Search

Abstract Background Prior work showed that patients from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry who had previously failed a prior biologic and then initiated ixekizumab demonstrated improvements in disease severity and patient-reported outcomes after 6 months. However, newer therapies such as interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i) were not considered. Here, with more recent data including IL-23i, 6-month effectiveness of ixekizumab following a switch from any biologic was assessed as well as whether 6-month effectiveness of ixekizumab was impacted by prior biologic class. Methods We included CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry patients who initiated ixekizumab after discontinuing another biologic therapy and had a corresponding 6-month follow-up visit following ixekizumab initiation (N = 743, 2016–2023). Immediate prior biologic class was categorized as tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i, n = 405), non-ixekizumab interleukin-17i (IL-17i, n = 237), or IL-23i (n = 101). Adjusted mean changes in body surface area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), itch, and skin pain were calculated for prior biologic class groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Proportions achieving ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100, respectively), Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1, and DLQI 0/1 were calculated for all patients and compared among prior biologic classes via relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable modified Poisson regression. Results Mean improvements in BSA, DLQI, itch, and skin pain, were 7.6, 3.6, 23.3, and 16.7, respectively, for ixekizumab patients who switched from TNFi or IL-12/23i (all p

Abstract Background The HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) is a risk factor for the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the production of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) in RA patients. Our objective was to examine the real-world effectiveness of abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with RA who were SE and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP3) positive. Methods Abatacept or TNFi initiators who were SE + and anti-CCP3+ (> 20 U/mL) at or prior to treatment and had moderate or high CDAI score (> 10) at initiation were identified. The primary outcome was mean change in CDAI score over six months. Analyses were conducted in propensity score (PS)-trimmed and -matched populations overall and a biologic-experienced subgroup. Mixed-effects models were used. Results In the overall PS-trimmed (abatacept, n = 170; TNFi, n = 157) and PS-matched cohorts (abatacept, n = 111; TNFi, n = 111), there were numerically greater improvements in mean change in CDAI between abatacept and TNFi but were not statistically significant. Similar trends were seen for biologic-experienced patients, except that statistical significance was reached for mean change in CDAI in the PS-trimmed cohort (abatacept, 12.22 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 10.13 to 14.31]; TNFi, 9.28 [95%CI 7.08 to 11.48]; p = 0.045). Conclusion In this real world cohort, there were numerical improvements in efficacy outcomes with abatacept over TNFi in patients with RA who were SE + and ACPA+, similar to results from a clinical trial population The only statistically significant finding after adjusting for covariates was greater improvement in CDAI with abatacept versus TNFi in the bio-experienced PS-trimmed cohort..

Abstract Introduction The impact of upadacitinib on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) symptoms was evaluated during the first 12 weeks of treatment via patient-reported outcomes (PROs) using a mobile health application (app). Methods Participating rheumatologists from the CorEvitas RA Registry (prospective, observational cohort) recruited patients with RA initiating upadacitinib treatment. A modified version of the ArthritisPower® app was used to collect PROs, including the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), duration of morning joint stiffness, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue 7a Short Form at baseline and weeks 1–4, 8, and 12. RAPID3 responses over time were assessed using Kaplan–Meier estimation to determine the proportion of patients achieving disease activity improvement and minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Results were analyzed for all patients initiating upadacitinib and a subsample of TNF inhibitor (TNFi)-experienced patients with moderate to severe disease at baseline. Results A total of 103 patients with RA initiating upadacitinib (62.1% TNFi-experienced) were included. At week 12, 53 patients (51.4%) completed the study and provided PRO data via the app. Among all patients, improvements in RAPID3, pain, morning stiffness, and fatigue were observed at week 1 and were maintained or further improved through week 12. At week 12, 37.5% of patients achieved RAPID3 low disease activity. Starting at week 1, improvements in RAPID3 disease activity category (19.4% of patients) and achievement of MCID (16.3%) were reported, with nearly 50% of patients achieving these outcomes by week 4 (RAPID3 category: 48.8%; MCID: 49.2%) and 60% by week 12 (RAPID3 category: 59.6%; MCID: 59.8%). TNFi-experienced patients generally reported similar outcomes. Patient-reported medication convenience and compliance were generally high. Conclusions In this real-world cohort of patients with RA, treatment with upadacitinib was associated with early and significant improvement in RAPID3, pain, morning stiffness, and fatigue regardless of prior TNFi experience. Clinically meaningful improvement in RAPID3 patient-reported disease activity was observed as early as week 1, with continued improvement reported through week 12.

Background Real-world data on the effectiveness of systemic therapy in atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited. Methods Adult patients with AD in the CorEvitas AD registry (2020–2021) who received systemic therapies for 4–12 months prior to enrollment were included based on disease severity: body surface area (BSA) 0%–9% and BSA ≥10%. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics. Pairwise effect sizes (ES) were used to compare BSA groups. Results The study included 308 patients (BSA 0%–9%: 246 [80%]; BSA ≥10%: 62 [20%]). Despite systemic therapy, both BSA groups reported the use of additional topical therapy and the presence of lesions at difficult locations. Moderate-to-severe AD (vIGA-AD®) was reported by 11% (BSA 0%–9%) and 66% (BSA ≥10%; ES = 0.56) of patients. Mean disease severity scores: total BSA (2% and 22%; ES = 3.59), EASI (1.1 and 11.1; ES = 2.60), and SCORAD (12.1 and 38.0; ES = 1.99). Mean scores for PROs: DLQI (3.7 and 7.5; ES = 0.75), and peak pruritus (2.2 and 4.5; ES = 0.81). Inadequate control of AD was seen in 27% and 53% of patients (ES = 0.23). Conclusions Patients with AD experience a high disease burden despite systemic treatment for 4–12 months. This study provides potential evidence of suboptimal treatment and the need for additional effective treatment options for AD.

Approximately half of heart failure patients in the US have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HFpEF impairs physical performance and thus reduces quality of life. Increasing dietary protein intake can increase lean body mass and physical performance in healthy elderly individuals, but the effect of a high-quality protein supplement, with or without a structured exercise program, has not been investigated in HFpEF patients. Twenty-three obese elderly HFpEF patients with grade 1 or 2 diastolic dysfunction were randomized into three groups: control, protein supplementation alone, and protein plus exercise. Protein supplementation involved providing sufficient whey protein so that total intake was 1.2 g protein/kg/day. The exercise intervention was 2 days of hydrotherapy and 1 day of gym sessions per week under supervision of a fitness expert. Physical parameters and functional tests were performed at baseline and at 12 weeks. Protein supplementation alone failed to improve physical performance. However, when combined with light exercise, there was significant improvement in some (6-minute walk, 10 m walking speed, quadriceps strength), but not all, physical function measurements. The results of this pilot study suggest that further exploration of potential interactive effects between protein supplementation and light exercise in individuals with HFpEF is warranted.