Search

Exposures to hydrazines occur during aeronautic and space operations and pose a potential risk to personnel. Historically, extensive preparatory countermeasures have been taken due to concern for severe toxicity. This study seeks to better understand manifestations of acute occupational exposures to hydrazine to guide recommendations for management. A retrospective database review of records from four United States regional poison centers was conducted of all human exposures to hydrazine, monomethylhydrazine, or 1,1-dimethylhydrazine over two decades. Following case abstraction, descriptive statistics were performed to characterize demographics, manifestations, treatments, and outcomes. One hundred and thirty-five cases were identified, and most were adult males exposed to inhaled hydrazine propellant vapors. Fifty-seven percent of patients were asymptomatic following exposure; otherwise, common symptoms were dyspnea, throat irritation, cough, ocular irritation, and headache. All patients were evacuated or received decontamination, with a few reports of symptomatic treatments, including oxygen supplementation and salbutamol (albuterol). Patients usually recovered quickly and were released after a brief healthcare facility evaluation or observed locally. No patients developed delayed symptoms. Symptoms of severe toxicity were not observed, and there were no deaths. Acute exposures to hydrazines during operations within the aerospace industry appear to be limited primarily to mucosal and mild pulmonary irritation without significant neurologic, hepatic, or hematologic toxicity. These findings are contrary to previously established expectations and may be related to low-level exposures or possibly due to current emergency countermeasures. Care in occupational hydrazine exposure will focus on evacuation, decontamination, and symptomatic management of chemical irritant properties of hydrazines. It is reasonable to manage mild cases outside of a healthcare facility. Continued endeavors in human space exploration and habitation will increase the risk of these exposures, making it imperative that clinicians be comfortable with the care and management of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: I nhalation of hydrazine or hydrazine-derivative (for example, monomethylhydrazine) vapors during spaceflight operations remains a risk to crew and ground support personnel. Here we sought to provide an evidence-based approach to inform acute clinical treatment guidelines for inhalational exposures during a noncatastrophic contingency spaceflight recovery scenario. METHODS: A review of published literature was conducted concerning hydrazine/hydrazine-derivative exposure and clinical sequelae. Priority was given to studies that described inhalation though studies of alternative routes of exposure were additionally reviewed. Where possible, human clinical presentations were prioritized over animal studies. RESULTS: Rare human case reports of inhalational exposure and multiple animal studies provide evidence of varied clinical sequelae, including mucosal irritation, respiratory concerns, neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, hemotoxicity (including Heinz body development and methemoglobinemia), and longitudinal risks. In an acute timeframe (minutes to hours), clinical sequelae are likely to be limited to mucosal and respiratory risk; neurological, hepatotoxic, and hemotoxic sequelae are unlikely without recurrent, longitudinal, or noninhalational exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Acute clinical management should focus on likely clinical concerns as supported by existing data; recovery medical personnel should be prepared to manage mucosal irritation and respiratory concerns, including the potential need for advanced airway management. There is little evidence supporting the need for acute interventions for neurotoxicity and there is no evidence that acute hemotoxic sequelae would drive the need for on-scene management of methemoglobinemia, Heinz body development, or hemolytic anemia. Training that overemphasizes neurotoxic or hemotoxic sequelae or specific treatments for such conditions potentially raises the risk for inappropriate treatment or operational fixation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Portable oxygen concentrators (POCs) are medical devices that use physical means to separate oxygen from the atmosphere to produce concentrated, medical-grade gas. Providing oxygen to low-resources environments, such as austere locations, military combat zones, rural Emergency Medical Services (EMS), and during disasters, becomes expensive and logistically intensive. Recent advances in separation technology have promoted the development of POC systems ruggedized for austere use. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the available data regarding POCs in these challenge environments. Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Defense Technical Information Center were searched from inception to November 2021. Articles addressing the use of POCs in low-resource settings were selected. Three authors were independently involved in the search, review, and synthesis of the articles. Evidence was graded using Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. Results: The initial search identified 349 articles, of which 40 articles were included in the review. A total of 724 study subjects were associated with the included articles. There were no Level I systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials. Discussion: Generally, POCs are a low-cost, light-weight tool that may fill gaps in austere, military, veterinary, EMS, and disaster medicine. They are cost-effective in low-resource areas, such as rural and high-altitude hospitals in developing nations, despite relatively high capital costs associated with initial equipment purchase. Implementation of POC in low-resource locations is limited primarily on access to electricity but can otherwise operate for thousands of hours without maintenance. They provide a unique advantage in combat operations as there is no risk of explosive if oxygen tanks are struck by high-velocity projectiles. Despite their deployment throughout the battlespace, there were no manuscripts identified during the review involving the efficacy of POCs for combat casualties or clinical outcomes in combat. Veterinary medicine and animal studies have provided the most robust data on the physiological effectiveness of POCs. The success of POCs during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic highlights the potential for POCs during future mass-casualty events. There is emerging technology available that combines a larger oxygen concentrator with a compressor system capable of refilling small oxygen cylinders, which could transform the delivery of oxygen in austere environments if ruggedized and miniaturized. Future clinical research is needed to quantify the clinical efficacy of POCs in low-resource settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment with β2‐agonists may cause elevated lactic acid, the end product of anaerobic metabolism of glucose. It has been proposed that lactic acidosis associated with β2‐agonists is caused by changes to direct biochemical impacts on glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, pyruvate metabolism, and free fatty acid production. However, much remains unknown, and there is a paucity of evidence regarding the underlying chemical changes associated with this lactic acidosis. The goal of our study was to investigate the impact of 1 hour of continuous albuterol on the untargeted serum metabolome of healthy subjects. Twenty‐four healthy participants received 7.5 mg of continuous albuterol for 1 hour. Baseline, 1‐hour, and 2‐hour lactic acid levels were drawn. Samples obtained at baseline and 1 hour were sent for untargeted metabolomic profiling. Participants had a baseline lactic acid of 1.45 ± 0.46 mmol/L. On average, lactate levels increased 0.33 ± 0.67 mmol/L after 1 hour (P =.02) and remained elevated at 2 hours (0.32 ± 0.72 mmol/L, P =.02), although there was overlap in lactate levels across times. For metabolomic analysis, fatty acids, organic acids, and sugars were elevated, and amino acids were reduced. Lactic acid and pyruvic acid metabolites, however, did not significantly change (after false discovery rate adjustment). In healthy participants, continuous albuterol alters the serum metabolome, but this change may not be clinically significant. The data support recent hypotheses that β2‐receptor activation stimulates lactic acid production, altering aerobic glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and free fatty acid production. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

introduction: Analysis of historical solar particle events (SPEs) provides context for some understanding of acute radiation exposure risk to astronauts who will travel outside of low-Earth orbit. Predicted levels of radiation exposures to exploration crewmembers could produce some health impacts, including nausea, emesis, and fatigue, though more severe clinical manifestations are unlikely. Using current models of anticipated physiological sequelae, we evaluated the clinical challenges of managing radiation-related clinical concerns during exploration spaceflight. methods: A literature review was conducted to identify terrestrial management standards for radiation-induced illnesses, focusing on prodromal symptom treatment. Terrestrial management was compared to current spacefllght medical capabilities to identify gaps and highlight challenges involved in expanding capabilities for future exploration spaceflight. results: Current spaflight medical resources, such as those found on the International Space Station, may be sufficient to manage some aspects of radiation-induced illness, although effective treatment of all potential manifestations would require substantial expansion of capabilities. Terrestrial adjunctive therapies or more experimental treatments are unavailable in current spacefllght medical capabilities but may have a role in future management of acute radiation exposure. discussion: Expanded medical capabilities for managing radiation-induced illnesses could be included onboard future exploration vehicles. However, this would require substantial research, time, and funding to reach flight readiness, and vehicle limitations may restrict such capabilities for exploration missions. The benefits of including expanded capabilities should be weighed against the likelihood of significant radiation exposure and extensive mission design constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]