Search

Entering HIV care is a vulnerable time for newly diagnosed individuals often exacerbating psychosocial difficulties, which may contribute to poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) ultimately influencing health behaviors including ART adherence, the driver of viral load suppression. Understanding HRQOL in people newly entering HIV care is critical and has the potential to guide practice and research. This exploratory cross-sectional study examined demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with limitations in four specific domains of HRQOL among persons initially entering outpatient HIV care at four sites in the United States (n = 335). In the unadjusted analysis, female gender was significantly associated with sub-optimal HRQOL with women having increased odds of reporting HRQOL challenges with pain, mood, mobility, and usual activity when compared to men. The adjusted models demonstrated attenuation of parameter estimates and loss of statistical significance for the associations with impaired HRQOL observed among women in unadjusted analyses, suggesting psychosocial factors related to HRQOL are complex and interrelated. Findings are consistent with a robust literature documenting gender-related health disparities. Programs aimed at improving HRQOL for persons initially entering HIV care are warranted generally, and specifically for women, and must address modifiable psychosocial factors via mechanisms including coping and social support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of AIDS & Behavior is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The Health Resources and Services Administration Special Projects of National Significance launched the Systems Linkage and Access to Care for Populations at High Risk of HIV Infection Initiative in 2011. Six state departments of health were funded to utilize a modified Learning Collaborative model to develop and/or adapt HIV testing, linkage to care and retention in care system-level interventions. More than 60 Learning Sessions were held over the course of the Learning Collaborative. A total of 22 unique interventions were tested with 18 interventions selected and scaled up. All interventions were created to impact services at a systems level, with standardized protocols developed to ensure fidelity. Our findings provide key lessons and present considerations for replication for use of a modified Learning Collaborative to achieve state-level systems change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Social networks can be leveraged to identify undiagnosed HIV-infected individuals. The NC-LINK clinic-based testing initiative utilized these networks to achieve a 5% (95% CI 1.1-8.9%) positivity rate by providing free HIV testing to anyone who accompanied an HIV-infected patient to their clinic appointment. During 2013-2015, 120 individuals were tested at two clinics (N > 1000 patients each) in North Carolina, with 5 new and 6 total positive results. Of these, three linked to care within 30 days and all within 365 days. If expanded further, this initiative could significantly increase the number of HIV-infected individuals aware of their status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This manuscript describes the experiences of three state departments of health (SDoH) that successfully launched data sharing interventions involving surveillance and/or patient data collected in clinics to improve care outcomes among people living with HIV. We examined 58 key informant interviews, gathered at two time points, to describe the development and implementation of data sharing interventions. We identified three common themes across states' experiences: creating standard practices, fostering interoperability, and negotiating the policy environment. Projects were successful when state teams adapted to changing circumstances and were committed to a consistent communication process. Once implemented, the interventions streamlined processes to promote linkage and retention in care among low-income populations living with HIV. Despite using routinely collected data, key informants emphasized the labor-intensive process to develop and sustain the interventions. Lessons learned from these three state experiences can help inform best practices for other SDoH that are considering launching similar interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The NC-LINK Project initiated both clinic-based retention services and state public health bridge counselor-based (SBCs) re-engagement services to retain and re-engage people living with HIV infection (PLWH) in care. The goal of this project is to compare efforts between clinic-based retention and SBC re-engagement services to determine whether patients are more or less likely to remain in HIV care services. Clinic appointment data were used to identify patients who were last seen more than 6-9 months prior. Patients either received clinic-based retention services only or were subsequently referred to the SBC re-engagement intervention if the retention services were unsuccessful. The frequency of re-engagement in care (180 days) and HIV suppression (VLS, within 1 year) was examined for patients in these two groups. The SBC group was less likely to have VLS at the visit prior to referral (adjusted OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.53, 2.72). Patients who were referred to the SBC were less likely to re-engage in care within 180 days as compared to those who received clinic-based retention services only (adjusted OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.21, 0.41). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ensuring continuity of and retention in care after release from prison is critical for optimizing health outcomes among people living with HIV. As part of a large federal initiative, we conducted qualitative interviews (n = 24) with individuals living with HIV and recently released from prison in four states to understand their experiences in different navigation interventions to improve access to HIV care post-release. Interventions were delivered only in prison, only in the community, or in both settings. While the interventions varied by design, overall, participants appreciated the breadth of support received from interventionists, including health system navigation, case management and social support. Even when individuals leaving prison were returning to clinics that they were familiar with, systems navigation supported continuity of care. Our findings elucidate why navigational support was instrumental, and underscore the value of a variety of types of navigation programs in facilitating continuity of care and reintegration post-prison. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Engagement in HIV care is critical to achieve viral suppression and ultimately improve health outcomes for people living with HIV (PLWH). However, maintaining their engagement in care is often a challenging goal. Utilizing patient navigators, trained in an adapted ARTAS intervention, to help re-engage out-of-care PLWH has proven to be a valuable resource. This qualitative study describes the encounters between PLWH (n = 11) and their care re-engagement navigators (n = 9). Participants were interviewed in-person; interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the strengths model of case management. PLWH shared how working with navigators increased their motivation to return to HIV care and assisted them to overcome barriers that were a hindrance to care engagement. Navigators described a strengths-based approach to working with their clients, thus helping facilitate PLWH care re-engagement goals and successes. Results from this study may inform the development of effective HIV navigation programs to re-engage out-of-care PLWH, often the hardest-to-engage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poor retention in care is associated with higher viral load (VL) results and decreased rates of viral load suppression (VS) in people living with HIV (PLWH). Therefore, improving retention in HIV care is a priority of national significance. The NC-LINK Retention Project utilized a systematic approach to identify, locate, and attempt to return to care patients who did not attend a clinic appointment for 6-9 months. Clinical and surveillance data were used to evaluate associations between patient characteristics and VL outcomes. Between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014, 1118 patients at participating clinics were identified as out-of-care and referred to retention staff. Of these, 712 (64%) were located in North Carolina. Patients with recent prior medical care (aPR 1.43, 95% CI 1.25, 1.66) and recent VS (aPR 1.28, 95% CI 1.16, 1.41) were more likely to be located. Of located patients, 58% re-engaged in care within 90 days of retention referral. Patients who achieved VS within 180 days were more likely to be 40-49 years (aPR 1.19 95% CI 1.01-1.40; compared with 18-29 age group), had insurance at their last visit (aPR 1.19 95% CI 1.01-1.77), had a care visit in the prior year (aPR 1.37 95% CI 1.05-1.77), and had VS at the prior care visit (aPR 2.54 95% CI 1.98-3.25). Clinic-based retention efforts may be effective at helping PLWH decrease out-of-care periods, but prior patterns of care usage persist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Decreased visit attendance leads to poor health outcomes, decreased viral suppression, and higher mortality rates for persons living with HIV. Retention in care is an important factor in improving health status for people living with HIV but continues to be a challenge in clinical settings. This paper details the development and implementation of the NC-LINK Retention Protocol, a clinic-based protocol to locate and reengage out-of-care patients, as part of overall clinic retention efforts. The protocol was implemented as one of four interventions of the NC-LINK Systems and Linkages Project, a multi-site initiative funded by the HIV/AIDS Bureau and the Special Projects of National Significance. Lists of out-of-care patients who had not received HIV medical care in over nine months and did not have a future appointment were created each month. Patient navigators, case managers, and other staff then followed a standardized protocol to locate and reengage these patients in care. A total of 452 patients were identified for reengagement services. Of those, 194 (43%) returned to care, 108 (24%) had another definitive outcome (incarcerated, deceased, or relocated) and 150 (33%) were referred for additional follow-up to locate and reengage in care. In summary, 67% of patients were located through the efforts of the clinic staff. The results of this intervention indicate that it is possible to successfully integrate a protocol into the existing infrastructure of a clinic and reengage a majority of out-of-care patients into medical care. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: HIV testing and linkage to care are critical first steps along the care continuum. Targeted efforts are needed in the South to achieve the goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, and qualitative examination of testing and linkage to care from the perspective of professionals in the field can provide nuanced insight into the strengths and limitations of a care system to inform improvement efforts. These issues are explored in North Carolina (NC), with potential applicability to other Southern states.Methods: Twenty-one interviews were conducted with professionals in the HIV prevention and care systems in NC. Interviews were analyzed for emergent themes.Results: Individuals' access barriers, aspects of clinics and clinical care, challenges for community-based organizations, stigma, and the role of the NC Department of Health and Human Services were identified as themes affecting testing and linkage.Discussion: These findings can inform efforts to address HIV testing and linkage to care in NC. This approach may provide beneficial insight for other systems of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Retention in HIV care is critical to decrease disease-related mortality and morbidity and achieve national benchmarks. However, a myriad of barriers and facilitators impact retention in care; these can be understood within the social-ecological model. To elucidate the unique factors that impact consistent HIV care engagement, a qualitative case study was conducted in North Carolina to examine the barriers and facilitators to retain and reengage HIV clients in care. HIV professionals (n = 21) from a variety of health care settings across the state participated in interviews that were transcribed and analyzed for emergent themes. Respondents described barriers to care at all levels within the HIV prevention and care system including intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, community, and public policy. Participants also described recent statewide initiatives with the potential to improve care engagement. Results from this study may assist other states with similar challenges to identify needed programs and priorities to optimize client retention in HIV care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: HIV testing and linkage to care are critical first steps along the care continuum. Targeted efforts are needed in the South to achieve the goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, and qualitative examination of testing and linkage to care from the perspective of professionals in the field can provide nuanced insight into the strengths and limitations of a care system to inform improvement efforts. These issues are explored in North Carolina (NC), with potential applicability to other Southern states. Methods: Twenty-one interviews were conducted with professionals in the HIV prevention and care systems in NC. Interviews were analyzed for emergent themes. Results: Individuals’ access barriers, aspects of clinics and clinical care, challenges for community-based organizations, stigma, and the role of the NC Department of Health and Human Services were identified as themes affecting testing and linkage. Discussion: These findings can inform efforts to address HIV testing and linkage to care in NC. This approach may provide beneficial insight for other systems of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Substance use is highly prevalent among people living with HIV (PLWH) and associated with poor health outcomes. Although understudied, integrating substance use and medical care for PLWH may decrease substance use. Using a quasi-experimental design, the authors tested an integrated model of substance use treatment provided by social workers located in HIV medical care settings in North Carolina. Participants were interviewed at baseline (N= 204), six months (n = 157), and 12 months (n = 138) using the Addiction Severity Index-Lite (ASI). In linear mixed analyses, statistically significant decreases were detected in ASI alcohol use (p = .003) and drug use (p = .023) severity scores after treatment participation. This was true regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, education, self-rated health status, and age, suggesting there were no differences in integrated treatment outcomes across demographic groups. In addition, greater reductions in anxiety and depression were associated with lower ASI alcohol and drug severity scores after treatment participation. Study findings suggest that integrated care in HIV clinics with enhanced communication between social workers and HIV medical providers may deliver improved treatment outcomes for PLWH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adherence with medication regimens for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a life-saving behavior for people with HIV infection, yet adherence is challenging for many individuals with co-occurring substance use and/or mood disorders. Medication-taking self-efficacy, which is the confidence that one can take one's medication as prescribed, is associated with better adherence with HIV medication. However, little is known about the influence that other kinds of self-efficacy have on adherence with HIV medication, especially among HIV-infected individuals with co-occurring substance use and/or mood disorders. We sought to examine the relationship between adherence with HIV medication among substance users and three specific kinds of self-efficacy, ie, one's confidence that one can communicate with medical providers, get support, and manage one's mood. We further sought to examine whether symptoms of depression and anxiety moderate these relationships. Methods: Patients were recruited from three HIV clinics in the southeastern United States as part of an integrated study of treatment for HIV and substance use. Results: We interviewed 154 patients with HIV and substance use who reported taking HIV medications. Based on symptoms of depression and anxiety using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety, 63% had probable depression and/or anxiety. Higher levels of self-efficacy in provider communication (β = 3.86, P , 0.01), getting needed support (β = 2.82, P , 0.01), and mood management (β = 2.29, P , 0.05) were related to better self-reported adherence with HIV medication among study participants with probable depression and/or anxiety. The three kinds of self-efficacy were not associated with medication adherence among participants with HIV and substance use only. Conclusion: In the search for mutable factors to improve medication adherence among individuals triply diagnosed with HIV, substance use, and mood disorders, these findings support previous research indicating the benefit of enhancing self-efficacy, and further point to three specific kinds of self-efficacy that may benefit medication adherence, ie, provider communication, getting support, and mood management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Co-occurrence of HIV and substance abuse is associated with poor outcomes for HIV-related health and substance use. Integration of substance use and medical care holds promise for HIV patients, yet few integrated treatment models have been reported. Most of the reported models lack data on treatment outcomes in diverse settings. This study examined the substance use outcomes of an integrated treatment model for patients with both HIV and substance use at three different clinics. Sites differed by type and degree of integration, with one integrated academic medical center, one co-located academic medical center, and one co-located community health center. Participants ( n = 286) received integrated substance use and HIV treatment for 12 months and were interviewed at 6-month intervals. We used linear generalized estimating equation regression analysis to examine changes in Addiction Severity Index (ASI) alcohol and drug severity scores. To test whether our treatment was differentially effective across sites, we compared a full model including site by time point interaction terms to a reduced model including only site fixed effects. Alcohol severity scores decreased significantly at 6 and 12 months. Drug severity scores decreased significantly at 12 months. Once baseline severity variation was incorporated into the model, there was no evidence of variation in alcohol or drug score changes by site. Substance use outcomes did not differ by age, gender, income, or race. This integrated treatment model offers an option for treating diverse patients with HIV and substance use in a variety of clinic settings. Studies with control groups are needed to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Substance use disorders are common among people living with HIV (PLWHA), and PLWHA with untreated substance use are less likely to receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) or achieve viral suppression when ART is prescribed. Integrated behavioral and medical interventions are one approach used to treat complex chronic illnesses, including HIV and substance abuse (SA). As the potential benefit for integrated HIV-substance abuse treatment is recognized, the number of providers attempting to integrate care is growing. Integrated care models can range from coordinated to colocated to fully integrated models. Providers need a better understanding of these implementation options for HIV-substance abuse treatment and how they impact providers of different disciplines. Between April and November 2006, interviews exploring the process of implementing an integrated HIV-substance abuse intervention were completed with clinic staff at three diverse HIV clinics in North Carolina. Key differences in implementation between sites were found. The degree of integrated care between sites ranged from colocated to integrated, and clinic staff perceived each integrated model to have advantages and disadvantages. Recommendations for implementing HIV-SA integrated care are made. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]