Search

Purpose: The Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS®) is a synthetic ligament consisting of fibres made of polyethylene terephthalate. Despite the LARS being used as an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) device for nearly 30 years and the well-documented complications from earlier synthetic ligament designs, there is a paucity of published medium- to long-term results. The aim of this study is to report the clinical and functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction using the LARS at a minimum follow-up of 6 years.Methods: Results of a single surgeon's entire cohort of 55 patients who underwent primary LARS ACL surgery were reviewed at a median of 7.8 years (6.0-9.4). Patient-reported outcome measures including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were collected and clinical assessment consisted of range of motion (ROM) and the KT-1000 arthrometer to assess the side-side difference in the operative and non-operative knee. Mechanical failures of the graft were confirmed at revision surgery and a survivorship analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results: The overall mechanical failure rate was 17/51 (33.3%) with ruptures occurring at a median 3.9 years (0.6-8.8 years) following primary LARS ACL surgery. Secondary operative procedures were performed in 39.2% of patients. For intact grafts, there was no statistically significant difference is side-to-side ROM or anterior knee laxity and subjective scores revealed a median IKDC subjective score of 85.1 (26.4-100) and SF-36 physical component score of 94.1.Conclusion: The rates of LARS ACL construct failure (33.3%) in this cohort are high and based on these results the LARS should not be considered as a graft option for primary ACL reconstruction.Level Of Evidence: III, cohort study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the longitudinal outcomes of acute repair and augmentation for the reconstruction of dislocated knees, using LARS synthetic ligaments.Methods: Patients with a knee dislocation surgically treated using LARS synthetic ligament augmentation, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months, were enrolled between 1996 and 2014. Range of motion, Lachman, pivot shift, posterior drawer, step off sign, valgus, varus, KT-1000 arthrometer, Telos technique, IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner, and Meyers scores were obtained every 2 years up to 10 years.Results: Median age was 32.1 years (IQR 23.2-43.3) at time of surgery. Median time from trauma to surgery was 9 days and mean follow-up time was 6.6 years. Median questionnaire scores were: Lysholm 79.5 (IQR 65.0-89.0), Tegner 4.0 (IQR 3.7-6.0), Meyers 3.0 (IQR 3.0-4.0), and mean IKDC was 63.8 (SD 18.9). Median flexion and extension of the injured knee was 124° (IQR 115-129.5) and 0° (IQR - 5 to 0), respectively. Median KT-1000 differential was 0.7 mm (IQR 0.1-3.1) for ACL and 0.9 mm (IQR 0.2-1.4) for PCL. Mean differential for Telos was 2.5 mm (SD 5.8) for ACL, 4 mm (IQR 2-6.3) for PCL 30°, and 8.2 mm (SD 4.4) for PCL 90° (consistent with PCL laxity). More than 90% of patients had good anterior articular stability and > 60% of patients had good posterior articular stability.Conclusions: Acute repair and augmentation of knee dislocations with LARS synthetic ligaments resulted in satisfactory outcomes for the ACL and collateral structures. Telos stress radiography showed PCL laxity in more than half of cases despite low laxity results with KT-1000. The perception of patients about knee function was sustained in time.Level Of Evidence: IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The injury of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) causes joint instability and, in the absence of adequate treatment, progressive joint deterioration, meniscal lesions and development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis.Methods: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes and complications in a consecutive case series of 60 patients with minimum follow-up of 5 years who underwent an arthroscopic surgery for ACL reconstruction using LARS™ ligament. Patients with concomitant meniscal or chondral lesions in the same knee were excluded.Results: The subjective evaluation of the patients involved in the study (Lysholm score, IKDC score and Tegner activity level scale) shows good/excellent results. The range of movement is optimal in most patients, and pain symptoms are considered mild. A total of 31.25% of the patients did not change their lifestyle that they had before the injury. None of the patients underwent resurgery in the same knee. In 85.4% of cases, X-ray images showed no signs of osteoarthritis after ACL reconstruction.Conclusions: Comparable with other series showed in the literature, this study assesses that the use of LARS™ in reconstruction of ACL is an excellent option for treating >40-year-old patients requesting rapid return to daily activities/sports also at the first surgery. By restoring knee stability, articular degeneration at short and medium follow-up was avoided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We describe an augmented surgical repair technique for gluteus minimus and medius tears, along with a supportive case series. A consecutive series of 22 patients presenting with clinical and radiological findings consistent with hip abductor tears, who had undergone failed prior conservative treatments, were prospectively recruited. Patients underwent open bursectomy, Y-iliotibial release, debridement of the diseased tendon, decortication of the trochanteric foot-plate and reattachment augmented with a LARS ligament through a trans-osseous tunnel, together with suture anchors. All patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively to 12 months with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and a Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), while a satisfaction scale was employed at 12 months. A statistically significant improvement (p<0.05) was observed for all patient reported outcome measures, while all patients were at least 'satisfied' with the procedure at 12 months. One patient reported some lateral hip discomfort at 10 months, and removal of the LARS interference screw provided immediate relief. One patient had a urological catheter-related complication. With no other complications and no clinical failures of the repair, we believe the technique to be safe and reliable, whilst reducing the incidence of re-tears as reported in the existing literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe an all-arthroscopic treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation and report the clinical results of the procedure. Methods: This study consisted of 54 patients of whom 49 were men and 5 were women. The age of the patients averaged 39 years (range 16-69 years). All the symptomatic acute and chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations classified according to Rockwood type III-IV were included in the study. All of them underwent standard clinical and radiological examination. Result: All the patients were regularly followed up at the institute with the average follow-up being 15.09 months (range 5-30 months). The results were assessed using the shoulder subjective value (SSV) and the Modified rating of the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) for acromioclavicular joint. The mean pre-operative SSV improved from 35.65 to the post-operative value of 88.6. According to the UCLA scale, 40 excellent, 8 good, 4 fair and 2 poor results were achieved. There were few problems encountered with the procedure like failure of ligament, incomplete reduction, capsulitis, and migration of sleeve and fracture clavicle. Conclusion: ACJ dislocations can effectively be treated with arthroscopy-assisted procedure. Since this procedure has given uniformly good to excellent results comparable to open reconstructive procedures, it can be a good treatment option for symptomatic ACJ dislocations. Level of evidence: IV, therapeutic series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: the choice of treatment of chronic grade III acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is controversial. Several surgical techniques have been described in the literature, responding differently to nonoperative treatment. The aim of this study is to describe a modified technique of stabilizing an AC joint dislocation with the new Infinity-Lock Button System, in order to demonstrate that it is effective in optimizing outcomes and decreasing complications. Methods: this is a retrospective study of 15 patients who underwent surgical stabilization of the AC joint dislocation between 2018 and 2019, through modified surgical technique using the Infinity-Lock Button System. Active range of motion (ROM), Specific Acromio Clavicular Score (SACS) and Constant Score (CS) were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at last 18 months follow up. Patients rated their outcomes as very good, good, satisfactory, or unsatisfactory. Results: a total of twelve patients rated their outcome as very good and three as good; no patients were dissatisfied with surgery. The mean Constant Score increased from 38 points preoperatively to 95 postoperatively, the average SACS score decreased from 52 points preoperatively to 10 postoperatively, both significantly. No complications were detected. Conclusion: the described technique is effective for treatment of chronic grade III AC joint dislocation, resulting in elevated satisfaction ratings and predictable outcomes. Nevertheless, further longer term follow-up studies are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]