Search

Public programs have been charged with implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) to improve outcomes for children with autism. However, research indicates that scale-up of EBPs poses challenges. This study identifies perceived variables linked to effective statewide scale-up of EBPs in special education by exploring implementation climate and leadership across special education organization types (e.g., schools, districts, and regional consortiums). A simultaneous QUAL + QUAN mixed methods design was employed with the primary function of convergence and triangulation. Data were drawn from focus groups with 30 special educators and a statewide survey completed by 656 school personnel in one U.S. state. In general, perceptions of implementation climate and leadership are weak in special education organizations, with strengths at regional levels focused on special education and increased challenges at the school and district levels. Implications for practice and future research are identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is increasingly prevalent, intervention costs are high, and long-term outcomes are poor. Proactive implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs; Steinbrenner et al., Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism, 2020) through an assessment or planning process can lead to more effective services (Rubin et al., Admin Policy Mental Health Mental Health Serv Res 43(6), 1023–1028, 2016). The objective of this study is (a) to identify factors associated with the use of proactive versus reactive strategies for school-based services for students with ASD and (b) to examine school personnel perceptions of the use of proactive versus reactive strategies. Data were from a larger project in which 6 semi-structured focus groups were conducted to understand school personnel perceptions of how school districts implement new programs for ASD. Transcripts were coded using an iterative coding and review process. In the present study, primary themes were identified and classified as proactive or reactive. Participants reported both proactive and reactive allocation of district resources for intervention implementation. Reactive implementation was associated with litigation or due process, escalated student behavior, and non-public school placement, whereas proactive implementation was associated with ASD-specific programming, grants, personnel experience with EBPs, and prospective needs assessment. Participants perceived the reactive strategies as disadvantageous, and yet these strategies were sometimes still employed. Understanding the role of proactive and reactive strategies and the factors that influence their use could enable more effective planning for EBP use to improve both cost savings and student outcomes. This study is an important first step to explore resource allocation for school-based services for students with ASD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scaling up the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) for autism across service sectors and regions has presented a considerable challenge indicating a clear need for continued development. The California Autism Professional Training and Information Network (CAPTAIN) integrates implementation drivers into specific procedures and methodology as an implementation strategy to support statewide scale up. The current study was designed to evaluate the impact of CAPTAIN on provider-level outcomes including attitude toward, and knowledge, fidelity and use of autism EBPs, and overall classroom quality. Overall, results indicated variability across measures, with some significant differences between CAPTAIN-trained and non-CAPTAIN-trained providers. CAPTAIN-trained providers reported more openness to EBP. Significantly more CAPTAIN-trained direct service providers reported collecting fidelity of implementation data (χ2(2, N = 1515) = 10.95, p = 0.004), collecting student data (χ2(2, N = 1509) = 14.19, p = 0.001), and reported using their primary EBP with "most or all students" (χ2(2, N = 1514) = 11.41, p = 0.003) than providers not trained by CAPTAIN. In summary, these preliminary findings show promise for the efficacy of the CAPTAIN model to increase dissemination and implementation of EBP at the classroom level. Supporting use of evidence-based practice in public service programs for autistic individuals is critical. The California Autism Professional Training and Information Network (CAPTAIN) brings together best practices from intervention and implementation research to support scale up of autism services. The current study was designed to evaluate the impact of CAPTAIN on provider-level outcomes including attitude toward, knowledge, fidelity, and use of autism EBPs and overall classroom quality. Overall, results indicated variability across measures, with some significant differences between CAPTAIN-trained and non-CAPTAIN-trained providers. These preliminary findings show promise for the efficacy of the CAPTAIN model to increase dissemination and implementation of EBP at the classroom level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Research regarding variables influencing evidence-based practice implementation within school services for students with autism spectrum disorder is limited. Using qualitative methods, the current study applies the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework to characterize factors impacting the implementation of practices for students with autism spectrum disorder across urban and rural school districts. The guiding questions of the study include: (1) Are contextual factors perceived as barriers or facilitators, and do these perceptions vary by district location? and (2) What are the key factors impacting implementation across the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment phases? Focus group participants (n = 33) were service providers to