Search

Background: Adavosertib is a first-in-class, selective small-molecule inhibitor of Wee1. Olaparib is an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Preclinical data suggest that adavosertib enhances the antitumor effect of PARP inhibitors. Objective: The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adavosertib plus olaparib were evaluated in patients with refractory solid tumors to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients in part A (dose finding) had a refractory solid tumor for which there is no established treatment and had received ≥ 1 prior course of systemic therapy; in part B (dose expansion), patients had platinum-sensitive extensive-stage or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received adavosertib [once (qd) or twice daily (bid)] for 3 consecutive days with 4 days off treatment (3/4), or 5 consecutive days with 2 days off (5/2), plus olaparib (bid) for 14 or 21 days of a 21-day cycle. Results: A total of 130 patients were enrolled in the study, 120 in part A and 10 in part B. The MTD for adavosertib bid was 175 mg (days 1–3, 8–10/21-day cycle) plus continuous olaparib 200 mg bid; the once-daily MTD (and RP2D) was adavosertib 200 mg (days 1–3, 8–10/21-day cycle) plus continuous olaparib 200 mg bid. In the MTD/RP2D cohort, one patient (7%) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of thrombocytopenia. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in the cohorts in which MTD/RP2D for bid dosing and RP2D for qd dosing were determined were fatigue (64.3% and 15.4%, respectively), diarrhea (42.9% and 30.8%), decreased appetite (35.7% and 23.1%), nausea (35.7% and 15.4%), and anemia (35.7% and 38.5%). In the SCLC dose-expansion cohort, TRAEs occurred in eight patients (88.9%), including thrombocytopenia (66.7%) and anemia (55.6%). In part A, objective response rate (ORR) was 14.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.7–22.9] overall; for the cohorts in which MTD/RP2D for bid dosing and RP2D for qd dosing were determined, ORR was 30.8% (9.1–61.4) and 9.1% (0.2–41.3), respectively. ORR was 11.1% [95% CI 0.3–48.2; one partial response (PR)], disease control rate was 22.2% (2.8–60.0; one PR, one stable disease), and median progression-free survival was 1.5 months (1.3–4.2) in the SCLC dose-expansion cohort. Conclusions: Adverse events and DLTs observed in the bid MTD and once-daily MTD/RP2D dosing schedules were manageable and consistent with known adavosertib and olaparib safety profiles. Limited antitumor activity was observed with adavosertib plus olaparib combination therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02511795 (registration: 28 July 2015). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain containing protein 3 (TIM-3) is a receptor found on a multitude of immune cells and is commonly overexpressed in patients with cancer. Due to its selective expression in immune cells and its preliminary efficacy in preclinical models, TIM-3 is a promising target as a treatment for cancer. Both monotherapy and combination regimens are being developed and are currently under investigation. This clinical review seeks to summarize and compile past, present, and future TIM-3 inhibitors in clinical trials [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inhibition of the adenosine 2A receptor (A2AR) diminishes the immunosuppressive effects of adenosine and may complement immune-targeting drugs. This phase 2 study evaluated the A2AR antagonist AZD4635 in combination with durvalumab or oleclumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Methods: Patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed disease progressing within 6 months on ≥ 2 therapy lines were randomly assigned to either Module 1 (AZD4635 + durvalumab) or Module 2 (AZD4635 + oleclumab). Primary endpoints were objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. Secondary endpoints included radiological progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results: Fifty-nine patients were treated (Module 1, n = 29; Module 2, n = 30). Median number of prior therapies was 4. One confirmed complete response by RECIST (Module 1) and 2 confirmed PSA responses (1 per module) were observed. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) possibly related to AZD4635 were nausea (37.9%), fatigue (20.7%), and decreased appetite (17.2%) in Module 1; nausea (50%), fatigue (30%), and vomiting (23.3%) in Module 2. No dose-limiting toxicities or treatment-related serious AEs were observed. In Module 1, AZD4635 geometric mean trough concentration was 124.9 ng/mL (geometric CV% 69.84; n = 22); exposures were similar in Module 2. In Modules 1 and 2, median (95% CI) rPFS was 2.3 (1.6 –3.8) and 1.5 (1.3– 4.0) months, respectively. Median PFS was 1.7 versus 2.3 months for patients with high versus low blood-based adenosine signature. Conclusion: In this heavily pretreated population, AZD4635 with durvalumab or oleclumab demonstrated minimal antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile. Clinical Trial.gov identifier: NCT04089553. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

B7-H3 is a transmembrane receptor highly prevalent on malignant cells and plays an important role in adaptive immunity that is not fully elucidated. Targeted B7-H3 inhibitors, including antibody-drug conjugates, radioimmunotherapy, and monoclonal antibodies, are a new class of antineoplastic agents showing promising preliminary clinical efficacy, observed with several of these agents against multiple tumor types. Particularly promising treatments are enoblituzumab for prostate cancer, 131Iomburtamab for central nervous system malignancies, and HS-20093 for small-cell lung cancer but further studies are warranted. There are clinical trials on the horizon that have not yet enrolled patients examining chimeric antigen receptor Tcell therapies, bi- and tri-specific killer engagers, and dual-affinity retargeting proteins. These data will be telling of the efficacy of B7-H3 inhibitors in both hematologic and solid malignancies. This study aimed to compile available results of B7-H3 inhibitors in oncology clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adavosertib selectively inhibits Wee1, which regulates intra-S and G2/M cell-cycle checkpoints. This study investigated dosing schedules for adavosertib monotherapy, determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received oral adavosertib qd or bid on a 5/9 schedule (5 days on treatment, 9 days off) in 14-day cycles, or qd on one of two 5/2 schedules (weekly, or for 2 of 3 weeks) in 21-day cycles. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic analyses were performed. Sixty-two patients (female, 64.5%; median age, 61.5 years; most common primary tumors: lung [24.2%], ovary [21.0%]) received treatment (qd schedules, n = 50; bid schedules, n = 12) for 1.8 months (median). Median time to maximum adavosertib concentration was 2.2–4.1 h; mean half-life was 5–12 h. Adverse events (AEs) caused dose reductions, interruptions and discontinuations in 17 (27.4%), 25 (40.3%) and 4 (6.5%) patients, respectively. Most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were anemia, neutropenia (each n = 9, 14.5%) and diarrhea (n = 8, 12.9%). Seven (11.3%) patients experienced 10 treatment-related serious AEs (pneumonia n = 2 [3.2%], dehydration n = 2 [3.2%], anemia n = 1 [1.6%], febrile neutropenia n = 1 [1.6%], and thrombocytopenia n = 1 [1.6%]). Overall objective response rate was 3.4% (2/58); disease control rate was 48.4% (30/62); median progression-free survival was 2.7 months. MTDs were 125 mg (bid 5/9) and 300 mg (qd 5/9 and 5/2 for 2 of 3 weeks); RP2D was 300 mg (qd 5/2 for 2 of 3 weeks). The safety profile was manageable, acceptable, and generally concordant with the known safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surufatinib, is a potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1–3; fibroblast growth factor receptor-1; colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor. This Phase 1/1b escalation/expansion study in US patients with solid tumors evaluated 5 once daily (QD) surufatinib doses (3 + 3 design) to identify maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), and evaluate safety and efficacy at the RP2D in 4 disease-specific expansion cohorts including pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [pNET] and extrapancreatic NETs [epNET]. MTD and RP2D were 300 mg QD (escalation [n = 35]); 5 patients (15.6%) (Dose Limiting Toxicity [DLT] Evaluable Set [n = 32]) had DLTs. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional. Estimated progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 11 months were 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.7, 78.2) and 51.1% (95% CI: 12.8, 80.3) for pNET and epNET expansion cohorts, respectively. Median PFS was 15.2 (95% CI: 5.2, not evaluable) and 11.5 (95% CI: 6.5,11.5) months. Response rates were 18.8% and 6.3%. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (both cohorts) were fatigue (46.9%), hypertension (43.8%), proteinuria (37.5%), diarrhea (34.4%). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor efficacy of 300 mg QD oral surufatinib in US patients with pNETs and epNETs are consistent with previously reported studies in China and may support applicability of earlier surufatinib studies in US patients. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02549937. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The nucleoside FF‐10502‐01, structurally similar to but with different biologic effects than gemcitabine, shows promising activity both alone and combined with cisplatin in preclinical gemcitabine‐resistant tumor models. We conducted an open‐label, single‐arm, 3 + 3 first‐in‐human trial to explore the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of FF‐10502‐01 in patients with solid tumors. Methods: Patients with inoperable metastatic tumors refractory to standard therapies were enrolled. Escalating intravenous FF‐10502‐01 doses (8–135 mg/m2) were administered weekly for 3 weeks in 28‐day cycles until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity was observed. Three expansion cohorts were subsequently evaluated. Results: A phase 2 dose of 90 mg/m2 was determined after evaluating 40 patients. Dose‐limiting toxicities included hypotension and nausea. Phase 2a enrolled patients with cholangiocarcinoma (36), gallbladder cancer (10), and pancreatic/other tumors (20). Common adverse events were grade 1–2 rash, pruritus, fever, and fatigue. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities were observed at low incidences, including thrombocytopenia (5.1%) and neutropenia (2%). Confirmed partial responses (PRs) occurred in five patients with gemcitabine‐refractory tumors, including three with cholangiocarcinoma and one each with gallbladder and urothelial cancer. Median progression‐free and overall survival rates in patients with cholangiocarcinoma were 24.7 and 39.1 weeks, respectively. Prolonged progression‐free survival in patients with cholangiocarcinoma was associated with BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations. Conclusion: FF‐10502‐01 was well tolerated with manageable side effects and limited hematologic toxicity. Durable PRs and disease stabilizations were observed in heavily pretreated biliary tract patients who had received prior gemcitabine. FF‐10502‐01 is distinct from gemcitabine and may represent an effective therapy. A phase 1/2a study of FF‐10502‐01, a nucleoside structurally similar to gemcitabine but with distinct biologic effects, demonstrates activity in patients with gemcitabine‐refractory tumors, including cholangiocarcinoma; this compares favorably to second‐line FOLFOX chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary cancer. Prolonged progression‐free survival in cholangiocarcinoma was associated with BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations, which may be important for patient selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) and indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase (IDO1) pathways is an appealing option for cancer treatment. METHODS: The open‐label, phase 1/2 ECHO‐203 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the IDO1 inhibitor epacadostat in combination with durvalumab, a human anti–PD‐L1 monoclonal antibody in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. RESULTS: The most common treatment‐related adverse events were fatigue (30.7%), nausea (21.0%), decreased appetite (13.1%), pruritus (12.5%), maculopapular rash (10.8%), and diarrhea (10.2%). Objective response rate (ORR) in the overall phase 2 population was 12.0%. Higher ORR was observed in immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)‐naïve patients (16.1%) compared with patients who had received previous CPI (4.1%). Epacadostat pharmacodynamics were evaluated by comparing baseline kynurenine levels with those on therapy at various time points. Only the 300‐mg epacadostat dose showed evidence of kynurenine modulation, albeit unsustained. CONCLUSIONS: Epacadostat plus durvalumab was generally well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. ORR was low, and evaluation of kynurenine concentration from baseline to cycle 2, day 1, and cycle 5, day 1, suggested >300 mg epacadostat twice daily is needed to ensure sufficient drug effect. Clinical trial information: A study of epacadostat (INCB024360) in combination with durvalumab (MEDI4736) in subjects with selected advanced solid tumors (ECHO‐203) (NCT02318277). Epacadostat plus durvalumab was generally well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. Objective response rate was low, and evaluation of kynurenine concentration from baseline to cycle 2, day 1, and cycle 5, day 1, suggested that >300 mg twice daily of epacadostat is needed to ensure sufficient drug effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background LY3022855 is a recombinant, immunoglobulin, human monoclonal antibody targeting the colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor. This phase 1 trial determined the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of LY3022855 in combination with durvalumab or tremelimumab in patients with advanced solid cancers who had received standard anti-cancer treatments. Methods In Part A (dose-escalation), patients received intravenous (IV) LY3022855 25/50/75/100 mg once weekly (QW) combined with durvalumab 750 mg once every two weeks (Q2W) IV or LY3022855 50 or 100 mg QW IV with tremelimumab 75/225/750 mg once every four weeks. In Part B (dose-expansion), patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or ovarian cancer (OC) received recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of LY3022855 from Part A and durvalumab 750 mg Q2W. Results Seventy-two patients were enrolled (median age 61 years): Part A = 33, Part B = 39. In Part A, maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and LY3022855 100 mg QW and durvalumab 750 mg Q2W was the RP2D. Four dose-limiting equivalent toxicities occurred in two patients from OC cohort. In Part A, maximum concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, and serum concentration showed dose-dependent increase over two cycles of therapy. Overall rates of complete response, partial response, and disease control were 1.4%, 2.8%, and 33.3%. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies were observed in 21.2% of patients. Conclusions LY3022855 combined with durvalumab or tremelimumab in patients with advanced NSCLC or OC had limited clinical activity, was well tolerated. The RP2D was LY3022855 100 mg QW with durvalumab 750 mg Q2W. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02718911 (Registration Date: May 3, 2011). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tepotinib is a highly selective and potent MET inhibitor in development for the treatment of patients with solid tumors. Given the favorable tolerability and safety profiles up to the maximum tested dose in the first‐in‐human (FIH) trial, an efficacy‐driven translational modeling approach was proposed to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). To study the in vivo pharmacokinetics (PKs)/target inhibition/tumor growth inhibition relationship, a subcutaneous KP‐4 pancreatic cell‐line xenograft model in mice with sensitivity to MET pathway inhibition was selected as a surrogate tumor model. Further clinical PK and target inhibition data (derived from predose and postdose paired tumor biopsies) from a FIH study were integrated with the longitudinal PKs and target inhibition profiles from the mouse xenograft study to establish a translational PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) model. Preclinical data showed that tumor regression with tepotinib treatment in KP‐4 xenograft tumors corresponded to 95% target inhibition. We therefore concluded that a PD criterion of sustained, near‐to‐complete (>95%) phospho‐MET inhibition in tumors should be targeted for tepotinib to be effective. Simulations of dose‐dependent target inhibition profiles in human tumors that exceeded the PD threshold in more than 90% of patients established an RP2D of tepotinib 500 mg once daily. This translational mathematical modeling approach supports an efficacy‐driven rationale for tepotinib phase II dose selection of 500 mg once daily. Tepotinib at this dose has obtained regulatory approval for the treatment of patients with non‐small cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inhibition of programmed cell death receptor protein-1 (PD-1) has proven to be a highly effective strategy for immunotherapy of cancer. Approvals of both PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors [PD-(L)1i] in multiple tumor types are evidence of the durable benefits they provide to patients with cancer. In this first-in-human trial, we assessed the safety and tolerability of JTX-4014, a fully human antibody targeting PD-1. Methods: JTX-4014 was administered to 18 patients with multiple solid tumor types who had not previously received a PD-(L)1i. The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of JTX-4014 and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included evaluation of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of JTX-4014, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against JTX-4014, and clinical activity. Results: JTX-4014 was well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified as compared with other PD-1is. The MTD was not reached and the RP2D was selected, based on PK modelling and supportive safety data, to be 500 mg every 3 weeks or 1000 mg every 6 weeks. Clinical activity, based on RECIST v1.1 criteria, demonstrated an overall response rate of 16.7% (n = 3) with one complete and two partial responses and a disease control rate of 44.4% (n = 8). The responses occurred at different doses in patients with PD-L1 positive tumors and in tumor types that are not typically PD-1i responsive. Conclusions: Further development of JTX-4014 is warranted as a monotherapy or in combination with other innovative cancer therapies. Trial registration number: NCT03790488, December 31 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Microsatellite‐stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) tends to be poorly immunogenic, with limited treatment options. In MSS CRC xenograft models, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus programed death 1 inhibitors resulted in synergistic antitumor activity and increased tumor immunogenicity. This phase 2 study evaluated FTD/TPI plus nivolumab in patients with MSS metastatic CRC. Methods: This single‐arm, safety lead‐in study used a Simon's two‐stage design (enrolling 6 patients in the safety lead‐in, proceeding to stage 2 if ≥2 of the first 15 patients achieved a partial or complete response per immune‐related response criteria [irRC] within 6 months). Patients with histologically proven MSS mCRC, and disease progression after ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens received FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily; days 1–5 and 8–12 every 28 days) plus nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Results: Between August 2016 and January 2017, 18 patients (50% men; median age 56.5 years) were enrolled; 72% had colon cancer and 56% had KRAS mutations. All patients received treatment (median, 2.5 cycles [range, 1–8]). No dose‐limiting toxicities were observed in the study. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) of any cause and grade were nausea (67%), diarrhea (61%), and neutropenia (50%); 13 patients (72%) experienced grade ≥3 AEs. No patients discontinued treatment because of AEs. No patient achieved a tumor response (either per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] or irRC), and the study did not progress to the second stage. Stable disease was achieved in 8 patients per irRC and in 10 patients per RECIST. Median progression‐free survival was 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.8–6.0 months) per irRC and 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.8–5.1 months) per RECIST. Conclusion: Patients with refractory MSS metastatic CRC failed to experience clinical benefit with FTD/TPI plus nivolumab, although safety data in this population indicated tolerability and feasibility of this combination. Trial registration number: NCT02860546. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background Treatment options for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are limited and checkpoint blockade inhibitors have been disappointing in this disease. Pegilodecakin has demonstrated single agent anti-tumor activity in immune-sensitive tumors. Phase 1 and preclinical data indicate synergy of pegilodecakin with 5-FU and platins. We assessed the safety and activity of pegilodecakin+FOLFOX in patients with PDAC. Methods IVY (NCT02009449) was an open-label phase 1b trial in the United States. Here we report on all enrolled patients from cohort C. Heavily pretreated patients were treated with pegilodecakin (self-administered subcutaneously daily at 2.5, 5, or 10 μg/kg) + 5-flurouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), dosed per manufacturers prescribing information, until tumor progression. Eligible patients had measurable disease per immune-related response criteria (irRC), were ≥ 18 years of age, and had ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were evaluated for primary(safety) and secondary (tumor response per irRC) endpoints. Results From 5 August 2014–12 July 2016, 39 patients enrolled in cohort C. All patients were evaluable for safety. In this advanced population, regimen had manageable toxicities with no immune-related adverse events (irAEs) greater than grade 1. The most common grade 3/4/5 TEAEs were thrombocytopenia (21[53.8%] of 39) and anemia (17[43.6%] of 39). In evaluable PDAC patients, the best overall response of pegilodecakin+FOLFOX was 3(14%) with CRs in 2(9%) patients. Conclusions Pegilodecakin+FOLFOX had an acceptable tolerability profile in PDAC, with no substantial irAEs seen, and promising efficacy with the combination yielding a 2-year OS of 24% (95% CI 10–42). These data led to the phase 3 study with pegilodecakin+FOLFOX as second-line therapy of PDAC (SEQUOIA). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: BRAF inhibitors are effective in melanoma and other cancers with BRAF mutations; however, patients ultimately develop therapeutic resistance through the activation of alternative signaling pathways such as RAF/RAS or MET. The authors hypothesized that combining the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib with either the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib or the MET inhibitor crizotinib could overcome therapeutic resistance. METHODS: Patients with advanced cancers and BRAF mutations were enrolled in a dose‐escalation study (3 + 3 design) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs) of vemurafenib with sorafenib (VS) or vemurafenib with crizotinib (VC). Results: In total, 38 patients (VS, n = 24; VC, n = 14) were enrolled, and melanoma was the most represented tumor type (VS, 38%; VC, 64%). In the VS arm, vemurafenib 720 mg twice daily and sorafenib 400 mg am/200 mg pm were identified as the MTDs, DLTs included grade 3 rash (n = 2) and grade 3 hypertension, and partial responses were reported in 5 patients (21%), including 2 with ovarian cancer who had received previous treatment with BRAF, MEK, or ERK inhibitors. In the VC arm, vemurafenib 720 mg twice daily and crizotinib 250 mg daily were identified as the MTDs, DLTs included grade 3 rash (n = 2), and partial responses were reported in 4 patients (29%; melanoma, n = 3; lung adenocarcinoma, n = 1) who had received previous treatment with BRAF, MEK, and/or ERK inhibitors. Optional longitudinal collection of plasma to assess dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA demonstrated the elimination of BRAF‐mutant DNA from plasma during therapy (P =.005). Conclusions: Vemurafenib combined with sorafenib or crizotinib was well tolerated with encouraging activity, including among patients who previously received treatment with BRAF, MEK, or ERK inhibitors. The combination of vemurafenib with either sorafenib or crizotinib is well tolerated in patients with BRAF‐mutant cancers. Clinical activity is observed even in patients who have received significant prior treatment with BRAF, MEK, or ERK inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is a plain language summary of a study called CodeBreaK 100. The CodeBreaK 100 study included patients with non-small-cell lung cancer that had spread outside the lung (advanced). Lung cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer. CodeBreaK 100 specifically looked at patients with a particular change(mutation) in the KRAS gene resulting in the mutated protein called KRAS G12C. The KRAS G12C mutation can lead to development and growth of lung cancer. Patients received a treatment called sotorasib, which has accelerated approval or full approval in over 50 countries for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with the KRAS G12C mutation. The CodeBreaK 100 study looked at whether sotorasib is a safe and effective treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Sotorasib is designed to specifically target and lock the mutated KRAS protein in the inactive state to treat non-small-cell lung cancer. In total, 174 adults were treated with sotorasib. Treatment-related side effects were seen in 70% of patients and were severe in 21% of patients. The most common side effects included diarrhea, increased liver enzymes, nausea and tiredness. 70 (41%) patients responded to sotorasib and 144 (84%) patients had tumors that either remained stable or shrunk in size. 29 (41%) patients who responded to sotorasib responded for over 12 months. After 2 years, 9 patients with a response remained on sotorasib; there were no notable increases in tumor size or development of new tumors over this time. There were 5patients who received sotorasib for more than 2 years and continued to respond. Long-term benefit was seen for some patients. Patients also benefitted from treatment when the tumor expressed different amounts of a protein called PD-L1.In total, 33% of patients were still alive after 2 years. Results show the long-term benefit of sotorasib therapy for people with advanced KRAS G12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03600883 (CodeBreaK 100) (ClinicalTrials.gov) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Parallel activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase–mammalian target of rapamycin pathway represents a mechanism of primary and acquired resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy, but the two pathways have yet to be cotargeted in humans. We performed a phase I study to evaluate the safety and activity of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib in combination with the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in BRAF -mutated advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: We performed a 3+3 dose-escalation study with escalating doses of both oral (PO) vemurafenib administered twice a day and PO everolimus administered daily. Results: Twenty patients with advanced cancers were enrolled. The median adult age was 64 years (range, 17 to 85 years); two pediatric patients were 10 and 13 years old. Patients were heavily pretreated with prior BRAF or MEK inhibitors (n = 11), phase I clinical trial therapy (n = 10), surgery (n = 18), radiation therapy (n = 11), and chemotherapy (n=13). One of the two pediatric patients initially experienced grade 3 rash, but after dermatologic intervention, the patient remains on trial with partial response and no dose reduction at time of analysis. Four dose-limiting toxicities (rash, n = 1; fatigue, n = 3) were observed at dose level 2. Therefore, dose level 1 (vemurafenib 720 mg PO twice a day and everolimus 5 mg PO daily) was the maximum-tolerated dose. Overall, four patients (22%) had a partial response and nine patients (50%) had stable disease as best response. One pediatric patient with pleomorphic xanthroastrocytoma remains on protocol with continued clinical response after 38 cycles. Conclusion: The combination of vemurafenib 720 mg PO twice a day and everolimus 5 mg PO daily is safe and well tolerated and has activity across histologies, with partial responses noted in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, optic nerve glioma, and xanthroastrocytoma, including patients who previously experienced progression on BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor therapy. Further investigation in a larger cohort of molecularly matched patients is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Both MET and c-SRC are important mediators of cancer progression and there is cross talk between the two molecules. Preclinical studies have demonstrated combination of MET and c-SRC inhibitors is effective in multiple cancer types. Methods We analyzed the safety and efficacy of administering a c-SRC inhibitor (dasatinib) in combination with a MET inhibitor (crizotinib) in a two-arm concurrent phase I study. Arm A consisted of crizotinib fixed at 250 mg twice per day with escalation of dasatinib. Arm B consisted of dasatinib fixed at 140 mg daily with escalation of crizotinib. Endpoints included dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and response (RECIST 1.1). Results We enrolled 61 patients (arm A: 31, arm B: 30). The most common cancers were sarcoma (21%) and prostate cancer (16%). In Arm A, at dose level 2 (DL2), 40% (2/5) experienced DLTs. In the expanded DL1, 21% (4/19) experienced DLTs (all grade 3). In Arm B, at DL2, 50% (2/4) experienced DLTs. In the expanded DL1, 22% (4/18) experienced DLTs (all grade 3). RP2D was determined to be arm A, DL1 (250 mg crizotinib orally twice per day plus 50 mg dasatinib orally daily). Partial response (N = 1) and stable disease for ≥6 months (N = 3) were seen. Conclusions The combination of crizotinib and dasatinib is safe to administer but tolerability is limited given the high rate of adverse events. Responses and durable stable disease were limited. Further precision therapy approach using this specific combination may be difficult given the toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Genomic profiling is increasingly used in the management of cancer. We have previously reported preliminary results of our precision medicine program. Here, we present response and survival outcomes for 637 additional patients who were referred for phase I trials and were treated with matched targeted therapy (MTT) when available. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced cancer who underwent tumor genomic analyses were treated with MTT when available. Results: Overall, 1,179 (82.1%) of 1,436 patients had one or more alterations (median age, 59.7 years; men, 41.2%); 637 had one or more actionable aberrations and were treated with MTT (n = 390) or non-MTT (n = 247). Patients who were treated with MTT had higher rates of complete and partial response (11% v 5%; P =.0099), longer failure-free survival (FFS; 3.4 v 2.9 months; P =.0015), and longer overall survival (OS; 8.4 v 7.3 months; P =.041) than did unmatched patients. Two-month landmark analyses showed that, for MTT patients, FFS for responders versus nonresponders was 7.6 versus 4.3 months (P <.001) and OS was 23.4 versus 8.5 months (P <.001), whereas for non-MTT patients (responders v nonresponders), FFS was 6.6 versus 4.1 months (P =.001) and OS was 15.2 versus 7.5 months (P =.43). Patients with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway alterations matched to PI3K/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin axis inhibitors alone demonstrated outcomes comparable to unmatched patients. Conclusion: Our results support the use of genomic matching. Subset analyses indicate that matching patients who harbor a PI3K and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway alteration to only a PI3K pathway inhibitor does not improve outcome. We have initiated IMPACT2, a randomized trial to compare treatment with and without genomic selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-induced thyroid dysfunction has been identified as an important but manageable adverse effect of targeted therapy. Several studies have suggested that patients who develop hypothyroidism respond better to TKIs, but this relationship is not well elucidated. We evaluated the relationship between new-onset hypothyroidism and clinical response in patients with advanced cancers treated with TKIs at our institution.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records for patients from four clinical trials that included at least one TKI  therapy between January 2006 and December 2011. Patients with preexisting thyroid disease, including thyroid cancer, hypothyroidism, or hyperthyroidism, were excluded. Analysis of 197 patients was performed. Response was determined using RECIST 1.0. Clinical benefit was described as complete response, partial response, or stable disease greater than 4 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to correlate patient characteristics with clinical response.Results: The median age for the 197 patients was 58 years (range, 13-85 years), and 56 % were female. Of the 197 patients, 52 (26 %) developed hypothyroidism after therapy. Clinical benefit rates were 50 % in patients with new-onset hypothyroidism versus 34 % in patients without hypothyroidism. In the univariate model, the odds ratio (OR) for new-onset hypothyroidism was 1.9 [95 % confidence interval (CI) (1.0, 3.6) and p = 0.05]. We grouped tumor types into six categories (breast, colorectal carcinoma, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, pancreas, and other). When adjusted for tumor type, age (>50 years) and sex, the OR was 2.9 [95 % CI (1.3, 6.5) and p = 0.012] for new-onset hypothyroidism.Conclusion: New-onset hypothyroidism was associated with favorable clinical response in patients who received TKI treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Cancer patients with predominantly hepatic metastases have poor outcomes and limited options. Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of a therapeutic agent may be an appropriate option for producing increased drug concentrations at the tumor sites while reducing systemic adverse effects in normal tissues.Methods: Patients with predominantly hepatic metastases (n = 48) were placed in 6 groups according to nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) dose level using a 3 + 3 design plus dose expansion for responsive tumor types. We evaluated the toxicity, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of nab-paclitaxel delivered via HAI.Results: Thirty-eight and ten patients underwent HAI over 1 and 4 h, respectively, at doses of up to 300 mg/m(2). The treatment was safe and exhibited antitumor activity. Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed that HAI of nab-paclitaxel over 4 h resulted in markedly lower peak drug concentrations (C max) and longer times to peak concentration (T max) than that over 1 h. The self-control pharmacokinetic studies showed that HAI of nab-paclitaxel led to much lower C max and areas under the curve (AUC), compared with intravenous infusion.Conclusions: HAI of nab-paclitaxel at up to 300 mg/m(2) over 4 h was well tolerated. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of C max, T max, and AUC implied that 4-h HAI enhanced hepatic extraction of nab-paclitaxel. Further preclinical and clinical studies are required to develop reliable methods of evaluation of hepatic extraction (clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT00732836, first registered on August 8, 2008, and last updated on October 27, 2014). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mutations of v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) are commonly identified in papillary and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma and are associated with worse prognosis compared with the wild type. BRAF inhibition in papillary thyroid carcinoma cell lines and xenografts inhibits proliferation and decreases downstream phosphorylation. Our objectives were to analyze safety and efficacy of the selective BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib in patients with metastatic BRAF-mutant thyroid carcinoma. Methods: We present the subset of patients with BRAF-mutant thyroid carcinoma enrolled in a larger phase 1 study, the main results of which are reported elsewhere. Results: Fourteen patients with BRAF V600E -mutant thyroid carcinoma were enrolled, of whom 13 (93%) had received prior radioactive iodine. The median duration on treatment was 8.4 months, and seven (50%) patients received treatment for ≥10 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events were skin papillomas ( n=8, 57%), hyperkeratosis ( n=5, 36%), and alopecia ( n=4, 29%), all of which were grade 1. Treatment-related adverse events grade ≥3 included grade 4 elevated lipase and grade 3 elevated amylase, fatigue, febrile neutropenia, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma ( n=1 for each). Four (29%) partial responses were observed, and nine (64%) patients achieved at least 10% decrease. Only one responder progressed while on the study drug after a response duration of 9.3 months. The other three responders had not progressed, with response duration of 4.6+, 10.4+, and 21.4+ months. With seven (50%) patients showing no progression at the time of study completion, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 months. Conclusions: Dabrafenib was well tolerated and resulted in durable responses in BRAF-mutant differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to evaluate the safety and biological activity of dual inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway with combined bevacizumab and cediranib (a VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor). METHODS This was a 3 + 3 dose escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cediranib was given orally daily for 21 days and bevacizumab intravenously every 2 weeks. Pharmacokinetics and correlates (nitric oxide synthase, nitrate oxide, and circulating tumor cells) were assessed. RESULTS Fifty-one patients were treated. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (grade 3-4; graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events [version 3.0]) observed included 1 patient with chest pain, 1 patient with fatigue, 2 patients with thrombocytopenia, 3 patients with hypertension (1 with intracranial hemorrhage), and 1 patient with grade 5 hemoptysis. Moreover, 2 patients presented with grade 3 intracranial bleeding beyond the DLT window. Dose level 2 (cediranib at a dose of 20 mg/day and bevacizumab at a dose of 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) was selected as the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D); 17 patients were treated at dose level 2 with 1 DLT and no intracranial bleeding or severe hypertension reported. Pharmacokinetics of cediranib at dose level 3 demonstrated a 46% to 77% increase in area under the curve (0-24 hours) on cycle 1 day 1 compared with historical controls. Four patients attained partial remissions: inflammatory breast cancer (-54%), basal cell carcinoma (-33%), alveolar soft part sarcoma (-33%), and synovial sarcoma (-32%). Patients with a lower circulating tumor cell count (< 30) at the predose period had a longer time to tumor progression ( P = .024, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS Cediranib at a dose of 20 mg/day and bevacizumab at a dose of 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks was found to be the RP2D. Activity in several tumor types was noted. Central nervous system bleeding and severe hypertension were observed at doses above the RP2D. Cancer 2014;120:2164-2173. © 2014 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Despite a wealth of preclinical studies, it is unclear whether PIK3CA or phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene aberrations are actionable in the clinical setting. Of 1,656 patients with advanced, refractory cancers tested for PIK3CA or PTEN abnormalities, PIK3CA mutations were found in 9% (146/1,589), and PTEN loss and/or mutation was found in 13% (149/1,157). In multicovariable analysis, treatment with a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor was the only independent factor predicting response to therapy in individuals harboring a PIK3CA or PTEN aberration. The rate of stable disease ≥6 months/partial response reached 45% in a subgroup of individuals with H1047R PIK3CA mutations. Aberrations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway are common and potentially actionable in patients with diverse advanced cancers. This work provides further important clinical validation for continued and accelerated use of biomarker-driven trials incorporating rational drug combinations. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background. We conducted this retrospective study to identify reasons that patients referred to a phase I clinical trial failed to enroll or delayed enrollment onto the trial. Materials and Methods.Outcome analyses were conducted independently on data collected from electronic medical records of two sets of consecutive patients referred to a phase I clinical trial facility at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Data from the first set of 300 patients were used to determine relevant variables affecting enrollment; data from the second set of 957 patients were then analyzed for these variables. Results. Resultsfromthetwosets of patients were similar. Approximately 55% of patients were enrolled in a phase I trial. Patients referred from within MD Anderson were more likely to be enrolled than patients seen originally outside the institution (p .006); black patients were more likely than white patients to enroll (69% vs. 43%; p.04). The median interval from the initial visit to initiation of treatments was 19 days. Major reasons for failure to enroll included failure to return to the clinic (36%), opting for treatment in another clinic (17%), hospice referral (11%), early death (10%), and lack of financial clearance (5%). Treatment was delayed for three weeks or more in 250 patients; in 85 patients (34%), the delay was caused by financial and insurance issues. Conclusion. Failure to return to the clinic, pursuit of other therapy, and rapid deterioration were the major reasons for failure to enroll; lengthy financial clearance was the most common reason for delayed enrollment onto a phase I trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Melanoma has the highest mortality of all the skin cancer subtypes. Historically, chemotherapy and immunologic therapies have yielded only modest results in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. The discovery of prevalent V600 BRAF mutations driving proliferation makes this oncogenic protein an ideal target for therapy. Dabrafenib, a reversible inhibitor of mutant BRAF kinase, improved response rates and median progression-free survival in patients with V600E BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, including those with brain metastases. With a well-tolerated toxicity profile, dabrafenib is effective as a monotherapy; however, resistance eventually develops in almost all patients. As a result, current research is exploring the role of combination therapies with dabrafenib to overcome resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We have observed severe, but rapidly reversible, hyperbilirubinemia in patients receiving hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of oxaliplatin. We performed a retrospective analysis to characterize this unusual phenomenon. Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of 113 consecutive patients receiving HAI oxaliplatin to describe the associated hyperbilirubinemia. Results: Four of 113 patients (3.5 %) presented with transient, severe (grade 3/4) hyperbilirubinemia post-HAI oxaliplatin. Peak levels of total bilirubin within 10–16 h of starting HAI oxaliplatin were 4.6, 12.2, 12.8, and 21.2 mg/dL and declined rapidly (within 24 after stopping treatment). One out of four patients experienced severe abdominal pain, and another patient had an infusion reaction (hypertension and hypoxemia) that reversed after discontinuation of infusion. Total bilirubin was predominantly direct. No significant decline in hemoglobin or increase in alkaline phosphatase occurred. Increase in liver transaminases post-infusion was mild to moderate (grades 1–3) and was seen after HAI oxaliplatin regardless of the emerged hyperbilirubinemia. Conclusions: Severe hyperbilirubinemia is a rare but rapidly reversible adverse effect of HAI oxaliplatin and may be accompanied by an abdominal pain syndrome or infusion reaction. Treating physicians should be aware for the potential of this reaction. The mechanism of this unusual reaction merits further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate clinicopathologic and molecular features of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and their outcomes in early-phase trials using pathway-targeting agents. Patients and Methods: We analyzed characteristics of 238 patients with mCRC referred to the phase 1 trials unit at MD Anderson Cancer Center. KRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF status were tested using PCR-based DNA sequencing. Results: Fifty-one percent of patients harbored KRAS mutations; 15% had PIK3CA mutations. In the multivariate regression model for clinical characteristics KRAS mutations were associated with an increased incidence of lung and bone metastases and decreased incidence of adrenal metastases; PIK3CA mutations were marginally correlated with mucinous tumors (p = 0.05). In the univariate analysis, KRAS and PIK3CA mutations were strongly associated. Advanced Duke's stage (p<0.0001) and KRAS mutations (p = 0.01) were the only significant independent predictors of poor survival (Cox proportional hazards model). Patients with PIK3CA mutations had a trend toward shorter progression-free survival when treated with anti-EGFR therapies (p = 0.07). Eighteen of 78 assessable patients (23%) treated with PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis inhibitors achieved stable disease [SD] ⩾6 months or complete response/partial response (CR/PR), only one of whom were in the subgroup (N = 15) with PIK3CA mutations, perhaps because 10 of these 15 patients (67%) had coexisting KRAS mutations. No SD ⩾6 months/CR/PR was observed in the 10 patients treated with mitogen-activating protein kinase (MAPK) pathway targeting drugs. Conclusions: KRAS and PIK3CA mutations frequently coexist in patients with colorectal cancer, and are associated with clinical characteristics and outcome. Overcoming resistance may require targeting both pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The authors validated the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score in patients with advanced lung, pancreatic, and head and neck cancers who were enrolled on phase 1 trials in the MD Anderson Cancer Center Phase I Clinical Trials Program. METHODS: The RMH score uses albumin (≥3.5 g/dL vs <3.5 g/dL), lactate dehydrogenase (less than or equal to the upper limit of normal [≤ULN] vs >ULN), and the number of metastatic sites (≤2 sites vs ≥3 sites) to predict patient survival in phase 1 trials. The authors of this report retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 229 consecutive patients with lung, pancreatic, and head and neck tumors who were treated on 57 phase 1 trials. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients with lung cancer (N = 85), pancreatic cancer (N = 83), and head and neck tumors (N = 61) were treated. The median patient age was 60 years (range, 26-85 years), and 63% of the patients were men. Patients with a good RMH prognostic score (0-1) at baseline had a longer median survival than patients with a poor prognostic score (2-3; 33.9 weeks vs 21.1 weeks; P < .0001). The RMH score was an independent variable that predicted survival in multivariate analysis. Other independent variables that predicted better survival were hemoglobin level (≥10.5 g/dL), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0-1), and tumor type. Patients who were treated on first-in-human trials did not fare worse compared with those who were not treated on first-in-human trials. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with lung, pancreatic, and head and neck tumors who were treated on phase 1 trials, survival was predicted accurately by the RMH prognostic score. Cancer 2012;. © 2011 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Oncogenic mutations of PIK3CA, RAS (KRAS, NRAS), and BRAF have been identified in various malignancies, and activate the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS/RAF/MEK pathways, respectively. Both pathways are critical drivers of tumorigenesis Methods: Tumor tissues from 504 patients with diverse cancers referred to the Clinical Center for Targeted Therapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center starting in October 2008 were analyzed for PIK3CA, RAS (KRAS, NRAS), and BRAF mutations using polymerase chain reaction-based DNA sequencing. Results: PIK3CA mutations were found in 54 (11%) of 504 patients tested; KRAS in 69 (19%) of 367; NRAS in 19 (8%) of 225; and BRAF in 31 (9%) of 361 patients. PIK3CA mutations were most frequent in squamous cervical (5/14, 36%), uterine (7/28, 25%), breast (6/29, 21%), and colorectal cancers (18/105, 17%); KRAS in pancreatic (5/9, 56%), colorectal (49/97, 51%), and uterine cancers (3/20, 15%); NRAS in melanoma (12/40, 30%), and uterine cancer (2/11, 18%); BRAF in melanoma (23/52, 44%), and colorectal cancer (5/88, 6%). Regardless of histology, KRAS mutations were found in 38% of patients with PIK3CA mutations compared to 16% of patients with wild-type (wt)PIK3CA (p = 0.001). In total, RAS (KRAS, NRAS) or BRAF mutations were found in 47% of patients with PIK3CA mutations vs. 24% of patients wtPIK3CA (p = 0.001). PIK3CA mutations were found in 28% of patients with KRAS mutations compared to 10% with wtKRAS (p = 0.001) and in 20% of patients with RAS (KRAS, NRAS) or BRAF mutations compared to 8% with wtRAS (KRAS, NRAS) or wtBRAF (p = 0.001). Conclusions: PIK3CA, RAS (KRAS, NRAS), and BRAF mutations are frequent in diverse tumors. In a wide variety of tumors, PIK3CA mutations coexist with RAS (KRAS, NRAS) and BRAF mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Background Salivary ductal carcinoma is a rare cancer with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-directed treatment has been attempted in HER2-amplified or overexpressed salivary gland malignancies with limited success. Methods We report resolution of measurable disease and minimal residual disease in a patient with salivary duct cancer treated with trastuzumab, lapatinib, and bevacizumab, with treatment ongoing for more than 2 years. Results This treatment has been tolerated well except for grade 2 diarrhea and mucositis, which required a dose reduction of lapatinib to 1000 mg daily. The response observed was achieved in spite of receiving extensive prior therapy, including trastuzumab and/or chemotherapy for 20 months on which his tumors progressed. Conclusion The combination of trastuzumab, lapatinib, and bevacizumab may warrant investigation as a non-cytotoxic alternative for treatment of HER2-amplified or overexpressed salivary duct carcinoma and other HER2-amplified or overexpressed salivary gland tumors, particularly those not responsive to trastuzumab monotherapy. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: E25-E27, 2014 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the original article, corresponding author's given name and family name are flipped. It should be "Siqing Fu" rather than "Fu Siqing". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]