 + carboplatin AUC = 5 d1, q3w × 2 cycles) treatment. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after esophagectomy received adjuvant tislelizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks for up to one year), and patients with non-pCR were assigned adjuvant tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for two cycles and then maintenance tislelizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 15 cycles). The primary endpoint of this study is 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) in non-pCR patients. The secondary endpoints include pCR rate, major pathological response rate, 2-year DFS in pCR patients, R0 resection rate, adverse events, and overall survival. Discussion: This protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Chest Hospital (IS23059). This is the first prospective clinical trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of perioperative immunotherapy for locally advanced resectable thoracic ESCC. We hypothesize that perioperative immunotherapy could be a promising therapeutic strategy that can provide better 2-year DFS in non-pCR patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT0605633. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Whether the addition of tislelizumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy increases the incidence of myelosuppression has not been well established. This study identified the risk factors for the development of myelosuppression in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) after receiving GC chemotherapy with or without tislelizumab. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 192 UC patients who received GC with or without tislelizumab at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between July 2014 and November 2022. Patient baseline characteristics were included in the statistical analyses after adjusting for previously reported risk factors affecting survival using propensity score matching (1:1). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with posttreatment myelosuppression. Results: A total of 192 patients were enrolled, of whom 96 were treated with tislelizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (T + GC) and 96 with GC alone. The incidence of leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia of any grade was 50.0%, 70.8%, and 42.7%, respectively, in the T + GC group and 41.7%, 72.9%, and 20.8%, respectively, in the GC group. In multivariate analysis, patients aged over 70 years (OR = 2.486, 95% CI: 1.067–5.792, p = 0.035) and those who received T + GC (OR = 3.119, 95% CI: 1.576–6.173, p = 0.001) were more likely to develop thrombocytopenia. Patients aged over 70 years (OR = 3.213, 95% CI: 1.254–8.237, p = 0.015) were more likely to develop anemia, and patients with renal insufficiency (OR = 2.105, 95% CI: 1.035–4.280, p = 0.040) were more likely to develop leukopenia. Eventually, 99 (51.6%) patients with UC successfully completed all the treatment cycles. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the addition of tislelizumab to GC chemotherapy led to a considerable increase in the occurrence of thrombocytopenia, whereas no significant changes were observed regarding anemia or leukopenia. It is crucial to fully inform patients at increased risk for myelosuppression of potential risks and closely monitor changes in their blood routines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at high risk of recurrence after hepatic resection or local ablation often undergo adjuvant immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors for 1 year in randomized controlled trials, but the appropriateness of this duration is controversial, especially given the risk of adverse events. Here we report the case of a 52-year-old Chinese man with initially unresectable multinodular recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent two cycles of transarterial chemoembolization, followed by hepatic resection and 24 months of adjuvant therapy with the PD-1 inhibitor tislelizumab. The patient achieved a recurrence-free survival time of 24 months, but he experienced elevated alpha fetoprotein, Grade 2 hypothyroidism and pruritus while on adjuvant therapy. This case highlights the need to optimize the duration of adjuvant immunotherapy after curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in order to minimize risk of not only recurrence but also adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study was aimed to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) combined with donafenib plus tislelizumab as the first‐line treatment for patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC). Methods: This is a prospective single‐center exploratory study. Eligible patients (Stage III/IV BTC, at least one measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1, etc.) received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV Q3W, oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 IV Q3W, donafenib 200 mg PO BID, and tislelizumab 200 mg IV Q3W until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was safety and secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), conversion rate, and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 13 patients were enrolled. The median follow‐up time was 420 days (range 345–487). The median duration of treatment was four cycles (range 1–15). The incidence of ≥Grade 3 treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) was 53.8% and no Grade 5 TRAE. The most frequent Grade 3–4 TRAEs were rash (4/13, 30.8%), platelet count decreased (2/13, 15.4%), and fatigue (2/13, 15.4%). Tumor response was assessed in eight evaluable patients; ORR was 25.0% (95% CI, 3.2%–65.1%) and DCR 87.5% (95% CI, 47.3%–99.7%). The median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 1.25‐NE). Three Stage III patients underwent subsequent surgery with a conversion rate of 23.1%. The median OS was not estimable. Conclusions: GEMOX combined with donafenib plus tislelizumab as the first‐line therapy for unresectable BTC showed manageable toxicity and encouraging efficacy especially in terms of promising conversion rate in Stage III patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the response characteristics of patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC) treated with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the first line. Methods Patients with nsq-NSCLC who achieved complete or partial remission after treatment with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in the RATIONALE 304 study, as assessed by an independent review board, were selected to analyze the response characteristics and safety profile of the responders. Time to response (TTR) was defined as the time from randomization to the achievement of first objective response. Depth of response (DpR) was defined as the maximum percentage of tumor shrinkage compared with the sum of the baseline target lesion length diameters. Results As of January 23, 2020, 128 patients treated with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy achieved objective tumor response (responders), representing 57.4%(128/223) of the intention-to-treat population, with a TTR of 5.1 to 33.3 weeks and a median TTR of 7.9 weeks. Of the responders (128), 50.8%(65) achieved first remission at the first efficacy assessment (week 6), 31.3%(40) at the second efficacy assessment (week 12), and 18.0%(23) at the third and subsequent tumor assessments. The percentages of responders who achieved a depth of tumor response of 30% to <50%, 50% to <70% and 70% to 100% were 45.3%(58/128), 28.1%(36/128) and 26.6%(34/128), respectively, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.7 to 9.9 months), 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.7 months to not reached) and not reached (95% CI: 11.8 months to not estimable), respectively. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy were generally well tolerated in responders with similar safety profile to the overall safety population. Conclusion Among responders to tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy for nsq-NSCLC, 82.0%(105/128) achieves response within the first two tumor assessments (12 weeks) and 18.0%(23/128) achieves response at later (18 to 33 weeks) assessments, and there is a trend toward prolonged PFS in responders with deeper tumor response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The failure rate after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is approximately 34.6%–48% for resectable esophageal carcinoma. Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is an important factor in predicting lower recurrence and better survival. Whether the sequential addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy will be beneficial to improving the pathologic complete response rate is unknown. Methods: Patients with pathologically confirmed thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and at clinical T1-2N1-3M0 or T3-4aN0-3M0 (stage II–IVA) according to the eighth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging will be allocated to receive neoadjuvant radiotherapy (41.4 Gy with 23 fractions to planning target volume) with concurrent chemotherapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2, once weekly for five weeks; carboplatin, area under the curve of 2 mg/mL/min, once weekly for five weeks) plus tislelizumab monotherapy sequentially (200 mg every three weeks for three cycles, beginning from the first to the 14th day after the end of radiotherapy). Then, subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy, including the whole mediastinum and abdomen, will be performed. The primary endpoint for this study is the pathologic complete response rate after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus tislelizumab. Discussion: The optimal timing of the combination of immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma is not determined. The results of this phase II trial will be helpful to clarify the safety and efficacy of the sequential addition of tislelizumab after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal carcinoma. Trial registration: This study was approved on January 26, 2021 and retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04776590) on March 1, 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To probe into the effects of tislelizumab combined with PC regimen (pemetrexed + cisplatin) in the treatment of advanced lung cancer. METHODS: Totally 82 patients with advanced lung cancer in the hospital from Feb. 2021 to Feb. 2022 were extracted to be divided into the observation group (n =41) and the control group (n = 41) via the random number table method. The control group was treated with PC regimen, while the observation group received tislelizumab on the basis of the control group. The disease remission rate and adverse reactions were compared between two groups. Before treatment, after 2 cycles of treatment and after 4 cycles of treatment, the levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), T lymphocytes, serum phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) and protein kinase B (Akt) were compared between two groups. RESULTS: The disease remission rate of 56. 10% (23/41) in the observation group was higher than that of 34. 15% (14/41) in the control group, with statistically significant difference (P < 0. 05). After 2 cycles of treatment and after 4 cycles of treatment, the serum levels of CEA, CA125, CYFRA21-1, PI3K and Akt in two groups were lower than those before treatment, and after 4 cycles of treatment were lower than after 2 cycles of treatment, and the observation group were lower than the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0. 05). After 2 cycles of treatment and after 4 cycles of treatment, the levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD4+ / CD8+ in the observation group were higher than those before treatment and higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0. 05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between two groups (P >0. 05). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of tislelizumab combined with PC regimen in the treatment of advanced lung cancer is significant, which can reduce the level of tumor markers, inhibit the PI3K/ Akt signaling pathway and enhance immune function with higher safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare malignant tumour of the bile duct. Due to the lack of typical clinical manifestations in the early stage, it is basically at an advanced stage when discovered. Radical resection remains the only curative therapy for patients with GBC. The resection rate is relatively low due to tumour invasion and metastasis, and the overall prognosis is poor. For most patients with unresectable lesions, chemotherapy has been the only recommended treatment for decades. Immunotherapy combined with TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) was proven to be effective in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Some physicians have attempted to apply immunotherapy and TKIs combined with traditional chemotherapy in patients with advanced GBC. However, the outcomes were not clear because limited cases were reported. Case presentation: We present a case series of four elderly patients with advanced GBC who received tislelizumab and lenvatinib combined with chemotherapy. All four patients responded to this treatment approach. Tumour responses were better in Patient 1 (TMB-H, MSS), Patient 2 (low TMB, MSS), and Patient 3 (low TMB, MSI-H) than in Patient 4 (low TMB, MSS), in whom metastasis occurred during the later stage of treatment. Conclusion: The combination of tislelizumab and lenvatinib may be a promising treatment for patients with advanced GBC. The efficacy and safety need further confirmation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bladder cancer is a common malignant tumor of the genitourinary system, with the primary cause of death being metastasis. The most common metastatic sites are the lymph nodes, liver, lung, bone, peritoneum, pleura, kidney, adrenal gland, and the intestine. Brain and heart metastases are rare. In this report, we describe a patient who had pulmonary lymph node metastases more than a year after being diagnosed with bladder cancer, followed by brain and cardiac metastases more than two years later. Following the failure of standard first-line chemotherapy, the patient accepted 6 cycles of tislelizumab immunotherapy. The re-examination revealed that the bilateral frontal brain metastases had vanished, the right temporal lobe metastases had been greatly decreased, the neurological symptoms had been alleviated, and the cardiac metastases had disappeared. This is a rare clinical case with encouraging effects of tislelizumab and can serve as a model for the treatment of similar patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Chemotherapy plus tislelizumab displayed an acceptable toxicity profile. • The combination showed effectiveness on RM-NPC patients who failed to another anti-PD-1 therapy. • Tregs increased with tumor progression. • The responders to tislelizumab showed a significant decrease in Tregs. • Tregs increased along with PD and decreased when CR. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine in combination with tislelizumab for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) who have previously received other anti-PD-1 therapies. This retrospective, observational study included patients with RM-NPC who had prior treatment with anti-PD-1 therapy and subsequently received tislelizumab along with low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine between March 2019 and August 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Among 25 eligible patients, 8 (20%) achieved a complete response (CR). The objective response rate (ORR) was 68%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 80%. The 1-year PFS rate was 78%. All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were all grade 1 or 2. The combination of tislelizumab with low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine demonstrated promising antitumor effectiveness in RM-NPC patients who had failed previous anti-PD-1 therapy, with a manageable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Alpha‑fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer (AFPGC) is a rare type of gastric cancer with a high rate of metastasis and poor prognosis. Despite substantial progress in the treatment of many solid tumors, there are no reports of the safety and effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with antiangiogenesis agents for AFPGC patients who have proficient mismatch repair. Case presentation: We describe a 69-year-old man who was diagnosed with metastatic AFPGC. After progression to chemotherapy resistance, tislelizumab combined with apatinib was administered, although the patient's gastroscopic pathology showed proficient mismatch repair. After three cycles of therapy, partial remission (reduced by 56%) was obtained, and the quality of life improved significantly. Surprisingly, after more than 1 year of continuous application of the combination treatment regimen, both the primary and metastatic tumors in this patient eventually disappeared, which obtained complete remission without surgery. The patient has had a progression-free survival of more than 24 months and is still continuing to benefit. Conclusions: This case is the first example of effective treatment of AFPGC with tislelizumab combined with apatinib. The outcomes of this case suggest a highly effective and tolerable therapeutic strategy for microsatellite-stabilized AFPGC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma in the real word. Methods We enrolled 32 patients with urothelial carcinoma who were treated with tislelizumab and chemotherapy (gemcitabine/cisplatin or paclitaxel). The