Search

Intratumoral heterogeneity of breast cancer remains a major challenge in successful treatment. Failure of cancer therapies can also be accredited to inability to systemically eradicate cancer stem cells (CSCs). Recent evidence points to the role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in expanding the pool of tumor cells with CSCs features. Thus, we assessed expression level as well as heterogeneity of CSCs markers in primary tumors (PT), lymph node metastasis (LNM), and circulating tumor cells (CTCs)–enriched blood fractions in order to correlate them with signs of EMT activation as well as clinicopathological data of breast cancer patients. Level of CSCs markers (ALDH1, CD44, CD133, OCT-4, NANOG) and EMT markers was quantified in PT (N=107), LNM (N=56), and CTCs-enriched blood fractions (N=85). Heterogeneity of CSCs markers expression within each PT and LNM was assessed by calculating Gini Index. Percentage of ALDH1-positive cells was elevated in PT in comparison to LNM (P = .005). However, heterogeneity of the four CSCs markers: ALDH1 (P = .019), CD133 (P = .009), OCT-4 (P = .027), and CD44 (P < .001) was decreased in LNM. Samples classified as mesenchymal (post-EMT) showed elevated expression of CSCs markers (OCT-4 and CD44 in PT; OCT-4 in LNM; ALDH1, OCT-4, NANOG, CD44 in CTCs). Patients with mesenchymal-like CTCs had worse prognosis than patients with epithelial-like or no CTCs (P = .0025). CSCs markers are enriched in PT, LNM, and CTCs with mesenchymal features, but their heterogeneity is decreased in metastatic lymph nodes. Mesenchymal CTCs phenotype correlates with poor prognosis of the patients.

Metastatic tumors involving salivary glands arising from the non-head and neck area are very rare. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is known for its high propensity for metastasis to unusual localizations. RCC metastasis to the maxillofacial area is an uncommon event (16%), but metastasis to salivary glands is extremely rare. We report a series of 9 such cases retrieved from two institutions. The group included 6 females and 3 males. The age at diagnosis ranged from 60 to 97 years (mean 72.6 years). The tumors involved the parotid gland in 7 cases, and the submandibular and small salivary gland of the oral cavity in 1 case each. The size of tumors ranged from 0.4 to 5 cm. Total parotidectomy with selective neck dissection was performed in 4 cases, while superficial parotidectomy was performed in 1 case and simple resection in 3 cases. Histologically, all the tumors were clear cell renal cell carcinomas, and therefore the differential diagnosis mainly included clear cell variants of salivary gland carcinomas. The parotid gland was the initial manifestation of renal malignancy in 4 of the cases, while in the remaining 5 cases a history of RCC had been known. The salivary gland involvement developed from 11 months to 13 years after the time of diagnosis of the primary tumor. In 2 cases it was the first site of dissemination. Pathologists need to maintain a high index of suspicion for the possibility of metastasis when confronted with oncocytic or clear cell neoplasms developing in salivary glands. RCC, although rare, should be included in this differential diagnosis.

Cribriform adenocarcinoma of the tongue and minor salivary glands (CAMSG) was first described 16 years ago. It typically presents as a mass at the base of the tongue with early spread to lymph nodes, but without potential for distant metastases. In the 2005 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors the entity was classified as a possible variant of polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA). Since then, more than 40 cases have been described in the English literature. Recently, PRKD1-3 translocation was found in more than 80% of CAMSGs. In some of those cases ARID1A or DDX3X was the translocation partner. We reviewed 183 primary carcinomas of major and minor salivary glands, resected at the Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland, in the period 1992-2012, and identified only one case of CAMSG. A giant tumor developed at the base of the tongue in a 76-year-old man. The primary tumor was resected with multiple bilateral cervical lymph node metastases. The patient received radiotherapy but died 10 months after the surgery due to causes not related to the primary cancer. The tumor presented PRKD3 rearrangement as confirmed by FISH. As the tumor is extremely rare (it represented only 0.5% of salivary gland tumors in our series), the controversy on its nosological status is still unresolved. This is the first report in the world literature of a patient who died in the course of CAMSG.

Intratumor heterogeneity implies heterogeneous protein function, facilitating tumor adaptation which results in therapeutic failure. We hypothesized that tumor heterogeneity at protein level may influence the course of the disease. As a single biopsy might not represent the full biologic complexity of the tumor, we have analyzed immunohistochemically four different cores obtained from each primary tumor within the cohort of 364 patients with endometrial cancer (EC). The following proteins were examined: estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), progesterone receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2, receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-3, v-erb-b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 4, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, phosphorylated v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1, v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog, DNA topoisomerase II alpha 170 kDa (TOP2A), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), tumor protein p53, RAD21 homolog, S. pombe, and runt-related transcription factor 1. Particularly strong correlation was found between TOP2A and CDKN2A heterogeneity and higher stage of the disease (P = .0002 and P = .0003, respectively). Most correlations with clinicopathologic data were observed for ESR1 heterogeneity that correlated with non-endometrioid carcinomas (P=.02), higher stage (P=.005), grade (P=.01), and the presence of metastases (P = .01). Thirty-nine (11.0%) patients were classified as “globally heterogeneous”. Cumulative tumor heterogeneity strongly correlated with the presence of metastases, higher stage, and higher grade of the disease (all P b .05). It also carried negative prognostic value (P=.0008). We show that the degree of heterogeneity in EC might serve as a clinically valid molecular marker.