Search

Background: The FAST is a 2 × 2 factorial trial addressing two questions: (1) the role of replacing cisplatin (P) with a non-platinum agent, vinorelbine (N), and (2) the role of adding a third agent, ifosfamide (I), in a doublet based on gemcitabine (G).Methods: A total of 433 stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were randomised to one of four arms: gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP), gemcitabine-vinorelbine, gemcitabine-ifosfamide-cisplatin or gemcitabine-ifosfamide-vinorelbine. Two comparisons were performed: N- vs P-containing regimens and I-triplets vs non-I doublets.Results: For N- vs P-containing regimens, adjusted overall survival was 9.7 vs 11.3 months (P=0.044), progression-free survival was 4.9 vs 6.4 months (P=0.020) and response rate was 24% vs 31% (P=0.124), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between doublets and triplets. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicity was significantly more frequent in P-containing therapy; grade 3-4 leucopenia was significantly more common in triplets. Concerning non-haematological toxicity, grade 3-4 nausea-vomiting was significantly increased in P-containing regimens.Conclusions: This trial provides evidence of a slight survival superiority of GP-containing regimens over platinum-free N-containing chemotherapy. This trial also confirms that the addition of a third chemotherapy agent (I) to a standard G-based doublet does not improve treatment outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:The FAST is a 2 × 2 factorial trial addressing two questions: (1) the role of replacing cisplatin (P) with a non-platinum agent, vinorelbine (N), and (2) the role of adding a third agent, ifosfamide (I), in a doublet based on gemcitabine (G).Methods:A total of 433 stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were randomised to one of four arms: gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP), gemcitabine-vinorelbine, gemcitabine-ifosfamide-cisplatin or gemcitabine-ifosfamide-vinorelbine. Two comparisons were performed: N- vs P-containing regimens and I-triplets vs non-I doublets.Results:For N- vs P-containing regimens, adjusted overall survival was 9.7 vs 11.3 months (P=0.044), progression-free survival was 4.9 vs 6.4 months (P=0.020) and response rate was 24% vs 31% (P=0.124), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between doublets and triplets. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicity was significantly more frequent in P-containing therapy; grade 3-4 leucopenia was significantly more common in triplets. Concerning non-haematological toxicity, grade 3-4 nausea-vomiting was significantly increased in P-containing regimens.Conclusions:This trial provides evidence of a slight survival superiority of GP-containing regimens over platinum-free N-containing chemotherapy. This trial also confirms that the addition of a third chemotherapy agent (I) to a standard G-based doublet does not improve treatment outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the study was to assess the toxicity and the clinical activity of biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) administered every 2 weeks (FOLFOX-4 regimen) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). A total of 61 previously untreated AGC patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85?mg?m-2 on day 1, FA 200?mg?m-2 as a 2?h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU 400?mg?m-2 and a 22?h infusion of 5-FU 600?mg?m-2, repeated for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks. All patients were assessable for toxicity and response to treatment. Four (7%) complete responses and 19 partial responses were observed (overall response rate, 38%). Stable disease was observed in 22 (36%) patients, with progressive disease in the other six (10%) patients. Median time to progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) were 7.1 and 11.2 months, respectively. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 haematologic toxicities were neutropenia, anaemia and thrombocytopenia in 36, 10 and 5%of the patients, respectively. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was recorded in three (5%) patients. FOLFOX-4 is an active and well-tolerated chemotherapy. Response rate (RR), TTP and OS were comparable with those of other oxaliplatin-based regimens, suggesting a role for this combination in gastric cancer.British Journal of Cancer (2005) 92, 1644-1649. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602573 www.bjcancer.com Published online 26 April 2005 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil are the only two compounds with reproducible activity against advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). We have evaluated a novel combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil on the clinical benefit response (CBR) end point. Eleven consecutive patients with symptomatic APC were entered in a two-stage phase II trial. Gemcitabine was administered by intravenous (i.v.) bolus injection at the dose of 1000 mg m[SUP-2] on days 1, 8, 15 and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m[SUP-2] was given by continuous i.v. infusion on days 1-5. Treatment was repeated every 28 days. A CBR was achieved in 7/11 patients. The mean time to loss of CBR was 26.5 weeks (range 14-18, median 22). Toxicity was mild and no APC patient experienced WHO grade 3 toxicity. The gemcitabine/5-fluorouracil combination is well tolerated and produces a symptomatic relief in the majority of APC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: MEN-1 is an autosomal dominant disease caused by mutation of the oncosuppressor gene menin. MEN-1 is typically associated with hyperparathyroidism, islet cell tumors and pituitary adenomas, but it can also be associated with other neoplasms, such as thymic carcinoids. Aim(s): In January 2009, a 49-year old patient diagnosed with a small cell neuroendocrine tumor of the thymus, considered inoperable. From March 2009 to March 2011, she received several systemic anti-neoplastic therapy consisting of carboplatin-etoposide, capecitabine-gemcitabine, somatostatin analogues and Everolimus. In March 2011, the patient presented progressive radiographic disease with worsening of the mediastinal syndrome. In April 2011, she was started on Sunitinib as reported in a large phase III trial on neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. She quickly achieved symptomatic improvement. Stable disease was detected on PET-CT scan in July 2011, which was confirmed in December 2011 by PET-CT scan. Materials and methods: Sunitinib 50 mg/daily, 4/2 w. Results: Thymic carcinoids are described in about 8% of pts with MEN-1, while 25% of patients with thymic carcinoids have MEN-1. Prophylactic thymectomy is a reasonable approach for patients with MEN-1. Recently, both Everolimus and Sunitinib have proved to be effective in two randomized controlled trials in PNET, with a considerable extension of PFS. Conclusion: This is the first reported case of a patient with a small cell neuroendocrine tumor of the thymus treated with Sunitinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]