1. Evaluation of a Novel Objective Method for The Assessment of Nasal Symmetry Among Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip.
- Author
-
Ezra, Liron, Bar Droma, Eitan, Baransi, Aamer, Friger, Michael, and Silberstein, Eldad
- Subjects
NASAL anatomy ,FACIAL anatomy ,CROSS-sectional method ,PEARSON correlation (Statistics) ,COMPUTER software ,ACADEMIC medical centers ,AESTHETICS ,PILOT projects ,RESEARCH evaluation ,PHOTOGRAPHY ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,BODY image ,PERSONAL beauty ,DIGITAL image processing ,CLEFT lip ,SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics) ,INTER-observer reliability ,CLEFT palate ,EVALUATION ,CHILDREN - Abstract
Objective: This is a cross sectional study aimed to asses novel semi objectve compter assisted method to asses the symmetry amog unilateral cleft lip patients. Design: using Standard inferior view nose photos that were uploaded to Digimizer© Version 4.6.1 (2005–2016 MedCalc Software) Image Analysis, symmetry percentage was calculated and compared between cleft and non-cleft neonates. This method was compared to two subjective methods of rating symmetry. Setting: This a cross sectional pilot study performed in the Univresity Medical Center using standard inferior views of unilateral cleft patients which were compared to non-cleft neonates. Patients: Photographs of 71 neonates with unilateral complete and incomplete cleft lip and 30 neonates without facial cleft, which were born at the university medical center, Beer Sheba, Israel, were analyzed in a standard manner to determine nasal symmetry. Main measures: the novel method proposed produced a nominal value for percentage of symmetry. Results: Using Pearson's correlation test we found intra-rater reliability of 91.2% (p < 0.001) and Inter-rater reliability of 82.9% (p < 0.001). The analysis correlated with the surgeons subjective scores in both the numerical ranking method at 73% (p < 0.001) and 72.6% (p < 0.001) and the Ordinal ranking method at 87.6% (p < 0.001) and 77.7% (p < 0.001). The ability of the method to discriminate healthy from Cleft Lip patients overall was 92.3% With high sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: This method accurately distinguishes healthy patients from cleft lip patients. We have achieved High levels of inter and intra-rater reliability. Significant correlations were found between our semiobjective method and the subjective scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF