Search

Abstract: Objective: This study was conducted to identify anatomical variations of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in the upper neck, the landmark of the anterior and inferior border of level IIb, and to evaluate the nerve''s effect on the border and the number of lymph nodes (LNs) in level IIb. Study Design and Setting: Case series with planned data collection. Subjects and Methods: A total of 181 neck dissections (NDs) were prospectively enrolled in this study. The relation between the SAN and adjacent structures (internal jugular vein [IJV], sternocleidomastoid muscle [SCM], cervical plexus) and the number of LNs in level IIb was investigated. Results: The SAN crossed the IJV ventrally in 72 cases (39.8%) and dorsally in 104 cases (57.4%), and passed through the IJV in five cases (2.8%). The SAN ran along the inner surface of the SCM and sent branches to the SCM without penetration of the muscle in 83 cases (45.9%), whereas in 98 cases (54.1%) the nerve sent branches to the SCM by penetration. Cervical plexus contribution to the SAN was seen from C2 in 96 cases (53.1%), C2 and C3 in 69 cases (38.1%), and C3 in 16 cases (8.8%). The mean number of LNs of level IIa and level IIb was 6.5 and 8.2 in cases in which the SAN crossed the IJV ventrally, and 6.8 and 5.4 in dorsally crossing cases. LNs included in the neck level IIb in ventrally crossing SAN cases were significantly larger than the dorsally crossing cases (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our results may help to minimize the incidence of injuring the SAN in the upper neck during ND. Neck level IIb would contain more LNs if the course of the nerve leans toward the ventral side. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic value of four different imaging methods-computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, ultrasonography (US), and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT-and their combined use for preoperative detection of cervical nodal metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Sixty-seven patients (58 men and 9 women; mean age, 60.1 years) with head and neck SCCs underwent CT, MR, US, and PET/CT before surgery. First, each study was reviewed separately for the presence of nodal metastases. Then, the value of combined images was assessed based on a confidence rating score for each modality assigned by observers. These results were verified, on a level-by-level basis, with histopathologic findings. Histopathologic examination revealed nodal metastases in 74 of 402 nodal levels. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 77.0%, 99.4%, and 95.3% for CT and MR; 78.4%, 98.5%, and 94.8% for US; and 81.1%, 98.2%, and 95.0% for PET/CT, respectively. The comparison of these modalities showed no statistically significant difference among them (p > 0.05). The combination of CT, MR, US, and PET/CT improved sensitivity (86.5%), without loss of specificity (99.4%) and accuracy (97.0%), although the difference failed to reach statistical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Sensory recovery after oral cavity and oropharyngeal reconstruction is 1 of the most important goals of free flap reconstruction. The aim of this study was to compare sensory recovery of sensate and nonsensate free flaps and to evaluate the morphologic differences between sensate and nonsensate free flaps. Methods A total of 27 cases of radial forearm free flap reconstruction after oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer resection were included in this study. Fifteen flaps were sensate flaps, and the other 12 flaps were nonsensate flaps. The sensory recovery was evaluated in 5 subjective senses: light tough, deep pressure, pain, warm, and cold senses. The 2-point discriminations were also recorded. For morphologic evaluation, the shapes of nerve fibers and nerve fiber bundles were observed and counted after immunohistochemical stains with S-100 protein and neuron-specific enolase and observed with transmission electron microscope. Results The scores of the 5 subjective senses in the sensate flaps and 2-point discrimination capabilities were significantly higher than those in the nonsensate flaps (p <.05). The number and the shape of the nerve fibers in the sensate flaps were more prominent (p <.05). Conclusion There were significant differences in sensory recovery between sensate and nonsensate flaps in oral cavity and oropharyngeal reconstruction, and the nerve fibers were larger, better arranged, and more numerous in sensate than nonsensate flaps. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2008 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conclusion. We conclude that increased expression level of the high mobility group I (HMGI(Y)) is closely associated with malignant transformation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), and the measurement of HMGI(Y) levels in HNSCCs may be useful as a prognostic marker. Objectives. To investigate whether HMGI overexpression is observed in HNSCCs, and its value as a prognostic marker in HNSCCs. Materials and methods. HMGI(Y) expression was determined at the protein level by immunohistochemisty using a HMGI(Y)-specific antibody and RT-PCR in 10 surgically resected specimens of non-neoplastic tissue (normal palatal tissue) and 40 HNSCCs. We also evaluated the association of HMGI(Y) overexpression within clinicopathologic parameters, i.e. clinical stage, pathologic grade, status of cervical lymph node metastasis, recurrence rate. Results. Expression of HMGI(Y) by immunohistochemical staining was observed in 35 of 40 (87.5%) HNSCC samples, whereas normal mucosa and/or the mucosa adjacent to the tumor tissue showed negative or weakly positive staining (p<0.05). Semi-quantification of HMGI(Y) by RT-PCR was 2.98±2.24 in cancer and 0.47±0.25 in normal tissue (p<0.001). High expression of HMGI(Y) was observed in recurrent cases, compared with non-recurrent cases (p<0.05). However, no significant correlation was observed between the levels of HMGI(Y) expression and other clinical factors such as clinical stage, pathologic grade, and status of cervical lymph node metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]