Search

The narrator-protagonist of Aleksandr Ivanov's novella "Stereoscope. A Twilight Story" (1909) stumbles upon a portal into a three-dimensional photographic world—the uncanny "bygone spaces" that cause him to veer between "fear" and nostalgic "rapture." These emotions are contradictory but also inseparable, which becomes clear when the narrator's experiences are read through the lens of Walter Benjamin's concept of aura. The story as a whole prefigures Benjamin's "definition of the aura as the aura of distance opened up with the look that awakens in an object perceived": the photograph in "Stereoscope" is endowed with a gaze, at once threatening and beguiling, that saps the protagonist's agency. Because Ivanov's text seeks to enact the protagonist's adventures for the reader, the"Twilight Story" not only testifies to the enduring power of the photographic image, but also showcases the auratic possibilities of language. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Motivation Identification of differentially expressed genes is necessary for unraveling disease pathogenesis. This task is complicated by the fact that many diseases are heterogeneous at the molecular level and samples representing distinct disease subtypes may demonstrate different patterns of dysregulation. Biclustering methods are capable of identifying genes that follow a similar expression pattern only in a subset of samples and hence can consider disease heterogeneity. However, identifying biologically significant and reproducible sets of genes and samples remain challenging for the existing tools. Many recent studies have shown that the integration of gene expression and protein interaction data improves the robustness of prediction and classification and advances biomarker discovery. Results Here, we present DESMOND, a new method for identification of Differentially ExpreSsed gene MOdules iN Diseases. DESMOND performs network-constrained biclustering on gene expression data and identifies gene modules—connected sets of genes up- or down-regulated in subsets of samples. We applied DESMOND on expression profiles of samples from two large breast cancer cohorts and have shown that the capability of DESMOND to incorporate protein interactions allows identifying the biologically meaningful gene and sample subsets and improves the reproducibility of the results. Availability and implementation https://github.com/ozolotareva/DESMOND. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Motivation Historically, gene expression has been shown to be the most informative data for drug response prediction. Recent evidence suggests that integrating additional omics can improve the prediction accuracy which raises the question of how to integrate the additional omics. Regardless of the integration strategy, clinical utility and translatability are crucial. Thus, we reasoned a multi-omics approach combined with clinical datasets would improve drug response prediction and clinical relevance. Results We propose MOLI, a m ulti- o mics l ate i ntegration method based on deep neural networks. MOLI takes somatic mutation, copy number aberration and gene expression data as input, and integrates them for drug response prediction. MOLI uses type-specific encoding sub-networks to learn features for each omics type, concatenates them into one representation and optimizes this representation via a combined cost function consisting of a triplet loss and a binary cross-entropy loss. The former makes the representations of responder samples more similar to each other and different from the non-responders, and the latter makes this representation predictive of the response values. We validate MOLI on in vitro and in vivo datasets for five chemotherapy agents and two targeted therapeutics. Compared to state-of-the-art single-omics and early integration multi-omics methods, MOLI achieves higher prediction accuracy in external validations. Moreover, a significant improvement in MOLI's performance is observed for targeted drugs when training on a pan-drug input, i.e. using all the drugs with the same target compared to training only on drug-specific inputs. MOLI's high predictive power suggests it may have utility in precision oncology. Availability and implementation https://github.com/hosseinshn/MOLI. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Motivation The goal of pharmacogenomics is to predict drug response in patients using their single- or multi-omics data. A major challenge is that clinical data (i.e. patients) with drug response outcome is very limited, creating a need for transfer learning to bridge the gap between large pre-clinical pharmacogenomics datasets (e.g. cancer cell lines), as a source domain, and clinical datasets as a target domain. Two major discrepancies exist between pre-clinical and clinical datasets: (i) in the input space, the gene expression data due to difference in the basic biology, and (ii) in the output space, the different measures of the drug response. Therefore, training a computational model on cell lines and testing it on patients violates the i.i.d assumption that train and test data are from the same distribution. Results We propose Adversarial Inductive Transfer Learning (AITL), a deep neural network method for addressing discrepancies in input and output space between the pre-clinical and clinical datasets. AITL takes gene expression of patients and cell lines as the input, employs adversarial domain adaptation and multi-task learning to address these discrepancies, and predicts the drug response as the output. To the best of our knowledge, AITL is the first adversarial inductive transfer learning method to address both input and output discrepancies. Experimental results indicate that AITL outperforms state-of-the-art pharmacogenomics and transfer learning baselines and may guide precision oncology more accurately. Availability and implementation https://github.com/hosseinshn/AITL. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proteomics technologies, which include a diverse range of approaches such as mass spectrometry-based, array-based, and others, are key technologies for the identification of biomarkers and disease mechanisms, referred to as mechanotyping. Despite over 15,000 published studies in 2022 alone, leveraging publicly available proteomics data for biomarker identification, mechanotyping and drug target identification is not readily possible. Proteomic data addressing similar biological/biomedical questions are made available by multiple research groups in different locations using different model organisms. Furthermore, not only various organisms are employed but different assay systems, such as in vitro and in vivo systems, are used. Finally, even though proteomics data are deposited in public databases, such as ProteomeXchange, they are provided at different levels of detail. Thus, data integration is hampered by non-harmonized usage of identifiers when reviewing the literature or performing meta-analyses to consolidate existing publications into a joint picture. To address this problem, we present ProHarMeD, a tool for harmonizing and comparing proteomics data gathered in multiple studies and for the extraction of disease mechanisms and putative drug repurposing candidates. It is available as a website, Python library and R package. ProHarMeD facilitates ID and name conversions between protein and gene levels, or organisms via ortholog mapping, and provides detailed logs on the loss and gain of IDs after each step. The web tool further determines IDs shared by different studies, proposes potential disease mechanisms as well as drug repurposing candidates automatically, and visualizes these results interactively. We apply ProHarMeD to a set of four studies on bone regeneration. First, we demonstrate the benefit of ID harmonization which increases the number of shared genes between studies by 50%. Second, we identify a potential disease mechanism, with five corresponding drug targets, and the top 20 putative drug repurposing candidates, of which Fondaparinux, the candidate with the highest score, and multiple others are known to have an impact on bone regeneration. Hence, ProHarMeD allows users to harmonize multi-centric proteomics research data in meta-analyses, evaluates the success of the ID conversions and remappings, and finally, it closes the gaps between proteomics, disease mechanism mining and drug repurposing. It is publicly available at https://apps.cosy.bio/proharmed/. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proteomics technologies, which include a diverse range of approaches such as mass spectrometry-based, array-based, and others, are key technologies for the identification of biomarkers and disease mechanisms, referred to as mechanotyping. Despite over 15,000 published studies in 2022 alone, leveraging publicly available proteomics data for biomarker identification, mechanotyping and drug target identification is not readily possible. Proteomic data addressing similar biological/biomedical questions are made available by multiple research groups in different locations using different model organisms. Furthermore, not only various organisms are employed but different assay systems, such as in vitro and in vivo systems, are used. Finally, even though proteomics data are deposited in public databases, such as ProteomeXchange, they are provided at different levels of detail. Thus, data integration is hampered by non-harmonized usage of identifiers when reviewing the literature or performing meta-analyses to consolidate existing publications into a joint picture. To address this problem, we present ProHarMeD, a tool for harmonizing and comparing proteomics data gathered in multiple studies and for the extraction of disease mechanisms and putative drug repurposing candidates. It is available as a website, Python library and R package. ProHarMeD facilitates ID and name conversions between protein and gene levels, or organisms via ortholog mapping, and provides detailed logs on the loss and gain of IDs after each step. The web tool further determines IDs shared by different studies, proposes potential disease mechanisms as well as drug repurposing candidates automatically, and visualizes these results interactively. We apply ProHarMeD to a set of four studies on bone regeneration. First, we demonstrate the benefit of ID harmonization which increases the number of shared genes between studies by 50%. Second, we identify a potential disease mechanism, with five corresponding drug targets, and the top 20 putative drug repurposing candidates, of which Fondaparinux, the candidate with the highest score, and multiple others are known to have an impact on bone regeneration. Hence, ProHarMeD allows users to harmonize multi-centric proteomics research data in meta-analyses, evaluates the success of the ID conversions and remappings, and finally, it closes the gaps between proteomics, disease mechanism mining and drug repurposing. It is publicly available at https://apps.cosy.bio/proharmed/. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Motivation Limited data access has hindered the field of precision medicine from exploring its full potential, e.g. concerning machine learning and privacy and data protection rules. Our study evaluates the efficacy of federated Random Forests (FRF) models, focusing particularly on the heterogeneity within and between datasets. We addressed three common challenges: (i) number of parties, (ii) sizes of datasets and (iii) imbalanced phenotypes, evaluated on five biomedical datasets. Results The FRF outperformed the average local models and performed comparably to the data-centralized models trained on the entire data. With an increasing number of models and decreasing dataset size, the performance of local models decreases drastically. The FRF, however, do not decrease significantly. When combining datasets of different sizes, the FRF vastly improve compared to the average local models. We demonstrate that the FRF remain more robust and outperform the local models by analyzing different class-imbalances. Our results support that FRF overcome boundaries of clinical research and enables collaborations across institutes without violating privacy or legal regulations. Clinicians benefit from a vast collection of unbiased data aggregated from different geographic locations, demographics and other varying factors. They can build more generalizable models to make better clinical decisions, which will have relevance, especially for patients in rural areas and rare or geographically uncommon diseases, enabling personalized treatment. In combination with secure multi-party computation, federated learning has the power to revolutionize clinical practice by increasing the accuracy and robustness of healthcare AI and thus paving the way for precision medicine. Availability and implementation The implementation of the federated random forests can be found at https://featurecloud.ai/. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hypertension and bronchial asthma are a major issue for people’s health. As of 2014, approximately one billion adults, or ~ 22% of the world population, have had hypertension. As of 2011, 235–330 million people globally have been affected by asthma and approximately 250,000–345,000 people have died each year from the disease. The development of the effective treatment therapies against these diseases is complicated by their comorbidity features. This is often a major problem in diagnosis and their treatment. Hence, in this study the bioinformatical methodology for the analysis of the comorbidity of these two diseases have been developed. As such, the search for candidate genes related to the comorbid conditions of asthma and hypertension can help in elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying the comorbid condition of these two diseases, and can also be useful for genotyping and identifying new drug targets. Results: Using ANDSystem, the reconstruction and analysis of gene networks associated with asthma and hypertension was carried out. The gene network of asthma included 755 genes/proteins and 62,603 interactions, while the gene network of hypertension - 713 genes/proteins and 45,479 interactions. Two hundred and five genes/proteins and 9638 interactions were shared between asthma and hypertension. An approach for ranking genes implicated in the comorbid condition of two diseases was proposed. The approach is based on nine criteria for ranking genes by their importance, including standard methods of gene prioritization (Endeavor, ToppGene) as well as original criteria that take into account the characteristics of an associative gene network and the presence of known polymorphisms in the analysed genes. According to the proposed approach, the genes IL10, TLR4, and CAT had the highest priority in the development of comorbidity of these two diseases. Additionally, it was revealed that the list of top genes is enriched with apoptotic genes and genes involved in biological processes related to the functioning of central nervous system. Conclusions: The application of methods of reconstruction and analysis of gene networks is a productive tool for studying the molecular mechanisms of comorbid conditions. The method put forth to rank genes by their importance to the comorbid condition of asthma and hypertension was employed that resulted in prediction of 10 genes, playing the key role in the development of the comorbid condition. The results can be utilised to plan experiments for identification of novel candidate genes along with searching for novel pharmacological targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]