1. Use of a Capsaicin Cough Challenge Test to Compare Four Different Techniques for Nebulization Delivery in Cats.
- Author
-
Talavera-López, Jesús, Tudela-González, Ana, and Muñoz-Prieto, Alberto
- Subjects
CAT diseases ,VETERINARY hospitals ,VETERINARY medicine ,RESPIRATORY diseases ,COUGH - Abstract
Simple Summary: In people with respiratory diseases, treatment through inhalation is widely recommended and standardized. In veterinary medicine, few studies have investigated the effectiveness of treatments by the inhalation route. Among other factors, tolerance to the method used to administer the aerosol is key to its therapeutic success. This study has standardized a cough provocation test in cats using nebulized capsaicin at increasing concentrations and, through its use, compared the effectiveness and tolerance of the four methods most used in veterinary hospitals to administer oxygen and nebulized solutions. The results provide a cough challenge protocol that can be used in future studies for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in cats with respiratory diseases. The protocol established that nebulization with a facial mask is the most effective, and nebulization in a chamber is the best tolerated. The flow-by method is a good alternative, but the hood method has poor cat tolerance. Successful aerosol therapy might rely more heavily on proper drug delivery than on the effectiveness of the medication. This study compared four techniques for nebulization delivery in cats. Tolerance rate (TR) was subjectively evaluated (1–3). Increasing capsaicin concentrations were nebulized for objective evaluation of efficiency. The positive response (PR) was considered when more than five coughs were induced. The following delivery methods were tested: flow-by (FB); face mask (FM); plastic-covered Elizabethan collar (EC); and plexiglass chamber (PC). The number of PRs (NPR) and the concentration of capsaicin that induced a PR (CCP) were statistically compared (p < 0.05). The PC method was the best tolerated (TR = 3.0 ± 0.0), followed by the FB (2.7 ± 0.5) and FM (2.6 ± 0.5). The EC was very stressful, and the test had to be suspended in four out of nine cats. The lowest CCP was found with the FM (91.8 ± 157.2 µM), followed by the FB (166.7 ± 190.9 µM), PC (242.6 ± 244.8 µM), and EC (350.0 ± 225.7 µM), with significant differences only between the FM and EC (p = 0.02). The highest NPR (8) corresponded to the FM, followed by the FB (7), the PC (5), and the EC (3), with significant differences between the FM and EC (p = 0.016). In conclusion, the capsaicin cough test induces reproducible and quantifiable cat responses. The FM is the most efficient for nebulization delivery, offering good compliance and the best quantitative results. FB nebulization is less efficient but may be practical if the FM is not tolerated. PC offers minor efficiency but may be useful for very stressed or aggressive cats. The EC presents low efficiency and compliance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF