Search

Abstract Introduction COVID‐19 drastically impacted the landscape of the United States’ medical system. Limited data is available on the nationwide implantation trends in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT‐D) devices before and during the pandemic. We aimed to explore the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on CRT‐D insertion rates and adverse outcomes related to delays in care. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective cross‐sectional analysis using the National Inpatient Sample database between 2017 and 2020. Variables were identified using their ICD‐10 codes. Inclusion criteria: age ≥ 18 years, presenting for a nonelective admission, primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease, hypertensive heart, chronic kidney disease, or heart failure, and underwent insertion of a CRT‐D. Between 2017 and 2020, CRT‐D devices were inserted during 23,635 admissions. On average, 6198 devices were implanted yearly from 2017 to 2019, with only 5040 devices being implanted in 2020. Additionally, reduced implantation rates were noted for every cohort of hospital size, location, and teaching status during this year. The year 2020 also had the highest average death rate at 1.39%, but this difference was statistically insignificant (adjusted Wald test p = .767), and COVID‐19 was not associated with an increased risk of inpatient mortality (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03–1.82, p = .162). Conclusion The COVID‐19 pandemic has affected all facets of the healthcare system, especially surgical volume rates. CRT‐D procedures significantly decreased in 2020. This is the first retrospective study highlighting the trend of reduced rates of CRT‐D implantation as a response to the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Background Hypertension is a global health issue associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate contemporary hypertension identification and management trends following the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Methods and Results Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted from 2017 to 2020 were analyzed. Participants between 20 and 79 years of age were included. Participants were stratified into different treatment groups based on indication and guideline adherence. Descriptive statistics were used to compare medication use, diagnosis rates, and blood pressure control. A total of 265 402 026 people met the inclusion criteria, of which 19.0% (n=50 349 209) were undergoing guideline antihypertensive management. In the guideline antihypertensive management group, a single antihypertensive class was used to treat 45.7% of participants, and 55.2% had uncontrolled blood pressure. Participants not undergoing guideline antihypertensive management qualified for primary prevention in 11.5% (n=24 741 999) of cases and for secondary prevention in 2.4% (n=5 070 044) of cases; of these, 66.3% (n=19 774 007) did not know they may have hypertension and were not on antihypertensive medication. Conclusions Adherence to guidelines for antihypertensive management is suboptimal. Over half of patients undergoing guideline treatment had uncontrolled blood pressure. One‐third of qualifying participants may not be receiving treatment. Education and medical management were missing for 2 in 3 qualifying participants. Addressing these deficiencies is crucial for improving blood pressure control and reducing cardiovascular event outcomes.

Lung abscesses and empyemas are 2 forms of pulmonary infection that can present with similar clinical features. However, empyemas are associated with higher morbidity and mortality, necessitating the need to distinguish one from the other. Plain radiographs can sometimes provide clues to help differentiate the 2 pathologies but more often than not, a computed tomography scan is required to confirm the diagnosis. Correct diagnosis is essential, as the goal standard therapeutic intervention for empyemas may be contraindicated in patients with lung abscesses. Empyemas require percutaneous or surgical drainage in combination with antibiotics, while lung abscesses are generally treated with antibiotics alone as drainage can be associated with various complications. We present a case of a 65-year-old man with parapneumonic empyema diagnosed with characteristic findings on chest computed tomography and treated with surgical drainage and antibiotics. We hope to improve patient outcomes by highlighting the classical radiographic findings that help distinguish empyema and abscess.

Abstract Novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID‐19) has been the focus of the medical community since its emergence in December 2019 and has already infected more than 100 million patients globally. Primarily described to cause a respiratory illness, COVID‐19 has been found to affect almost every organ system. Bradycardia is a newly recognized ramification of COVID‐19 that still has unknown prognostic value. Studies have shown an increase in the incidence of arrhythmias, cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, acute coronary syndromes, and coagulopathies in infected patients as well as an increased risk of mortality in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. While the pathogenesis of bradycardia in COVID‐19 may be multifactorial, clinicians should be aware of the mechanism by which COVID‐19 affects the cardiovascular system and the medication side effects which are used in the treatment algorithm of this deadly virus. There has yet to be a comprehensive review analyzing bradyarrhythmia and relative bradycardia in COVID‐19 infected patients. We aim to provide a literature review including the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of COVID‐19 induced bradyarrhythmia.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients with severe COVID-19. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 249 patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) during the first wave of the pandemic to determine risk factors for AKI. Demographics, comorbidities, and clinical and outcome variables were obtained from electronic medical records. Results: Univariate analysis revealed older age, higher admission serum creatinine, elevated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, elevated admission D-Dimer, elevated CRP on day 2, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor requirement, and azithromycin usage as significant risk factors for AKI. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher admission creatinine (p = 0.0001, OR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.56–3.70), vasopressor requirement (p = 0.0001, OR = 3.20, 95% CI = 1.69–5.98), elevated admission D-Dimer (p = 0.008, OR = 1.0001, 95% CI = 1.000–1.001), and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) on day 2 (p = 0.033, OR = 1.0001, 95% CI = 1.004–1.009) were independent risk factors. Conversely, the combined use of Tocilizumab and corticosteroids was independently associated with reduced AKI risk (p = 0.0009, OR = 0.437, 95% CI = 0.23–0.81). Conclusion: This study confirms the high rate of AKI and associated mortality among COVID-19 patients admitted to ICUs and suggests a role for inflammation and/or coagulopathy in AKI development. One should consider the possibility that early administration of anti-inflammatory agents, as is now routinely conducted in the management of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome, may improve clinical outcomes in patients with AKI.