Search

Objectives: To compare the usefulness of high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) with chest radiography (CR) in the diagnosis and assessment of severity of silicosis.Methods: 27 workers exposed to silica underwent CR, HRCT, and pulmonary function tests. Two experienced readers independently evaluated CR by International Labour Office classification, and grouped the results into four categories. HRCT categories of nodule profusion and the extent of emphysema were graded on a four point scale; in 20 subjects the percentage distribution of lung densities were measured by HRCT.Results: Concordance between readers was higher for HRCT than for CR (K statistic = 0.49 and 0.29 respectively). There was poor concordance between CR and HRCT in the early stage of silicosis. No significant difference in pulmonary function tests was found among different CR categories, but forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), maximal expiratory flow at 50% and 75% of FVC (MEF50, MEF75), and diffusion capacity significantly decreased with increasing HRCT categories. Subjects with simple silicosis detected by HRCT had a lower FEV1 than subjects without silicosis, whereas subjects with conglomerated silicosis showed higher residual volume and functional residual capacity than subjects with simple silicosis. These relations were not affected by smoking or symptoms of chronic bronchitis. Different grades of emphysema detected by HRCT were significantly different in diffusion capacity. Only the HRCTs of the lowest and the highest categories of profusion of parenchymal opacities were significantly different in their distribution of density classes.Conclusion: HRCT is more reproducible and accurate than CR, as suggested by the higher agreement between readers and the better correlation with pulmonary function tests, irrespective of smoking and chronic bronchitis; however, these data do not support the hypothesis that HRCT is more sensitive than CR in the early detection of silicosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two radiologists reviewed in masked fashion 144 standard chest radiographs, previously judged as normal by other readers, within a cohort of asymptomatic shipyard workers exposed to amosite. Among the 144 workers we selected subjects ( n = 72) who fitted the following criteria: (1) documented occupational exposure to asbestos; (2) absence of any clinical symptomatology suggestive of asbestosis or of any other lung disease. Thirty-eight of them had standard chest radiogrphs that were confirmed as normal by both our radiologists, while 34 showed suspected pleural plaques or a very slight parenchymal involvement. These 72 subjects underwent high-resolution CT (HRCT): pleural plaques were shown in 33, parenchymal alterations in 7, and both pleural and parenchymal involvement in 13. HRCT findings were strictly correlated to the duration of amosite exposure and to the latency time since first exposure. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy values of standard chest radiographs were calculated with respect to HRCT and found to be, for pleural and parenchymal findings respectively: sensitivity 53% and 19%; specificity 72% and 94%; accuracy 60% and 72%. In conclusion, pleural and/or pulmonary involvement in asbestos-exposed workers can be shown by HRCT before the appearance of any symptomatology and abnormality on chest radiography. Furthermore the HRCT findings are correlated to the duration of exposure and latency time. time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]