children with autism spectrum disorder from urban- and rural-located school districts. Several personnel-related themes (attitudes and buy-in, knowledge and skills, staffing, and burnout) were shared by participants representing both urban and rural districts. However, some themes related to system and organizational factors (leadership approval, support and expectations, district structure, competing priorities, time for effective professional development, litigation and due process, and materials and resources) differed between the district locations. This project serves as an initial step in understanding the current process of evidence-based practice implementation within the school context and may help identify intervention targets to include in implementation planning. The law requires that schools use evidence-based practices to educate students with autism spectrum disorder. However, these practices are often not used, or are not used correctly in school programs. Understanding barriers and facilitators of use of evidence-based practices in schools will help improve the implementation process. This study uses focus groups to characterize how school-based providers representing urban or rural school districts perceive barriers and facilitators for implementing new practices for students with autism spectrum disorder. Guiding questions include the following: (1) Are contextual factors perceived as barriers or facilitators and how do these vary by district location? and (2) What are the key factors impacting implementation across the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment phases? Focus group participants (n = 33) were service providers to children with autism spectrum disorder from urban- and rural-located school districts. Several personnel-related themes (attitudes and buy-in, knowledge and skills, staffing, and burnout) were shared by participants representing both urban and rural districts. However, some personnel-related themes and organizational factors were unique to rural or urban districts. For example, themes related to system and organizational factors (leadership approval, support and expectations, district structure, competing priorities, time for effective professional development, litigation and due process, and materials and resources) differed between the district locations. This project serves as an initial step in identifying implementation strategies that may improve the use of evidence-based practices in schools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The California Autism Professional Training and Information Network (CAPTAIN) is a statewide interagency collaboration with the goal of scaling up the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). CAPTAIN began as a clinical initiative then further developed under the influence of implementation science methodology. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework (EPIS) has impacted targeted strategy use for this statewide scale-up of EBPs by informing the development of key partnerships, implementation goals, and collaborative processes within CAPTAIN. Currently, CAPTAIN has over 407 members representing 140 school and community agencies who provide training and coaching in EBP and meet regularly with regional teams. Outcome data indicate 51.9% of the members provide training and coaching to more than three direct service providers/programs per year. Primary barriers to implementation of EBP were time for training (25.6%), lack of substitute teachers (16.5%), and staff lacking foundational skills (11.5%). Facilitators of implementation and sustainment of the CAPTAIN model include active participation in effective dissemination practices, creative funding and leveraging of local resources, development of the regional collaboratives with an active membership, member commitment to EBP for ASD, and use of implementation science to identify and overcome barriers. The purpose of this paper is to highlight CAPTAIN as a model for statewide scale-up of EBP in schools as well as other community agencies. Although these efforts have focussed on EBP for ASD, the concepts, partnerships, and procedures will likely be transferable to other focal issues and may be generalized across service sectors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Autistic students benefit from child-centered goals that align with evidence-based practices (EBPs) that meet their individualized needs, however, most teachers are not trained in how to implement autism-specific EBPs. The challenges do not lie with teachers alone. Professional development (PD) providers, such as district or regional autism experts who train and coach teachers on how to implement autism-specific EBPs, face barriers accessing the needed supports to conduct high-quality PD and lack experience with individualizing their methods for training and coaching teachers. When PD providers have networks of professional support, they can potentially gain access to resources to provide successful individualized coaching for teachers. No research has measured the impact of the social networks of PD providers on their performance as coaches in classrooms for teachers of autistic students. To test the hypothesis that social network resources can impact the performance of PD providers who coach teachers how to use EBPs for their autistic students, we conducted social network analysis with PD providers. Findings suggest that network factors were associated with the self-reported performance for PD providers. PD providers who have more people in their networks who were autism EBP experts, as well as more people in their networks who supported them with how to individualize their PD efforts to specific teachers or districts, had higher performance as teacher coaches. We discuss future research about how to support network development for PD providers and policy implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]