Search

In bacteria, the export of proteins by the twin-arginine translocase (Tat) pathway is directed by cleavable N-terminal signal peptides. We studied the relationship between transport and maturation using a substrate, YedY, that contains an Ala > Leu substitution at the -1 position of the signal peptide. This blocks maturation and leads to the accumulation of a membrane-bound precursor form with the mature domain exposed to the periplasm. Its accumulation does not block transport of other Tat substrates, indicating that exit from the translocation channel has taken place, and the precursor protein is fir mLy integrated into the membrane bilayer. The membrane-integrated nature of the precursor, and complete absence of precursor protein in the periplasm, strongly suggest that the precursor has undergone lateral transfer into the bilayer during translocation. We propose that subsequent proteolytic processing releases the mature protein into the periplasm. A delay in processing results in an inhibition of cell growth, emphasizing a requirement for efficient maturation of Tat substrates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mechanisms for importing colicins from the extracellular medium into Escherichia coli target cells implicate a complex cascade of interactions with host proteins. It is known that colicins interact with membrane receptors, and they may appropriate them structurally, but not functionally, as a scaffold on the surface of the target cell so that they can be translocated across the outer membrane. During the import into the periplasm, colicins parasitize functionally membrane porins and energy-transducers by mimicking their natural substrates or interacting partners. Such structural or functional parasitism also takes place during the late molecular events responsible for the processing and translocation of nuclease colicins across the inner membrane. Two different RNase colicins (D and E3) require an endoproteolytic cleavage, dependent on the inner membrane ATPase/protease FtsH, in order to transfer their C-terminal toxic domain into the cytoplasm. Moreover, the processing of colicin D necessitates a specific interaction with the signal peptidase LepB, but without appropriating the catalytic activity of this enzyme. A comparison of the differences in structural and functional organizations of these two colicins, as well as the pore-forming colicin B, is discussed in the present paper in connection with the sequential steps of their import mechanisms and the exploitation of the machinery of the target cell. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]