1. An Evaluation of the Arginine Requirements of Broiler Chickens and the Potential Arginine and Energy-Saving Effects of Guanidinoacetic Acid †.
- Author
-
Verhelle, Adriaan and Saremi, Behnam
- Subjects
BROILER chickens ,METABOLIZABLE energy values ,AMINO acids ,POULTRY ,DIETARY supplements - Abstract
Simple Summary: Poultry are unable to synthesize arginine. Thus, it is essential to include enough arginine in poultry feed. One can save some arginine by means of providing the molecules in which arginine is needed as a building block. However, the question is how much arginine can these kinds of molecules replace in poultry feed. Herein, these questions are addressed in two trials comparing guanidinoacetic acid and arginine. Moreover, the energy-saving potential of guanidinoacetic acid is evaluated. Optimal performance in broiler chickens was achieved when birds were provided with higher dietary arginine content compared to the available recommendation tables. Supplementation of either arginine or guanidinoacetic acid with a low-arginine feed alleviated the lower performance. However, more guanidinoacetic acid was needed to provide the same level of growth attained with arginine (1 to 0.57 ratio). Reduction of dietary energy by 50 and 100 kcal/kg did not significantly influence the performance of birds at all stages of growth. Moreover, guanidinoacetic acid had no energy-sparing effect. This study helps the industry to accurately meet the arginine and energy requirements of broiler chickens. Two 35-day trials were conducted to determine the arginine (Arg) requirement of broiler chickens and the Arg and energy-sparing effects of guanidinoacetic acid (GAA). In experiment 1, a low-Arg diet (basal diet) was supplemented with increasing levels (0.06–0.61%) of L-Arg or GAA. In experiment 2, a diet meeting the energy and amino acid requirements of broiler chickens served as the positive control (PC). Two negative control (NC) groups were assigned by reducing either 50 (NC1) or 100 (NC2) kcal nitrogen-corrected metabolizable energy. Test groups were supplemented with 0.06% GAA for NC1 and 0.12% GAA for NC2 to compensate for the lower energy in the feed. The low dietary Arg concentration (starter: 1.02%, grower: 0.88%, finisher: 0.75%) significantly reduced overall performance (p < 0.05). Supplementation of either L-Arg or GAA with a low-Arg diet both alleviated the lower performance (p < 0.05). However, more GAA was needed to provide the same level of growth attained with L-Arg at an equivalency rate of 1 GAA to 0.57 Arg. Reduction of dietary energy by 50 and 100 kcal did not significantly influence the performance of birds at all stages of growth. Moreover, no effect of GAA supplementation at 0.06% or 0.12% was observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF