Search

In the last three decades, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has increased in incidence and severity in many countries worldwide. The increase in CDI incidence has been particularly apparent among surgical patients. Therefore, prevention of CDI and optimization of management in the surgical patient are paramount. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts from the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) updated its guidelines for management of CDI in surgical patients according to the most recent available literature. The update includes recent changes introduced in the management of this infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In recent years, there has been a worldwide increase in infections caused by microorganisms resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents. Methods: In the past few decades, an increased prevalence of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant pathogens, including Enterococcus spp., carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, and resistant Candida spp., also has been observed among intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). Results: The increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistance is responsible for a substantial increase in morbidity and mortality rates associated with IAIs. Conclusions: It is necessary for every surgeon treating IAIs to understand the underlying epidemiology and clinical consequences of antimicrobial resistance. Emergence of drug resistance, combined with the lack of new agents in the drug development pipeline, indicates that judicious antimicrobial management will be necessary to preserve the utility of the drugs available currently. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bleeding is a common complication that can reduce procedural visibility and worsen outcome. Insufficient hemostasis can also lead to postoperative bleeding that can, in rare cases, be fatal. Topical hemostatic agents are used to ensure adequate hemostasis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Subjects and Methods: This prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, historical control group study investigated the use of Floseal® (Baxter International, Inc., Deerfield, IL) hemostatic matrix as an adjunct to surgical techniques to achieve hemostasis of the resected areas in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The primary end point was the rate of complete hemostasis 10 minutes after laparoscopic application of Floseal to the gallbladder bed. Secondary end points included complete hemostasis rates at 2, 4, and 6 minutes, surgery time, laparoscopic procedure to open laparotomy conversion rate, postoperative bleeding rate, and mortality and safety outcomes over the entire follow-up period. Results: From April to November 2011, 101 consecutive patients were enrolled (51 men; mean age, 61.5±6.2 years). The historical control group of 100 age- and gender-matched patients with acute cholecystitis had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy without hemostatic agent. In the Floseal group, bleeding ceased within 10 minutes after laparoscopic application of the hemostatic agent to the gallbladder bed in all patients. The conversion rate was significantly lower in the Floseal group than in the control group (4 versus 12 patients, P<.05). Conclusions: Floseal in acute cholecystitis is safe, is effective in controlling bleeding, and results in a lower conversion rate compared with cholecystectomy without hemostatic agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intra-abdominal infections are still associated with high rate of morbidity and mortality. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with intra-abdominal infections may be an important factor in the quality of care. The presence of a team of health professionals from various disciplines, working in concert, may improve efficiency, outcome, and the cost of care. A World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Consensus Conference was held in Bologna on July 2010, during the 1st congress of the WSES, involving surgeons, infectious disease specialists, pharmacologists, radiologists and intensivists with the goal of defining recommendations for the early management of intra-abdominal infections. This document represents the executive summary of the final guidelines approved by the consensus conference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Timing and adequacy of peritoneal source control are the most important pillars in the management of patients with acute peritonitis. Therefore, early prognostic evaluation of acute peritonitis is paramount to assess the severity and establish a prompt and appropriate treatment. The objectives of this study were to identify clinical and laboratory predictors for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute peritonitis and to develop a warning score system, based on easily recognizable and assessable variables, globally accepted. Methods: This worldwide multicentre observational study included 153 surgical departments across 56 countries over a 4-month study period between February 1, 2018, and May 31, 2018. Results: A total of 3137 patients were included, with 1815 (57.9%) men and 1322 (42.1%) women, with a median age of 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 28–66). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 8.9%, with a median length of stay of 6 days (IQR 4–10). Using multivariable logistic regression, independent variables associated with in-hospital mortality were identified: age > 80 years, malignancy, severe cardiovascular disease, severe chronic kidney disease, respiratory rate ≥ 22 breaths/min, systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg, AVPU responsiveness scale (voice and unresponsive), blood oxygen saturation level (SpO2) < 90% in air, platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm3, and lactate > 4 mmol/l. These variables were used to create the PIPAS Severity Score, a bedside early warning score for patients with acute peritonitis. The overall mortality was 2.9% for patients who had scores of 0–1, 22.7% for those who had scores of 2–3, 46.8% for those who had scores of 4–5, and 86.7% for those who have scores of 7–8. Conclusions: The simple PIPAS Severity Score can be used on a global level and can help clinicians to identify patients at high risk for treatment failure and mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]