The central midcontinent of the USA's cratonic platform is a region of low elevation and relief underlain by tectonic basins, domes, faults, and monoclines. To investigate potential correlations among shallow crustal structure and crustal thickness, we produced a high‐resolution Moho‐depth map of the region by applying the recently developed H‐κ‐c receiver‐function method to data from EarthScope Transportable‐Array and Flexible‐Array stations. Results indicate that Moho depth varies from 38 to 57 km. Changes of Moho depth and of Vp/Vs ratios do not correlate with Precambrian tectonic boundaries, suggesting that they reflect post‐accretion tectonics. Deeper Moho underlies sedimentary basins, implying a relationship between crustal thickness and lithospheric subsidence. Thicker crust may be due to rift‐related underplating, and thinner crust may have undergone delamination. Some depth changes underlie known faults and fold zones. Since short‐wavelength undulations were detected only under high‐density seismic arrays, they may occur more widely but have yet to be resolved. Plain Language Summary: Studies of the central midcontinent region of the USA, a portion of North America's relatively stable craton, reveal that both the Moho (the crust/mantle boundary) and the surface of the Great Unconformity (the boundary between crystalline basement and overlying Phanerozoic sedimentary cover) have kilometers of relief, even though land‐surface relief in the region is, at most, 0.5 km. To clarify the nature of variations in Moho depth, so as to make it possible to correlate these variations with other geologic features of the shallow continental crust, we applied a new, more robust, method in estimating Moho depth to data from all available EarthScope seismic stations in the region. This effort yielded a new, high‐resolution map of Moho depth. Significantly, we found large undulations (ups and downs) of the Moho both at the regional scale and at the local scale. Some of these undulations correlate with the boundaries of regional basins and domes, as defined by the depth to the Great Unconformity, and others correlate with known faults. The development of thickness variations may reflect geologic events, such as addition of new rock to the base of the crust, or removal of lower crust, which happened after the crust first formed. Key Points: We applied an improved receiver‐function method in central midcontinent of the U.S. to construct a refined Moho‐depth mapOur results indicate Moho depth variations of different wavelengths, some of which correspond with known geological structuresMoho depth variations cross Precambrian boundaries, suggesting a likely post‐accretion tectonic modification of the lithosphere [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]