Kavazović, Inga, Dimitropoulos, Christoforos, Gašparini, Dora, Rončević Filipović, Mari, Barković, Igor, Koster, Jan, Lemmermann, Niels A., Babić, Marina, Cekinović Grbeša, Đurđica, and Wensveen, Felix M.
Memory CD8 T cells play an important role in the protection against breakthrough infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Whether the route of antigen exposure impacts these cells at a functional level is incompletely characterized. Here, we compare the memory CD8 T cell response against a common SARS-CoV-2 epitope after vaccination, infection, or both. CD8 T cells demonstrate comparable functional capacity when restimulated directly ex vivo , independent of the antigenic history. However, analysis of T cell receptor usage shows that vaccination results in a narrower scope than infection alone or in combination with vaccination. Importantly, in an in vivo recall model, memory CD8 T cells from infected individuals show equal proliferation but secrete less tumor necrosis factor (TNF) compared with those from vaccinated people. This difference is negated when infected individuals have also been vaccinated. Our findings shed more light on the differences in susceptibility to re-infection after different routes of SARS-CoV-2 antigen exposure. [Display omitted] • Infection and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 both favor CD8 T EMRA differentiation • Ex vivo functionality of memory T cells is similar after infection and vaccination • The scope of memory CD8 T cells is larger after infection than after vaccination • Vaccination-induced memory generates secondary effectors with superior functionality Kavazović et al. compare SARS-CoV-2-specific memory CD8 T cells from people after infection, vaccination, or both. Infection induces a more clonally diverse memory pool than vaccination, but these cells produce less TNF after in vivo recall. Subsequent vaccination negates differences, stressing the importance of boosting irrespective of antigenic history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]