Search

Background: Our pediatric heart transplant center transitioned from post‐bypass basiliximab (BAS) induction to either anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG) or pre‐bypass BAS. The purpose of this study was to compare first‐year rejection rates before and after this change. Methods: A single‐center retrospective analysis was conducted of pediatric heart transplant recipients from 2010 to 2019. Primary outcome was first‐year rejection. Bivariate analysis, Kaplan‐Meier curves, and multivariable regression were performed across eras. Results: Forty‐three early era patients (55%) received post‐bypass BAS, and 35 late era patients (45%) received pre‐bypass BAS (n = 17) or ATG (n = 18). First‐year rejection decreased in the late era (31% vs 53%, p =.05). This finding was more pronounced after excluding infants (38% vs 73%, p =.006). Late era was associated with a decreased likelihood of rejection (all cohort OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05‐0.66; infants excluded OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04‐0.61). No differences in post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease, donor‐specific antibody, or infection were observed. Conclusions: Fewer late era patients receiving ATG or pre‐bypass BAS induction had first‐year rejection compared to the early era patients receiving standard post‐bypass BAS induction. This programmatic shift in induction strategy was readily achievable and potentially effective in reducing first‐year rejection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Racial disparities have been reported among pediatric patients waitlisted for and undergoing heart transplantation but have not been studied further upstream in the transplant candidate evaluation process. We retrospectively studied our single‐center experience in order to investigate any potential biases in the evaluation process. Results of the heart transplant evaluation in children ≤18 years old at our institution were analyzed. Primary outcome was final disposition to waitlist or not. Race was defined by family self‐identification. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were performed. From 2013 to 2019, 133 unique patients were referred for listing consideration. While Black patients comprised 44% of the referral population and had more markers of socioeconomic disadvantage, they comprised 43% of the patients who were listed for transplantation with no significant difference between these proportions (p =.96). Black and White patients made up a similar proportion of patients deemed too well or too ill for listing. Black patients had lower annual household income estimates and rates of household marriage. Despite identifying significant social challenges in 27 patients (18 of them Black), only five patients (3 Black and 2 White) were turned down for listing due to social barriers. While limited by the small number of patients turned down for social barriers, our transplant evaluation process does not appear to result in racial disparities in access to listing. Further studies are needed using national cohorts to explore possible racial disparities upstream from waitlisting and transplantation, such as during the referral and evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]