incidence of treatment-related adverse reactions during treatment and the efficacy evaluation were statistically analyzed. Results All patients were divided into two groups: 15 patients in the tislelizumab combined with paclitaxel group and 17 patients in the tislelizumab combined with GC group. Among 24 efficacy-evaluable patients, the ORR was 54.2% and the DCR was 83.3%. The ORR were 50.0% and 58.3%, and the DCR were 75.0% and 91.7% in the tislelizumab combined with paclitaxel group and the tislelizumab combined with GC group respectively. Common treatment-related adverse reactions included anemia (56.3%), loss of appetite (53.1%) and skin pruritus (50.0%). The grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21.8% of patients. Common immune-related adverse reactions included skin toxicity (53.1%) and immune colitis (9.4%). Conclusion Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy on urothelial cancer has significant curative effect, safety and controllability, but attention should be paid to immune-related adverse reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We attempt to study the short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of pemetrexed combined with tislelizumab in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor tumor protein 53 co-variant lung adenocarcinoma. The purpose is to explore the application effect of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor tumor protein 53 co-variant lung adenocarcinoma and provides reference for clinical work. We randomly selected 66 patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor+tumor protein 53 co-variant lung adenocarcinoma received from July 2019 to June 2021, then divided them into control group (n=33) and observation group (n=33). Treated control group with chemotherapy alone (pemetrexed), treated observation group chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (pemetrexed+tislelizumab). Evaluated the short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of both groups, and checked the changes of immune indexes before and after treatment in both groups. In the comparison of short-term efficacy, observation group had higher disease control rate and objective remission rate than control group (p<0.05); but in the comparison of long-term efficacy, observation group had remarkably higher median disease progression-free survival than control group (p<0.05); both groups had no obvious difference in adverse reactions rate (p>0.05); in the comparison of immune indicators, observation group had higher cluster of differentiation 3+, cluster of differentiation 4+, cluster of differentiation 4+/cluster of differentiation 8+ and natural killer cells activities in T cell subsets than control group, but lower cluster of differentiation 8+ in T cell subgroup than control group (p<0.05). Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (pemetrexe+tislelizumab) application is effective and safe in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor+tumor protein 53 co-variant lung adenocarcinoma treatment, can prolong the survival period of patients, has good safety and will not have a great impact on immune indicators level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To study the efficacy of tislelizumab combined with albumin paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced lung cancer, and to explore its effect on T cell subsets. Methods: 80 patients with advanced lung cancer who were treated in the hospital from July 2018 to October 2021 were selected and divided into monotherapy group and joint group according to different treatment methods, with 40 cases in each group. The monotherapy group received albumin paclitaxel treatment, and the joint group received tisleli beads combined with albumin. To compare the clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, serum IgA and IgG levels before and posttreatment, and peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets between the two groups of patients. Results: (1) The clinical treatment effective rate of patients in the joint group was 87.5 %, which was higher than the clinical treatment effective rate of 67.5 % in the monotherapy group (P<0.05); (2) Liver and kidney damage, vomiting, fatigue, and leukopenia in the two groups of patients posttreatment There was no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions such as neurotoxicity and hand-foot syndrome(P>0.05); (3) Serum IgA and IgG of patients in the joint group posttreatment were higher than those in the monotherapy group(P<0.05); (4) Study posttreatment, the ratio of CD4+ and CD4+ /CD8+ T lymphocytes in the group was higher than that of the monotherapy group (P<0.05), while the ratio of CD8+ T lymphocytes was lower than that of the monotherapy group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of tisleli beads combined with albumin paclitaxel can significantly improve the clinical treatment efficiency of patients with advanced lung cancer, but does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions, and can effectively improve the immune function of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Targeted therapy with combined dabrafenib and trametinib has been proven to provide clinical benefits in patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, the treatment strategy for NSCLC patients with BRAF non-V600E mutations remains limited. Here, we present a NSCLC patient with a BRAF N581S mutation, which is a class III BRAF mutation, and this patient had a durable response to targeted therapy with combined anlotinib and tislelizumab. We hope to bring more attention to rare non-V600 BRAF mutations by presenting this case of NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC), characterized by poor differentiation, aggressive progression, and early metastasis, is a rare type of non‐small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), which shows a low response rate to conventional antitumor therapies and has a poor prognosis. With the achievements in gene sequencing, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, several new approaches have recently been explored in PSC treatment. A small case series of PSC patients were found to have programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) overexpression, a prerequisite for PD‐1 inhibiting therapy, which made immunotherapy possible. However, anti‐PD‐1 treatment for PSCs was still at a preliminary stage. Here, we report the successful outcome of tislelizumab monotherapy in a patient with advanced PSC with pleural invasion, thus providing a novel promising approach for PSC patients with PD‐L1 overexpression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Patient characteristics were associated with treatment patterns in HCC. • Tislelizumab, camrelizumab, and tislelizumab + TACE had similar effectiveness in advanced HCC. • PVTT was an independent risk factor for PFS in advanced HCC patients. Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have shown promising clinical efficacy in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, little evidence exists regarding their treatment patterns and outcomes in real-world practice in China. This study aimed to investigate real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of PD-1 inhibitors as first-line therapies for patients with advanced HCC in China. The study population included adult patients with advanced HCC who were initially treated with PD-1 inhibitors from April 2020 to November 2022 in China. Descriptive statistics were used to report first-line treatment patterns and associations between patient characteristics and the most frequently used treatment patterns. The effectiveness of first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitors was also evaluated according to survival and tumor response. The analyses enrolled 480 patients. The four most frequently used first-line treatment patterns of camrelizumab, tislelizumab, camrelizumab + TACE, and tislelizumab + TACE showed statistical differences in patient characteristics of gender, HBV infection, liver cirrhosis, BCLC stage, and portal vein tumor thrombus (all P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in median progression-free survival among the first-line treatments of tislelizumab, camrelizumab, and tislelizumab + TACE (not reached vs. 4.4 months vs. 3.6 months, P = 0.5178). The three groups had similar objective response rates (25.0 % vs. 28.6 % vs. 28.6 %, P = 0.927), and disease control rates (73.1 % vs. 78.6 % vs. 64.3 %, P = 0.573) with no statistical significance. Our findings provided insights into potential therapeutic strategies of PD-1 inhibitors in first-line settings for advanced HCC in real-world practice in China. It was recommended to consider patient characteristics associated with therapeutic options when making clinical decisions. Prospective randomized controlled studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up times were warranted further to verify the potential clinical benefits of PD-1 inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While combined immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy have demonstrated efficacy in renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma, the efficacy of first-line treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with germline BRCA2 mutation remains unproven. We described a BRCA2-mutated patient with PDAC who presented with posterior cardiac metastasis 8 months after surgery. After receiving four cycles of anlotinib combined with tislelizumab, abdominal CT scans indicated a complete response. The patient sustained this response for over 14 months on the combination regimen, with no reported adverse events. In conclusion, the combination of tislelizumab and anlotinib may offer a viable therapeutic option for recurrent metastatic BRCA2-mutated PDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-programmed cell death 1 immuno-monotherapy has become the second-line standard treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after the failure of first-line chemotherapy. However, new biomarkers are still needed to identify patients at risk of tumor progression and to select patients with advanced ESCC who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy. A total of 12 patients with advanced ESCC treated with tislelizumab were prospectively enrolled and endoscopic biopsy samples were collected. Plasma was obtained prior to and after every 2-3 treatment cycles with tislelizumab and when disease progression occurred. Targeted sequencing of 425 genes from plasma cell-free DNA, DNA from leukocytes and fixed esophageal tumor biopsies was performed. The patients underwent imaging analyses every 6-8 weeks until disease progression. The association between status of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or changes in ctDNA following tislelizumab immunotherapy and response, tumor progression and survival was determined. All patients had evaluable next-generation sequencing results at the time of analysis. The results showed that patients with ESCC with liver metastasis had a significantly shorter median progression-free survival (mPFS: 1.4 vs. 11.7 months; P=0.037). TSC complex subunit 2 [11.7 months vs. not reached (NR); P=0.004] and zinc finger protein 217 (11.7 months vs. NR; P=0.022) gene mutations were the independent and negative prognostic factors for median overall survival (OS), respectively. Of note, ctDNA dynamic changes expressed as ∆ mutant molecules per milliliter of plasma (∆MMPM; MMPM detected at the first monitoring time-point after the first infusion of tislelizumab as baseline MMPM) predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and OS more accurately compared to the ctDNA change of an individual gene. ∆MMPM <20% was an independent predictor of PFS (2.8 vs. 14.6 months; P=0.029), although there was no significant difference for OS (16.7 vs. 17.6 months; P=0.830). In conclusion, changes in ctDNA levels were associated with anti-tumor effects, progression and disease-specific survival. ctDNA sequencing is promising for predicting response and progression after tislelizumab immunotherapy as second-line monotherapy for advanced ESCC [the present study was part of the RATIONALE-302 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT03430843; 29.01.2018)]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Tislelizumab + chemotherapy had antitumor activity in patients with advanced lung cancer. • Median PFS were 9.0 (NSQ), 7.0 (SQ-A), and 6.9 months (SCLC); PFS in SQ-B was immature. • Median OS was not reached in all cohorts except for SCLC (15.6 months). • Distinct immune/cell cycle–related gene signatures were associated with efficacy. This phase 2 study explored tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced lung cancer. Eligible patients had histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced/metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ), squamous NSCLC (SQ), or extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). All patients received tislelizumab 200 mg in combination with 4–6 cycles of platinum-doublet. The NSQ cohort received pemetrexed + platinum Q3W for 4 cycles followed by pemetrexed maintenance, the SQ cohort received paclitaxel + platinum (A) or gemcitabine + platinum (B) Q3W, and the SCLC cohort received etoposide + platinum Q3W. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and tolerability profile were secondary endpoints; exploratory endpoints included overall survival (OS) and predictive biomarkers. Fifty-four patients (NSQ, n = 16; SQ = 21 [SQ-A, n = 15; SQ-B, n = 6]; SCLC, n = 17) were enrolled; as of February 25, 2019, 14 remained on treatment. Confirmed ORRs were 44% (NSQ), 80% (SQ-A), 67% (SQ-B), and 77% (SCLC). Median PFS were 9.0 months (NSQ), 7.0 months (SQ-A), and 6.9 months (SCLC); PFS in SQ-B are not mature. Median OS was not reached in all cohorts except for SCLC (15.6 months). Common treatment-emergent AEs included anemia (79.6%, n = 43) and decreased white blood cell count (74.1%, n = 40). Gene expression analyses revealed distinct patterns by histology type; lower tumor inflammation signature levels were observed among nonresponding patients with NSQ and SCLC. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity, was generally well tolerated, and distinct immune- and cell cycle–related gene signatures were associated with efficacy across cohorts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Blocking of the interaction between Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 by monoclonal antibodies has elicited unprecedented therapeutic benefits and achieved a major breakthrough in immunotherapy of multiple types of tumors. Here, we determined the crystal structure of PD-1 in complex with the Fab fragment of tislelizumab. This monoclonal antibody was approved in December 2019 by the China National Medical Product Administration for Hodgkin's lymphoma and is under multiple clinical trials in China and the US. While the three complementarity determining regions (CDRs) in the light chain are involved in the target interaction, only CDR3 within the heavy chain interacts with PD-1. Tislelizumab binds the front β-sheet of PD-1 in a very similar way as PD-L1 binds to PD-1, thereby blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction with a higher affinity. A comparative analysis of PD-1 interactions with therapeutic antibodies targeting PD-1 provides a better understanding of the blockade mechanism of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in addition to useful information for the improvement of therapeutic antibodies capable of diminishing checkpoint signaling for cancer immunotherapy. • The crystal structure of the PD-1/tislelizumab complex was determined. • Tislelizumab blocks the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction by mimicking the PD-L1 binding on PD-1. • Tislelizumab binding does not involve the flexible loops of PD-1, unlike other antibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncological treatment has increased in recent years. The therapeutic strategy of targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway has altered the management of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Tislelizumab, a novel anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody developed in China, has demonstrated efficacy in treating advanced NSCLC. However, its potential role as a neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced NSCLC has not been definitively established. Current guidelines do not specify which patient populations may gain the most benefit from neoadjuvant immunotherapy coupled with chemotherapy, nor do they indicate the optimal timing, dose or duration of adjuvant maintenance therapy post-NSCLC surgery. Similarly, data concerning the safety and practicability of surgical resection following neoadjuvant tislelizumab treatment for NSCLC remain limited. The present study describes the case of a patient diagnosed with stage IIIB NSCLC, which was initially deemed unresectable. A preoperative biopsy of the tumor mass revealed squamous cell carcinoma and a negative PD-L1 gene test. Notably, after two cycles of neoadjuvant tislelizumab treatment coupled with chemotherapy, the tumor exhibited marked shrinkage. This permitted the patient to undergo thoracoscopic radical lung cancer resection, which resulted in a pathological complete response. Postoperative pathology identified a large infiltration of lymphoplasmacytic cells and foamy histiocytes. The patient experienced grade 2 myelosuppression, a condition that was successfully addressed with the administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The present case indicates the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant immunotherapy integrated with chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced, PD-L1-negative NSCLC prior to surgical intervention. Moreover, the case suggests the potential of this therapeutic combination to alter the tumor microenvironment. However, the generalization of these findings necessitates further validation through randomized multicenter trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Checkpoint inhibitors are effective in recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (R/M NPC). RATIONALE-309 (NCT03924986) randomized 263 treatment-naive R/M NPC patients to tislelizumab or placebo every 3 weeks (Q3W), plus chemotherapy (Q3W for 4–6 cycles). At interim analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with tislelizumab-chemotherapy versus placebo-chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.52; 95% confidence interval: 0.38, 0.73; p < 0.0001). PFS benefit for tislelizumab-chemotherapy versus placebo-chemotherapy was observed regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 expression. PFS after next line of treatment and overall survival showed favorable trends for tislelizumab-chemotherapy versus placebo-chemotherapy. The safety profile was similar between arms. Gene expression profiling (GEP) identified immunologically "hot" tumors, and showed an activated dendritic cell (DC) signature was associated with tislelizumab-chemotherapy PFS benefit. Our results support that tislelizumab-chemotherapy should be considered as first-line treatment for R/M NPC, and GEP and activated DC signature results may help identify patients who might benefit most from immunochemotherapy treatment. [Display omitted] [Display omitted] • First-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy improves PFS, PFS2, and OS • The combination shows a manageable safety profile in patients with R/M NPC • Efficacy is observed irrespective of EBV level and PD-L1 expression • Patients with high levels of activated dendritic cell signature may benefit most from treatment Yang et al. demonstrate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (gemcitabine-cisplatin) in treatment-naive patients with recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer. Compared with placebo-chemotherapy, tislelizumab-chemotherapy extends progression-free survival, irrespective of PD-L1 expression, as well as progression-free survival after next line of treatment, with a tolerable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare form of poorly differentiated non-small-cell lung cancer that is prone to distant metastases. PSC is therapeutically challenging, with low sensitivity to conventional radiotherapy and a poor overall prognosis. The present study reported on the case of a 29-year-old male non-smoker diagnosed with both PSC and lung adenocarcinoma; the cancer had a complex etiology and rapidly metastasized after surgery. The patient presented with an EML4-ALK gene fusion in both tumors with high programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. After initial treatment failure, Alectinib, Anlotinib and Tirelizumab were combined, which rapidly resolved the patient's symptoms and led to partial remission of disease at 6 weeks and effective control of the disease 7 months into the treatment. This case exemplifies the efficacy of combining targeted chemotherapy with immunotherapy for patients with PSC. Furthermore, this outcome suggests the usefulness of genetic testing and monitoring PD-L1 expression to identify patients with PSC who may be candidates likely to respond to this combined therapeutic regimen. The present study provides evidence of the success of a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with PSC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has an increasing incidence worldwide, and the global 5-year survival rate ranges from 5–30%. In China, HCC seriously threatens the nation's health; the incidence of HCC ranks fourth among all theriomas, and the mortality rate is the third highest worldwide. The main therapies for HCC are surgical treatment or liver transplantation; however, most patients with HCC will experience postoperative recurrence or metastasis, eventually resulting in mortality. As for advanced or unresectable HCC, the current appropriate treatment strategy is transarterial chemoembolization; however, limited therapeutic effect and natural or acquired drug resistance affect the efficacy of this approach. Previous studies have demonstrated that PD-L1 expression on host cells and myeloid cells plays an important role in PD-L1 blocked-mediated tumor regression. Thus, further research on programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is required. Countries including the United States, France, Britain and China have developed PD-1/PD-L1 blockers, including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, toripalimab, sintilimab and camrelizumab. Notably, all of these blockers have therapeutic effect and influencing factors in HCC. Factors that influence the clinical outcome of PD-1 have also been discovered, such as inflammatory genes, specific receptors and signaling pathways. The discovery of these factors will help to identify novel methods, such as combination treatment, to decrease the influence of other factors on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1. Sorafenib and lenvatinib have been approved for first-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. When first-line treatment frequently fails, pembrolizumab and ipilimumab plus nivolumab are used following sorafenib (but not lenvatinib) treatment in advanced HCC. Thus, tumor immunotherapy using PD-1/PD-L1 blockers exhibits promising outcomes for the treatment of HCC, and more novel PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are being developed to fight against this disease. The present review discusses the clinical results and influencing factors of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in HCC to provide insight into the development and optimization of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]