Search

Introduction: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is an eosinophil-associated disease (EAD) characterized by inflammation in small- to medium-sized blood vessels. In the REal-world inVestigation of Eosinophilic-Associated disease overLap (REVEAL) study, overlap among 11 EADs was assessed. In the present sub-study, we evaluated EGPA overlap with other EADs, all-cause EAD- and EGPA-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs, and their relationship with blood eosinophil count and treatments received. Methods: REVEAL, a retrospective study, used Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. In this sub-study, eligibility criteria included an age of ≥ 12 years, ≥ 1 EAD, continuous health-plan eligibility, and compliance with the EGPA/GPA case definition per International Classification of Diseases Ninth/Tenth Revision diagnostic codes between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2018. Patients were grouped based on whether they had received immunomodulators/cyclophosphamide/mepolizumab (ICM) or not (non-ICM). Results: Of 701 patients with EGPA, 29.5% were in the ICM group. Overall, 72.2% had ≥ 1 overlapping EAD. The number of overlaps was similar for the ICM and non-ICM groups. In patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/µL, 22.8% had ≥ 1 overlapping EAD. The mean annual all-cause cost was $98,644, 54.1% of which was from outpatients and 33.6% from inpatients. The mean annual EAD- and EGPA-related costs were $23,820 and $9,306, respectively. Patients in the non-ICM group versus the ICM group had higher all-cause ($101,560 vs $91,684) but lower EAD-related ($22,733 vs $26,412) and EGPA-related ($6,171 vs $16,786) costs. All-cause HCRU and costs increased with increasing overlap. Conclusions: EGPA was associated with substantial HCRU and costs, driven by outpatient and inpatient settings. More overlapping EADs were associated with higher HCRU and costs, highlighting the need for treatment to reduce healthcare expenditure in these patients. Infographic available for this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evaluate clinical characteristics, comorbidity burden, major depressive disorder (MDD)-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), medication burden, and antidepressant treatment (ADT) patterns among older adults with MDD with and without selected comorbidities. Using Komodo's Healthcare Map claims data (1/1/2016-9/30/2022), patients with MDD (≥65 years) treated with ADTs were assessed 24 months preceding (baseline) and 12 months following (follow-up) first observed ADT prescription fill (index). Patients were separated into cohorts of those with ≥1 of 5 selected comorbidities and those without. Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and MDD-related HCRU were assessed during baseline; treatment patterns were assessed during follow-up. Baseline and follow-up all-cause and comorbidity-specific medication burdens (mean prescription claims/month) were determined. Among the total cohort (N = 417,643), 97.1% had ≥1 of 5 selected comorbidities: hypertension (80.3%), hyperlipidemia (75.4%), diabetes (54.2%), anxiety disorder (39.0%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (19.5%). Baseline and follow-up all-cause medication burdens per month were 3.8 and 4.5 for patients with selected comorbidities and 1.7 and 2.3 for those without. During baseline, most patients (96.0% with selected comorbidities, 96.2% without) had ≥1 outpatient visit, and a numerically higher percentage of those with vs. without selected comorbidities had MDD-related emergency room (13.9% vs. 6.0%) and inpatient (13.5% vs. 4.1%) visits. The majority of both cohorts (61.0% with selected comorbidities, 59.5% without) underwent treatment pattern changes. This study highlights the medication burden and ADT patterns in older adults with MDD, assessing these outcomes among patients with and without comorbidities. Numerically higher medication burdens among those with selected comorbidities suggests future studies could investigate the impact of comorbidities on MDD-related care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a rare, inherited disorder with multi-systemic effects that impact the skeletal muscles, eyes, heart, skin and gastrointestinal, endocrine, respiratory, and central nervous systems. DM is divided into two subtypes: DM1 can present from early childhood through adulthood and also has a congenital form (cDM) while DM2 typically manifests during mid-adulthood. Both forms are progressive with no approved treatments, and unmet need for disease-modifying therapies remains high. This study interrogated health insurance claims data to explore the clinical experience, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and all-cause costs for DM. Results: A total of 8541 patients with DM and 242 patients with cDM and their matched controls were selected from a database of over 200 million claimants. HCRU and all-cause costs, including pharmacy, outpatient, and inpatient services, were analyzed across four years in 12-month follow-up periods. Mean all-cause costs per DM patient were high in each of the four periods (range $14,640–$16,704) and showed a steady increase from 13 to 23 months on, while the control group mean costs declined from $9671 in the first 12 months after the index event, to approach the US population average ($5193) over time. For cDM, the highest mean costs were in the first 12-months ($66,496 vs. $2818 for controls), and remained high (above $17,944) across all subsequent periods, while control mean costs approached $0. For DM and cDM, HCRU was higher compared to controls across all study periods and all-cause healthcare costs were mostly driven by inpatient and outpatient encounters. Analysis of all diagnosis codes over the study period (comorbidities) demonstrated an elevated comorbidity profile consistent with the clinical profile of DM. Conclusions: This study is among the first to utilize claims data to increase understanding of the clinical experience and health economic outcomes associated with DM. The markedly elevated HCRU patterns and comorbidity profile presented here add to the broad body of scientific and clinical knowledge on DM. These insights can inform clinical care and support the development of disease modifying and/or symptom-targeting therapies that address the multi-systemic, progressive nature of DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a rare, inherited disorder with multi-systemic effects that impact the skeletal muscles, eyes, heart, skin and gastrointestinal, endocrine, respiratory, and central nervous systems. DM is divided into two subtypes: DM1 can present from early childhood through adulthood and also has a congenital form (cDM) while DM2 typically manifests during mid-adulthood. Both forms are progressive with no approved treatments, and unmet need for disease-modifying therapies remains high. This study interrogated health insurance claims data to explore the clinical experience, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and all-cause costs for DM. Results: A total of 8541 patients with DM and 242 patients with cDM and their matched controls were selected from a database of over 200 million claimants. HCRU and all-cause costs, including pharmacy, outpatient, and inpatient services, were analyzed across four years in 12-month follow-up periods. Mean all-cause costs per DM patient were high in each of the four periods (range $14,640–$16,704) and showed a steady increase from 13 to 23 months on, while the control group mean costs declined from $9671 in the first 12 months after the index event, to approach the US population average ($5193) over time. For cDM, the highest mean costs were in the first 12-months ($66,496 vs. $2818 for controls), and remained high (above $17,944) across all subsequent periods, while control mean costs approached $0. For DM and cDM, HCRU was higher compared to controls across all study periods and all-cause healthcare costs were mostly driven by inpatient and outpatient encounters. Analysis of all diagnosis codes over the study period (comorbidities) demonstrated an elevated comorbidity profile consistent with the clinical profile of DM. Conclusions: This study is among the first to utilize claims data to increase understanding of the clinical experience and health economic outcomes associated with DM. The markedly elevated HCRU patterns and comorbidity profile presented here add to the broad body of scientific and clinical knowledge on DM. These insights can inform clinical care and support the development of disease modifying and/or symptom-targeting therapies that address the multi-systemic, progressive nature of DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a rare, inherited disorder with multi-systemic effects that impact the skeletal muscles, eyes, heart, skin and gastrointestinal, endocrine, respiratory, and central nervous systems. DM is divided into two subtypes: DM1 can present from early childhood through adulthood and also has a congenital form (cDM) while DM2 typically manifests during mid-adulthood. Both forms are progressive with no approved treatments, and unmet need for disease-modifying therapies remains high. This study interrogated health insurance claims data to explore the clinical experience, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and all-cause costs for DM. Results: A total of 8541 patients with DM and 242 patients with cDM and their matched controls were selected from a database of over 200 million claimants. HCRU and all-cause costs, including pharmacy, outpatient, and inpatient services, were analyzed across four years in 12-month follow-up periods. Mean all-cause costs per DM patient were high in each of the four periods (range $14,640–$16,704) and showed a steady increase from 13 to 23 months on, while the control group mean costs declined from $9671 in the first 12 months after the index event, to approach the US population average ($5193) over time. For cDM, the highest mean costs were in the first 12-months ($66,496 vs. $2818 for controls), and remained high (above $17,944) across all subsequent periods, while control mean costs approached $0. For DM and cDM, HCRU was higher compared to controls across all study periods and all-cause healthcare costs were mostly driven by inpatient and outpatient encounters. Analysis of all diagnosis codes over the study period (comorbidities) demonstrated an elevated comorbidity profile consistent with the clinical profile of DM. Conclusions: This study is among the first to utilize claims data to increase understanding of the clinical experience and health economic outcomes associated with DM. The markedly elevated HCRU patterns and comorbidity profile presented here add to the broad body of scientific and clinical knowledge on DM. These insights can inform clinical care and support the development of disease modifying and/or symptom-targeting therapies that address the multi-systemic, progressive nature of DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a rare, inherited disorder with multi-systemic effects that impact the skeletal muscles, eyes, heart, skin and gastrointestinal, endocrine, respiratory, and central nervous systems. DM is divided into two subtypes: DM1 can present from early childhood through adulthood and also has a congenital form (cDM) while DM2 typically manifests during mid-adulthood. Both forms are progressive with no approved treatments, and unmet need for disease-modifying therapies remains high. This study interrogated health insurance claims data to explore the clinical experience, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and all-cause costs for DM.Results: A total of 8541 patients with DM and 242 patients with cDM and their matched controls were selected from a database of over 200 million claimants. HCRU and all-cause costs, including pharmacy, outpatient, and inpatient services, were analyzed across four years in 12-month follow-up periods. Mean all-cause costs per DM patient were high in each of the four periods (range $14,640-$16,704) and showed a steady increase from 13 to 23 months on, while the control group mean costs declined from $9671 in the first 12 months after the index event, to approach the US population average ($5193) over time. For cDM, the highest mean costs were in the first 12-months ($66,496 vs. $2818 for controls), and remained high (above $17,944) across all subsequent periods, while control mean costs approached $0. For DM and cDM, HCRU was higher compared to controls across all study periods and all-cause healthcare costs were mostly driven by inpatient and outpatient encounters. Analysis of all diagnosis codes over the study period (comorbidities) demonstrated an elevated comorbidity profile consistent with the clinical profile of DM.Conclusions: This study is among the first to utilize claims data to increase understanding of the clinical experience and health economic outcomes associated with DM. The markedly elevated HCRU patterns and comorbidity profile presented here add to the broad body of scientific and clinical knowledge on DM. These insights can inform clinical care and support the development of disease modifying and/or symptom-targeting therapies that address the multi-systemic, progressive nature of DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Use claims data to assess healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who had surgery and patients who did not.UC patients from a German health insurance were included between 01/01/2010–31/12/2017. Patients with proctocolectomy or colectomy between 01/07/2010 and 31/12/2014 were identified, and surgery date was set as index. For patients with IPAA, the last surgery in the 6 months was taken as index. Non-surgery patients received random index. After propensity score matching, UC-related HCRU and cost were observed for three years post-index.Of 21,392 UC patients, 85 underwent surgery and 2655 did not. After matching, 76 were included in the surgery group and 114 in the non-surgery group. Matched cohorts did not differ in baseline characteristics and mortality rates where high in both groups (21.1% and 29.0%, respectively). The percentage of patients with at least one hospitalization in the follow-up period was higher in the surgery (53.9%) compared to the non-surgery group (25.4%, p<0.001). In contrast, the number of outpatient prescriptions of UC-related drugs in the non-surgery group (11.2) was almost twice as large as in the surgery group (5.8, p<0.001). Hospitalization cost was 4.6 times higher in the surgery (1955.5€) than in the non-surgery group (419.6€, p<0.001). Medication cost was three times higher in the non-surgery group (6519€) compared to the surgery group (2151.7€, p<0.001).Based on hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and medical treatment, results show a considerable patient burden in UC from surgery complications or disease exacerbation in case of colectomy.Methods: Use claims data to assess healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who had surgery and patients who did not.UC patients from a German health insurance were included between 01/01/2010–31/12/2017. Patients with proctocolectomy or colectomy between 01/07/2010 and 31/12/2014 were identified, and surgery date was set as index. For patients with IPAA, the last surgery in the 6 months was taken as index. Non-surgery patients received random index. After propensity score matching, UC-related HCRU and cost were observed for three years post-index.Of 21,392 UC patients, 85 underwent surgery and 2655 did not. After matching, 76 were included in the surgery group and 114 in the non-surgery group. Matched cohorts did not differ in baseline characteristics and mortality rates where high in both groups (21.1% and 29.0%, respectively). The percentage of patients with at least one hospitalization in the follow-up period was higher in the surgery (53.9%) compared to the non-surgery group (25.4%, p<0.001). In contrast, the number of outpatient prescriptions of UC-related drugs in the non-surgery group (11.2) was almost twice as large as in the surgery group (5.8, p<0.001). Hospitalization cost was 4.6 times higher in the surgery (1955.5€) than in the non-surgery group (419.6€, p<0.001). Medication cost was three times higher in the non-surgery group (6519€) compared to the surgery group (2151.7€, p<0.001).Based on hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and medical treatment, results show a considerable patient burden in UC from surgery complications or disease exacerbation in case of colectomy.Results: Use claims data to assess healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who had surgery and patients who did not.UC patients from a German health insurance were included between 01/01/2010–31/12/2017. Patients with proctocolectomy or colectomy between 01/07/2010 and 31/12/2014 were identified, and surgery date was set as index. For patients with IPAA, the last surgery in the 6 months was taken as index. Non-surgery patients received random index. After propensity score matching, UC-related HCRU and cost were observed for three years post-index.Of 21,392 UC patients, 85 underwent surgery and 2655 did not. After matching, 76 were included in the surgery group and 114 in the non-surgery group. Matched cohorts did not differ in baseline characteristics and mortality rates where high in both groups (21.1% and 29.0%, respectively). The percentage of patients with at least one hospitalization in the follow-up period was higher in the surgery (53.9%) compared to the non-surgery group (25.4%, p<0.001). In contrast, the number of outpatient prescriptions of UC-related drugs in the non-surgery group (11.2) was almost twice as large as in the surgery group (5.8, p<0.001). Hospitalization cost was 4.6 times higher in the surgery (1955.5€) than in the non-surgery group (419.6€, p<0.001). Medication cost was three times higher in the non-surgery group (6519€) compared to the surgery group (2151.7€, p<0.001).Based on hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and medical treatment, results show a considerable patient burden in UC from surgery complications or disease exacerbation in case of colectomy.Conclusions: Use claims data to assess healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who had surgery and patients who did not.UC patients from a German health insurance were included between 01/01/2010–31/12/2017. Patients with proctocolectomy or colectomy between 01/07/2010 and 31/12/2014 were identified, and surgery date was set as index. For patients with IPAA, the last surgery in the 6 months was taken as index. Non-surgery patients received random index. After propensity score matching, UC-related HCRU and cost were observed for three years post-index.Of 21,392 UC patients, 85 underwent surgery and 2655 did not. After matching, 76 were included in the surgery group and 114 in the non-surgery group. Matched cohorts did not differ in baseline characteristics and mortality rates where high in both groups (21.1% and 29.0%, respectively). The percentage of patients with at least one hospitalization in the follow-up period was higher in the surgery (53.9%) compared to the non-surgery group (25.4%, p<0.001). In contrast, the number of outpatient prescriptions of UC-related drugs in the non-surgery group (11.2) was almost twice as large as in the surgery group (5.8, p<0.001). Hospitalization cost was 4.6 times higher in the surgery (1955.5€) than in the non-surgery group (419.6€, p<0.001). Medication cost was three times higher in the non-surgery group (6519€) compared to the surgery group (2151.7€, p<0.001).Based on hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and medical treatment, results show a considerable patient burden in UC from surgery complications or disease exacerbation in case of colectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]