Search

Background and aimsAcute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is characterized by systemic inflammation, which may initiate an acute-phase response leading to hypercatabolism. Patients with ASUC are usually treated with high-dose steroids that may further accelerate the metabolic response and lead to hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. Nevertheless, the degree of synergy between inflammation and steroid treatment and their influence on the insulin resistance remains unknown. We aimed to measure the degree of metabolic stress including insulin resistance in patients with ASUC during admission and three weeks after discharge.MethodsThis single-center cohort study was conducted in adult patients with ASUC, defined and assessed by Truelove and Witt’s criteria. Indirect calorimetry, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and the Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) were applied at baseline and at follow-up three weeks after discharge.ResultsAmong the 22 patients admitted during the project period, 15 provided consent for participation in the study. Median C-reactive protein at inclusion was 37.6 [4; 154.7]. Both median HOMA-IR and fasting plasma glucose were markedly increased at inclusion (median 8.6 [3.8; 14.1] and 7.1 [6; 8.7], respectively), and both had decreased significantly three weeks after discharge (p=0.0036 and p=0.0039, respectively). No significant differences were observed in resting energy expenditure or anthropometric measurements from baseline to follow-up.ConclusionPatients with ASUC presented with marked insulin resistance, indicating that the days following admission and high-dose steroid treatment are particularly vulnerable. Despite improvement at three-week follow-up, patients still exhibited insulin resistance compared with relevant control groups.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT0527183.

Abstract Background Approximately 20% of older people are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. Even a short hospital stay decreases the ability to cope with the activities of daily living. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the feasibility of recruitment, (2) assess the acceptability of the intervention, and (3) investigate if an individual nutritional intervention could reduce the readmission rate of geriatric patients within 30 days of being discharged to their own homes. Methods The unblinded, randomized, controlled pilot trial includes geriatric patients discharged to their own homes. Forty patients were recruited from a medical ward and randomized to standard treatment (n = 19) or individualized nutritional intervention (n = 21). The intervention was dietary counseling and a nutrition plan before discharge, combined with two home visits performed by an educated nutritionist over a period of 4 weeks. Outcomes were readmission (primary), mortality, protein and energy intake, body weight, activity of daily living, handgrip strength, number of chair stands, and quality of life. Intention-to-treat analysis, per-protocol analysis, and post hoc analysis of readmissions were carried out. Results Recruitment was feasible, and there was high compliance to the intervention. There was no difference in readmission between the intervention group and control group 30 days after discharge (29% vs 11%). The individual nutritional intervention had a positive impact on achieving 75% of energy requirements at 30 days for the intervention group compared to the control group (93% vs 47%, p = 0.01). No other differences were found between the groups. Conclusion The individual nutritional intervention did not prevent readmission among geriatric patients in this trial. Recruitment procedures functioned well, and the intervention was well accepted by the patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03519139 . Retrospectively registered on 8 May 2018