1. Fluid bolus therapy in emergency department patients: Indications and physiological changes.
- Author
-
Bihari, Shailesh, Teubner, David J, Prakash, Shivesh, Beatty, Thomas, Morphett, Mark, Bellomo, Rinaldo, and Bersten, Andrew
- Subjects
ACADEMIC medical centers ,ANALYSIS of variance ,ARTERIES ,BLOOD pressure ,BODY temperature ,CHI-squared test ,CLASSIFICATION ,STATISTICAL correlation ,EMERGENCY medical services ,FLUID therapy ,HEART beat ,HEMODYNAMICS ,LENGTH of stay in hospitals ,HOSPITAL emergency services ,LONGITUDINAL method ,SCIENTIFIC observation ,PATIENTS ,RESPIRATORY measurements ,SHOCK (Pathology) ,SOLUTION (Chemistry) ,T-test (Statistics) ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,REPEATED measures design ,DATA analysis software ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,HOSPITAL mortality ,TERTIARY care ,MANN Whitney U Test ,THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Objective The aim of the present paper is to study the indications for fluid bolus therapy (FBT) and its associated physiological changes in ED patients. Methods Prospective observational study of FBT in a tertiary ED, we recorded indications, number, types and volumes, resuscitation goals and perceived success rates of FBT. Moreover, we studied key physiological variables before, 10 min, 1 h and 2 h after FBT. Results We studied 500 FBT episodes (750 [500-1250] mL). Median age was 59 (36-76) years and 57% were male. Shock was deemed present in 135 (27%) patients, septic shock in 80 (16%), and cardiogenic shock in 30 (6%). Overall, 0.9% saline (84%) was the most common fluid and hypotension the most common indication (70%). 'Avoidance of hospital/ICU admission' was the goal perceived to have the greatest success rate (85%). However, although mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased ( P < 0.01) and heart rate (HR) decreased ( P = 0.04) at 10 min ( P = 0.01), both returned to baseline at 1 and 2 h. In contrast, respiratory rate (RR) increased at 1 ( P < 0.01) and 2 h ( P = 0.03) and temperature decreased at 1 and 2 h (both P < 0.001). In patients with shock, 1 h after FBT, there was a median 3 mmHg increase in MAP ( P = 0.01) but no change in HR ( P = 0.44), while RR increased ( P < 0.01) and temperature decreased ( P = 0.01). Conclusions In ED, FBT is used mostly in patients without shock. However, after an immediate haemodynamic effect, FBT is associated with absent or limited physiological changes at 1 or 2 h. Even in shocked patients, the changes in MAP at 1 or 2 h after FBT are small. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF