Search

Background: Natto (fermented soybeans)-induced hypersensitivity is characterized by delayed symptom onset that hampers diagnosis. We aimed to clarify the clinical utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) in the diagnosis of natto-induced hypersensitivity. Methods: Five patients with a history of anaphylaxis and chronic urticaria suspected of natto-induced hypersensitivity and seven with chronic spontaneous urticaria clinically unrelated to natto were enrolled in the patient and control groups, respectively. The BAT was performed with two incubation times, 15 min and 1 h, in combination with various concentrations of natto-mucilage extract. Results: In controls, CD203c levels in basophils remained low in the 15-min incubation but were significantly increased in the 1-h incubation. In the patient group, in the 15-min condition, basophil CD203c was significantly upregulated by natto mucilage but not by soybean vs controls (P = 0.001). Low concentrations of natto mucilage were sufficient to upregulate basophil CD203c in the anaphylaxis cases, but high concentrations were required to induce the same effect in the urticaria cases. Finally, the dose-dependent pattern of the BAT results differed significantly between the anaphylaxis and urticaria cases (P = 0.006). Thus, a strong background reaction was observed in the BAT with 1 h incubation; 15 min of incubation was sufficient to identify patients with natto-induced hypersensitivity and may distinguish the clinical phenotype of natto-induced hypersensitivity, i.e., anaphylaxis or urticaria. Conclusions: The BAT with a 15-min incubation period is useful in diagnosing natto-induced hypersensitivity.

AbstractPurpose Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) are an important anti-inflammatory drug for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). However, those treatment responses are variable. In this study, we stratified AD patients by patterns of response to remission maintenance therapy (proactive therapy) with topical tacrolimus, a typical TCI. Thereafter, we explored patient features that predict the success or failure of proactive therapy using TCI (TCI proactive therapy).Methods A single-arm open-label clinical study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TCI proactive therapy was conducted in 31 patients with AD. Patients were treated with TCS to induce remission (remission-induction period) followed by daily TCI ointment (0.1% tacrolimus) application for 4 weeks (maintenance therapy period), and twice-weekly application for 12 weeks (proactive therapy period). Based on its results, treatment outcomes were correlated with the patients’ clinical and laboratory findings.Results Of the 31 patients enrolled in the study, 21 successfully completed maintenance therapy (TCI responders). Among them, 13 completed (proactive-completed group) and 8 failed proactive therapy (proactive-dropout group). At the beginning of maintenance therapy, the serum IgE level was significantly higher in the TCI responders than in those who failed maintenance therapy (p = 0.049). At the beginning of proactive therapy, the mean-SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score was significantly different between the proactive-completed (11.7 ± 4.6) and proactive-dropout (16.6 ± 4.2) groups (p = 0.025). In proactive-dropout group patients, worsened disease activity correlated well with the elevation of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) levels and peripheral eosinophil count.Conclusion AD patients were stratified into three different response patterns to TCI proactive therapy. Patients with less involvement of IgE in the pathogenesis and inadequate remission induction by TCS may not be expected to respond well to TCI proactive therapy.Key messagesAD patients can be stratified into three types according to their pattern of responsiveness to TCI proactive therapy.The efficacy of TCI proactive therapy is lower in AD patients with lower serum IgE levels.TCI proactive therapy should be done after the achievement of adequate remission induction by TCS.