Search

Patients in PLEIADES and EQUULEUS had received a median (range) of 1 (1-1) and 2 (1-4) prior lines of therapy, respectively, and 60 (90.9%) and 85 (100%) patients had received prior proteasome inhibitor therapy. EQUULEUS (NCT01998971) evaluated daratumumab IV plus weekly Kd (carfilzomib 70 mg/m SP 2 sp ; dexamethasone 40 mg) in RRMM patients after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy (including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug). Patients in CANDOR received carfilzomib 56 mg/m SP 2 sp twice weekly (monthly cumulative dose, 336 mg/m SP 2 sp [Cycle 1, 264 mg/m SP 2 sp ]), while patients in PLEIADES and EQUULEUS received carfilzomib 70 mg/m SP 2 sp weekly (monthly cumulative dose, 210 mg/m SP 2 sp [Cycle 1, 160 mg/m SP 2 sp ]; ie, 62.5% of CANDOR monthly dose). [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: Evidence on the effect of self-protection via social distancing and wearing face-masks on infections during chemotherapy is currently not available. We asked if the occurrence of acute infections during chemotherapy for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) decreased when COVID-19 protection measures were in effect. Methods: We analyzed the occurrence of infections during all documented eBEACOPP cycles starting between 01 March and 30 June of 2017 to 2020 in patients treated within the GHSG HD21 study in Germany and compared the infection rates and characteristics by logistic regression models and means of descriptive statistics. Results: We analyzed 911 cycles of 313 adult patients treated with 4 to 6 cycles of eBEACOPP. We found a significant decrease in the occurrence of infections during chemotherapy for HL during COVID-19 lockdown from 131 (19.6%) of 670 cycles in 2017–2019 to 30 (12.6%) of 239 cycles during COVID-19 lockdown [OR 0.574 (95% CI 0.354–0.930), P = 0.024]. The strongest effect was evident for unspecified infections with 39 cycles (5.8%) during 2017–2019 in comparison to 5 cycles (2.1%) during COVID-19 lockdown. 20 (24.1%) of 83 patients had an infection during the COVID-19 lockdown versus 99 (43.2%) of 229 patients in the years 2017–2019 (P = 0.0023). Conclusion: The significant decrease of infections during chemotherapy for HL during COVID-19 lockdown reveals the protective measures' potential to shield patients from transmissible pathogens. We conclude that these measures could be recommended for HL patients at risk for infections during chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: To further improve outcome in young high‐risk patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) the number of rituximab (R) infusions was doubled in combination with standard CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy. Seventy‐seven patients (aged 18–60 years) with an age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index of 2–3 received 12 × R (375 mg/m2) on days 0, 1, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85 and 99 together with eight cycles of CHOEP‐14. Results were retrospectively compared to those of patients receiving 6 × R and 8 × CHOEP‐14 in the standard arm of the randomized R‐MegaCHOEP trial. Two‐year overall survival (OS) was 82% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73%–92%]; 2‐year event‐free (EFS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) was 69% (95% CI 59–80%) and 76% (95% CI 66%‐–6%), respectively. Comparing 12 to six doses of R revealed no differences (univariate/multivariate) in EFS (at 2 years: 69% vs. 71%), PFS (76% vs. 75%) and OS (82% vs. 85%), with P = 0·766, P = 0·871 and P = 0·843, respectively. Doubling the number of R infusions concomitant to CHOEP did not improve treatment outcomes. Nonetheless, OS and PFS of young high‐risk patients who received only six infusions of R combined with CHOEP remain excellent and were confirmed in an independent cohort of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Analysis of the efficiency and toxicity of cyclophosphamide-based stem cell mobilization in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma ( RMM). Methods Peripheral blood stem cells ( PBSCs) were mobilized with high dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2 daily on days 1 and 2) and G- CSF plus pre-emptive/rescue plerixafor in RMM patients (first to third relapse) treated within the Re LApsE trial of the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group ( GMMG). Results Mobilization was initiated with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CY) and G- CSF in 30 patients. Fifteen patients received additional pre-emptive/rescue administration of plerixafor. Stem cell collection was successful (≥2×106 CD34+ cells per kg bw) in 77% (23/30 patients). Patients with prior high-dose melphalan collected a significantly lower median total number of PBSCs than patients without prior high-dose melphalan (3.3×106 vs 17×106 CD34+ cells/kg bw). Toxicity of HD-CY was frequent with 12 serious adverse events ( SAE) in 37% of patients (11/30 patients). Infections accounted for the majority of SAE reports. In two patients, SAEs were lethal (septic shock). Conclusions These data proof feasibility of PBSC collection at relapse but emphasize the importance of collection and storage of additional PBSC transplants during first-line treatment when mobilization is more efficient and less toxic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gene expression profiling (GEP) has significantly contributed to the elucidation of the molecular heterogeneity of multiple myeloma plasma cells (MMPC) and only recently it has been recommended for risk stratification. Prior to GEP MMPC need to be enriched resulting in an inability to immediately freeze bone marrow aspirates or use RNA stabilization reagents. As a result in multi-center MM trials sample processing delay due to shipping may be an important confounder of molecular analyses and risk stratification based on GEP data. Results: We compared GEP data of 145 in-house and 246 shipped samples and detected 3301 down-regulated and 3501 up-regulated genes in shipped samples. For 3994 genes we confirmed differential expression in an independent set of 85 in-house and 97 shipped samples. Differentially expressed genes were enriched in processes like ribosome biogenesis, cell cycle, and apoptosis. Among GEP based risk predictors the IFM-15 seemed to underestimate high risk in shipped samples, whereas the GEP70 and the EMC-92 gene signatures were more robust. In order to provide a tool to assess the "shipping effect" in public repositories, we generated a 17-gene predictor for shipped samples with a 10-fold cross validation error rate of 0.06 for the training set and an error rate of 0.15 for the validation set. Conclusion: Sample processing delay significantly influences GEP of MMPC, implying it should be avoided if samples were used for risk stratification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The addition of etoposide to the CHOP protocol (CHOEP) has been shown to improve outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The intravenous administration of etoposide on three consecutive days represents a logistic problem and needs resources particular in the outpatient setting. This could be avoided by using etoposide capsules on days 2 and 3. However, the oral administration of cytotoxic agents is often affected by variable absorption and drug interactions. We investigated the pharmacokinetic equivalency of oral and intravenous etoposide in ten patients (male, n = 7; female, n = 3; median age 56 years) with aggressive lymphomas. Treatment consisted of standard CHOP plus etoposide 100 mg/m2 given intravenously on day 1, and 200 mg/m2 orally on days 3 and 4. Samples from blood and urine were taken on days 1 (i.v. study) and 3 (p.o. study) before and after etoposide administration. Etoposide levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with the TOPFIT computer program. Mean peak plasma level after intravenous etoposide was significantly higher compared to oral administration (16.3 ± 3.7 vs. 12.0 ± 4.2 μg/ml; P = 0.015). The mean bioavailability of oral etoposide was 58 ± 15% with an interpatient variability of 26%. Significant differences of bioavailability of oral etoposide between the used dose levels (350, 400 and 450 mg) were not observed. Mean AUC after a 100 mg/m2 intravenous and a 200 mg/m2 oral dose of etoposide were 74.0 ± 18.3 and 84.9 ± 29.6 μg h/ml ( P = 0.481). Interpatient variability of AUC was 25% for the intravenous route and 35% after oral intake. Urinary etoposide excretion as percentage of administered dose was 39.4 ± 10.6% after intravenous infusion versus 35.4 ± 9.4% after oral intake ( P = 0.422). Renal clearance was also very similar with intravenous and oral route (18.5 ± 7.4 vs. 16.7 ± 6.6 ml/min; P = 0.546). The equivalency of AUC after 200 mg/m2 of oral and 100 mg/m2 of intravenous etoposide support the use of the oral preparation in patients treated with the CHOEP regimen, which makes the chemotherapy more convenient for the patients and help to reduce costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To assess the outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) treatment in patients with hematological malignancies. Design and setting. Retrospective cohort study in the medical ICU of a university hospital. Patients. 104 critically ill patients after receiving conventional chemotherapy or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Interventions. We analyzed demographic data, underlying disease, intensity of antineoplastic regimen, cause of admission, need for mechanical ventilation, and hemofiltration, ICU survival, and survival after discharge, furthermore neutrophil count, C-reactive protein (≤150 vs. >150 mg/l), antithrombin III, prothrombin time, and SAPS II (≤50 vs. >50) at ICU admission. All recorded variables were evaluated for prognostic relevance by univariate and multivariate analyses. Measurements and results. Overall ICU mortality was 44%, with significantly higher mortality in ventilated patients (74% vs. 12% in nonventilated patients, p<0.001). Overall survival for the entire group 6 months and 1 year after ICU admission was 33% and 29%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed mechanical ventilation and SAPS II as independent prognostic factors of both ICU mortality and long-term survival, while C-reactive protein predicted only ICU mortality. Conclusions. The outcome of patients not requiring ventilatory support in this study was encouraging, while invasive ventilation was again confirmed as predicting a dismal prognosis in this population. Efforts should be directed to avoiding this procedure by reducing the pulmonary toxicity of antineoplastic treatment and to making ventilatory support more tolerable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]