Search

Since the acceptability of a medicine can significantly impact therapeutic outcomes, this study aimed to determine and compare the preferences of children, parents, and healthcare professionals for the most commonly used pediatric oral medicine formulations (syrup, mini-tablets, oblong tablets, round tablets) addressing all pediatric age groups, 0–<18 years (y). This survey study employed sex-, age-, and participant group-adapted questionnaires for eight cohorts of participants, i.e., children 6–<12 y, adolescents 12–<18 y, parents of children in four age groups (0–<2 y, 2–<6 y, 6–<12 y, and 12–<18 y), nurses, and pediatricians. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. In the age groups 0–<2 y and 2–<6 y, mini-tablets were preferred over syrup by all participants. In the age group 6–12 y, solid dosage forms were also preferred over syrup by all participants. In the age group 12–<18 y, healthcare professionals preferred solid dosage forms over syrup. Parents preferred higher amounts of mini-tablets and syrup compared to round and oblong tablets, while adolescents' preferences did not differentiate between these formulations. Based on the study results and in contrast to current practice, it is suggested to consider solid dosage forms for future age-appropriate medicinal products already for younger age groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Currently, body weight-based dosing of rifampicin is recommended. But lately, fat-free mass (FFM) was reported to be superior to body weight (BW). The present evaluation aimed to assess the influence of body mass-related covariates on rifampicin's pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters in more detail using non-linear mixed effects modeling (NLMEM). Methods: Twenty-four healthy Caucasian volunteers were enrolled in a bioequivalence study, each receiving a test and a reference tablet of 600 mg of rifampicin separated by a wash-out period of at least 9 days. Monolix version 2023R1 was used for NLMEM. Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were performed to visualize the relationship of body size descriptors to the exposure to rifampicin. Results: A one-compartment model with nonlinear (Michaelis–Menten) elimination and zero-order absorption kinetics with a lag time best described the data. The covariate model including fat-free mass (FFM) on volume of distribution (V/F) and on maximum elimination rate (Vmax/F) lowered the objective function value (OFV) by 56.4. The second-best covariate model of sex on V/F and Vmax/F and BW on V/F reduced the OFV by 51.2. The decrease in unexplained inter-individual variability on Vmax/F in both covariate models was similar. For a given dose, MCS showed lower exposure to rifampicin with higher FFM and accordingly in males compared to females with the same BW and body height. Conclusion: Our results indicate that beyond BW, body composition as reflected by FFM could also be relevant for optimized dosing of rifampicin. This assumption needs to be studied further in patients treated with rifampicin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Noscapine is a commonly used cough suppressant, with ongoing research on its anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor properties. The drug has a pronounced pharmacokinetic variability. Objective: This evaluation aims to describe the pharmacokinetics of noscapine using a semi-mechanistic population pharmacokinetic model and to identify covariates that could explain inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. Methods: Forty-eight healthy volunteers (30 men and 18 women, mean age 33 years) were enrolled in a randomized, two-period, two-stage, crossover bioequivalence study of noscapine in two different liquid formulations. Noscapine plasma concentrations following oral administration of noscapine 50 mg were evaluated by a non-compartmental analysis and by a population pharmacokinetic model separately. Results: Compared to the reference formulation, the test formulation exhibited ratios (with 94.12% confidence intervals) of 0.784 (0.662–0.929) and 0.827 (0.762–0.925) for peak plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration–time curve, respectively. Significant differences in p values (< 0.01) were both observed when comparing peak plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration–time curve between CYP2C9 genotype-predicted phenotypes. A three-compartmental model with zero-order absorption and first-order elimination process best described the plasma data. The introduction of a liver compartment was able to describe the profound first-pass effect of noscapine. Total body weight and the CYP2C9 genotype-predicted phenotype were both identified as significant covariates on apparent clearance, which was estimated as 958 ± 548 L/h for extensive metabolizers (CYP2C9*1/*1 and *1/*9), 531 ± 304 L/h for intermediate metabolizers with an activity score of 1.5 (CYP2C9*1/*2), and 343 ± 197 L/h for poor metabolizers and intermediate metabolizers with an activity score of 1.0 (CYP2C9*1/*3, *2/*3, and*3/*3). Conclusion: The current work is expected to facilitate the future pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic development of noscapine. This study was registered prior to starting at "Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien" under registration no. DRKS00017760. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a chronic relapsing gastroduodenal disorder with limited treatment options. Herbal products, like the six-herb combination STW 5-II, can target multiple FD gastrointestinal symptoms. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of STW 5-II for overall FD, and key symptoms, based on Rome IV criteria. Methods: We systematically screened the literature for randomized controlled clinical studies testing STW 5-II in FD. Meta-analysis was performed using data from individual patients with at least one key FD symptom (fullness, early satiety, or epigastric pain) of at least moderate severity at baseline. ANCOVA-based meta-analyses were performed on improvements in the total symptom sum score, and single symptoms, after 4 and 8 weeks. Safety data were analyzed by calculating odds ratios for all adverse events. Results: Four randomized controlled trials, including 613 patients, were identified, and two were eligible for efficacy analysis. STW 5-II significantly improved the FD symptom sum score (mean difference of 1.74 after 4 weeks and 2.07 after 8 weeks) and key FD symptoms of fullness (0.28 and 0.29), early satiety (0.25 and 0.26), and epigastric/upper abdominal pain (0.26 and 0.3). Treatment-related or severe adverse events did not differ between STW 5-II and placebo. Conclusion: The results support that STW 5-II significantly improves FD symptoms after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment with no difference in relation to safety signals compared to placebo. Thus, STW 5-II can be considered an effective and safe treatment option for FD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mini-tablets are advantageous over liquid formulations in overcoming challenges related to stability, taste, and dosage. This open-label, single-dose, cross-over study investigated the acceptability and safety of drug-free, film-coated mini-tablets in children aged 1 month–6 years (stratified: 4–6 years, 2–<4 years, 1–<2 years, 6–<12 months, and 1–<6 months), and their preference for swallowing either a high quantity of 2.0 mm or a low quantity of 2.5 mm diameter mini-tablets. The primary endpoint was acceptability derived from swallowability. The secondary endpoints were investigator-observed palatability, acceptability as a composite endpoint derived from both swallowability and palatability, and safety. Of 320 children randomized, 319 completed the study. Across all tablet sizes, quantities and age groups, acceptability rates based on swallowability were high (at least 87%). Palatability was rated as "pleasant/neutral" in 96.6% of children. The acceptability rates as per the composite endpoint were at least 77% and 86% for the 2.0 mm and 2.5 mm film-coated mini-tablets, respectively. No adverse events or deaths were reported. Recruitment in the 1–<6-months group was stopped early due to coughing—evaluated as "choked on" in three children. Both 2.0 mm and 2.5 mm film-coated mini-tablets are suitable formulations for young children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This phase I study was performed in volunteers of Japanese ethnicity to compare pharmacokinetic data after infusion of 6 % hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 with historical data of Caucasians. Methods: In an open-label, uncontrolled, single-center study, 12 healthy male Japanese volunteers received single intravenous infusions of 500 ml 6 % HES 130/0.4 (Voluven 6 %; Fresenius Kabi Deutschland, Bad Homburg, Germany) over 30 min. Results: Plasma concentration of 6 % HES 130/0.4 was highest at end of infusion (5.53 ± 0.55 mg/ml) and decreased following a biphasic manner. Total plasma clearance and rapid and slow elimination half-lives obtained by a two-compartment model were 1.14 ± 0.16 l/h, 1.12 ± 0.26 h, and 9.98 ± 2.38 h, respectively, and the volume of distribution was 4.76 ± 0.64 l. Mean area under the concentration-time curve was 26.7 ± 3.75 mg/ml h. The total amount of HES excreted into urine was 59.4 % of the applied dose. Hemodilution was observed in all 12 subjects as indicated by a decrease of hemoglobin from 15.5 ± 0.4 g/dl at baseline to 13.8 ± 0.4 g/dl after the end of infusion. Adverse events in this study refer to changes of laboratory parameters and were assessed as not clinically relevant. Conclusion: Single administration of a 500 ml solution of 6 % HES 130/0.4 was confirmed to be safe and tolerable in healthy male Japanese subjects. A rapid renal excretion was observed within 24 h after drug administration, accounting for 96 % of the total amount excreted. A comparison with pharmacokinetic data derived from Caucasians did not reveal significant differences to Japanese and confirmed the good tolerability in both ethnic groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] There is limited evidence for the acceptability of various drug formulations holding the potential to improve medicines administration to children. Suitable formulations need to meet the requirements of pediatric patients. Previous studies have demonstrated the acceptance of mini-tablets. Oblong tablets may carry more active ingredient content per unit than mini-tablets and could be an important alternative when the drug substance requires administration of higher doses. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of acceptability of oblong tablets in comparison to 3 ml glucose syrup in children aged 1 to 5 years. Secondary objectives were investigation of acceptability, swallowability and palatability of mini-tablets, oblong tablets and glucose syrup in children between 1 and 5 years. An open, randomized, single dose two-way cross-over design in two parallel study arms was applied. 280 children were stratified to one of five age groups and randomized to receiving one oblong tablet (2.5 × 6 mm) in comparison either to 3 ml glucose syrup or to three mini-tablets (2 × 2 mm). Acceptability and swallowability were assessed according to pre-defined evaluation criteria. The application of the formulations was video documented to evaluate the palatability. As primary objective, non-inferiority was observed regarding acceptability of the oblong tablet compared to syrup in all age groups (84.4% vs 80.1%, difference 4,29% points with 95% CI of −3.00%,11.57%). For swallowability, superiority of the oblong tablet compared to syrup could be shown (74.5% vs. 53.2%, difference 21.26% points, 95% CI of 11.29%, 31.23%). Regarding palatability, <10% of children demonstrated unpleasant reaction after intake of the oblong tablet or mini-tablets as graded by both raters, however, in contrast up to 40% of children after intake of syrup. Oblong tablets are a promising, safe alternative to liquid drug formulations and administration of multiple mini-tablets in children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study evaluated a propofol-based anesthesia regimen with spontaneous breathing in pediatric patients scheduled for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study propofol formulated with long-chain triglycerides (LCT) and mixed medium-chain/long-chain triglycerides (MCT/LCT) were used. Ninety patients aged 2.4 months to 7.3 years were premedicated with intravenous midazolam. Lidocaine was injected prior to propofol to reduce injection pain. Anesthesia was induced and maintained by propofol. Glycopyrronium bromide was administered for saliva reduction. Hemodynamics, blood oxygen saturation and endtidal capnography were continuously monitored. All patients received additional oxygen. The aggregated propofol dose for induction and maintenance of anesthesia was analyzed for therapeutic equivalence. Incidence of injection pain, laboratory safety values, vital signs, and the adverse event profile were analyzed to compare tolerability and safety. Results: Propofol anesthesia was safe and successful in all children. Both propofol formulations were equivalent regarding dose requirements (mean induction and maintenance doses for anesthesia 2.0–4.0 mg·kg−1 and 6.0–8.8 mg·kg−1·h−1 respectively; aggregated doses 8–13.26 mg·kg−1). There were no differences in drug safety such as hemodynamics, spontaneous breathing, injection pain, and laboratory values. Duration of induction and of recovery from anesthesia were short and all examinations were completed with minimal interruption. Conclusions: Propofol-based short-term anesthesia was well suited for anesthesia during MRI procedures in the studied pediatric patients. There were no clinically relevant differences between the two propofol formulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was a comparative investigation of the influence of concomitant food intake on the bioavailability of two nifedipine-containing controlled-release formulations. Adalat® OROS and CORAL® were compared in a randomised, non-blind, four-way crossover design in 24 healthy, male subjects after single dose administration following a high fat American breakfast or an overnight fast of 12 h, respectively. Plasma samples were withdrawn until 48 h post-dose. In the fasted state, the bioavailability (AUC and Cmax values) was lower for CORAL® than for Adalat® OROS. Under fed conditions, differences in bioavailability between both products were markedly increased. With respect to the therapeutic use of both products, the most important finding was the significant dose-dumping effect observed after fed administration of CORAL®, resulting in nifedipine plasma concentrations of nearly three- to four-fold in 11 of 24 volunteers. The mean ratio of Cmax was 235% comparing CORAL® with Adalat® OROS under these conditions. The formulation-dependent food interaction observed in this study may be therapeutically relevant, especially in the case of changing administration conditions or switching from one product to the other. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]