Search

Irrigation is an important adaptation strategy to cope with climate change which reduces vulnerability to water stress and improves crop productivity to feed millions. There is evidence of crop yield stagnation in many developing countries, and irrigation efficiency is claimed to increase crop productivity. Therefore, this paper uses data envelopment analysis to evaluate the farmer’s productivity through technical efficiency (TE), i.e., the relationship between resource inputs and outputs of 513 paddy farmers in Eastern India. The results show that the farms are, on average operating at 14% TE, leaving a considerable scope to improve up to 86% to reach the optimal level. A significant difference is observed between irrigated and rain-fed paddy farmers, such that10% of the irrigated farms achieved efficiency scores over 40% and only 2% of rain-fed farms achieved the same. The tobit and beta fit regression models are estimated to find out the factors that influence the TE. Both surface water and groundwater sources of irrigation are used as predictors, along with other socio-demographic factors. Access to surface water irrigation is identified to be a significant determinant of farm efficiency, however, surface water irrigation, such as canal irrigation, is accessible only to farmers living on plain land. Farmers living on highlands need to explore other sources of irrigation practices, such as drip and sprinkler, that can increase TE and farm productivity. Therefore, this paper calls for government intervention to provide extensive training and facilities for these micro-irrigation practices.

Water scarcity threatens food security and leads to various economic, social, and environmental challenges, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. As the agricultural sector consumes the most significant amount of water, conserving water resources in this sector is particularly important. Cultivation of low-water-demand (LWD) crops with high value-added is one of the effective measures to reduce agricultural water demand and improve farmers' livelihoods. However, changing water-intensive crops to LWD crops (e.g., medicinal plants) is voluntary pro-environmental behavior. Considering the role of psychological theories in understanding and explaining human behaviors, the main purpose of the current paper is to explore the socio-psychological determinants underlying farmers' intention to adopt an LWD cropping pattern using the Health Belief Model (HBM). In this regard, data were collected using face-to-face interviews with 184 farmers living in Zanjan province, Iran to examine their intention to cultivate LWD medicinal plants. Using structural equation modeling for data analysis, the HBM explained 49% of the variance in farmers' behavioral intentions. The structural equation modeling outcomes also revealed that self-efficacy, perceived barriers, cues to action, and perceived benefits are significantly related to farmers' intention to choose medicinal plants. Overall, the findings indicated the effectiveness and applicability of the HBM in illustrating farmers’ intention to change their cropping pattern. Applying some strategies such as providing the necessary facilities and training programs for farmers, as well as, advertisements aimed at promoting the cultivation of medicinal plants can significantly contribute to conserving water resources in the study area.

This paper uses a dynamic economic model to take a holistic view of what constitutes soil health. The model considers actions taken over multiple periods of time to maximize the combined value of crop production, environmental quality, and investments in soil characteristics net of the costs of those actions. The model makes it clear that how soil health is assessed depends on the set of services soils provide and on the value that society places on those services. The temporal and spatial variability of those services and their values implies that the characteristics defining healthy soils will be location-specific and time-dependent. An additional implication is that an index of soil health valid for all places and times is unlikely to be feasible, although a soil health index that is “good enough” for specific locations at specific times may well be possible. Empirical evidence indicates that choices about managing soils generally involve tradeoffs, i.e., that “win-win” actions that increase agricultural productivity, improve environmental quality, and build up stocks of desirable soil characteristics are unlikely to occur. Assessments of soil health are most productively conducted by focusing on aspects of agricultural productivity, environmental quality, and soil characteristics of primary importance while ignoring those of secondary importance. Greater interdisciplinary cooperation between economists, soil scientists, and environmental scientists is likely the most fruitful path for making progress in developing methods for measuring soil health.

Automation and robotics are the key players in modern agriculture. They offer potential solutions for challenges related to the growing global population, demographic shifts, and economic status. This review paper evaluates the challenges and opportunities of using new technologies and the often-missed link between automation technology and agricultural economics. Through a systematic analysis of the literature, this study explores the potential of automation and robotics in farming practices, as well as their socio-economic effects, and provides strategic recommendations for those involved. For this purpose, various types of robots in different fields of agriculture and the technical feasibility and challenges of using automation have been discussed. Other important factors, including demographic shifts, labor market effects, and economic considerations, have been analyzed. Furthermore, this study investigates the social effects of automation, particularly in terms of employment and workforce adaptation. It finds that, while automation boosts productivity and sustainability, it also causes labor displacement and demands considerable technological investment. This thorough investigation fills a crucial gap by assessing economic sustainability, labor market evolution, and the future of precision agriculture. It also charts a course for further research and policy-making at the intersection of agricultural technology and socio-economic fields and outlines a future roadmap for further research and policy.