Search

Background Middle-aged women have a lower prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with age-matched men, but mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain controversial. To verify whether there is a link between circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and gender-specific difference of CAD, we compared subpopulations of EPCs among postmenopausal normal women, patients with CAD, and age-matched men. Methods We studied 71 consecutive middle-aged patients with stable CAD (30 postmenopausal women and 41 men) and 40 middle-aged normal controls (20 postmenopausal women and 20 men). Blood samples were drawn at time of coronary angiography and subpopulations of EPCs were measured by flow cytometry. Results Women and men with CAD had similar age, risk factors, clinical presentation, left ventricular function, extension of CAD, and medical therapy at time of coronary angiography. Hematologic analysis showed that men and women with CAD had similar white cell count, mononuclear cells, and subpopulations of EPCs. Postmenopausal normal women, conversely, had significantly higher absolute numbers of CD34+, CD133+, CD105+ and CD14+ cells than other groups. Conclusions Increased numbers of subpopulations of EPCs in normal postmenopausal women might contribute to the gender-specific difference of CAD in middle age. Lack of difference in EPCs between women and men with CAD suggests that stem cells become unable to play a protective role when the disease is clinically evident. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To obtain a 'snapshot' view of access-specific percutaneous cardiovascular procedures outcomes in the real world. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective study performed over a 30-day period. SETTING: Nine hospitals with invasive cardiology facilities, reflecting the contemporary state of healthcare. PATIENTS: Unselected consecutive sample of patients undergoing any percutaneous cardiovascular procedure requiring an arterial access. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous cardiovascular procedures by radial or femoral access MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the combined incidence of in-hospital (a) major and minor haemorrhages; (b) peri-procedural stroke; and (c) entry-site vascular complications. The secondary outcome was the combined incidence of in-hospital death and myocardial infarction/reinfarction. For analysis purposes, outcomes were allocated to arterial access-determined study arms on an intention-to treat basis. Multivariable analysis adjusted using propensity score was performed to correct for selection bias related to arterial site. RESULTS: A total of 1052 patients were enrolled: 509 underwent radial access and 543 femoral access. In both groups, 40% underwent a coronary angioplasty. Relative to femoral access, radial access was associated with a lower incidence both of primary (4.2% vs 1.96%, p = 0.03, respectively) and secondary endpoints (3.1% vs 0.6%, p = 0.005, respectively). Multivariate analysis, adjusted for procedural and clinical confounders, confirmed that intention-to-access via the radial route was significantly and independently associated with a decreased risk both of primary (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.84) and secondary endpoints (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates strikingly better outcomes of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures with radial access versus femoral access in contemporary, real-world clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To obtain a “snapshot” view of access-specific percutaneous cardiovascular procedures outcomes in the real world. Design: Multicentre, prospective study performed over a 30-day period. Setting: Nine hospitals with invasive cardiology facilities, reflecting the contemporary state of healthcare. Patients: Unselected consecutive sample of patients undergoing any percutaneous cardiovascular procedure requiring an arterial access. Interventions: Percutaneous cardiovascular procedures by radial or femoral access Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the combined incidence of in-hospital (a) major and minor haemorrhages; (b) peri-procedural stroke; and (c) entry-site vascular complications. The secondary outcome was the combined incidence of in-hospital death and myocardial infarction/reinfarction. For analysis purposes, outcomes were allocated to arterial access-determined study arms on an intention-to treat basis. Multivariable analysis adjusted using propensity score was performed to correct for selection bias related to arterial site. Results: A total of 1052 patients were enrolled: 509 underwent radial access and 543 femoral access. In both groups, 40% underwent a coronary angioplasty. Relative to femoral access, radial access was associated with a lower incidence both of primary (4.2% vs 1.96%, p = 0.03, respectively) and secondary endpoints (3.1% vs 0.6%, p = 0.005, respectively). Multivariate analysis, adjusted for procedural and clinical confounders, confirmed that intention-to-access via the radial route was significantly and independently associated with a decreased risk both of primary (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.84) and secondary endpoints (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.62). Conclusions: Our study indicates strikingly better outcomes of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures with radial access versus femoral access in contemporary, real-world clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Aims: Recording coronary arteries' flow by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) is a new task. Despite several studies concerning the left anterior descending artery (LAD) exist, the same for posterior descending coronary artery (PD) do not. Reported feasibility is not more than 76%. The aim of the study was to try to improve feasibility by using an additional two-dimensional view as a guide.Methods and Results: PD flow recording was performed in 35 consecutive unselected patients under the guidance of the usual two-dimensional modified view [a two-chamber view (2-C)], and with a new four-chamber modified view (4-C). A semi-quantitative growing-quality score (from 0 to 3 points) to the trace was given. Contrast enhancement was used if PD was not visualized without it. The overall feasibility was 80%. A good or very good velocity signal (TTDE score ≥2) was observed in 48% of patients without contrast enhancement. Time for first visualization of PD was short and significantly lower in 2-C than in 4-C (66 ± 39 vs 90 ± 70 s, respectively, P<0.05).Conclusions: TTDE recording of PD flow gained better feasibility being guided by two views. Maximal time for first visualization of PD was less than 3 min. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]