Search

Abstract Background Research in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has shown promising results with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of oligometastatic disease, wherein distant disease may be limited to one or a few distant organs by host factors. Traditionally, PET/CT has been used in detecting metastatic disease and avoiding futile surgical intervention, however, sensitivity and specificity is limited to only 81 and 79%, respectively. Mediastinal staging still identifies occult nodal disease in up to 20% of NSCLC patients initially thought to be operative candidates. Endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive tool for the staging and diagnosis of thoracic malignancy. When EBUS is combined with endoscopic ultrasound using the same bronchoscope (EUS-B), the diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value increase to 84 and 97%, respectively. Endoscopic staging in patients with advanced disease has never been studied, but may inform treatment if a curative SABR approach is being taken. Methods This is a multi-centre, prospective, cohort study with two-stage design. In the first stage, 10 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC (lung tumour ± hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy) with up to 5 synchronous metastases will be enrolled An additional 19 patients will be enrolled in the second stage if rate of treatment change is greater than 10% in the first stage. Patients will be subject to EBUS or combined modality EBUS/EUS-B to assess bilateral lymph node stations using a N3 to N2 to N1 progression. Primary endpoint is defined as the rate of change to treatment plan including change from SABR to conventional dose radiation, change in mediastinal radiation field, and change from curative to palliative intent treatment. Discussion If a curative approach with SABR for oligometastatic disease is being explored, invasive mediastinal staging may guide treatment and prognosis. This study will provide insight into the use of endoscopic mediastinal staging in determining changes in treatment plan of NSCLC. Results will inform the design of future phase II trials. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04852588. Date of registration: April 19, 2021. Protocol version: 1.1 on December 9, 2021.

Convex probe endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspirations (CP-EBUS-TBNAs) and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial lung biopsies (RP-EBUS-TBLBs) can be performed under moderate sedation or general anesthesia. Moderate sedation is more convenient, however patient discomfort may result in inadequate tissue sampling. General anesthesia ensures better patient cooperation but requires more logistics and also carries sedation risks. We aim to describe the diagnostic yield and safety of CP-EBUS-TBNAs and RP-EBUS-TBLBs when performed under moderate sedation at our center. All patients who underwent CP-EBUS-TBNA and/or RP-EBUS-TBLB under moderate sedation, between January 2015 and May 2017, were reviewed. Primary outcomes were defined in regard to the diagnostic yield and safety profile. A total of 336 CP-EBUS-TBNAs and 190 RP-EBUS-TBLBs were performed between January 2015 and May 2017. The mean sedation doses used were 50 mcg of intravenous fentanyl and 2.5 mg of intravenous midazolam. The diagnostic yield of the CP-EBUS-TBNAs and RP-EBUS-TBLBs were 62.5% and 71.6%, respectively. Complication rates were low with: transient bleeding 11.9%, transient hypoxia 0.5%, and pneumothorax 0.1%. None required escalation of care, post procedure. Performing CP-EBUS-TBNAs and RP-EBUS-TBLBs under moderate sedation is safe and provides good diagnostic yield. These procedures should, therefore, be considered as first-line sampling techniques.

Objectives: Peripheral lung nodules containing ground-glass opacity (GGO), which include both pure GGN (nodules that contain only GGO) and part-solid GGN (nodules that contain both GGO and consolidation), are difficult to diagnose by conventional transbronchial biopsy (TBB) because they are not visible by fluoroscopy. Recently developed endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided TBB is useful for diagnosing these nodules. This study was performed to clarify the contribution of EBUS to the diagnostic yield of TBB for peripheral lung nodules containing GGO. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 41 patients (21 male, 20 female; median age, 72 years) with peripheral lung pure GGN or part-solid GGN who underwent EBUS-guided TBB. Results: The median diameter of the target lesions was 18.6 mm (range, 8.8–46.7 mm). There were seven pure GGN lesions and 34 part-solid GGN lesions. The total diagnostic yield was 65.9% (27/41). EBUS images could be obtained (positive) in 30 (73.1%) patients. Among the clinical factors studied, only a positive EBUS finding was significantly associated with a higher diagnostic yield (p=0.018). Diagnostic yield tended to be higher in patients with a positive CT bronchus sign (presence of a bronchus leading directly to the target lesion) and increased consolidation-to-tumor ratio. Conclusions: EBUS-guided TBB is useful for diagnosing GGN or part-solid GGN. Obtaining positive EBUS findings is important for successful TBB for lesions containing GGO.

Background: Mediastinal lymphadenopathy (ML) presents a diagnostic challenge. The technique to sample the lymph nodes has evolved from conventional "blind" transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) to the present day endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided procedure that improves the accuracy of sampling. Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of "rapid on-site evaluation" (ROSE) in EBUS-guided TBNA (EBUS-TBNA) for the diagnosis of ML. Patients and Methods: This prospective study included 80 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for computed tomography/positron emission tomography (CT/PET) diagnosed ML over a 4-month period at a single tertiary care center. All 80 of these patients underwent histopathological evaluation (HPE) in addition to cytology. Three out of these 80 (3.7%) patients were excluded in view of inadequate material on EBUS-TBNA. After the sampling of nodes was done, the slides were stained with rapid hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and then on-site evaluation was done. The tissue derived was also processed for HPE in all cases. Results: ROSE revealed granuloma in 27 patients and malignancy in 14 patients, and the remaining patients showed nonspecific inflammation. Concomitant histopathology revealed granuloma in 34 patients and malignancy in 14 patients. Considering HPE as gold standard, the overall sensitivity and specificity of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis were 85.4% and 89.6%, respectively. For malignancy alone, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 98.4%, respectively. Conclusion: This novel approach is safe, has good diagnostic yield, and has an excellent potential in assisting safe and accurate diagnostic interventional bronchoscope.