Search

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the impact of mental illness on first-time transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and repeat TAVR (viv-AVR) outcomes including postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF/AFL), as well as trends over time. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using de-identified data reports from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database from 2005-2018, multivariate logistics models were used to predict endpoints including POAF, the Society of Cardiothoracic surgeon (STS) endpoint (MM), and 30-day readmission (READMIT) in patients with and without mental illness. The TAVR procedure was approved for high-risk patients after 2012, and intermediate-risk patients after 2016, indicting a need to analyze the two populations separately. Multivariate analysis was only conducted on the first-time TAVR patients because of the small n in the viv-TAVR population. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: After 2012, 13.05% (1,810/13,870) of patients undergoing TAVR and 20.83% (15/72) undergoing viv-TAVR were diagnosed with a mental illness before the procedure. After 2016, 15.59% (1,485/9,524) TAVR patients and 20.00% (11/55) viv-TAVR patients had a preoperative diagnosis of mental illness. Multivariate analysis showed that mentally ill patients did not have significant differences in rates of POAF, 30-day readmission, and 30-day composite outcomes when compared to patients without mental illnesses following TAVR procedures after 2012 and 2016. Patients with POAF after both 2012 and 2016 were significantly less likely to be mentally ill, Black, and Hispanic. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Of the mentally ill patients who underwent TAVR, there was no significant difference in short-term outcomes after 2012 vs. 2016, compared to patients without mental illnesses. The small number of mentally ill patients undergoing TAVR may point to provider bias as a contributor to this high selectivity, and further evaluation would be of clinical use.

Introduction: Globally, 300 million adults have clinical obesity. Heightened adiposity and inadequate musculature secondary to obesity alter bipedal stance and gait, diminish musculoskeletal tissue quality, and compromise neuromuscular feedback; these physiological changes alter stability and increase injury risk from falls. Studies in the field focus on obese patients across a broad range of body mass indices (BMI >30 kg/m2) but without isolating the most morbidly obese subset (BMI ≥40 kg/m2). We investigated the impact of obesity in perturbing postural stability in morbidly obese subjects elected for bariatric intervention, harboring a higher-spectrum BMI. Subjects and Methods: Traditional force plate measurements and stabilograms are gold standards employed when measuring center of pressure (COP) and postural sway. To quantify the extent of postural instability in subjects with obesity before bariatric surgery, we assessed 17 obese subjects with an average BMI of 40 kg/m2 in contrast to 13 nonobese subjects with an average BMI of 30 kg/m2. COP and postural sway were measured from static and dynamic tasks. Involuntary movements were measured when patients performed static stances, with eyes either opened or closed. Two additional voluntary movements were measured when subjects performed dynamic, upper torso tasks with eyes opened. Results: Mean body weight was 85% (p < 0.001) greater in obese than nonobese subjects. Following static balance assessments, we observed greater sway displacement in the anteroposterior (AP) direction in obese subjects with eyes open (87%, p < 0.002) and eyes closed (76%, p = 0.04) versus nonobese subjects. Obese subjects also exhibited a higher COP velocity in static tests when subjects’ eyes were open (47%, p = 0.04). Dynamic tests demonstrated no differences between groups in sway displacement in either direction; however, COP velocity in the mediolateral (ML) direction was reduced (31%, p < 0.02) in obese subjects while voluntarily swaying in the AP direction, but increased in the same cohort when swaying in the ML direction (40%, p < 0.04). Discussion and Conclusion: Importantly, these data highlight obesity’s contribution towards increased postural instability. Obese subjects exhibited greater COP displacement at higher AP velocities versus nonobese subjects, suggesting that clinically obese individuals show greater instability than nonobese subjects. Identifying factors contributory to instability could encourage patient-specific physical therapies and presurgical measures to mitigate instability and monitor postsurgical balance improvements.

Remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus with metabolic surgery is a field of active investigation and development. The extraordinary results obtained in diabetic patients with BMI > 35 kg/m2 have led investigators to query if similar results could be achieved in patients with BMI < 35 kg/m2. A few studies have been recently conducted to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of bariatric surgery in diabetic patients with BMI BMI < 35 kg/m2. However, stronger evidence would be required before insurance coverage is extended for bariatric surgery to all type 2 diabetic patients, in addition to those with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 for whom eligibility is already established. In addition, the hormonal and metabolic mechanisms of diabetes remission after gastrointestinal surgery are yet to be determined. This paper will review the evidence about safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of bariatric surgery in type 2 diabetes mellitus remission and the potential socioeconomic impact of offering bariatric surgery to diabetic patients with BMI BMI < 35 kg/m2.