Search

Purpose: Anthracycline-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel-containing chemotherapy is effective for perioperative breast cancer treatment. However, these treatments frequently induce oral mucositis (OM), with an incidence ranging from 20 to 50%. The association of OM development between different chemotherapeutic treatments remains unclear. Consequently, this study aimed to compare OM development during docetaxel-containing chemotherapy between patients with and without OM experience during previous anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatments to assess the association between OM development and treatment regimens. Methods: Seventy-two patients with breast cancer receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel-containing chemotherapy as a perioperative treatment were categorized into the control (no prior OM experience with anthracycline-cyclophosphamide) and OM-experience (OM development during previous treatment) groups and retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was the incidence of all-grade OM in the first docetaxel-containing chemotherapy cycle. Additionally, the incidences of OM and dysgeusia during all treatment cycles and factors associated with the incidence of OM were evaluated. Results: The incidence of all-grade OM in the first cycle was significantly higher in the OM-experience group (54.2%) than in the control group (10.4%; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, its incidence in all treatment cycles was higher in the OM-experience group (66.7%) than in the control group (12.5%, P < 0.0001). However, the incidence of dysgeusia did not differ between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed OM experience during previous anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment and concomitant pertuzumab use as independent risk factors for OM development in subsequent docetaxel-containing chemotherapy. Conclusion: Our study suggests that patients experiencing OM with anthracycline-cyclophosphamide during perioperative breast cancer treatment exhibit symptoms following subsequent docetaxel-containing chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oral mucositis (OM) is a common adverse effect of docetaxel-containing treatment. This study aimed to assess whether dexamethasone (DEX) dose-dependently attenuates docetaxel-induced OM and dysgeusia. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients with breast cancer receiving docetaxel-containing regimens at Hokkaido University Hospital between June 2015 and June 2022. The patients were divided into low-dose and high-dose groups (DEX 4 or 8 mg/day on days 2–4, respectively), and incidence of OM and dysgeusia, and risk factor(s) for OM incidence were evaluated. The incidence of all-grade OM in the first cycle was 57.8% in the low-dose group and 19.2% in the high-dose group (P = 0.0002), which met our primary endpoint. The incidence of OM in all treatment cycles was also significantly lowered by DEX-dose increase (P = 0.01). In contrast, the incidence of dysgeusia was similar between the two groups in the first and all cycles (P = 0.50 and P = 0.28, respectively). These results were also confirmed in a propensity score-matched population. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also suggested that lower DEX dosage was a singular risk factor for all-grade OM incidence. In conclusion, our study suggests that DEX dose-dependently reduces the incidence of OM in docetaxel-containing regimens for breast cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Docetaxel-induced fluid retention (DIFR) cumulatively occurs and is one of the most troublesome adverse effects. This study aimed to determine whether high dose dexamethasone (DEX) could prevent DIFR during breast cancer treatment. Breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel (75 mg/m2)-containing regimens were divided into 4 and 8 mg/day DEX groups, with each DEX dose administered on days 2–4 and retrospectively assessed. Incidence of greater than or equal to grade 2 DIFR was significantly lower in the 8 mg group (13.0%) compared to the 4 mg group (39.6%, P = 0.001). All-grade DIFR was also less in the 8 mg group (P = 0.01). Furthermore, the maximum variation of body weight was significantly lower in the 8 mg group (P = 0.0003). These results were also confirmed in the propensity score-matched population. Additionally, time-related DIFR incidence was also significantly delayed in the 8 mg group (P = 0.0005). Our study revealed that high dose DEX prevents DIFR. Therefore, further studies on its management are required for less onerous chemotherapy provision with better DIFR control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Taxane-associated acute pain syndrome (T-APS) is one of the most bothersome adverse effects caused by taxanes. We have previously reported the attenuating effect of dexamethasone (DEX) on T-APS and its risk factors under DEX prophylaxis. However, the appropriate DEX dosage administration remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether DEX dose-dependently prevents T-APS in breast cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with breast cancer who received docetaxel (75 mg/m2)-containing chemotherapy without pegfilgrastim and regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The patients were divided into 4 mg/day and 8 mg/day DEX groups, with each DEX dosage on days 2–4 (n = 68 for each group). Primary endpoint was the comparison of all-grade T-APS incidence between the groups. Propensity score-matching was performed to adjust the baseline factors between the groups, and outcomes in the matched-population were also assessed. Results: The incidence of all-grade T-APS was 72.1% in 4 mg/day group and 48.5% in 8 mg/day group, which was significantly lowered by higher DEX dosage (P = 0.008). The severity of T-APS was also significantly reduced in 8 mg/day group (P = 0.02). These results were confirmed in the propensity score matching. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that higher DEX dosage was an independent T-APS preventive factor, whereas age < 55 years was a risk factor. Moreover, DEX-dosage-associated adverse effects similarly appeared in both groups. Conclusion: Our study suggested that DEX dose-dependently prevents T-APS in breast cancer treatment. As understanding of the nature of T-APS and its appropriate management can significantly contribute to less onerous chemotherapy provision, further studies are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype characterized by a lack of therapeutic targets. The paucity of effective treatment options motivated a number of studies to tackle this problem. Immunosuppressive cells infiltrated into the tumor microenvironment (TME) of TNBC are currently considered as candidates for new therapeutic targets. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) have been reported to populate in the TME of TNBC, but their roles in the clinical and biological features of TNBC have not been clarified. This study identified that interleukin-34 (IL-34) released by TNBC cells is a crucial immunomodulator to regulate MDSCs accumulation in the TME. We provide evidence that IL-34 induces a differentiation of myeloid stem cells into monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs) that recruits regulatory T (Treg) cells, while suppressing a differentiation into polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSCs). As a result, the increase in M-MDSCs contributes to the creation of an immunosuppressive TME, and the decrease in PMN-MDSCs suppresses angiogenesis, leading to an acquisition of resistance to chemotherapy. Accordingly, blockade of M-MDSC differentiation with an estrogen receptor inhibitor or anti-IL-34 monoclonal antibody suppressed M-MDSCs accumulation causing retardation of tumor growth and restores chemosensitivity of the tumor by promoting PMN-MDSCs accumulation. This study demonstrates previously poorly understood mechanisms of MDSCs-mediated chemoresistance in the TME of TNBC, which is originated from the existence of IL-34, suggesting a new rationale for TNBC treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 63-year-old woman had a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy, and adjuvant endocrine therapy for 5 years before being diagnosed with recurrent lesions involving the right anterior chest wall, multiple lymph nodes, and pulmonary metastases. The patient was subsequently initiated on a paclitaxel and bevacizumab regimen. During this treatment, the patient complained of palpitations and malaise. Chest radiography revealed a left pneumothorax. Despite attempts at conservative treatment, the pneumothorax did not improve and a thoracoscopic approach was required. One of the metastatic tumors in the left lower lobe appeared to rupture, and this area was estimated to be the cause of air leak. The tumor was covered with a tissue seal sheet, and the patient's condition improved with no recurrence of pneumothorax. This case highlights the importance of early conversion to surgical treatment when conservative treatment for pneumothorax is unresponsive due to the potential side effects of bevacizumab. The findings of this case report may be of interest to oncologists, pulmonologists, and other healthcare professionals involved in the care of patients with breast cancer and pulmonary metastases who are undergoing bevacizumab chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the most common complications associated with chemotherapy. Here, we evaluated whether systemic dexamethasone (DEX) dosage in prophylactic antiemetics affected the incidence of OM in anthracycline-containing regimens. Patients receiving anthracycline-containing regimens for breast cancer were divided into high- and low-DEX dose groups and retrospectively evaluated. The incidence of all-grade OM in the first cycle in the high- and low-dose groups was 27.3% and 53.5%, respectively, and was significantly lowered by increasing the DEX dose (P < 0.01); thus, the study met its primary endpoint. The result in all treatment cycles was also significant (P = 0.02). In contrast, the incidence of dysgeusia was similar between the high- and low-dose groups in the first and all cycles (13.6% and 16.3% in the first cycle [P = 0.79] and 27.3% and 34.9% in all cycles [P = 0.42], respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that low DEX dosage was an independent risk factor for all-grade OM development. In conclusion, our study suggests that DEX attenuates OM in anthracycline-containing regimens for breast cancer treatment in a dose-dependent manner. Further evaluation of OM prophylaxis, including DEX administration, is required for better control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most severe complications associated with chemotherapy for breast cancer. We encountered a case in which mirogabalin initially ameliorated, and additional duloxetine further attenuated eribulin-induced CIPN. Herein, we report its management. A 53-year-old woman received eribulin treatment as third-line chemotherapy for recurrent breast cancer. She experienced grade 2 CIPN with adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide treatment (worst numeric rating scale (NRS) 6/10 for numbness and 6/10 for pain) and had baseline grade 1 symptoms only in the hands (NRS 1/10 for each). CIPN in the hands and feet worsened to NRS 3/10 on day 1 of cycle 4. Mirogabalin (5 mg twice daily) was initiated, resulting in stable symptoms for approximately 6 weeks with grade 1 somnolence and heaviness of the head. The dosage was increased with careful attention to adverse effects to 22.5 mg per day, and the NRS was reduced from 5/10 to 3/10 for numbness and from 8/10 to 5/10 for pain. We administered duloxetine 20 mg with domperidone (10 mg three times a day) for further pain attenuation on day 1 of cycle 15, decreasing the NRS to 1/10 for numbness and 3/10 for pain. Duloxetine was increased due to CIPN degradation (NRS 3/10 and 5/10), resulting in a significant pain attenuation to 1/10. As the CIPN-attenuating mechanisms of mirogabalin and duloxetine are different, we consider that the additive and synergetic effects of this combination affected the results. Combination therapy with these drugs may be a promising strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical targeted sequencing allows for the selection of patients expected to have a better treatment response, and reveals mechanisms of resistance to molecular targeted therapies based on actionable gene mutations. We underwent comprehensive genomic testing with either our original in-house CLHURC system or with OncoPrime. Samples from 24 patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer underwent targeted sequencing between 2016 and 2018. Germline and somatic gene alterations and patients' prognosis were retrospectively analyzed according to the response to endocrine therapy. All of the patients had one or more germline and/or somatic gene alterations. Four patients with primary or secondary endocrine-resistant breast cancer harbored germline pathogenic variants of BRCA1, BRCA2, or PTEN. Among somatic gene alterations, TP53, PIK3CA, AKT1, ESR1, and MYC were the most frequently mutated genes. TP53 gene mutation was more frequently observed in patients with primary endocrine resistance compared to those with secondary endocrine resistance or endocrine-responsive breast cancer. Recurrent breast cancer patients carrying TP53-mutant tumors had significantly worse overall survival compared to those with TP53-wild type tumors. Our 160-gene cancer panel will be useful to identify clinically actionable gene alterations in breast cancer in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]