Search

Background: People use lumbar supports to prevent low back pain. Secondary analyses from primary preventive studies suggest benefit among workers with previous low back pain, but definitive studies on the effectiveness of supports for the secondary prevention of low back pain are lacking.Objective: To determine the effectiveness of lumbar supports in the secondary prevention of low back pain.Design: Randomized, controlled trial.Setting: Home care organization in the Netherlands.Patients: 360 home care workers with self-reported history of low back pain.Intervention: Short course on healthy working methods, with or without patient-directed use of 1 of 4 types of lumbar support.Measurements: Primary outcomes were the number of days of low back pain and sick leave over 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the average severity of low back pain and function (Quebec Back Pain Disability scale) in the previous week.Results: Over 12 months, participants in the lumbar support group reported an average of -52.7 days (CI, -59.6 to -45.1 days) fewer days with low back pain than participants who received only the short course. However, the total sick days in the lumbar support group did not decrease (-5 days [CI, -21.1 to 6.8 days]). Small but statistically significant differences in pain intensity and function favored lumbar support.Limitations: Study participants were unblinded, and a substantial amount of missing data required imputation. Objective data on sick days due to low back pain were not available.Conclusion: Adding patient-directed use of lumbar supports to a short course on healthy working methods may reduce the number of days when low back pain occurs, but not overall work absenteeism, among home care workers with previous low back pain. Further study of lumbar supports is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM: To systematically review the evidence on the influence of sociodemographic, lifestyle, and (bio)medical variables on the course of prevalent disability and transition rates to different outcome categories in community-dwelling older people. METHOD: Articles were identified through searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases and reference lists of relevant articles. Prospective population studies that assessed disability at baseline and reported on associations between potential prognostic variables and disability were included. Methodological quality of studies was assessed by standardised criteria, after which relevant data were extracted. A synthesis of the available evidence was carried out. RESULTS: Nine cohort studies reported transition rates and eight cohort studies presented multivariate analyses on prognostic factors. There was some heterogeneity among studies in definition and assessment of disability. There is moderate to strong evidence that higher age, cognitive impairment, vision impairment, and poor self-rated health are prognostic factors of disability. CONCLUSION: Prognostic factors, partly modifiable, are identified that should be taken into account in targeting treatment and care for older people with disabilities. Further conceptual and methodological standardisation is required in order to enable a meta-analysis and obtain higher levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: After trauma, internal knee lesions are found in approximately two thirds of patients. However, magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities have also been described in asymptomatic volunteers. HYPOTHESIS: Not all visualized lesions in symptomatic posttraumatic knees are the result of recent trauma; there are subgroups of lesions that may be preexistent. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study (prevalence); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients visiting their general practitioners after knee trauma were invited for magnetic resonance imaging of both knees. Prevalence of knee abnormalities was compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic knees. Multivariable analysis was performed to investigate the association between lesions that were seen in symptomatic and asymptomatic knees (ie, effusion and meniscal tears) and recent trauma, history of old trauma, age, and osteoarthritis. RESULTS: In 134 participants, ligament lesions were found almost exclusively in symptomatic knees. Meniscal lesions and effusion were almost equally found in symptomatic and asymptomatic knees. Effusion was related to recent trauma (odds ratio, 14.0; 95% confidence interval, 5.0-39.6) and osteoarthritis (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-15.5) but not to history of old trauma and age. Meniscal tears were more common in older patients (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.12) but were not related to osteoarthritis. History of old trauma was more strongly related to the group of radial, longitudinal, and complex meniscal tears (odds ratio, 8.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.3-22.5) than to horizontal tears (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-5.6). Recent trauma was not related to horizontal meniscal tears but was strongly related to other types of meniscal tears (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-6.9). CONCLUSION: Ligament knee lesions are most probably the result of recent trauma. Radial, longitudinal, and complex meniscal tears are strongly related to trauma, whereas horizontal meniscal tears and effusion may be preexistent in many cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of future hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) in subjects with hand OA at baseline and to evaluate whether the concurrent presence of hand OA, other risk factors for OA, or an OA biomarker (type II collagen C-telopeptide degradation product [CTX-II]) further increases the risk. METHODS: Radiographs of the hands (baseline) and the hips and knees (baseline and 6.6 years later) were obtained in a randomly selected subset of participants in the Rotterdam Study who were ages 55 years and older. Radiographs were scored for the presence of OA using the Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) system. A total of 1,235 subjects without OA of the hip/knee (K/L score 0-1) at baseline were included in the study. CTX-II levels were measured at baseline. The independent risk of future hip/knee OA in subjects with hand OA at baseline was assessed by logistic regression, as stratified for age, sex, body mass index, family history of OA, and heavy workload. RESULTS: Overall 12.1% of the participants (19.7% of those with hand OA versus 10.0% of those without) developed hip or knee OA (odds ratio [OR] 2.1 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.3-3.1]). Subjects with hand OA had an increased risk of future hip OA (OR 3.0 [95% CI 1.6-5.4]), which was further increased in those with a family history of OA. Subjects with hand OA had an OR of 1.6 [95% CI 1.0-2.8) for the future development of knee OA, which was further increased in those who were overweight. Concurrent hand OA and high levels of CTX-II further increased the risk of having hip or knee OA at followup (OR 4.2 [95% CI 2.3-7.8]). CONCLUSION: The presence of hand OA at baseline showed an increased risk of future hip/knee OA (higher for hip OA than for knee OA). The concurrent presence of hand OA and other OA risk factors or high CTX-II levels further increased the risk of future hip/knee OA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of the use of various types of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on progression of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and knee. METHODS: In 1,695 subjects (2,514 hips) and 635 subjects (874 knees) ages 55 years and older from the Rotterdam Study, radiographs of the hip and knee at baseline and followup (mean followup time 6.6 years) were evaluated. Radiologic OA (ROA) progression was defined as a minimum increase of 1 in the Kellgren/Lawrence grade or incident joint replacement at followup. The associations between the different types of NSAIDs and progression of ROA were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Those subjects who were receiving diclofenac >180 days had a 2.4-fold increased risk (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.0-6.2) of progression of hip ROA and a 3.2-fold increased risk (95% CI 1.0-9.9) of knee ROA, compared with those considered short-term users (diclofenac for 1-30 days). These associations were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, baseline ROA, followup time, and defined daily dosage. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that diclofenac may induce accelerated progression of hip and knee ROA. Whether this occurs because of a true deleterious effect on cartilage or because of excessive mechanical loading on a hip following pain relief remains to be investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between urinary concentrations of C-telopeptide fragments of type II collagen (CTX-II) and the prevalence and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee and hip. METHODS: The study population consisted of a sample of 1,235 men and women ages > or =55 years who were enrolled in the Rotterdam Study (a population-based cohort study) and who were followed up for a mean of 6.6 years. Prevalent radiographic OA was defined as a Kellgren/Lawrence score > or =2; progression of radiographic OA was defined as a decrease in joint space width. RESULTS: Subjects with a CTX-II level in the highest quartile had a 4.2-fold increased risk of having radiographic OA of the knee (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.5-7.0) and of the hip (95% CI 2.2-7.8) compared with subjects with a CTX-II level in the lowest quartile. We observed a substantially stronger association between CTX-II levels and radiographic OA for subjects with hip pain (odds ratio [OR] 20.4, 95% CI 2.3-185.2) than for those without hip pain (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5-6.0). Subjects with a CTX-II level in the highest quartile had a 6.0-fold increased risk for progression of radiographic OA at the knee (95% CI 1.2-30.8) and an 8.4-fold increased risk for progression of radiographic OA at the hip (95% CI 1.0-72.9). All of these associations were found to be independent of known risk factors for OA, such as age, sex, and body mass index. CONCLUSION: This study shows that CTX-II is associated with both the prevalence and the progression of radiographic OA at the knee and hip. Importantly, this association is independent of known clinical risk factors for OA and seems stronger in subjects with joint pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]