Search

Background: Enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) syndrome can mimic otosclerosis in adults, presenting with an air–bone gap (ABG) and even absent stapedial reflexes. The ABG in inner-ear disorders is currently the object of several authors' studies and seems to be related to a third mobile window (TMW) phenomenon. This can lead to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Given that it would be inappropriate and harmful to perform CT scans in all patients with a clinical diagnosis of otosclerosis, this study aims to highlight some clinical features useful for the differential diagnosis between otosclerosis and these rare cases of EVA presenting with an ABG, thus enabling the identification of suspected cases to be tested with CT scans. Methods: Between April and May 2024, a narrative review was conducted focusing on the differential diagnosis between some rare cases of EVA and otosclerosis. Clinical, audiological, and radiologic features of both conditions were investigated. Results: This review demonstrates the diagnostic challenge in differentiating atypical cases of EVA from otosclerosis in a subset of patients. Clinical and audiological features are important for differential diagnosis, but may not always be sufficient. Therefore, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the temporal bone plays a pivotal role in definitive diagnosis. Conclusions: In some specific cases, pre-operative imaging assessment using HRCT emerges as an essential tool for differentiating these two conditions and avoiding unnecessary stapes surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The most frequently observed congenital inner ear malformation is enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA). It is often accompanied with incomplete partition type 2 (IP2) of the cochlea and a dilated vestibule, which together constitute Mondini malformation. Pathogenic SLC26A4 variants are considered the major cause of inner ear malformation but the genetics still needs clarification. The aim of this study was to identify the cause of EVA in patients with hearing loss (HL). Genomic DNA was isolated from HL patients with radiologically confirmed bilateral EVA (n = 23) and analyzed by next generation sequencing using a custom HL gene panel encompassing 237 HL-related genes or a clinical exome. The presence and segregation of selected variants and the CEVA haplotype (in the 5′ region of SLC26A4) was verified by Sanger sequencing. Minigene assay was used to evaluate the impact of novel synonymous variant on splicing. Genetic testing identified the cause of EVA in 17/23 individuals (74%). Two pathogenic variants in the SLC26A4 gene were identified as the cause of EVA in 8 of them (35%), and a CEVA haplotype was regarded as the cause of EVA in 6 of 7 patients (86%) who carried only one SLC26A4 genetic variant. In two individuals with a phenotype matching branchio-oto-renal (BOR) spectrum disorder, cochlear hypoplasia resulted from EYA1 pathogenic variants. In one patient, a novel variant in CHD7 was detected. Our study shows that SLC26A4, together with the CEVA haplotype, accounts for more than half of EVA cases. Syndromic forms of HL should also be considered in patients with EVA. We conclude that to better understand inner ear development and the pathogenesis of its malformations, there is a need to look for pathogenic variants in noncoding regions of known HL genes or to link them with novel candidate HL genes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pathogenic variants in the SLC26A4, FOXI1, and KCNJ10 genes are associated with hearing loss (HL) and specific inner ear abnormalities (DFNB4). In the present study, phenotype analyses, including clinical data collection, computed tomography (CT), and audiometric examination, were performed on deaf individuals from the Sakha Republic of Russia (Eastern Siberia). In cases with cochleovestibular malformations, molecular genetic analysis of the coding regions of the SLC26A4, FOXI1, and KCNJ10 genes associated with DFNB4 was completed. In six of the 165 patients (3.6%), CT scans revealed an incomplete partition of the cochlea (IP-1 and IP-2), in isolation or combined with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) anomaly. Sequencing of the SLC26A4, FOXI1, and KCNJ10 genes was performed in these six patients. In the SLC26A4 gene, we identified four variants, namely c.85G>C p.(Glu29Gln), c.757A>G p.(Ile253Val), c.2027T>A p.(Leu676Gln), and c.2089+1G>A (IVS18+1G>A), which are known as pathogenic, as well as c.441G>A p.(Met147Ile), reported previously as a variant with uncertain significance. Using the AlphaFold algorithm, we found in silico evidence of the pathogenicity of this variant. We did not find any causative variants in the FOXI1 and KCNJ10 genes, nor did we find any evidence of digenic inheritance associated with double heterozygosity for these genes with monoallelic SLC26A4 variants. The contribution of biallelic SLC26A4 variants in patients with IP-1, IP-2, IP-2+EVA, and isolated EVA was 66.7% (DFNB4 in three patients, Pendred syndrome in one patient). Seventy-five percent of SLC26A4-biallelic patients had severe or profound HL. The morphology of the inner ear anomalies demonstrated that, among SLC26A4-biallelic patients, all types of incomplete partition of the cochlea are possible, from IP-1 and IP-2, to a normal cochlea. However, the dominant type of anomaly was IP-2+EVA (50.0%). This finding is very important for cochlear implantation, since the IP-2 anomaly does not have an increased risk of "gushers" and recurrent meningitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective/Hypothesis: To explore the characteristics of vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) in children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and to determine the diagnostic value of VEMP testing for this particular inner ear structural anomaly. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study in a pediatric tertiary care facility. Methods: A total of 25 pediatric cases (37 ears) of EVA were identified with complete records, including otologic evaluation, CT scan of the temporal bone, and audiologic assessment. Results of audiometry, tympanometry, and VEMP testing were analyzed. Results: Hearing loss was found in 97% (36/37) of the ears with EVA. Airbone gaps (conductive components) were found in all hearing losses with normal middle ear pressure and mobility. Abnormally low threshold VEMP responses were found in 92% (34/37) of the ears with EVA. VEMP responses were absent unilaterally in three EVA patients who had vestibular complaints. No clear correlation was found between the size of EVA and the audiologic findings. Conclusions: The presence of airbone gaps in children with EVA was found without apparent middle ear pathology. Characteristics of VEMP in EVA were lower thresholds and higher amplitudes despite of the presence of airbone gaps. The abnormally low threshold VEMP responses suggested a ''third'' window effect in the pathologic condition of EVA. Unilateral absence of VEMP may implicate peripheral vestibular impairment. The findings from our study are helpful in clinical evaluation of young children who usually give limited and ambiguous input regarding their hearing and vestibular problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]