1. Overall survival is comparable between percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and liver resection as first-line therapies for solitary 3–5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma.
- Author
-
Chung, Shih-Da, Yong, Chee-Chien, Kee, Kwong-Ming, Lu, Sheng-Nan, Hu, Tsung-Hui, Wang, Jing-Houng, Hung, Chao-Hung, Chen, Chien-Hung, Liu, Yueh-Wei, Li, Wei-Feng, Wang, Chih-Chi, Yen, Yi-Hao, and Lin, Chih-Yun
- Subjects
PROPENSITY score matching ,CATHETER ablation ,OVERALL survival ,HEPATOCELLULAR carcinoma ,SURVIVAL rate - Abstract
Purpose: Few studies have compared survival outcomes between liver resection (LR) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating solitary 3–5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to clarify this issue. Methods: Patients with Child–Pugh class A liver disease and a solitary HCC of 3–5 cm without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis who underwent LR or percutaneous RFA between 2011 and 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study; 310 patients underwent LR and 114 patients underwent percutaneous RFA. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline variables, including age, sex, alpha-fetoprotein level, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, between the two groups. Results: Before PSM, 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly lower in the percutaneous RFA group than in the LR group (both p < 0.001). After PSM, 5-year OS was comparable between the two modalities (p = 0.367); however, 5-year RFS was significantly lower in the RFA group than in the LR group (p = 0.001). The two modalities did not differ in severe post-treatment complications (p = 1.000). Conclusions: Five-year OS did not differ between treatment modalities for patients with a solitary HCC of 3–5 cm; however, the LR group's 5-year RFS was superior. LR should be recommended as the first-line treatment for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF