Search

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a flexible dosing regimen (16 or 24 mg/day) of galantamine prolonged-release capsule (PRC) compared with placebo in subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). This phase III, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group trial randomized 971 patients to treatment for 6 months. Efficacy endpoints included change in the 11-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog/11), Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus caregiver input (CIBIC-plus), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) scores. Galantamine was associated with significant improvements in the ADAS-cog/11 score but not in the CIBIC-plus or NPI scores. Galantamine PRC was associated with significant improvement in ADCS-ADL scores. Galantamine PRC had similar tolerability and safety profiles compared with twice-daily galantamine, and when administered as a once-daily flexible dosing regimen of 16 or 24 mg/day, was demonstrated to be as safe and effective for the treatment of mild to moderate AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In clinical trials, short-term galantamine treatment produces consistent positive effects on global ratings, cognitive tests, and assessments of activities of daily living and behavior in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD), providing the rationale for longer-term, open-label treatment. In this continuation trial following enrollment in previous 12-month trials, patients received galantamine 24 mg/day for a total of 24 months (total exposure up to 36 months). Primary efficacy measures were the ADAS-cog/11 and DAD. Adverse events (AEs) were coded to WHO preferred terms, including AEs begun in previous trials. Initial improvement in cognitive function was followed by a gradual decline, as measured by increased ADAS-cog/11 scores. At 36 months, ADAS-cog/11 scores increased by a mean (SEM) of 12.4 (0.80) points (P < 0.001) versus a projected 22-point increase for untreated patients. Functional abilities, as measured by the DAD, had decreased significantly at each time point versus baseline (P < 0.001). The most common treatment-emergent AEs were agitation (16.1%), insomnia (12.4%), fall (11.2%), and urinary tract infection (10.2%). AEs were mainly mild to moderate, appropriate for an elderly population, with few judged treatment related. Galantamine 24 mg/day is safe and effective for long-term treatment of mild-to-moderate AD. Potential exists for prolonged benefit with galantamine therapy versus lack of treatment for the long-term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of galantamine 24 mg/day and donepezil 10 mg/day in patients with Alzheimer's disease. PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN: This was a rater-blinded, randomised, parallel-group multicentre study (18 outpatient clinics) in the UK. 182 patients (69 male, 113 female) with Alzheimer's disease were randomised to galantamine (n = 94) or donepezil (n = 88) for 52 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effects of galantamine and donepezil on function using the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BrADL); cognition using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog/11); behaviour using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI); caregiver burden using the Screen for Caregiver Burden; and safety were assessed. RESULTS: BrADL total scores showed no significant difference between treatment groups in mean change from baseline to week 52. In the total population, in terms of cognition, galantamine patients' scores on the MMSE at week 52 did not differ significantly from baseline (-0.52 +/- 0.39, p < 0.5 vs baseline), whereas donepezil patients' scores deteriorated significantly from baseline (-1.58 +/- 0.42, p < 0.0005 vs baseline). The between-group difference in MMSE change, which showed a trend for superiority of galantamine, did not reach statistical significance (p < or = 0.1). In the ADAS-cog/11 analysis, between-group differences for the total population were not significant, whereas galantamine-treated patients with MMSE scores of 12-18 demonstrated an increase (worsening) in the ADAS-cog/11 score of 1.61 +/- 0.80 versus baseline, compared with an increase of 4.08 +/- 0.84 for patients treated with donepezil, with a significant between-group difference in favour of galantamine (p < or = 0.05). More caregivers of patients receiving galantamine reported reductions in burden compared with donepezil. Changes from baseline in NPI were similar for both treatments.Both treatments were well tolerated; most adverse events were transient and of mild-to-moderate intensity, and were consistent with the findings of previous clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Significant advantages were found in the treatment response to galantamine (versus donepezil) on cognition as measured by response rates on the MMSE and ADAS-cog/11. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of galantamine in subjects with hepatic impairment with those in healthy subjects. This was an open-label study in which a single oral 4-mg dose of galantamine was administered to volunteers with mild (Child-Pugh score of 5-6, n = 8), moderate (Child-Pugh score of 7-9, n = 8), or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score of 10-15, n = 1) and to healthy, matched control subjects (n = 8). Galantamine pharmacokinetics and safety (adverse events, laboratory test results, electrocardiograms, vital signs, and cardiac events) were assessed over 6 days after administration of galantamine. The pharmacokinetic parameters of galantamine were similar in subjects with mild hepatic impairment compared with healthy controls. Compared with the healthy control group, subjects with moderate hepatic impairment showed relative increases in the area under the plasma-concentration curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) (+33%) and terminal half-life (t1/2) (+30%) (p = 0.051 and p = 0.003, respectively), a 23% relative decrease in total plasma clearance (p = 0.061), and a small but significant relative increase in the fraction of free plasma galantamine (p = 0.009). Galantamine was well tolerated by all subjects. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) or premature withdrawals from the study because of AEs. Reported AEs were headache (three cases), nausea (one case), and paresthesia (one case). There were no clinically relevant changes in clinical laboratory findings, vital signs, and electrocardiograms. Low patient recruitment (n = 1) precluded statistical analysis of galantamine pharmacokinetics and safety in severe hepatic impairment. It was concluded that the pharmacokinetics of galantamine in subjects with mild hepatic impairment was similarto those in healthy subjects. In subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, galantamine clearance was decreased by approximately 23% compared with normal volunteers. Galantamine was also well tolerated and appeared to be safe in subjects with mild ormoderate hepatic impairment. Based on the study results, it appears that it would not be necessary to adjust doses of galantamine during administration to subjects with mild hepatic impairment. In subjects with moderately impaired hepatic function, dose titration should proceed cautiously. Unfortunately, difficulties with patient recruitment did not allow adequate assessment of the safety of galantamine in subjects with severe hepatic impairment in this study. Therefore, the use of galantamine in subjects with severe hepatic impairment is not recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of galantamine in Alzheimer's disease at 3 months using flexible dose escalation.Methods: A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial in 43 centres in the United States, Canada, Great Britain, South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand. Patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (n=386; 171 women) with a score of 11-24 on the mini mental state examination, and a score> or =12 on the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale (ADAS-cog) were randomised to placebo, or galantamine escalated over 4 weeks to a maintenance dose of 24 or 32 mg/day. The primary outcome measures were the change in ADAS-cog score and the clinician's interview based impression of change plus caregiver input (CIBIC-plus) score. Activities of daily living (ADL) and behavioural symptoms were secondary outcomes. To compare the effects of highest levels of dosing, an observed cases (OC) analysis was undertaken, with classic intention to treat (ITT) and ITT with last observation carried forward (LOCF) as confirmatory analyses.Results: At 3 months, galantamine (24-32 mg/day) produced a significantly better outcome on cognitive function than placebo (treatment difference=1.9 points on ADAS-cog, p=0.002) and a significantly better global response than placebo, as measured by CIBIC-plus (deterioration in 21% of patients on galantamine v 37% on placebo; p<0.001). Galantamine produced significant benefits on basic and instrumental ADL. Behavioural symptoms did not change significantly from baseline levels in either group. Adverse events (primarily gastrointestinal) were of mild to moderate intensity. There were no important differences between the OC, ITT, and ITT/LOCF analyses. Most patients (82%) who were maintained on the higher dose of galantamine completed the study.Conclusions: Patients on galantamine, compared with those on placebo, experienced benefits in cognitive function and instrumental and basic activities of daily living. Flexible dose escalation of galantamine was well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immunologically mediated disorder in which inflammation and demyelination of the central nervous system white matter are prominent features, resulting in various neurological signs and symptoms. In most patients, the course of the disease is initially characterised by relapses and remissions. In patients with chronic disease there is a tendency towards a gradually progressive disease course. MS relapses can best be treated with a course of high dose intravenous methylprednisolone. In ambulatory patients with relapsing remitting MS, partial prevention of relapses can be achieved by the use of interferon-β-1a or -1b, whereas there is (as yet less convincing) evidence that glatiramer acetate (copolymer-1) might also be effective. At this time, there is no proof that these drugs are effective in patients with progressive MS, although trial results are expected to be available soon. In patients with rapidly progressive disease, it might be worth considering the effect of methotrexate. Future treatment options include new strategies to interfere with disease-relevant, specific or nonspecific immune mechanisms as well as drugs that might promote remyelination. In spite of the advances that have been made over the past few years, symptomatic treatment, including a multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach, remains the mainstay of treatment of the majority of MS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To calculate age adjusted risks for multiple sclerosis in relatives of Flemish patients with multiple sclerosis.Methods: Lifetime risks were calculated using the maximum likelihood approach.Results: Vital information was obtained on 674 probands with multiple sclerosis in Flanders and a total of their 26225 first, second, and third degree relatives. Full medical information to allow documentation of multiple sclerosis status was available for 21351 (81.4%) relatives. The age adjusted risk for parents was 1.61 (SEM 0.35)%, for siblings 2.10 (SE 0.36)%, and for children 1.71 (SEM 0.70)%. For aunts and uncles, the risk was 0.66 (SEM 0.13)%.Conclusions: The risk for first degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis in Flanders is increased 10-fold to 12-fold; for second degree relatives, it is increased threefold. This information can be used for risk counselling in families and provides additional support for the role of more than one locus contributing to the susceptibility of multiple sclerosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evaluates the safety and efficacy of galantamine for patients with probable Alzheimer's disease. Use of flexible dose escalation with galantamine; Scores of the patients in the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale; Factors of the primary outcome measures.