1. INTRODUCING THE SHERPA MODEL FOR MANAGING MULTI-MORBIDITY TO TRAINEE GPS:OUTCOMES AND RELEVANCE TO ELDERLY CAREÂ.
- Author
-
Swancutt, D., Jack, E., Neve, H., Tredinnick-Rowe, J., Axford, N., and Byng, R.
- Subjects
- *
MEDICAL education , *HOSPITAL medical staff , *BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL model , *PHYSICIANS' attitudes , *CONFERENCES & conventions , *ENTRY level employees , *MEDICAL referrals , *COMORBIDITY , *ELDER care , *EDUCATIONAL outcomes - Abstract
Background: Primary care trainees are traditionally taught to use a consultation model which focuses on eliciting the patients’ main reason for consulting “today”. As the number of patients with multi-morbidity increases, this approach is often inappropriate or unhelpful. Patients can be left without an understanding of their interacting health issues. The SHERPA model provides a biopsychosocial framework for consulting patients with multi-morbidity. We aimed to examine the responses to this model when integrated into a training programme for newly registered GPs. Methods: Sixteen participants provide qualitative data on their experience and followup use of SHERPA. Four hours of teaching were observed. Twenty-four feedback templates on training (n=18) and SHERPA application (n=6) were collected. Individual semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with trainees (n=5) and trainers (n=3). Data were transcribed and, using the Framework approach, systematically analysed focussing on the trainees’ reaction to the teaching sessions and their ability to use the SHERPA consultation model. Results: Participants engaged well with the teaching sessions, enjoying the scenarios and bringing observations from their own experience. Five participants went on to apply SHERPA successfully with their patients. Barriers to using this approach were: not seeing appropriate patients with multi-morbidities (due to current placement or patient type); time; lack of confidence and familiarity; concern about missing important immediate clinical issues; and viewing the approach as “in addition” rather than key to shared decisionmaking. Conclusion:TheSHERPA model was viewed as a helpful addition by traineeGPs, although practical issues, fears and not seeing it as their priority for their case-mix, limited their application of it. Regular support from trainers, where trainees reflect on their experience of using SHERPA, could increase their confidence and familiarity with this method. These findings suggest that SHERPA may be relevant to other specialities such as geriatric medicine, where multi-morbidity is common. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF