Search

More than 80% of people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) take first-line tenofovir-disoproxil/lamivudine (or emtricitabine)/dolutegravir (TLD). Due to hard-fought activism, TLD now costs <$45 per person per year in more than 100 LMICs under Voluntary License. With final dolutegravir (DTG) patents expiring by 2029, generic TLD will soon be available globally. Here, we identify seven critical benchmarks that underpin TLDs' success which novel antiretroviral therapy (ART) should now meet, and an eighth benchmark for which novel ART should aim. These benchmarks are superior efficacy; high genetic barrier to resistance; safety in hepatitis B coinfection; favourable drug interaction profiles; HIV2 efficacy; safety in pregnancy, long-acting formulation availability and affordable pricing. We compare the generic TLD availability timeline with development timelines for two case-study novel ART combinations: islatravir/doravirine and cabotegravir/rilpivirine. We demonstrate that currently these regimens and trial programs will not meet key benchmarks required to compete with TLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale Methods Results Conclusions Doravirine (DOR) is an attractive new option both for ART‐naïve people with HIV (PWH) and those with suppressed HIV‐RNA who seek treatment simplification. We used real‐world data to examine the pattern of use of DOR‐containing regimens in these settings.All PWH enrolled in the Icona cohort after January 2020 who initiated a three‐drug regimen (3‐DR) with DOR or an integrase inhibitor (INSTI)‐based regimen as first antiretroviral therapy (ART) or when switching ART, with HIV‐RNA ≤50 copies/mL, were included. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression models to identify demographic factors, immuno‐virological and laboratory markers associated with the prescription of 3‐DR DOR instead of INSTI‐based regimens.A total of 5803 PWH were included; 1958 were in the first regimen (80 DOR, 1,878 INSTI) and 3854 (387 DOR, 3,458 INSTI) were ART‐experienced virologically suppressed. In the first line, 3‐DR DOR was more frequently started in people who inject drugs, and its use was also associated with higher body mass index, higher low‐density lipoprotein levels, and less advanced HIV disease compared with PWH initiating an INSTI‐based regimen. In the switch setting, older age, Italian origin, higher estimated glomerular filtration rate and aspartate aminotransferase levels were all strongly associated with 3‐DR DOR use, as well as higher a CD4/CD8 ratio (only vs. 3‐DR INSTI), while the association with lipid abnormalities was attenuated.Our analysis shows that among PWH in care in Italy, those with less advanced HIV disease but with other fragilities and potential risk factors for comorbidities are more likely to use DOR‐ than INSTI‐based regimens, regardless of prior treatment history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Methods Results Conclusions Treatment‐related weight gain and metabolic complications with antiretroviral integrase‐based regimens, especially among Black women, suggest the need for alternative options.We conducted a 48‐week, open‐label, single‐arm, single‐centre, phase IIIb switch study to evaluate the tolerability, safety and efficacy of switching from stable efavirenz‐ or dolutegravir‐based antiretroviral therapy to doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Black women.The 101 participants enrolled (median age 35 years; interquartile range 31–40) were on efavirenz (n = 46; mean duration on therapy 1.7 years) or dolutegravir‐based (n = 55; mean duration 1.5 years) antiretrovirals at screening. Retention at 48 weeks was 92/101 participants, and viral suppression was >90% throughout the study, with a single case of doravirine resistance (106 M, V108I and H221Y mutations). The mean weight percentage change at week 48 was 4.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0–6.5; p < 0.001), and the adjusted mean change was 2.7 kg (95% CI 1.50–3.98; p < 0.001); for efavirenz, the percentage change was 5.0% (95% CI 2.9–7.1; p < 0.001), and the adjusted weight gain was 3.5 kg (95% CI 1.93–5.13); for dolutegravir, the percentage change was 4.5% (95% CI 1.8–7.3; p < 0.001), and the adjusted weight gain was 2.1 kg (95% CI 0.26–3.90). Statistically significant decreases in lipid panel percent mean to week 48 included: total cholesterol −8.4% (95% CI −11.3 to −5.5; p < 0.001), triglycerides −10.4% (95% CI −16.4 to −4.4; p < 0.001) and high‐density lipoprotein −14.8% (95% CI −18.5 to −11.2%; p < 0.001), with minor differences when disaggregating the mean percent change in lipids between previous efavirenz/dolutegravir regimens. Adverse events due to doravirine were few and mild.Our findings suggest that a switch to doravirine from efavirenz or dolutegravir is safe and effective in Black women, with significant improvement in lipid profiles, but does not arrest progressive weight gain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doravirine (DOR) is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) with efficacy against some NNRTI-resistant mutants. Although DOR resistance mutations are established for HIV-1 subtype B, it is less clear for non-B subtypes. This study investigated prevalent NNRTI resistance mutations on DOR susceptibility in HIV-1 subtype C. Prevalent drug resistance mutations were identified from a South African genotypic drug resistance testing database. Mutations, single or in combination, were introduced into replication-defective pseudoviruses and assessed for DOR susceptibility in vitro. The single V106M and Y188L mutations caused high-level resistance while others did not significantly impact DOR susceptibility. We observed an agreement between our in vitro and the Stanford HIVdb predicted susceptibilities. However, the F227L mutation was predicted to cause high-level DOR resistance but was susceptible in vitro. Combinations of mutations containing K103N, V106M or Y188L caused high-level resistance, in agreement with the predictions. These mutations are frequently observed in patients failing efavirenz- or nevirapine-based first-line regimens. However, they are also observed in those failing a protease inhibitor-based second-line regimen, as we have observed in our database. Genotypic drug resistance testing is therefore vital prior to the initiation of DOR-based treatment for those previously exposed to efavirenz or nevirapine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doravarine (DOR) is an antiviral drug with a marketed authorization for the management of occupational blood and body fluid exposure. The currently existing packaging, consisting of multiple unit bottles comprising 30 tablets, is not fully appropriate for daily nominative dispensing at the hospital. This study aims at assessing the impact of the change in packaging on the key attributes of the drug: assay, impurity profile, and dissolution. As the first step, which is not fully depicted in the literature, the main potential impurities that could appear during storage (i.e., degradation products (DPs) of DOR) were characterized using a forced degradation protocol followed by an LC-MS/MS analysis. These results paved the way for in silico toxicological assessment and targeted degradation product profiling. Based on this study, the assessment of the implication of repackaging on the formation of DOR's degradation products should be a primary focus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) are associated with neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs). The aim of this study was to evaluate improvements in NPAEs after switching an INSTI-based regimen to darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c) or doravirine (DOR). Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the reversibility of NPAEs via the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and D) in patients who started antiretroviral therapy with dolutegravir (DTG) or bictegravir (BIC). These patients were switched to DRV/c or DOR. Scales were compared at the moment of the switch and 12 weeks later. Results: We included 1153 treatment-naïve men, 676 (58.7%) with BIC and 477 (41.3%) with DTG. A total of 32 (2.7%) experienced NPAEs that led to discontinuation. Insomnia was found in 20 patients; depression via PHQ-9 in 21 patients, via HADS-D in 5 patients, and anxiety via HADS-A in 12 patients. All of them were evaluated by a psychiatrist at the moment of the symptoms; 7 (21.8%) started psychotropic drugs. After 12 weeks of follow-up, PHQ-9, ISI, HADS-A, and HADS-D decreased, with a p-value ≤ 0.05. Conclusions: NPAEs seem to improve after switching to a DRV/c- or DOR-based regimen after the first 4 and 12 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Limited data are available regarding the susceptibility of the reverse transcriptase V106 polymorphism to doravirine. Methods Doravirine susceptibility was measured in site-directed mutants (SDMs) containing V106I, V106A, V106M, and Y188L mutations in subtype B (NL4-3, HXB2) and CRF02_AG background and in recombinant viruses with RT harboring V106I alone derived from 50 people with HIV. Results HIV-1 B subtype was detected in 1523 of 2705 cases. Prevalence of V106I was 3.2% in B and 2.5% in non-B subtypes, and was higher in subtype F (8.1%) and D (14.3%). Fold-changes (FC) in susceptibility for SDMs were below doravirine biological cutoff (3.0) for V106I, but not for V106A, V106M, and Y188L. Clinically derived viruses tested included 22 B (median FC, 1.2; interquartile range [IQR], 0.9–1.6) and 28 non-B subtypes (median FC, 1.8; IQR, 0.9–3.0). Nine (18%) viruses showed FC values equal or higher than the doravirine biological FC cutoff. Conclusions The prevalence of the HIV-1 RT V106I polymorphism in MeditRes HIV consortium remains low, but significantly more prevalent in subtypes D and F. V106I minimally decreased the susceptibility to doravirine in SDMs and most clinical isolates. Reduced susceptibility seems to occur at increased frequency in subtype F1; however, the clinical impact remains to be investigated. Clinical Trials Registration NCT04894357. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective s : The availability of doravirine (DOR) allowed clinicians to prescribe a dolutegravir (DTG)‐based two‐drug regimen (2DR) in individuals not eligible to receive lamivudine (3TC) or rilpivirine (RPV). The aims of this study were to describe the durability of DTG + DOR compared with DTG/3TC and DTG/RPV and the rate of virological failure and target not‐detected maintenance over time. Methods: This retrospective, monocentric analysis included all subjects who started a DTG‐based 2DR from 2018 to 2022 as a simplification. Descriptive statistics and non‐parametric tests to describe and compare the groups were applied. Kaplan–Meier probability curves and Cox regression models for regimens durability were used. Results: The study enrolled 710 individuals: 499 treated with DTG/3TC, 140 with DTG/RPV, and 71 with DTG + DOR. A 2DR with DOR was prescribed to older subjects who had a longer infection, greater exposure to different antiretroviral regimens, a higher proportion of resistance‐associated mutations, and a worse immune‐virologic status. Over a cumulative follow‐up of 68 152 weeks, 42 discontinuations were registered (5.9%). DTG + DOR had a risk of treatment interruption of 7.8% at 48 weeks and 9.8% at 96 weeks, significantly higher than the other 2DRs. In the multivariate Cox model, DTG + DOR and DTG/RPV were significantly associated with discontinuation. The maintenance of target not detected during follow‐up was similar among groups. The rate of virological failure was higher for DTG + DOR through different event definitions. Conclusions: DTG + DOR durability was high over a long follow‐up albeit lower than for other 2DRs. This combination might be an effective option in people with HIV that has proven difficult to treat. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The pharmacokinetics of doravirine has been studied in clinical trials but not in real‐world settings. Our study aims to characterize and identify factors influencing doravirine (a CYP3A4 substrate) pharmacokinetics in real‐world people with HIV (PWH). Methods: A total of 174 doravirine concentrations measured in 146 PWH followed up in the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program at the University Hospital of Lausanne (Switzerland) between 2019 and 2023 were included in the analysis. Demographic data, clinical information and comedications were recorded during the routine SHCS visits (every 3–6 months). Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the clinical significance of the covariates retained in the final model were performed using NONMEM. Results: A one‐compartment model with first‐order absorption and linear elimination best described doravirine pharmacokinetics. Potent CYP3A4 inhibitors and, to a lesser extent age, were the only tested covariates to significantly impact doravirine clearance (CL). Potent CYP3A4 inhibitors reduced CL by 50%, and a 30% decrease in CL was observed in an 80‐year‐old compared with a 55‐year‐old PWH. The effect of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors was prominent, explaining 59% of between‐subject variability in CL. Model‐based simulations predicted 2.8‐fold and 1.6‐fold increases in median steady‐state trough and maximum doravirine concentrations, respectively, when a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor was co‐administered. Conclusions: Our findings show that potent CYP3A4 inhibitors and age influence doravirine pharmacokinetics. However, given the good tolerability of doravirine, dosing adjustment of doravirine is probably not mandatory in those situations. TDM remains useful essentially in specific clinical situations, such as hepatic impairment, suspected nonadherence or pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Islatravir is a new antiretroviral drug that inhibits the reverse transcriptase (RT) of HIV-1 through multiple mechanisms. It is proposed to be used in combination with doravirine, a new NNRTI. M184V/I mutations have been shown to reduce the in vitro antiviral activity of islatravir, but their effect when pre-selected during ART has not been investigated. Methods HIV-1 rt sequences were obtained from four individuals of the Garrahan HIV cohort prior to, or during virological failure to ART. HIV-1 infectious molecular clones were constructed on an NL4-3 backbone, and infectious viruses were produced by transfection of 293T cells. Fold-changes in IC50 were calculated for each mutant versus the NL4-3 WT. HIV-1 phenotypic drug resistance was tested in vitro against NRTIs and NNRTIs. Results In all the cases, M184I/V, either alone or in the presence of other mutations, was associated with reduced susceptibility to islatravir, abacavir and lamivudine. Viruses carrying M184V/I showed variable levels of resistance to islatravir (4.8 to 33.8-fold). The greatest reduction in susceptibility was observed for viruses carrying the mutations M184V + V106I (33.8-fold resistance) or M184V + I142V (25.2-fold resistance). For NNRTIs, the presence of V106I alone did not affect susceptibility to doravirine or etravirine, but showed a modest reduction in susceptibility to efavirenz (6-fold). Susceptibility to doravirine was slightly reduced only for one of the mutants carrying V106I in combination with Y181C and M184V. Conclusions Mutations and polymorphisms selected in vivo together with M184V/I depend on the viral genetic context and on ART history, and could affect the efficacy of islatravir once available for use in the clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background IMPAACT 2014 study is a phase I/II, multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized study of doravirine (DOR) co-formulated with lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) as fixed-dose combination (DOR FDC) in adolescents with HIV-1. We report the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of DOR FDC through 96 weeks. Methods Participants were adolescents aged 12 to <18 years who weighed at least 45 kg and who were either antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve or virologically suppressed without documented resistance mutations to DOR/3TC/TDF. The efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL assessed at weeks 48 and 96 using the observed failure approach. Safety and tolerability outcomes were incidence of adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuations. Results A total of 45 adolescents, median age 15 (range, 12–17) years, 58% females, were enrolled and 2 (4.4%) participants were ARV naïve. Of the 45 participants, 42 (93.3%) completed the study and 41 (91.1%) completed the study treatment. At week 48, 41/42 (97.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 87.4–99.9) and week 96, 37/40 (92.5%; 95% CI, 79.6–98.4) participants had achieved or maintained HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL. There were no treatment-related discontinuations due to AEs and no drug-related AEs ≥grade 3 or deaths. Conclusions We found once-daily dosing of DOR FDC to be safe and well tolerated for maintaining viral suppression through 96 weeks in adolescents living with HIV-1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of the present research is to develop a reliable, sensitive, and robust stability-indicating RP-HPLC method to quantify doravirine along with its impurities (IMP-A, IMP-B). The separation was accomplished on a Inertsil ODS C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) column at 216 nm using 0.1% orthophosphoric acid and acetonitrile at a flow rate of 1 mL/min eluted with a retention time of IMP-A, IMP-B, and doravirine of 2.52 min, 3.96 min, and 8.74 min respectively. The optimized method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, specificity, system suitability, and robustness as per International Council for Harmonization guidelines. The optimized method showed linearity within the concentration range 10–200 μg/mL, 0.7–14 μg/mL, and 0.5–10 μg/mL for doravirine, IMP-A, and IMP-B respectively. The method was found to be precise at %RSD < 2 and accurate with percentage recovery for doravirine, IMP-A, and IMP-B of 100.46%, 100.2%, and 99.2% respectively. The optimized method proved to be sensitive, robust, and specific. This optimized method can be routinely employed in quality control laboratories for the quantification of doravirine along with its impurities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

HIV post- exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a prevention tool for individuals with a recent potential exposure to HIV. Doravirine has been available since 2019 in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and lamivudine and has not been evaluated as a PEP. DOR/3TC/TDF is our department's most commonly prescribed PEP treatment since 2021. This study evaluates the completion rate of the DOR/3TC/TDF as compared to EVG/c/FTC/TAF for PEP, which was the regimen prescribed until 2020 in our hospital. This retrospective observational study was conducted between January 2020 and September 2021. The subjects included consecutively were adults who consulted for an HIV sexual exposure accident and for whom DOR/3TC/TDF in 2021 or EVG/c/FTC/TAF in 2020 was prescribed. The outcomes were the completion rate to the end of treatment (28 days), the seroconversion rate, and the description of side effects. During the study period, 311 people were included: 140 treated with DOR/3TC/TDF and 171 treated with EVGc/FTC/TAF. Considering subjects with a follow-up visit, the completion rate was 96.8% (90/93) in the DOR/3TC/TDF group, and 94.6% (123/130) in the EVG/c/FTC/TAF group (p-value: 0.53). The number of people lost to follow-up was nearly equivalent in both groups: 27.1% (38/140) in the DOR/3TC/TDF group and 23.4% (40/171) in the EVG/c/FTC/TAF group (p-value: 0.45). A side effect was described for 38% (36/94) in the DOR/3TC/TDF group, and 29.7% (38/128) in the EVG/c/FTC/TAF group. No cases of seroconversion were observed. DOR/3TC/TDF appears to have a similar safety profile to EVG/c/FTC/TAF. Due to its lower cost, it seems to be a treatment option for consideration in the context of HIV-exposure accidents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background New regimens may provide better tolerability, convenience, and safety for nonoccupational human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). For this reason, we evaluated the single-tablet regimen of doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) for 28 days. Methods This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm trial including individuals with potential HIV-1 exposure within 72 hours. The primary endpoint was noncompletion of PEP at day 28. Secondary endpoints were adverse effects, adherence, and rate of seroconversion. We performed follow-up at day 7, week 4, and week 12. Results Between September 2019 and March 2022, the study enrolled 399 individuals. Median age was 30 (interquartile range [IQR], 27–36) years, and 91% (n = 364) were male. The mode of exposure was sex between men in 84% (n = 331) of cases; risk assessment for HIV-1 transmission was considered as "high" in 97% (n = 385) of the participants. Median time from exposure to consultation was 24 (IQR, 13–40) hours. Noncompletion of PEP was 29% (n = 114) (95% confidence interval [CI], 24%–33%) and 20% (n = 72) (95% CI, 16%–25%) per modified intention-to-treat. Main reasons for noncompletion were loss to follow-up (n = 104 [91%]) and intolerance (n = 8 [7%]). Older age was associated with a lower risk of premature discontinuation (OR, 0.94; P <.001). One hundred twenty-three (31%) participants reported adverse events, mostly mild and self-limited (82%); discontinuation occurred in 8 cases (2%). Adherence to PEP in the assessed users was 96%. There were no HIV seroconversions. Conclusions DOR/3TC/TDF is a well-tolerated option for nonoccupational PEP. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04233372. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the past, one of the most widely used non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) in first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) of HIV infection was efavirenz (EFV), which is already used as a cost-effective treatment in developing countries due to its efficacy, tolerability, and availability. However, EFV also demonstrates several adverse effects, like hepatotoxicity, altered lipid profile, neuropsychological symptoms, and behavioral effects in children after in utero exposure. In 2018, another NNRTI, doravirine (DOR), was approved due to its similar efficacy but better safety profile. Preclinical safety studies demonstrated that DOR is not genotoxic and exhibits no developmental toxicity or effects on fertility in rats. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos have been widely accepted as a vertebrate model for pharmacological and developmental studies. We used zebrafish embryos as an in vivo model to investigate the developmental toxicity of DOR compared to EFV. After exposure of the embryos to the drugs from the gastrula stage up to different developmental stages (30 embryos for each arm, in three independent experiments), we assessed their survival, morphology, hatching rate, apoptosis in the developing head, locomotion behavior, vasculature development, and neutral lipid distribution. Overall, DOR showed a better safety profile than EFV in our model. Therapeutic and supra-therapeutic doses of DOR induced very low mortality [survival rates: 92, 90, 88, 88, and 81% at 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 μM, respectively, at 24 h post fecundation (hpf), and 88, 85, 88, 89, and 75% at the same doses, respectively, at 48 hpf] and mild morphological alterations compared to EFV exposure also in the sub-therapeutic ranges (survival rates: 80, 77, 69, 63, and 44% at 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 μM, respectively, at 24 hpf and 72, 70, 63, 52, and 0% at the same doses, respectively, at 48 hpf). Further, DOR only slightly affected the hatching rate at supra-therapeutic doses (97, 98, 96, 87, and 83% at 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 μM, respectively, at 72 hpf), while EFV already strongly reduced hatching at sub-therapeutic doses (83, 49, 11, 0, and 0% at 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 μM, respectively, at the same time endpoint). Both DOR at therapeutic doses and most severely EFV at sub-therapeutic doses enhanced apoptosis in the developing head during crucial phases of embryo neurodevelopment and perturbed the locomotor behavior. Furthermore, EFV strongly affected angiogenesis and disturbed neutral lipid homeostasis even at sub-therapeutic doses compared to DOR at therapeutic concentrations. Our findings in zebrafish embryos add further data confirming the higher safety of DOR with respect to EFV regarding embryo development, neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and lipid metabolism. Further studies are needed to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the better pharmacological safety profile of DOR, and further human studies are required to confirm these results in the zebrafish animal model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doravirine (DOR) is a newly approved non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). We aimed to investigate, in a real-life setting, how switching to a DOR-based regimen rather than a rilpivirine (RPV)-based regimen impacted metabolic and hepatic safety. The analysis included 551 antiretroviral treatment (ART)-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH), starting RPV-based or DOR-based regimens with viral load < 200 copies/mL, baseline (T0), and at least one control visit (6-month visit, T1). We enrolled 295 PLWH in the RPV and 256 in the DOR cohort. At T1, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C), and triglycerides significantly decreased in both DOR and RPV cohorts, while high-density lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) only decreased in RPV-treated people. Consistently, the TC/HDL-C ratio declined more markedly in the DOR (−0.36, p < 0.0001) than in the RPV cohort (−0.08, p = 0.25) (comparison p = 0.39). Similar trends were observed when excluding the PLWH on lipid-lowering treatment from the analysis. People with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels showed a slight ALT increase in both cohorts, and those with baseline ALT > 40 IU/L experienced a significant decline (−14 IU/L, p = 0.008) only in the DOR cohort. Lipid profile improved in both cohorts, and there was a significant reduction in ALT in PLWH with higher-than-normal baseline levels on DOR-based ART. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The pharmacokinetics of doravirine (DOR) have not been clarified in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). In this study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics of DOR in four HIV-1-infected patients undergoing HD who were administered DOR. The participants were patients undergoing HD for end-stage renal disease and were administered DOR. DOR was administered once daily (one tablet of 100 mg), every evening. On days of HD treatment, DOR was administered after the end of the procedure. After administration of DOR for at least 1 week, the plasma DOR concentration was measured. The median plasma trough DOR concentration was 766.9 ng/mL (range: 509–1085 ng/mL). The median DOR clearance by HD, DOR elimination rate, half-life (T 1/2) of plasma DOR concentration during HD, and T 1/2 during the non-HD period were 85.04 mL/min, 73.12%, 7.71 h, and 13.76 h, respectively. The T 1/2 during the HD period was significantly shorter than the T 1/2 during the non-HD period (p = 0.0030). In this study, elimination of DOR by HD was confirmed. Viral suppression was maintained in all patients undergoing HD, and none had adverse events or safety problems. As DOR is eliminated by HD, monitoring its plasma concentration is considered necessary for clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thanks to the modern ARV regimens and the fact that the morbidity and mortality of metabolic syndrome increases with age, clinicians are continuously researching effective and safe antiretroviral regimens with low impact on the lipid profile. Doravirine (DOR) is the latest non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that shows long-term safety and tolerability and a favorable lipid profile. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of DOR-based three-drug regimens on the lipid profile in clinical practice. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 38 treatment-experienced, virologically suppressed people living with HIV (PLWH) switching to this regimen, following the eligibility criteria. We carried out comparison analysis of immunological and metabolic parameters between baseline and 48 weeks of follow up. In our cohort of treatment-experienced, virologically suppressed PLWH, three-drug regimens with DOR showed good efficacy and a positive profile on lipid metabolism at 48 weeks of follow up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Doravirine (DOR) is a newly approved antiretroviral belonging to the class of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), well tolerated and leading to an improved lipid profile in antiretroviral experienced people living with HIV (PLWH). We aimed at evaluating if the lipid-lowering effect is linked to the drug class, using real-life data from the SCOLTA cohort. Methods: We compared the lipid profile modifications in experienced PLWH switching to a DOR-based regimen from rilpivirine or another NNRTI-based regimen or from an integrase strand transferase (INSTI)-based regimen. T0 and T1 were defined as the baseline and 6-month follow-up respectively. Data were collected at baseline and prospectively every six months and changes from baseline were compared using a multivariable linear model. Results: In 107 PLWH, enrolled in the SCOLTA DOR cohort, with undetectable HIV-RNA at baseline, 32.7% switched from RPV-based regimens (DOR1), 29.9% from other NNRTI-including regimens (DOR2) and 37.4% switched from INSTI-including regimens (DOR3). At T1, TC significantly decreased in DOR2 (-15 mg/dL) and DOR3 (-23 mg/dL), and significantly more in DOR3 than in DOR1 (-6 mg/dL) (p = 0.016). HDL-C declined in DOR2 (-2 mg/dL) whereas it increased in DOR1 (+ 3 mg/dL) (p = 0.042) and remained stable in DOR3. LDL-C significantly decreased from baseline in DOR2 (-12 mg/dL) and DOR3 (-22 mg/dL) and was different between DOR1 (-8 mg/dL) and DOR3 (p = 0.022). TC/HDL ratio showed a significant decline in the DOR3 group (-0.45), although similar to DOR1 (-0.23, p = 0.315) and DOR2 (-0.19, p = 0.254). Triglycerides did not noticeably change. ALT significantly decreased in PLWH with a baseline level > 40 UI/mL. Conclusions: PLWH on doravirine treatment showed different trends in blood lipids according to their previous regimen. In PLWH switching from RPV, minimal modifications were seen, whereas in those switching from other NNRTIs and from INSTI-including regimens, we observed an overall improvement in lipid profile, seemingly independent of the "statin effect" of TDF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Doravirine has a unique resistance profile but how this profile might increase its usefulness beyond first-line therapy in persons with susceptible viruses has not been well studied. We sought to determine scenarios in which doravirine would retain activity against isolates from ART-naïve persons with transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and to identify gaps in available doravirine susceptibility data. Methods: We analyzed published in vitro doravirine susceptibility data and applied the results to 42,535 RT sequences from ART-naïve persons published between 2017 and 2021. NNRTI drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were defined as those with a Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database doravirine penalty score either alone or in combination with other mutations. Results: V106A, Y188L, F227C/L, M230L, and Y318F were associated with the greatest reductions in doravirine susceptibility. However, several NNRTI DRMs and DRM combinations lacking these canonical resistance mutations had > tenfold reduced susceptibility including G190E, one isolate with G190S, three isolates with L100I + K103N, one isolate with K103N + P225H, and isolates with L100I + K103N + V108I and K101E + Y181C + G190A. Of the 42,535 ART-naïve sequences, 3,374 (7.9%) contained a NNRTI DRM of which 2,788 (82.6%) contained 1 DRM (n = 33 distinct mutations), 426 (12.6%) contained 2 DRMs (79 distinct pairs of mutations), and 143 (4.2%) contained ≥ 3 DRMs (86 distinct mutation patterns). Among the 2,788 sequences with one DRM, 112 (4.0%) were associated with ≥ 3.0-fold reduced doravirine susceptibility while 2,625 (94.2%) were associated with < 3.0-fold reduced susceptibility. Data were not available for individual NNRTI DRMs in 51 sequences (1.8%). Among the 426 sequences with two NNRTI DRMs, 180 (42.3%) were associated with ≥ 3.0 fold reduced doravirine susceptibility while just 32 (7.5%) had < 3.0 fold reduced susceptibility. Data were not available for 214 (50.2%) sequences containing two NNRTI DRMs. Conclusions: First-line therapy containing doravirine plus two NRTIs is expected to be effective in treating most persons with TDR as more than 80% of TDR sequences had a single NNRTI DRM and as more than 90% with a single DRM were expected to be susceptible to doravirine. However, caution is required for the use of doravirine in persons with more than one NNRTI DRM even if none of the DRMs are canonical doravirine-resistance mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: We studied the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of 100-mg doravirine and doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate fixed-dose combination (100/300/300 mg DOR FDC) treatment in adolescents with HIV-1. Methods: Adolescents ages 12 to younger than 18 years were enrolled in 2 sequential cohorts. Cohort 1 evaluated intensive PK and short-term safety of 100-mg single-dose doravirine in adolescents ≥35 kg. Cohort 2 participants either initiated treatment with DOR FDC (antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve) or switched to DOR FDC from a previous ARV regimen (virologically suppressed). The first 10 Cohort 2 participants had intensive PK evaluations, and safety, sparse PK, and HIV RNA were assessed through week 24. Results: Fifty-five adolescents, median age 15.0 years and baseline weight 51.5 kg, were enrolled. Nine participants completed Cohort 1 PK assessments (8 of the 9 participants weighed ≥45 kg) and 45 initiated study drug in Cohort 2. The doravirine geometric mean (GM) AUC0–∞ was 34.8 μM∙hour, and the GM C24 was 514 nM after a single dose, with a predicted steady-state GM C24,ss,pred of 690 nM. Cohort 2 enrolled adolescents weighing ≥45 kg. Plasma concentrations of doravirine, tenofovir, and lamivudine achieved by Cohort 2 participants were similar to those reported in adults. No drug-related serious or grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred. Forty-two of 45 participants (93.3%; 95% CI: [81.7, 98.6]) achieved or maintained HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL. Conclusions: Doravirine and DOR FDC achieved target PK in adolescents with HIV-1. DOR FDC was well-tolerated and maintained excellent virologic efficacy through 24 weeks, offering a favorable option for adolescents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doravirine (DOR) concentrations and HIV-1 RNA were evaluated in genital fluids from adults with HIV on stable therapy who switched to DOR + FTC/TAF. High protein-unbound DOR concentrations were observed in both seminal plasma and cervicovaginal fluid. DOR + FTC/TAF maintained viral suppression in genital fluids in all but 1 participant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: Islatravir (MK-8591) is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor in development for treatment and prevention of HIV-1. We present efficacy and safety data for islatravir and doravirine (DOR) through 96 weeks of the phase 2b trial (NCT03272347). Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging trial, participants initially received islatravir (0.25, 0.75, or 2.25 mg) with doravirine (100 mg) and lamivudine (3TC, 300 mg) or a fixed-dose combination of doravirine, 3TC, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) daily. Beginning at week 24, participants receiving islatravir stopped 3TC if HIV-1 RNA from the prior visit was <50 copies per milliliter and continued taking the assigned islatravir dose (still blinded) with doravirine. All islatravir groups transitioned to open-label use of 0.75 mg between weeks 60 and 84. Efficacy end points at week 96 included the proportion of participants maintaining HIV-1 RNA of <50 copies per milliliter (FDA Snapshot). Safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) reporting. Results: One hundred twenty-one treatment-naive participants received the study drugs and were included in the analyses. Through week 96, HIV-1 RNA<50 copies per milliliter was maintained in 86.2% (25/29), 90.0% (27/30), and 67.7% (21/31) of participants in the 0.25-, 0.75-, and 2.25-mg islatravir groups, respectively, 81.1% (73/90) of the combined islatravir group, and 80.6% (25/31) of the DOR/3TC/TDF group. One participant in the 2.25-mg islatravir group had Protocol-Defined Virologic Failure after week 48. Drug-related AE rates were higher for DOR/3TC/TDF participants (22.6%) compared with islatravir (combined 7.8%). Two participants (2.2%) receiving islatravir with doravirine and one (3.2%) receiving DOR/3TC/TDF discontinued because of an AE. Conclusions: Treatment regimens containing islatravir and doravirine maintained viral suppression through week 96 and were well tolerated regardless of dose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We determined total and unbound concentrations of doravirine (DOR) in cerebrospinal fluid and blood plasma. Total and unbound DOR concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid exceeded the half-maximal effective concentration against wild-type virus (5.1 ng/mL) in all patients, suggesting that DOR may contribute to inhibit viral replication in this compartment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Doravirine (DOR) is a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor. In the phase 3 DRIVE-AHEAD trial in treatment-naive adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, DOR demonstrated noninferior efficacy compared with efavirenz (EFV) and superior profiles for neuropsychiatric tolerability and lipids at 48 weeks. We present data through week 96. Methods DRIVE-AHEAD is a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, noninferiority trial in antiretroviral treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/mL. Participants were randomized to a daily fixed-dose tablet of DOR (100 mg), lamivudine (3TC; 300 mg) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF; 300 mg) (DOR/3TC/TDF) or EFV (600 mg), emtricitabine (FTC; 200 mg) and TDF (300 mg) (EFV/FTC/TDF). The efficacy end point of interest at week 96 was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL (Food and Drug Administration Snapshot Approach) with a predefined noninferiority margin of 10% to support week 48 results. Safety end points of interest included prespecified neuropsychiatric adverse events and the mean change in fasting lipids at week 96. Results Of 734 participants randomized, 728 received study drugs and were included in analyses. At week 96, HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL was achieved by 77.5% of DOR/3TC/TDF vs 73.6% of EFV/FTC/TDF participants, with a treatment difference of 3.8% (95% confidence interval, –2.4% to 10%). Virologic failure rates were low and similar across treatment arms, with no additional resistance to DOR observed between weeks 48 and 96. Prespecified neuropsychiatric adverse events and rash were less frequent in DOR/3TC/TDF than in EFV/FTC/TDF participants through week 96. At week 96, fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels increased in the EFV/FTC/TDF group but not in the DOR/3TC/TDF group; the mean changes from baseline in total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio were similar. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02403674. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the primary analysis of the DRIVE-SHIFT trial, switching to doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) maintained suppression of HIV-1 through week 48. Here, we present long-term efficacy and safety outcomes through week 144 of the DRIVE-SHIFT trial. Methods: This phase 3, randomized, open-label trial evaluated switching from a stable antiretroviral regimen to once-daily DOR/3TC/TDF in adults with HIV-1 suppressed for $6 months and no previous virologic failure. Participants switched at day 1 [immediate switch group (ISG); n = 447] or week 24 [delayed switch group (DSG); n = 209]. Nine ISG participants who completed week 48 but did not enter extension-1 were excluded from week 144 efficacy analyses. Results: At week 144, HIV-1 RNA, 50 copies/mL was maintained in 80.1% of the ISG (351/438) and 83.7% of the DSG (175/209), while 2.7% (12/438) and 4.8% (10/209), respectively, had HIV-1 RNA $50 copies/mL (Food and Drug Administration Snapshot approach). Protocol-defined virologic failure after switch occurred in 2.1% of ISG (9/438) and 3.3% of DSG (7/209); no viral resistance to doravirine was detected in 4 participants with samples available. Reductions in fasting lipids were observed at 24 weeks after switch and maintained through week 144. The mean weight change from switch to week 144 was +1.4 kg for ISG and +1.2 kg for DSG. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (16.2%), headache (12.3%), and diarrhea (9.1%). Overall, 4.1% discontinued because of adverse events, and no deaths occurred. Conclusions: These results confirm that switching to once-daily DOR/3TC/TDF is a generally well-tolerated option for maintaining viral suppression in adults considering a change in therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Dolutegravir has replaced efavirenz in most low‐ and middle‐income countries, due to better tolerability and formidable resistance profile, but dolutegravir side effects suggest alternatives are needed. We evaluated doravirine resistance in South Africa as a first step to assess whether doravirine may replace dolutegravir. Methods: A retrospective dataset was analysed for predicted doravirine susceptibility, including sequences obtained from three patient groups. First, data from 277 patients initiating antiretroviral treatment (ART) were collected between February 2013 and October 2014 as part of a national survey. Second, data from 788 patients experiencing NNRTI‐based ART failure were obtained between February 2013 and October 2014 as part of a national survey. Third, data derived from 584 patients who had genotypic drug resistance testing requested after NNRT‐based failure as part of individual patient management between January 2016 and December 2019. Pol sequences were generated using validated population‐based in‐house genotyping and submitted to Stanford HIVdb v8.9. Results and discussion: Less than 5% of patients initiating ART presented with genotypic doravirine resistance, whereas most patients experiencing NNRTI‐based ART failure presented with predicted intermediate (41.0%) or high‐level resistance (43.8%) to doravirine. High‐level resistance to doravirine was commonly predicted by the presence of at least three DRMs (79.7%). The predicted resistance profile to doravirine in ART‐naïve patients is promising, but less so in those experiencing failure to first‐generation NNRTIs. Accumulation of NNRTI DRMs seems to be an important factor in the poor resistance prediction for doravirine. Conclusions: Although doravirine is approved as initial therapy in patients who are ART‐naïve, it is currently recommended to obtain a genotype prior to the initiation of ART. Clinical studies are needed to ascertain whether predicted resistance profiles in ART naïve and NNRTI‐treated patients translate into poor clinical outcomes, especially in settings where genotypic resistance testing is not available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doravirine, a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV‐1), is predominantly cleared by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and metabolized to an oxidative metabolite (M9). Coadministration with rifabutin, a moderate CYP3A4 inducer, decreased doravirine exposure. Based on nonparametric superposition modeling, a doravirine dose adjustment from 100 mg once daily to 100 mg twice daily during rifabutin coadministration was proposed. However, M9 exposure may also be impacted by induction, in addition to the dose adjustment. As M9 concentrations have not been quantified in previous clinical studies, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed to investigate the change in M9 exposure when doravirine is coadministered with CYP3A inducers. Simulations demonstrated that although CYP3A induction increases doravirine clearance by up to 4.4‐fold, M9 exposure is increased by only 1.2‐fold relative to exposures for doravirine 100 mg once daily in the absence of CYP3A induction. Thus, a 2.4‐fold increase in M9 exposure relative to the clinical dose of doravirine is anticipated when doravirine 100 mg twice daily is coadministered with rifabutin. In a subsequent clinical trial, doravirine and M9 exposures, when doravirine 100 mg twice daily was coadministered with rifabutin, were found to be consistent with model predictions using rifampin and efavirenz as representative inducers. These findings support the dose adjustment to doravirine 100 mg twice daily when coadministered with rifabutin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Doravirine (DOR) is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in patients with no known DOR resistance-associated mutations. DOR was rationally designed to address limitations associated with other approved NNRTIs, particularly resistance from common NNRTI resistance-associated mutants containing K103N, Y181C, or G190A reverse transcriptase substitutions. Setting: Data to date from both in vitro studies and clinical trials have been compiled to summarize the resistance profile of DOR. Methods: We analyzed data from in vitro studies and phase 2 and 3 trials to assess the emergence of resistance-associated mutations and their impact on efficacy among participants treated with DOR. Results: DOR exhibited a distinct resistance profile compared with efavirenz and rilpivirine in vitro and in vivo; mutant viruses that were resistant to DOR showed limited cross-resistance to efavirenz and rilpivirine. In clinical trials, the development of DOR resistance-associated substitutions in reverse transcriptase was uncommon. Conclusion: Overall, minimal cross-resistance across NNRTIs was observed for DOR and limited development of DOR-related resistance. These data should assist clinicians in further understanding the resistance profile of DOR, so appropriate treatment decisions can be made for their patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A simple and rapid stability indicating reverse phase ultra-performance liquid chromatographic method has been established and validated for the simultaneous quantification of lamivudine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, doravirine and efavirenz in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. The chromatographic separation was performed on Acquity Ethylene Bridged Hybrid Phenyl (50 mm×2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) column. The isocratic elution system of water and acetonitrile in the ratio 50:50 v/v pumped at a flow rate 0.4 ml/min in isocratic mode. The injection volume set was 1 µl and the detection wavelength was 238 nm. The column temperature was set at 30°. The retention times of lamivudine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, doravirine and efavirenz were found to be 1.012 min, 1.233 min, 1.428 min and 1.666 min respectively with a total run time of 3 min. The proposed method was validated according to International Council on Harmonisation Q2 (R1) guidelines. The percentage recoveries were found to be in the range of 99.56-100.40 %. The relative standard deviation values obtained during precision studies were found to be less than 2. Linearity between concentration and response was found within the specified concentration range and the correlation coefficient was found to be 0.999 for all the drugs. Degradation studies were carried out under various stress conditions such as acid, base, oxidation, heat and light and found no interference of degraded impurity peaks at the retention time of analyte peaks. Hence, the proposed ultra-performance liquid chromatographic method can be utilized in the routine quality investigation of lamivudine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, doravirine and efavirenz either individually or simultaneously in bulk and co-formulated dosage forms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is known and objective: Doravirine is a non‐nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐1 infection. This phase 1 study in healthy adults investigated the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of long‐acting parenteral (LAP) microsuspension formulations of doravirine administered as an intramuscular (IM) injection. Methods: After confirmation of tolerability and safety of oral doravirine, 36 participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive IM doravirine 200 mg as Treatment A (1 × 1 mL, 20% [200 mg/mL] suspension), B (1 × 0.66 mL, 30% [300 mg/mL] suspension) or C (2 × 0.5 mL, 20% suspension). Blood samples were taken as venous plasma, venous dried blood spots (DBS) and fingerstick DBS. Results and discussion: Plasma concentration‐time profiles following IM treatments demonstrated rapid initial doravirine release, with initial peak ~4 days post‐injection, followed by decline over the next ~6 days; a second peak was reached at ~24‐36 days, corresponding to prolonged and sustained release, with measurable concentrations up to Day 183. Treatment C was associated with highest peak concentrations and shortest time to maximum concentration. Elimination half‐lives for all IM formulations were prolonged versus oral administration (~46‐58 days vs ~11‐15 hours). Oral doravirine and IM doravirine were generally well tolerated; injection‐site pain was the most common adverse event for IM doravirine. Doravirine concentrations from DBS samples showed strong correlations to venous plasma concentrations. What is new and conclusions: Novel doravirine LAP IM injection formulations investigated in this study demonstrated sustained plasma doravirine concentrations over a course of >20 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A new simple, precise and robust isocratic reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of lamivudine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and doravirine in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. The validation included specificity, linearity, system suitability, precision, robustness, LOD and LOQ characteristics. The chromatographic separation was achieved on C18X bridge phenyl column (150 × 4.6 mm, 3 μm particle size) eluted with acetonitrile and hexane-1-sulfonic acid (pH 2.5; 50:50, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min and monitored at 243 nm over a run time of 12 min. The retention times of lamivudine, TDF, and doravirine were found to be 2.45, 7.3, and 8.79 min. respectively. The method was linear in the range of 5 – 100 μg/mL (r2 = 0.999) for lamivudine and TDF and in the range of 1.75 – 35 μg/mL (r2 = 0.999) for doravirine. The percentage recoveries of three drugs were within the acceptable limits (98 – 102%). The method was found to be precise as confirmed by % RSD < 0.6. Forced degradation study was conducted as per ICH guidelines, and the three drugs showed degradation within 21.4 – 33.8% under acidic, basic, oxidative, photolysis, and hydrolysis conditions. The proposed RP-HPLC method can be used for the quantification of lamivudine, TDF, and doravirine in API and tablets without any interference from excipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We report the results of the reverse transcriptase (RT)/protease (PR) transmitted drug resistance (TDR) prevalence study in 2018, focusing on doravirine resistance-associated mutations and the differences observed when Stanford or French National Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS)/Spanish Network of AIDS Research (RIS)/IAS-USA resistance interpretation algorithms are used to describe clinically relevant resistance.Methods: We used the WHO 2009 list to investigate the prevalence of NNRTI, NRTI and PI TDR, in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients, adding mutations E138A/G/K/Q/R, V106I, V108I, V179L, G190Q, H221Y, F227C/L/V, M230IDR, L234I, P236L and Y318F in RT. The prevalence of doravirine resistance-associated mutations, as described by Soulie et al. in 2019, was evaluated. Clinically relevant TDR was investigated using the latest versions of ANRS, RIS, IAS-USA and Stanford algorithms.Results: NNRTI mutations were detected in 82 of 606 (13.5%) patients. We found 18 patients (3.0%) with NRTI mutations and 5 patients (0.8%) with PI mutations. We detected 11 patients harbouring doravirine resistance-associated mutations (prevalence of 1.8%). Furthermore, we observed important differences in clinically relevant resistance to doravirine when ANRS/RIS (0.7%), IAS-USA (0.5%) or Stanford algorithms (5.0%) were used. V106I, which was detected in 3.8% of the patients, was the main mutation driving these differences. V106I detection was not associated with any of the clinical, demographic or virological characteristics of the patients.Conclusions: The prevalence of NRTI and PI TDR remains constant in Spain. Doravirine TDR is very infrequent by RIS/ANRS/IAS-USA algorithms, in contrast with results using the Stanford algorithm. Further genotype-phenotype studies are necessary to elucidate the role of V106I in doravirine resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Doravirine, a novel NNRTI, selects for specific mutations in vitro, including mutations at reverse transcriptase (RT) positions 106, 108, 188, 227, 230 and 234. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of doravirine-associated resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-experienced patients.Methods: Doravirine-associated resistance mutations identified in vitro or in vivo were studied in a set of 9199 HIV-1 RT sequences from HIV-1 antiretroviral-experienced patients, including 381 NNRTI-failing patients in France and Italy between 2012 and 2017. The following mutations were considered as resistance mutations: V106A/M, V108I, Y188L, G190S, F227C/L/V, M230I/L, L234I, P236L, K103N + Y181C, K103N + P225H and K103N + L100I.Results: The frequencies of doravirine-associated resistance mutations (total dataset versus NNRTI-failing patients) were: V106A/M, 0.8% versus 2.6%; V108I, 3.3% versus 9.2%; Y188L, 1.2% versus 2.6%; G190S, 0.3% versus 2.1%; F227C/L/V, 0.5% versus 1.8%; M230I/L, 2.8% versus 0%; L234I, 0.1% versus 0.5%; K103N + Y181C, 3.9% versus 3.9%; K103N + P225H, 2.9% versus 4.7%; and K103N + L100I, 1.7% versus 3.9%, with a significantly higher proportion of these mutations in the NNRTI-failing group (P < 0.05), except for M230I/L and K103N + Y181C. The overall prevalence of sequences with at least one doravirine-associated resistance mutation was 12.2% and 34.9% in the total dataset and NNRTI-failing patients (P < 0.001), respectively. In comparison, the prevalence of the common NNRTI mutations V90I, K101E/P, K103N/S, E138A/G/K/Q/R/S, Y181C/I/V and G190A/E/S/Q were higher (8.9%, 7.9%, 28.6%, 12.6%, 14.2% and 8.9%, respectively).Conclusions: These results suggest that doravirine resistance in antiretroviral-experienced patients generally and specifically among NNRTI-failing patients is lower than resistance to other NNRTIs currently used, confirming its distinguishing resistance pattern. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Doravirine (DOR) demonstrated noninferior efficacy to darunavir plus ritonavir (DRV+r) and efavirenz (EFV) in 2 ongoing phase 3 trials: DRIVE-FORWARD (NCT02275780) and DRIVE-AHEAD (NCT02403674). Methods This prespecified analysis pooled efficacy data through the first 48 weeks of DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-AHEAD from the DOR groups (DOR/lamivudine [3TC]/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF] or DOR [100 mg daily] with emtricitabine [FTC]/TDF or abacavir [ABC]/3TC [n = 747]) compared with DRV+r (800/100 mg daily) with FTC/TDF or ABC/3TC (n = 383) or EFV/FTC/TDF (600/200/300 mg daily; n = 364). Efficacy assessments included the proportion of participants with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA <50 copies/mL and change in CD4+ T-cell count. Results At week 48, DOR demonstrated noninferior efficacy to DRV+r and EFV, with 84.1% of DOR-treated participants achieving HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL compared with 79.9% of the DRV+r and 80.8% of the EFV groups. Results were similar across demographic/prognostic subpopulations, including baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, gender, race, and HIV-1 subtype. Mean increases from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count through 48 weeks were 195.5 cells/mm3 for DOR, 185.6 cells/mm3 for DRV+r, and 188.4 cells/mm3 for EFV/FTC/TDF. Conclusions DOR, as a single entity (in combination with other antiretroviral agents) and as a fixed-dose combination (DOR/3TC/TDF), demonstrated noninferior efficacy to DRV+r and EFV as assessed by the proportion of HIV-1-infected, treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02275780 and NCT02403674. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background A prespecified integrated safety analysis was conducted for 3 doravirine (DOR) double-blind trials (Phase IIb: P007 [NCT01632345]; Phase III: DRIVE-FORWARD [NCT02275780] and DRIVE-AHEAD [NCT02403674]). Methods DOR (100 mg) arms from these trials were compared with darunavir plus ritonavir (DRV+r) in DRIVE-FORWARD and efavirenz (EFV) in P007 and DRIVE-AHEAD. Background therapies were emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) in P007; abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) or FTC/TDF in DRIVE-FORWARD; and 3TC/TDF for DOR and FTC/TDF for EFV in DRIVE-AHEAD. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants discontinuing due to adverse events (AEs) through Week 48. Results Discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar for participants on DOR and DRV+r (2.5% vs 3.1%, respectively) and lower for those on DOR than for those on EFV (2.5% vs 6.6%, respectively). Rates of drug-related AEs for DOR, DRV+r, and EFV were 30.9%, 32.1%, and 61.4%, respectively. In an analysis of DOR versus EFV, the treatment difference for discontinuations due to AEs was −3.4%, favoring DOR (95% confidence interval −6.2 to −0.8; P =.012). Fewer participants experienced neuropsychiatric AEs on DOR than on EFV (25.0% vs 55.9%, respectively), and fewer experienced diarrhea on DOR than on DRV+r (12.4% vs 22.5%, respectively). Changes from baseline in most lipid parameters also favored DOR. Conclusions At Week 48, DOR at 100 mg had a favorable safety profile compared with EFV or DRV+r and a favorable tolerability profile compared with EFV. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01632345; NCT02275780 and NCT02403674. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doravirine is a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of HIV type 1 infection. A subset of people living with HIV receives methadone for the treatment of opioid addiction. The current study (NCT02715700) was an open‐label, multiple‐dose, drug interaction study in participants on a methadone maintenance program to investigate potential drug‐drug interactions between doravirine and methadone. Participants received a stable methadone maintenance dose of 20 to 180 mg once daily for 14 days prior to day 1 and remained on their maintenance dose over days 1 through 7. On days 2 through 6, an oral dose of doravirine 100 mg was coadministered. For doravirine and methadone pharmacokinetic analysis, blood samples were collected before dosing through 24 hours after dosing. Fourteen participants were enrolled; all participants completed the study. For R‐methadone, geometric least squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for dose‐normalized area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to 24 hours, plasma concentration at 24 hours, and maximum plasma concentration ([methadone + doravirine]/methadone alone) were 0.95 (0.90‐1.01), 0.95 (0.88‐1.03), and 0.98 (0.93‐1.03), respectively. For doravirine, based on a comparison with historical data, modest decreases in area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to 24 hours, plasma concentration at 24 hours, and maximum plasma concentration were observed after coadministration of doravirine and methadone; geometric least squares mean ratios ([methadone + doravirine]/doravirine alone [90% confidence intervals]) were 0.74 (0.61‐0.90), 0.80 (0.63‐1.03), and 0.76 (0.63‐0.91), respectively. Coadministration of doravirine and methadone was generally well tolerated. No serious adverse events occurred, and there were no discontinuations. In conclusion, coadministration of methadone and doravirine did not have a clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetic profile of either agent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doravirine is a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type‐1 (HIV‐1) infection. In vitro and clinical data suggest that doravirine is unlikely to cause significant drug–drug interactions via major drug‐metabolizing enzymes or transporters. As a common HIV‐1 infection comorbidity, type 2 diabetes mellitus is often treated with metformin. Perturbations of metformin absorption or elimination may affect its safety and efficacy profile; therefore, understanding potential drug–drug interactions between doravirine and metformin is important. An open‐label, fixed‐sequence, 2‐period trial in healthy adults was conducted. Single‐dose metformin 1000 mg was administered in period 1; in period 2, doravirine 100 mg was administered once daily on days 1 to 7, and single‐dose metformin 1000 mg was administered on day 5. Plasma pharmacokinetics for metformin alone and coadministered with doravirine were assessed. Fourteen participants enrolled and completed the trial. Least‐squares geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of metformin AUC0‐∞, and Cmax following coadministration of metformin and doravirine compared with metformin alone were 0.94 (0.88‐1.00) and 0.94 (0.86‐1.03), respectively; metformin Tmax and half‐life were also minimally impacted. These data indicate that doravirine did not have a clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of metformin. Metformin alone and coadministered with doravirine was generally well tolerated. These data support coadministration of doravirine 100 mg and metformin 1000 mg without dose adjustment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doravirine is a novel non‐nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Because of potential concomitant administration with acid‐reducing agents, a drug‐interaction trial was conducted to evaluate the potential impact of these types of medications on doravirine pharmacokinetics. In an open‐label, 3‐period, fixed‐sequence trial, healthy adult participants received the following: period 1, a single dose of doravirine 100 mg; period 2, coadministration of a single dose of doravirine 100 mg and an antacid (1600 mg aluminum hydroxide, 1600 mg magnesium hydroxide, and 160 mg simethicone); period 3, 40 mg pantoprazole once daily on days 1–5 coadministered with a single dose of doravirine 100 mg on day 5. There was a minimum 10‐day washout between periods. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected, and safety was assessed. Fourteen participants (8 male, 6 female) were enrolled, and 13 completed the trial. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for doravirine AUC0‐inf, Cmax, and C24 for doravirine + antacid/doravirine were 1.01 (0.92–1.11), 0.86 (0.74–1.01), and 1.03 (0.94–1.12), respectively, and for doravirine + pantoprazole/doravirine were 0.83 (0.76–0.91), 0.88 (0.76–1.01), and 0.84 (0.77–0.92), respectively. Doravirine was generally well tolerated administered alone or with either of the acid‐reducing agents. Coadministration of an aluminum/magnesium‐containing antacid or pantoprazole did not have a clinically meaningful effect on doravirine pharmacokinetics, supporting the use of acid‐reducing agents with doravirine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: Doravirine is a novel, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in treatment-naive adults with HIV-1. Methods: In this open-label, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, adults with HIV-1 virologically suppressed for ≥6 months on 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus a boosted protease inhibitor, boosted elvitegravir, or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor were randomized (2:1) to switch to once-daily, single-tablet doravirine 100 mg with lamivudine 300 mg and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) or to continue their current therapy (Baseline Regimen) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (defined by the FDA Snapshot approach), with the primary comparison between DOR/3TC/TDF at week 48 and Baseline Regimen at week 24 and a secondary comparison between the groups at week 24 (noninferiority margin, −8%). Results: Six hundred seventy participants (447 DOR/3TC/TDF, 223 Baseline Regimen) were treated and included in the analyses. At week 24, 93.7% on DOR/3TC/TDF vs 94.6% on Baseline Regimen had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL [difference −0.9 (−4.7 to 3.0)]. At week 48, 90.8% on DOR/3TC/TDF had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL, demonstrating noninferiority vs Baseline Regimen at week 24 [difference −3.8 (−7.9 to 0.3)]. In participants on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor at entry, mean reductions in fasting LDL-C and non-HDL-C at week 24 were significantly greater for DOR/3TC/TDF vs Baseline Regimen (P < 0.0001). Adverse events occurred in 68.9% on DOR/3TC/TDF and 52.5% on Baseline Regimen by week 24, leading to treatment discontinuation in 2.5% and 0.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Switching to once-daily DOR/3TC/TDF is a generally well-tolerated option for maintaining viral suppression in patients considering a change in therapy. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02397096. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of doravirine (MK-1439), a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, were investigated. Two clinical trials were conducted in healthy subjects: an oral single dose [14 C]doravirine (350 mg, ∼200 µCi) trial (n = 6) and an intravenous (IV) single-dose doravirine (100 µg) trial (n = 12). In vitro metabolism, protein binding, apparent permeability and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transport studies were conducted to complement the clinical trials. Following oral [14 C]doravirine administration, all of the administered dose was recovered. The absorbed dose was eliminated primarily via metabolism. An oxidative metabolite (M9) was the predominant metabolite in excreta and was the primary circulating metabolite (12.9% of circulating radioactivity). Following IV administration, doravirine clearance and volume of distribution were 3.73 L/h (95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.09, 4.49) and 60.5 L (95% CI 53.7, 68.4), respectively. In vitro, doravirine is not highly bound to plasma proteins (unbound fraction 0.24) and has good passive permeability. The metabolite M9 was generated by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A)4/5-mediated oxidation. Doravirine was a P-gp substrate but P-gp efflux is not expected to play a significant role in limiting doravirine absorption or to be involved in the elimination of doravirine. In conclusion, doravirine is a low clearance drug, primarily eliminated by CYP3A-mediated metabolism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • Doravirine (DOR) resistance is uncommon among non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-experienced patients. • Complete DOR resistance in NNRTI-experienced patients is mainly related to Y188L mutation. • Previous efavirenz and etravirine use are associated with detection of DOR resistance. • Previous rilpivirine use is associated with a lower probability of DOR resistance. ABSTRACT This study investigated the prevalence of doravirine (DOR) resistance mutations in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-experienced patients. DOR resistance was assessed in samples from NNRTI-experienced patients who underwent genotypic testing for virological failure from the Antiretroviral Response Cohort Analysis (ARCA) database. Intermediate DOR resistance was defined as detection of any of V106A/M, Y188C/H, V108I, and K103N+P225H. High-level DOR resistance was defined as detection of any of Y188L, M230L, G190E, V106A/M+F227L, and V106A/M+L234I. Overall, 6893 patients were included in the study: 64.2% had experienced efavirenz (EFV), 54.4% nevirapine (NVP), 6.8% etravirine (ETR), 7.7% rilpivirine (RPV) and 0.7% delavirdine. Among NNRTI-experienced patients, 12.7% and 6.1% of subjects had intermediate and high-level DOR resistance, respectively. The most common DOR resistance mutation was Y188L. In multivariable analysis, previous EFV use (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.15–2.02) and ETR use (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.34–2.73) were associated with detection of high-level DOR resistance, whilst RPV use was associated with a lower probability of high-level DOR resistance (OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.22–0.71). Moreover, EFV use (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.19–2.58) and ETR use (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.10–2.68) were associated with detection of the Y188L mutation, whereas RPV use was not (OR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.05–0.50). In Italy, DOR resistance is uncommon among NNRTI-experienced patients, confirming a distinguishing resistance pattern within NNRTIs. However, previous EFV and ETR experience poses a higher risk of DOR resistance. These results support the use of DOR in NNRTI-experienced patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• UHPLC-MS/MS procedures were developed to measure total and unbound plasma antiretroviral concentrations. • Antiretrovirals evaluated were bictegravir, darunavir, doravirine, and dolutegravir. • Unbound concentrations were obtained by combined equilibrium dialysis and UHPLC-MS/MS procedures. • The procedures' applicability was verified using subjects receiving antiretroviral therapy. • The measurement procedures can be helpful for therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in routine laboratories. Fixed-dose combinations of antiretroviral drugs are commonly used to treat HIV infection and therapeutic monitoring is not part of routine clinical practice. However, drug concentrations monitoring might have role in different clinical scenarios as well as for research purposes. This study aimed to develop and validate UHPLC-MS/MS procedures for measuring total and unbound concentrations of bictegravir, dolutegravir, darunavir and doravirine in human plasma. Equilibrium dialysis preceded sample preparation (based on protein precipitation) for measuring unbound antiretroviral concentrations. Chromatographic separations were achieved on an Acquity®-UPLC® HSS™-T3 column (50 mm × 2.1 mm; 1.8 µm) using a non-linear water/acetonitrile gradient containing 0.1 % formic acid at a 0.5 mL/min flow rate. Antiretrovirals were detected by tandem mass spectrometry in positive electrospray ionisation and multiple reaction monitoring modes. No significant interferences or carry-over were observed. Imprecisions, absolute relative biases, normalised matrix effects and recoveries were ≤15.0 %, ≤11.1 %, (94.7–104.1)% and (96.7–105.5)%, respectively. Non-linear measuring intervals were observed between (25–10,000) µg/L for total/plasma dialysate concentrations and linearity schemes (1.00–100) µg/L for buffer dialysate concentrations. The UHPLC-MS/MS procedures developed could be used for research purposes and therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in routine clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling's prediction potential is critical in clinical pharmacology decision making during pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Doravirine is a novel HIV-1 NNRTI recently shown to be non-inferior to both darunavir/ritonavir and efavirenz in combination therapy with two NRTIs in treatment-naive patients. Doravirine has an in vitro resistance profile that is distinct from other NNRTIs and retains activity against viruses containing the most frequently transmitted NNRTI mutations.Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of doravirine resistance-associated mutations in HIV-1-infected treatment-naive patients in Europe.Methods: From 2010 to 2016, 9764 treatment-naive patients were tested for NNRTI antiretroviral drug resistance by bulk sequencing in Greece, Italy and France. We studied the prevalence of doravirine resistance-associated mutations previously identified in vitro: V106A/M, V108I, Y188L, V190S, H221Y, F227C/L/V, M230I/L, L234I, P236L, Y318F and K103N/Y181C.Results: Among 9764 sequences, 53.0% and 47.0% of patients had B and non-B subtypes, respectively. Overall, the presence of at least one doravirine resistance-associated mutation (n = 137; 1.4%) or the K103N/Y181C mutations (n = 5; 0.05%) was very rare. The most prevalent mutations were V108I (n = 62; 0.6%), Y188L (n = 18; 0.2%), H221Y (n = 18; 0.2%) and Y318F (n = 23; 0.2%). The frequency of doravirine resistance-associated mutations was similar between B and non-B subtypes. In comparison, the prevalence of rilpivirine, etravirine, nevirapine and efavirenz resistance was higher whatever algorithm was used (ANRS: 8.5%, 8.1%, 8.3% and 3.9%, respectively; Stanford: 9.9%, 10.0%, 7.5% and 9.4%, respectively).Conclusions: The prevalence of doravirine resistance-associated mutations is very low in antiretroviral-naive patients. These results are very reassuring for doravirine use in naive patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Doravirine (DOR), a novel non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is active against wild-type Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 and the most common NNRTI-resistant variants, and has a favorable and unique in vitro resistance profile. Methods DRIVE-AHEAD is a phase 3, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Antiretroviral treatment–naive adults with ≥1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL were randomized (1:1) to once-daily, fixed-dose DOR at 100 mg, lamivudine at 300 mg, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) at 300 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) or to efavirenz at 600 mg, emtricitabine at 200 mg, and TDF at 300 mg (EFV/FTC/TDF) for 96 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants with <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 48 (Food and Drug Administration snapshot approach; non-inferiority margin 10%). Results Of the 734 participants randomized, 728 were treated (364 per group) and included in the analyses. At week 48, 84.3% (307/364) of DOR/3TC/TDF recipients and 80.8% (294/364) of EFV/FTC/TDF recipients achieved <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (difference 3.5%, 95% CI, -2.0, 9.0). DOR/3TC/TDF recipients had significantly lower rates of dizziness (8.8% vs 37.1%), sleep disorders/disturbances (12.1% vs 25.2%), and altered sensorium (4.4% vs 8.2%) than EFV/FTC/TDF recipients. Mean changes in fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) (-3.83 vs +13.26 mg/dL) were significantly different between DOR/3TC/TDF and EFV/FTC/TDF (−1.6 vs +8.7 mg/dL and −3.8 vs +13.3 mg/dL, respectively). Conclusions In HIV-1 treatment-naive adults, DOR/3TC/TDF demonstrated non-inferior efficacy to EFV/FTC/TDF at week 48 and was well tolerated, with significantly fewer neuropsychiatric events and minimal changes in LDL-C and non–HDL-C compared with EFV/FTC/TDF. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02403674 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Graphical abstract Abstract A novel series of acetamide-substituted derivatives and two prodrugs of doravirine were designed and synthesized as potent HIV-1 NNRTIs by employing the structure-based drug design strategy. In MT-4 cell-based assays using the MTT method, it was found that most of the new compounds exhibited moderate to excellent inhibitory potency against the wild-type (WT) HIV-1 strain with a minimum EC 50 value of 54.8 nM. Among them, the two most potent compounds 8i (EC 50 = 59.5 nM) and 8k (EC 50 = 54.8 nM) displayed robust activity against WT HIV-1 with double-digit nanomolar EC 50 values, being superior to lamivudine (3TC, EC 50 = 12.8 μM) and comparable to doravirine (EC 50 = 13 nM). Besides, 8i and 8k shown moderate activity against the double RT mutant (K103N + Y181C) HIV-1 RES056 strain. The HIV-1 RT inhibition assay further validated the binding target. Molecular simulation of the representative compounds was employed to provide insight on their structure-activity relationships (SARs) and direct future design efforts. Finally, the aqueous solubility and chemical stability of the prodrugs 9 and 10 were investigated in detail. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To describe the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) among 84 children newly diagnosed with HIV in France in 2006-17.Methods: HIV-1 resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were characterized using both the 2009 Stanford list of mutations and the 2017 French National Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS) algorithm. A genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) was estimated for each first-line recommended ART combination.Results: Patients were mainly infected through mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) (73/84; 86.9%), but only 18 children (24.7% of vertically infected patients) were previously exposed to antiretroviral prophylaxis from MTCT. Non-B variants were identified in 90.5% (76/84) of patients. The frequency of TDR was 8.3% (7/84) using the 2009 Stanford list and 16.7% (14/84) using both the Stanford list and the 2017 ANRS algorithm. The prevalence of PI-, NRTI-, efavirenz/nevirapine-, etravirine/rilpivirine- and doravirine-associated RAMs was 0%, 3.6%, 6.0%, 11.9% and 2.4%, respectively. Single-, dual- and triple-class resistance was present in 15.5%, 1.2% and 0% of cases, respectively. Additionally, 3/60 (5%) strains had integrase inhibitor (INI)-related RAMs (an isolated E157Q mutation, which could mostly affect the susceptibility to raltegravir/elvitegravir rather than that to dolutegravir). Among the 18 children exposed to MTCT prophylaxis, RAMs were identified in only 1 case (5.6%). The proportion of fully active combinations (GSS = 3) was ≥97.6%, ≥94.1%, ≥92.9% and ≥89.3% for PI-, INI-, efavirenz/nevirapine- and rilpivirine-based regimens, respectively.Conclusions: The proportion of NRTI- and NNRTI-related TDR in children is lower in France than in low- and middle-income countries. However, we suggest favouring PI- or dolutegravir- over NNRTI-based combinations to treat newly diagnosed HIV-infected children, even in the absence of previous exposure to antiretroviral prophylaxis of MTCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Doravirine is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus‐1 infection in combination with other antiretroviral therapies. The cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A‐dependent metabolism of doravirine makes it susceptible to interactions with modulators of this pathway, including the antituberculosis treatment rifampin. Rifabutin, an alternative antibiotic used to treat tuberculosis, may have a lower‐magnitude effect on CYP3A. The aim of this trial was to determine the effect of steady‐state rifabutin on doravirine single‐dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability. In this open‐label, 2‐period, fixed‐sequence, drug‐drug interaction study, healthy subjects received a single dose of doravirine 100 mg alone and coadministered on day 14 of once‐daily administration of rifabutin 300 mg for 16 days. Plasma samples were taken to determine doravirine pharmacokinetics, and safety was monitored throughout. Dose adjustment of doravirine in the presence of coadministered rifabutin was explored through nonparametric superposition analysis. Rifabutin reduced doravirine area under the concentration‐time curve from time zero to infinite and plasma drug concentration 24 hours postdose with geometric mean ratios ([rifabutin+doravirine]/[doravirine alone]) (90%CIs) of 0.50 (0.45‐0.55) and 0.32 (0.28‐0.35), respectively. Doravirine apparent clearance increased from 5.9 L/h without rifabutin to 12.2 L/h when coadministered. Doravirine pharmacokinetics with and without coadministered rifabutin were not equivalent. Nonparametric superposition analysis projected that administration of doravirine 100 mg twice daily with rifabutin will restore steady‐state trough concentration values to efficacious levels associated with doravirine 100 mg once daily in the absence of CYP3A inducers. Doravirine may be coadministered with rifabutin when the doravirine dose frequency is increased from 100 mg once daily to 100 mg twice daily. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doravirine is a novel, potent, nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor currently in development for HIV-1 infection treatment. As a substrate for CYP3A-mediated metabolism, doravirine could potentially be affected by liver-function changes. As a portion of the HIV-1-infected population has varying degrees of liver impairment, we investigated the effect of moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetic profile and tolerability of single-dose doravirine 100 mg in otherwise healthy subjects. A total of 16 subjects aged 44-64 years took part in the open-label, single-dose trial: 8 with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score, 7-9; 6 men, 2 women) and 8 healthy individuals (mean age and height matched with the impairment group; 6 men, 2 women). Subjects with hepatic impairment were required to have chronic, stable hepatic impairment with features of cirrhosis of any etiology. Blood sampling revealed that doravirine exposure was similar in both groups. The observed geometric least-squares mean ratio (90% confidence interval; moderately impaired/healthy subjects) was 0.99 (0.72-1.35) for AUC0-∞, 0.93 (0.74-1.18) for AUC0-24 h, 0.90 (0.66-1.24) for Cmax, and 0.99 (0.74-1.33) for C24 h. Geometric mean apparent terminal t½ was ∼18 hours for both groups, whereas median Tmax was 2 hours (range, 1-6 hours) and 2.5 hours (range, 1-3 hours) for impaired and healthy individuals, respectively. In addition, doravirine was generally well tolerated. The results demonstrate that moderate hepatic impairment does not have a clinically meaningful effect on doravirine pharmacokinetics. Therefore, dose adjustment should not be necessary in patients with both HIV-1 and moderate hepatic impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]