Search

Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are complex infections that require precise microbiological documentation to optimize antibiotic therapy. Currently, diagnosis is based on microbiological culture, sometimes complemented by amplification and sequencing of the 16S rDNA gene. Clinical metagenomics (CMg), that is, the sequencing of the entire nucleic acids in a sample, was previously shown to identify bacteria not detected by conventional methods, but its actual contribution to the diagnosis remains to be assessed, especially with regard to 16S rDNA sequencing. In the present study, we tested the performance of CMg in 34 patients (94 samples) with suspected BJIs, as compared to culture and 16S rDNA sequencing. A total of 94 samples from 34 patients with suspicion of BJIs, recruited from two sites, were analyzed by (i) conventional culture, (ii) 16S rDNA sequencing (Sanger method), and (iii) CMg (Illumina Technology). Two negative controls were also sequenced by CMg for contamination assessment. Based on the sequencing results of negative controls, 414 out of 539 (76.7%) bacterial species detected by CMg were considered as contaminants and 125 (23.2%) as truly present. For monomicrobial infections (13 patients), the sensitivity of CMg was 83.3% as compared to culture, and 100% as compared to 16S rDNA. For polymicrobial infections (13 patients), the sensitivity of CMg was 50% compared to culture, and 100% compared to 16S rDNA. For samples negative in culture (8 patients, 21 samples), CMg detected 11 bacteria in 10 samples from 5 different patients. In 5/34 patients, CMg brought a microbiological diagnosis where conventional methods failed, and in 16/34 patients, CMg provided additional information. Finally, 99 antibiotic resistance genes were detected in 24 patients (56 samples). Provided sufficient genome coverage (87.5%), a correct inference of antibiotic susceptibility was achieved in 8/8 bacteria (100%). In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the CMg provides complementary and potentially valuable data to conventional methods of BJIs diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess, in a clinical cohort, the efficacy of switching current ART in virologically suppressed patients to a dolutegravir-based regimen, regardless of the genotypic susceptibility score (GSS).Patients and methods: This was an observational single-centre study assessing ART-treated patients with plasma viral load (pVL) <50 copies/mL who were switched to a dolutegravir-based regimen with 1 year of follow-up. PCR negative was defined as an undetected PCR signal. Trough plasma concentration (C24) was determined using UPLC-MS/MS.Results: Two hundred and thirty-nine patients initiated a dolutegravir-based regimen: 12%, 29% and 59% had a total GSS of 1 or 1.5 (group 1), 2 or 2.5 (group 2) and 3 (group 3), respectively. At switch initiation, the median time since first ART and the median duration with pVL <50 copies/mL were 13 years (IQR = 6-19) and 3 years (IQR = 1-6), respectively. Median times since last genotype were 9, 10 and 5 years for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Twenty patients (8.4%) discontinued the dolutegravir-based regimen due to adverse events. During the study, 96.4% (n = 661/686) of all pVL were <50 copies/mL. Four patients (1.7%) experienced virological failure (two pVL >50 copies/mL) without emergence of resistance; these patients' GSSs were 2, 2.5, 3 and 3. The median dolutegravir C24 was 1545 ng/mL (IQR = 1150-2097). Of the patients with pVL <20 copies/mL, 72% were PCR negative during the follow-up, with no difference between the three groups of patients.Conclusions: This observational cohort study showed a high level of virological suppression maintenance in the first year following the switch to a dolutegravir-based regimen, even in patients with GSS ≤2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction:Pregnancy is an exclusion criteria in most clinical trials involving antiretroviral therapy (ART) and modern contraception methods are systematically proposed to women of childbearing age. Nevertheless pregnancies are often observed. Reproductive choices during clinical trials should be understood to adapt interventions to the level of risk for mother and baby safety. Our goal was to describe the reproductive behavior and pregnancy outcomes among HIV-infected women on second-line antiretroviral treatment enrolled in two clinical trials and to compare them with those of HIV-positive women in non-research settings. Methods:The number and outcomes of pregnancies were recorded among 281 non menopausal women enrolled in the ANRS 12169-2LADY and ANRS 12286-MOBIDIP clinical trials in Cameroon, Senegal and Burkina Faso. All participants had agreed to use a least one contraceptive method (barrier or non-barrier) which was provided for free during the study. Data were collected through revision of pregnancy notification forms and by data extraction from the study database, regularly updated and checked during the study. Results:Sixty-six women had 84 pregnancies between January 2010 and July 2015 resulting in a pregnancy rate of 8.0 per 100 women-years (WY) (95% CI 6.5–9.9) which is similar to the ones observed in cohort studies in Sub-Saharan Africa (varying from 2.5 to 9.4 pregnancies per 100 WY). Among 60 live births, 10 (16.6%) were born prematurely and 9 (15%) had a low birth weight. Sixteen miscarriages/stillbirths occurred (19.5%). This percentage is comparable to the one expected in the seronegative population which is reassuring for HIV-positive women considering pregnancy on ART. Only one minor birth defect was diagnosed. In univariate and multivariate analysis, miscarriages/stillbirths were not associated either with age, nadir of CD4 count, duration of ART, CD4 count, or viral load at the beginning of pregnancy. Conclusion:HIV-positive women participating in clinical trials conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa tend to get pregnant as often as seropositive women who received medical care in non-research settings. It is therefore essential to adopt a pragmatic approach by re-evaluating the relevance of the criteria for exclusion of pregnant women according to the risk associated with exposure and to seek more effective and innovating contraceptive strategies when using potentially teratogenic molecules. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives: The principal outcome was to describe clinical characteristics of a transgender male-to-female (TGW) cohort followed for pre-exposure HIV prophylaxis (PrEP).Introduction: Few efforts and preventive interventions have targeted transgender population, despite them being at great risk of HIV infection.Methods: This was a retrospective transgender male-to-female (TGW) cohort followed for PrEP at Bichat Hospital Sexual Health Clinic between February 2016 and January 2019.The principal outcome was to describe clinical characteristics of this TGW population: modalities of PrEP uptake, treatment adherence and tolerance, sanitary system retention, hormonal therapy and STIs.Data about age, ethnicity, language, sex work and sanitary healthcare insurance coverage were also collected.Results: Forty-nine TGW were included, with a median age of 33 years; 43/49 (87.7%) were from South America and 43/49 (87.7%) were sex workers. Forty-four 44/49 TGW (89.7%) had no regular healthcare insurance coverage. Nineteen out of 49 (38.7%) had a history of STI in the last 12 months. Hormone intake was reported in 16/49 (32.60%). PrEP with oral TDF/FTC was prescribed on a daily basis for 45/49 TG (91.8%). Two TGW discontinued PrEP for gastrointestinal intolerance. No case of renal toxicity or HIV seroconversion has been reported. Retention rate was high (71.4%), but average follow-up was 9 months.Conclusions: Our data showed a very vulnerable population, with a high proportion of migrants, sex workers and with a low healthcare insurance coverage. Retention rate was high (71.4%). Further multi-component interventions are needed to improve global sex health approach, PreP follow-up and sanitary system retention among TGW population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of our study was to assess a possible association between plasma inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, IL-6, soluble CD14) and the extent of fibrosis or cirrhosis using a FibroScan® in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed 60 HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had paired plasma samples and FibroScan® values available. All included patients were controlled for HIV infection (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) and had detectable HCV RNA levels. Levels of three biomarkers were measured in all samples using commercial ELISA kits. Multivariate logistic regression models identified factors associated with the METAVIR stages of fibrosis (F0–F2 vs. F3–F4). Results: In univariate logistic regression analyses, in addition to sCD14 (odds ratio [OR] = 3.23, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.30–7.97, P = 0.01), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase, platelet counts, and CD4 cell counts were associated with the stage of liver fibrosis and, thus, were introduced into the model. However, only AST (OR = 1.06, 95%CI = 1.02–1.10, P = 0.0009) was independently associated with F3–F4 stage liver fibrosis. Conclusions: In our study of HIV/HCV co-infected patients, sCD14 plasma level, a biomarker of monocyte activation, was not independently associated with the F3–F4 stage of liver fibrosis. We hypothesize that the higher levels of inflammation markers observed in HIV/HCV co-infected patients, compared to HCV mono-infected patients, prevent this association being observed within this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]